PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael L Astion

Publications and source records attributed to Michael L Astion.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.

Our objective was to improve the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy, to allow readers to assess the potential for bias in the study, and to evaluate its generalizability. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Steering Committee searched the literature to identify publications on the appropriate conduct and reporting of diagnostic studies and extracted potential items into an extensive list. Researchers, editors, and members of professional organizations shortened this list during a 2-day consensus meeting with the goal of developing a checklist and a generic flow diagram for studies of diagnostic accuracy. The search for published guidelines regarding diagnostic research yielded 33 previously published checklists, from which we extracted a list of 75 potential items. At the consensus meeting, participants shortened the list to a 25-item checklist, using evidence whenever available. A prototypical flow diagram provides information about the method of patient recruitment, the order of test execution, and the numbers of patients undergoing the test under evaluation, the reference standard, or both. Evaluation of research depends on complete and accurate reporting. If medical journals adopt the checklist and the flow diagram, the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy should improve, to the advantage of clinicians, researchers, reviewers, journals, and the public.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2003

Using interactive software to teach image-based clinical laboratory tests in developing countries: a pilot trial in Nepal.

This study explores the feasibility of using computer tutorials to train laboratory personnel in Nepal. Training incorporated three software programs that teach microscope-based laboratory tests (peripheral blood smears, urinalysis, Gram stains). Forty-seven participants attended training sessions and completed a questionnaire. The participants' overall perception was: 1) the software was superior to formal lectures for learning image-based laboratory tests (43 participants, 92%); 2) the software would enhance job performance (43 participants, 92%); 3) more subjects should be taught using software (40 participants, 85%); and 4) the software helped participants learn new materials (38 participants, 81%). Considering that 79% of the participants were novice computer users, it is noteworthy that 38 (81%) participants thought the method of instruction was easy to understand. Factors contributing to learning included: 1) the resemblance of the computer images to actual microscope images derived from patient samples (37 participants, 68%); 2) the use of multiple examples of cells and other microscopic structures (28 participants, 60%); 3) the ability to interact with images and animations (23 participants, 49%); 4) the step-by-step explanation of laboratory techniques (21 participants, 45%); and 5) the self-pacing of the tutorial (12 participants, 26%). Overall, the pilot study suggests that educational software could help train clinical laboratory personnel in developing countries.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Characteristics of educational software use in 106 clinical laboratories.

The University of Washington, Seattle, has developed educational software for clinical laboratories. We used a 32-question survey to study software implementation. Of 106 clinical laboratories (response rate, 60%) that purchased the software and completed the survey, 89 laboratories (84%) that reported using the software formed the basis for the study. The most common software users were laboratory personnel, followed by medical technologist or medical laboratory technician students, residents, and medical students; the mean (SD) number of personnel categories using the software per laboratory was 1.8 (0.8). The most common reasons for use were initial instruction, cross-training, and competency assessment. The most frequent setting for software use was an area where laboratory testing occurred, followed by a dedicated training location, a location chosen by the employee, a classroom, and a distance learning mode. On a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent), the average satisfaction rating as an instructional tool was 4.4 and as a competency assessment tool, 4.2. Compared with laboratories in hospitals with 400 beds or fewer, laboratories in hospitals with more than 400 beds used the software for more categories of users (P = .008), had a higher proportion of laboratories using it for residents (P = .003), and had a higher proportion of laboratories with dedicated training areas (P = .02).

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗