Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Michael R Sperling.
Temporal lobectomy is the most common neurosurgical procedure performed for medically refractory epilepsy. Temporal lobe epilepsy has historically been one of the most difficult forms of epilepsy to treat, and it carries a significant psychosocial and medical burden. The inadequacy of medical therapy led to the development of effective neurosurgical procedures, and this article cites several seminal authors who pioneered the development of the field.
PURPOSE: To measure the interrater reliability of presurgical testing and surgical decisions among epilepsy centers. METHODS: Seven centers participating in an ongoing, prospective multicenter study of resective epilepsy surgery agreed to conform to a detailed protocol regarding presurgical evaluation and surgery. To assess quality assurance, each center independently reviewed 21 randomly selected surgical cases for preoperative study lateralization and localization, and surgical decisions. Interrater reliability was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), validated for use with multiple raters, and calculated in a two-way random model based on absolute agreement. RESULTS: Agreement for ICC values: > or = 0.75, excellent; 0.60-0.74, good; 0.40-0.59, fair; < or = 0.39, poor. One center was excluded for missing data. Agreement was excellent for extracranial EEG lateralization (0.8039), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lateralization (0.9521) and localization (0.9130), Wada lateralization (0.9453), and intracranial EEG localization (0.7905). Agreement was good for extracranial EEG localization (0.7384) and neuropsychological testing lateralization (0.7178) and localization (0.6891). Consensus about the decision to perform intracranial monitoring was fair (0.5397), in part reflecting one center's tendency toward intracranial monitoring. Overall agreements on whether to perform surgery (0.8311) and specific surgery recommended (0.8164) were excellent. CONCLUSIONS: High interrater reliability among six epilepsy centers was present for interpretation of most components of presurgical testing. Although consensus for the decision to perform intracranial monitoring was only fair, agreements for the ultimate decision about resective surgery and specific choice of resection were excellent. We believe that this study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing multicenter protocols for neurologic management, especially those involving localization, as well as protocols combining study results with clinical decision making.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The authors retrospectively assessed the relation between total and free serum concentrations and serum albumin in a sample of hospitalized patients to evaluate how well free serum concentrations can be estimated from total phenytoin serum concentrations. The authors also assessed the interpatient and intrapatient variability of the phenytoin free fraction. Paired serum samples of total and free phenytoin serum concentrations and serum albumin were obtained from 48 hospitalized patients (28 males, 20 females; mean age, 51 y; range, 13-90 y). Concomitant medications were recorded. Phenytoin free fraction and adjusted total phenytoin serum concentrations (adjusted for serum albumin) were calculated. One hundred sixty-three samples were obtained (mean, 3.4 samples per patient; range, 1-16 samples); 28 patients had more than one pair of samples obtained. Mean phenytoin free fraction was 15% +/- 7% (range, 4%-61%) for the 163 samples. The variability for the total, free, and free fractions were 65%, 75.9%, and 45.8%, respectively. There was significant variability in the phenytoin free fraction within individual patients who had more than one pair of serum concentrations obtained. The intraindividual coefficient of variation in phenytoin free fraction was 85% +/- 21.3% (range, 2%-94%). Despite strong overall correlation between the total phenytoin serum and free serum concentrations, there is excessive variability in phenytoin protein binding. Correction for serum albumin was not useful in this patient group. Because of significant interpatient and intrapatient variability in phenytoin serum concentrations, monitoring of total serum concentrations is unreliable and free phenytoin serum concentrations should be considered for monitoring in hospitalized patients.