PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael R. Judd

Publications and source records attributed to Michael R. Judd.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Athletic Training Education Program Directors' Perceptions on Job Selection, Satisfaction, and Attrition.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential reasons for becoming a program director and reasons for leaving the program director position within athletic training education programs accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP); in addition, to describe the most and least beneficial and satisfying aspects of the program director position. DESIGN AND SETTING: In 1999, we sent a validated survey to athletic training education program directors of CAAHEP-accredited athletic training education programs. SUBJECTS: Of 113 athletic training education program directors of accredited undergraduate programs, 83 participated, for a response rate of 73.4%. MEASUREMENTS: The survey consisted of open-ended questions regarding potential reasons for becoming a program director and possibly leaving the program direction position and most and least beneficial and satisfying aspects of the position. We used inductive content analysis to determine themes for the responses to the open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics, including percentages, were calculated to report the data. RESULTS: Academic environment was the primary theme for becoming an athletic training education program director and professional appointment was the primary theme for possibly leaving the position. Professional advancement and student growth and success were the primary themes for the most beneficial and satisfying aspects. Workload and student issues and discipline were the primary themes for the least beneficial and satisfying aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Factors that affect job selection, satisfaction, and attrition are related to academic environment, teaching, students, professional advancement, program development/advancement, workload, personal issues, and athletics.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Dilemmas of Program Directors: Then and Now.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current roles and responsibilities of program directors of athletic training education programs accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP) and to address the dilemmas of program directors' credibility with student athletic trainers, tenure and promotion, and clinical involvement in athletics. DESIGN AND SETTING: We sent a survey to all program directors who direct CAAHEP athletic training education programs. SUBJECTS: Eighty-three of 113 program directors of undergraduate programs participated in the study-a response rate of 73.4%. MEASUREMENTS: The survey consisted of demographic data: degree, age, major, years of experience as program director, and route to certification and questions concerning title, job responsibilities, expectations, and academic appointment. RESULTS: Most respondents (72%) indicated that their title was program director, and they had a median of 9 years of experience. Sixty-two percent had been certified as an athletic trainer for a median of 18.5 years. Forty-three percent had doctoral degrees and held the rank of assistant professor. Ninety-six percent indicated teaching was the primary duty and expectation of their program director's position. CONCLUSIONS: The dilemmas of tenure and promotion, decreased clinical involvement, and student athletic trainers' perceptions of program directors remain problematic. The dilemmas still exist as they did 12 years ago and are becoming more involved due to educational reform. Program directors must be able to communicate their roles and responsibilities to their administrators.

Journal Article↗