PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael L Paine

Publications and source records attributed to Michael L Paine.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Ectopic expression of dentin sialoprotein during amelogenesis hardens bulk enamel.

Dentin sialophosphpoprotein (Dspp) is transiently expressed in the early stage of secretory ameloblasts. The secretion of ameloblast-derived Dspp is short-lived, correlates to the establishment of the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), and is consistent with Dspp having a role in producing the specialized first-formed harder enamel adjacent to the DEJ. Crack diffusion by branching and dissipation within this specialized first-formed enamel close to the DEJ prevents catastrophic interfacial damage and tooth failure. Once Dspp is secreted, it is subjected to proteolytic cleavage that results in two distinct proteins referred to as dentin sialoprotein (Dsp) and dentin phosphoprotein (Dpp). The purpose of this study was to investigate the biological and mechanical contribution of Dsp and Dpp to enamel formation. Transgenic mice were engineered to overexpress either Dsp or Dpp in their enamel organs. The mechanical properties (hardness and toughness) of the mature enamel of transgenic mice were compared with genetically matched and age-matched nontransgenic animals. Dsp and Dpp contributions to enamel formation greatly differed. The inclusion of Dsp in bulk enamel significantly and uniformly increased enamel hardness (20%), whereas the inclusion of Dpp weakened the bulk enamel. Thus, Dsp appears to make a unique contribution to the physical properties of the DEJ. Dsp transgenic animals have been engineered with superior enamel mechanical properties.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2006

Altering biomineralization by protein design.

To create a bioceramic with unique materials properties, biomineralization exploits cells to create a tissue-specific protein matrix to control the crystal habit, timing, and position of the mineral phase. The biomineralized covering of vertebrate teeth is enamel, a distinctive tissue of ectodermal origin that is collagen-free. In forming enamel, amelogenin is the abundant protein that undergoes self-assembly to contribute to a matrix that guides its own replacement by mineral. Conserved domains in amelogenin suggest their importance to biomineralization. We used gene targeting in mice to replace native amelogenin with one of two engineered amelogenins. Replacement changed enamel organization by altering protein-to-crystallite interactions and crystallite stacking while diminishing the ability of the ameloblast to interact with the matrix. These data demonstrate that ameloblasts must continuously interact with the developing matrix to provide amelogenin-specific protein to protein, protein to mineral, and protein to membrane interactions critical to biomineralization and enamel architecture while suggesting that mutations within conserved amelogenin domains could account for enamel variations preserved in the fossil record.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2006

3. Protein-protein interactions of the developing enamel matrix.

Extracellular matrix proteins control the formation of the inorganic component of hard tissues including bone, dentin, and enamel. The structural proteins expressed primarily in the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, enamelin, and amelotin. Other proteins, like biglycan, are also present in the enamel matrix as well as in other mineralizing and nonmineralizing tissues of mammals. In addition, the presence of sulfated enamel proteins, and "tuft" proteins has been examined and discussed in relation to enamel formation. The structural proteins of the enamel matrix must have specific protein-protein interactions to produce a matrix capable of directing the highly ordered structure of the enamel crystallites. Protein-protein interactions are also likely to occur between the secreted enamel proteins and the plasma membrane of the enamel producing cells, the ameloblasts. Such protein-protein interactions are hypothesized to influence the secretion of enamel proteins, establish short-term order of the forming matrix, and to mediate feedback signals to the transcriptional machinery of these cells. Membrane-bound proteins identified in ameloblasts, and which interact with the structural enamel proteins, include Cd63 (cluster of differentiation 63 antigen), annexin A2 (Anxa2), and lysosomal-associated glycoprotein 1 (Lamp1). These and related data help explain the molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for the removal of the organic enamel matrix during the events of enamel mineralization, and how the enamel matrix influences its own fate through signaling initiated at the cell surface. The knowledge gained from enamel developmental studies may lead to better dental and nondental materials, or materials inspired by Nature. These data will be critical to scientists, engineers, and dentists in their pursuits to regenerate an entire tooth. For tooth regeneration to become a reality, the protein-protein interactions involving the key dental proteins must be identified and understood. The scope of this review is to discuss the current understanding of protein-protein interactions of the developing enamel matrix, and relate this knowledge to enamel biomineralization.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2006

An amelogenin minigene to study alternative splicing.

Diversity in gene expression is commonly observed as a result of alternative splicing of RNA transcripts. This is true in the case of amelogenin, one of the enamel matrix proteins. Our hypothesis is that additional amelogenin mRNA transcripts are generated in vivo, but these transcripts have yet to be observed because of the limitations of currently used detection methodologies. For this study our objective was to create an amelogenin minigene to study amelogenin RNA splicing events in cell lines of diverse character. Mouse genomic DNA was used as a PCR template to amplify the amelogenin DNA sequence spanning exons 2-7. The resulting PCR-generated DNA was subcloned in an expression vector. This resulting amelogenin minigene was shown to be functionally active by transfection into multiple cell lines. We have successfully cloned an amelogenin minigene, and as a result we describe and discuss novel amelogenin alternatively spliced transcripts.

Alternative Splicing↗
PubMed2006

Using the yeast two-hybrid assay to discover protein partners for the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide and for tuftelin-interacting protein 11.

The established structural proteins of the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. Historically, tuftelin and tuftelin-interacting protein 11 (TFIP11) have also been discussed as possible enamel proteins. Protein complexes are achieved by protein-protein interactions, and it is protein complexes that control biomineralization. The purpose of our recent studies was to catalog protein partners for these proteins that are, or have been, implicated in tooth formation. We used the sensitive yeast two-hybrid assay to identify proteins that interact directly with amelogenin, ameloblastin, enamelin, the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP) and TFIP11. In this manuscript we refer to, or document, potential protein partners for the proteins listed above. The yeast two-hybrid assay may ultimately prove to be a valuable proteomics methodology for using to decipher molecular events that ultimately result in enamel biomineralization.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2006

Amelogenins regulate expression of genes associated with cementoblasts in vitro.

Amelogenins are major proteins expressed by ameloblasts during development of the crown (enamel and dentin). These matrix proteins guide crystal habits of the mineral phase of developing enamel and are possible regulators of other genes/proteins during development and maturation of crown and root (dentin and cementum). This study focused on defining the effect that a specific proteolytic cleavage product of amelogenin, tyrosine-rich amelogenin peptide (TRAP), has on cementoblast behavior. Immortalized cementoblasts (OCCM-30) were exposed to TRAP in vitro. Cells treated with TRAP were evaluated for cell proliferation, gene expression for osteocalcin (OCN), osteopontin (OPN), and bone sialoprotein (BSP), and induction of mineral nodule formation. No significant difference in cell proliferation was found between vehicle-treated cells and those treated with TRAP for up to 9 d after treatment. Gene expression of OCN, OPN, and BSP in TRAP-treated cementoblasts showed down-regulation, up-regulation, and no significant change, respectively, relative to vehicle control. A marked decrease in mineral nodule formation was found in cells treated with TRAP compared with the vehicle control, in a dose-dependent manner. These data, along with our previous results demonstrating similar activity with full-length amelogenin and leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP), suggest that amelogenin-like molecules regulate mesenchymal cell behavior.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2005

Structural characterization of the major extrapallial fluid protein of the mollusc Mytilus edulis: implications for function.

The major protein component of the extrapallial fluid of the mollusc Mytilus edulis has been previously isolated and partially characterized. It was postulated to play a role in shell mineralization because of its intriguing property of Ca(2+)-binding-induced self-assembling. However, it also binds other divalent ions, including Cd(2+), Cu(2+), Mn(2+), and Mg(2+). Herein is the initial report on the characterization of the primary structure of the extrapallial (EP) protein by RT-PCR and cDNA sequencing methods and by de novo peptide sequencing with mass spectrometry. The EP protein is comprised of 213 amino acids postcleavage of a signal peptide of 23 amino acids. The protein is rich in His, Glu, and Asp residues. The site of N-glycosylation, "NHTE", at amino acid positions 54-57 and the intramolecular disulfide bond between Cys 139 and Cys 171 of the protein have been characterized also. Sequence comparisons reveal that the EP protein possesses little homology to any presently known matrix proteins previously isolated from mollusc shells but rather it highly resembles a heavy metal binding protein and a histidine-rich glycoprotein, both from the hemolymph of M. edulis. The predicted domain profile and amino acid composition suggest that its N-terminus may be involved in calcium binding. The abundance of histidine residues of the protein may account for its heavy metal binding properties. Thus, the EP protein perhaps has multiple functions, serving as a Ca(2+)-transport protein, a shell matrix protein, and a heavy metal detoxification protein.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein overexpression during amelogenesis.

The gene for dentin sialophosphoprotein produces a single protein that is post-translationally modified to generate two distinct extracellular proteins: dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein. In teeth, dentin sialophosphoprotein is expressed primarily by odontoblast cells, but is also transiently expressed by presecretory ameloblasts. Because of this expression profile it appears that dentin sialophosphoprotein contributes to the early events of amelogenesis, and in particular to those events that result in the formation of the dentino-enamel junction and the adjacent "aprismatic" enamel. Using a transgenic animal approach we have extended dentin sialoprotein or dentin phosphoprotein expression throughout the developmental stages of amelogenesis. Overexpression of dentin sialoprotein results in an increased rate of enamel mineralization, however, the enamel morphology is not significantly altered. In wild-type animals, the inclusion of dentin sialoprotein in the forming aprismatic enamel may account for its increased hardness properties, when compared with bulk enamel. In contrast, the overexpression of dentin phosphoprotein creates "pitted" and "chalky" enamel of non-uniform thickness that is more prone to wear. Disruptions to the prismatic enamel structure are also a characteristic of the dentin phosphoprotein overexpressing animals. These data support the previous suggestion that dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein have distinct functions related to tooth formation, and that the dentino-enamel junction should be viewed as a unique transition zone between enamel and the underlying dentin. These results support the notion that the dentin proteins expressed by presecretory ameloblasts contribute to the unique properties of the dentino-enamel junction.

Amelogenesis↗
PubMed2005

Enamel matrix protein interactions.

UNLABELLED: The recognized structural proteins of the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. While a large volume of data exists showing that amelogenin self-assembles into multimeric units referred to as nanospheres, other reports of enamel matrix protein-protein interactions are scant. We believe that each of these enamel matrix proteins must interact with other organic components of ameloblasts and the enamel matrix. Likely protein partners would include integral membrane proteins and additional secreted proteins. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to identify and catalog additional proteins that play a significant role in enamel formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the yeast two-hybrid assay to identify protein partners for amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. Once identified, RT-PCR was used to assess gene transcription of these newly identified and potential "enamel" proteins in ameloblast-like LS8 cells. RESULTS: In the context of this yeast assay, we identified a number of secreted proteins and integral membrane proteins that interact with amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. Additionally, proteins whose functions range from the inhibition of soft tissue mineralization, calcium ion transport, and phosphorylation events have been identified as protein partners to these enamel matrix proteins. For each protein identified using this screening strategy, future studies are planned to confirm this physiological relationship to biomineralization in vivo. CONCLUSION: Identifying integral membrane proteins of the secretory surface of ameloblast cells (Tomes' processes) and additional enamel matrix proteins, based on their abilities to interact with the most abundant enamel matrix proteins, will better define the molecular mechanisms of enamel formation at its most rudimentary level.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2004

The COOH terminus of the amelogenin, LRAP, is oriented next to the hydroxyapatite surface.

The organic matrix in forming enamel consists largely of the amelogenin protein self-assembled into nanospheres that are necessary to guide the formation of the unusually long and highly ordered hydroxyapatite (HAP) crystallites that constitute enamel. Despite its ability to direct crystal growth, the interaction of the amelogenin protein with HAP is unknown. However, the demonstration of growth restricted to the c-axis suggests a specific protein-crystal interaction, and the charged COOH terminus is often implicated in this function. To elucidate whether the COOH terminus is important in the binding and orientation of amelogenin onto HAP, we have used solid state NMR to determine the orientation of the COOH terminus of an amelogenin splice variant, LRAP (leucine-rich amelogenin protein), which contains the charged COOH terminus of the full protein, on the HAP surface. These experiments demonstrate that the methyl 13C-labeled side chain of Ala46 is 8.0 A from the HAP surface under hydrated conditions, for the protein with and without phosphorylation. The experimental results provide direct evidence orienting the charged COOH-terminal region of the amelogenin protein on the HAP surface, optimized to exert control on developing enamel crystals.

Alanine↗
PubMed2004

Overexpression of TRAP in the enamel matrix does not alter the enamel structural hierarchy.

The secreted, full-length amelogenin is the dominant protein of the forming enamel organ. As enamel mineralization progresses, amelogenin is quickly subjected to proteolytic activity, and eliminated from the enamel environment. Mature enamel contains only traces of structural proteins, including enamelin and the sheath protein ameloblastin. In addition, a proteolytic fragment of amelogenin, known as the tyrosine-rich amelogenin peptide or TRAP, is present in low but isolatable quantities. By overexpressing TRAP during enamel development we sought to determine if such overexpression would result in structural alterations to the mature enamel. We reasoned that overexpressing a protein associated with enamel maturation, at an inappropriate developmental stage, would result in alterations to the enamel protein assembly and hence, alterations in enamel structure and morphology. As judged by transmission and scanning electron microscopy, the enamel formed by overexpressing TRAP showed little morphological differences when compared to the enamel of normal nontransgenic animals. Based on scanning electron-microscopic images, there was modest hypomineralization evident in the interrod enamel of the TRAP-overexpressing animals. However, this finding was inconsistent and inconsequential from a structural and functional perspective. From these results it appears that additional amounts of TRAP protein in the immature enamel matrix are not sufficient to alter the properties of the enamel extracellular matrix to an extent that the hierarchical structure of mature enamel is altered.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2004

In vivo overexpression of tuftelin in the enamel organic matrix.

The primary sequences of human and mouse tuftelin are 89% identical. Both proteins comprise 390 amino acids and produce an acidic protein with an isoelectric point of 5.7, and an unmodified molecular weight of 44 kD. Using fluorescent-tagged tuftelin and amelogenin plasmid constructs we saw little evidence that these two enamel proteins colocalize in ameloblast-like LS-8 cells. Tuftelin is primarily localized to distinct 'speckled' domains within the cell cytoplasm. In an attempt to better define a physiological function for tuftelin during amelogenesis, we have produced transgenic mice that overexpress tuftelin in ameloblasts and subsequently the enamel matrix. Tuftelin overexpression impacts dramatically upon the enamel crystallite habit and the enamel prismatic structure. Overexpressing tuftelin results in gross imperfections in enamel that is evident both at the nanoscale and the mesoscale. The most notable difference observed in the transgenic animals, when compared to wild-type animals, is an apparent loss of restricted growth of enamel crystallites along their a-axis and b-axis. This equates to a change in the crystallite aspect ratio. In the transgenic animals the crystallite structures appear more 'plate'-like in contrast to the symmetric, 'ribbon'-like crystallite morphology that is a characteristic feature of mammalian enamel.

Ameloblasts↗
PubMed2003

A transgenic animal model resembling amelogenesis imperfecta related to ameloblastin overexpression.

Genetic diseases that affect tooth enamel are grouped under the classification amelogenesis imperfecta. Human pedigrees and experiments on transgenic and null mice have all demonstrated that mutations to the secreted proteins amelogenin, enamelin, and enamelysin result in visibly, structurally, or mechanically defective enamel. In an attempt to better define a physiologic function for ameloblastin during enamel formation, we have produced transgenic mice that misexpress the ameloblastin gene. These transgenic animals exhibit imperfections in their enamel that is evident at the nanoscale level. Specifically, ameloblastin overexpression influences enamel crystallite habit and enamel rod morphology. These findings suggest enamel crystallite habit and rod morphology are influenced by the temporal and spatial expression of ameloblastin and may implicate the role of the ameloblastin gene locus in the etiology of a number of undiagnosed autosomally dominant cases of amelogenesis imperfecta.

Amelogenesis Imperfecta↗
PubMed2003

Enamel structure properties controlled by engineered proteins in transgenic mice.

UNLABELLED: Amelogenin protein has regulatory effects on enamel biofabrication in mammalian tooth. Using teeth obtained from transgenic mice that express two separate protein-engineered versions of amelogenins, we made structure-nanomechanical properties correlations and showed 21% hardness and 24% elastic modulus degradation compared with the age-matched wildtype littermates. We attribute the inferior properties to the disorganization of the protein matrix resulting in defective mineral formation. INTRODUCTION: Enamel is a bioceramic initiated by the biosynthesis of a complex mixture of proteins that undergoes self-assembly to produce a super molecular ensemble that controls the nucleation and habit of the crystalline mineral phase. Ultimately, the inorganic crystals grow to almost fully replace the organic phase. This biofabrication process occurs at physiologic conditions of pH, temperature, pressure, and ion concentration and results in the hardest tissue in the vertebrate body, with the largest and longest substituted-hydroxyapatite crystals known to biomineralizing systems. The most abundant protein of forming mammalian enamel, amelogenin, has been shown to have a significant regulatory effect on this complex process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this work, we present the effect of protein engineering of amelogenin on the mechanical properties of the resultant mouse enamel. We have produced two types of transgenic animals that express separate versions of amelogenin proteins that lack the required self-assembly domains. The resultant matured enamel was extensively characterized for its mechanical properties at the nanoscale by means of nanoindentation and atomic force microscopy (AFM). These techniques have enabled us to probe the mechanical properties that are representative of a single enamel rod. RESULTS: Our nanoindentation measurements have revealed that the altered amelogenin with dysfunctional self-assembly properties resulted in a degradation by as much as 21% in hardness and 24% in elastic modulus compared with the age-matched wildtype littermates. Furthermore, the enamel formed by these defective proteins is found to display a decrease in indentation surface pile-up volume by up to 32%. CONCLUSIONS: We attribute these inferior mechanical properties for the enamel grown by the engineered amelogenins to result from the disorganization of the nanospheres formed in the protein matrix starting at the mineral nucleation stage with a consequential alteration to the fully grown mineral component. By engineering the properties of proteins that contribute to the nanoscale level of hierarchy in enamel biomineralization, it is possible to regulate the properties of the resulting bioceramic at the mesoscale level of the tissue.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2003

Functional domains for amelogenin revealed by compound genetic defects.

We have previously used the yeast two-hybrid assay and multiple in vitro methodologies to show that amelogenin undergoes self-assembly involving two domains (A and B). Using transgenic animals, we show that unique enamel phenotypes result from disruptions to either the A- or B-domain, supporting the role of amelogenin in influencing enamel structural organization. By crossbreeding, animals bearing two defective amelogenin gene products have a more extreme enamel phenotype than the sum of the defects evident in the individual parental lines. At the nanoscale level, the forming matrix shows alteration in the size of the amelogenin nanospheres. At the mesoscale level of enamel structural hierarchy, 6-week-old enamel exhibits defects in enamel rod organization caused by perturbed organization of the precursor organic matrix. These studies reflect the critical dependency of amelogenin self-assembly to form a highly organized enamel organic matrix, and that amelogenins engineered to be defective in self-assembly produce compound defects in the structural organization of enamel.

Amelogenin↗
PubMed2003

Amelogenin self-assembly and the role of the proline located within the carboxyl-teleopeptide.

A hallmark of biological systems is a reliance on protein assemblies to perform complex functions. We have focused attention on mammalian enamel formation because it relies on a self-assembling protein complex to direct mineral habit. The principle protein of enamel is amelogenin that self-assembles to form nanospheres. In mice, the principal amelogenin product is a 180 amino acid hydrophobic protein. The yeast two-hybrid assay has been used to demonstrate the importance of amelogenin self-assembly domains. We have generated specific variants of amelogenin to analyze contributions of individual amino acids to the self-assembly process. These amelogenin variants have been produced either by deleting carboxyl-terminal amino acids (to generate proteins that relate to the documented proteolytic products of mouse amelogenin) or by a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Assessment of variant amelogenins truncated at the carboxyl-terminal imply that the proline at position 169 of mouse amelogenin (M180) plays a significant role in amelogenin self-assembly. Site-directed mutagenesis of this particular proline, however, failed to disrupt the amelogenin self-assembly property. These conflicting data add to the complexity of protein-protein assembly mechanisms as they relate to the enamel matrix. Available data suggest a robustness of this enamel protein (amelogenin) that ensures a functional, even though mechanically less than optimal, enamel results despite either minor or major genetic errors to the amelogenin gene locus.

Amelogenesis↗