PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael S Higgins

Publications and source records attributed to Michael S Higgins.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of a hands-free wireless communication device in the perioperative environment.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and reliability of a hands-free voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) communication system in the perioperative environment. Two surveys were administered to anesthesiologists and operating room (OR) nurses working at an academic medical center. Providers were queried by alphanumeric pages or VOIP queries during OR work shifts to measure communication response times. Providers, responding to the query, were asked to verbally complete a system performance survey to capture information regarding their workload and work environment at the time of the query. A user feedback survey was independently administered in writing to a convenience sample of OR providers to obtain information regarding provider communication preferences, concerns, and recommendations. OR providers responded to communication queries four times faster when using VOIP compared to alphanumeric pagers. Providers found VOIP to be much less reliable than conventional pager-telephone systems. Dead spots in the 802.11b network and errors in speaker recognition were frequently cited as sources of system failures. Providers also expressed concern in maintaining confidentiality of patient data or other clinical data communicated using this system. The results of this study suggest that VOIP is still a developing technology but one that is currently viable in the clinical setting. The technology can be used efficiently and securely in health care if users are given the proper training its functions and capabilities.

Anesthesiology↗

A preliminary study of 24-hour post-cesarean patient controlled analgesia: postoperative pain reports and morphine requests/utilization are greater in abstaining smokers than non-smokers.

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical studies have not examined the relationship between nicotine abstinence and opioid use for postoperative analgesia. This may be important because tobacco smokers are routinely required to abstain from smoking just before and during acute post-surgical recovery. This study investigated IV morphine self-administration [patient controlled analgesia (PCA)], subjective pain/drug effects and other measures during post-operative (elective Cesarean section) recovery. MATERIAL/METHODS: Seven females, selected to vary in nicotine use [4 non-using controls (CON), 3 users (NIC)], completed the protocol. Gender, time and type of surgery, and pre- and intra-operative medications were controlled. Subject assessments included the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Profile of Mood States; drug effects were measured using the Addiction Research Center Inventory. RESULTS: Mean (M +/-SD) 24-hr morphine responding (button-pressing requests) was significantly higher for NIC (M=183+/-50) than CON (M=38+/-10). Weight-adjusted morphine use (mg/kg/24 hr) was significantly higher for NIC (M=1.80+/-0.23) than CON (M=0.64+/-0.14). Although the groups reported similar pain severity following morphine loading, NIC patients reported significantly greater pain severity than CON patients after 24 hr PCA. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that a history of nicotine use and/or short-term nicotine abstinence can modulate morphine use and analgesia during post-operative recovery. These procedures provide a model for studying patterns and determinants of analgesic self-administration in medical settings.

Adult↗

Improving anesthesiologist performance through profiling and incentives.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of profiling and incentives on anesthesiologist behavior in relation to several key indicators of performance. DESIGN: Prospective collection and analysis of operational data before and after implementation of a physician profiling, reporting, and incentive program. SETTING: University hospital. MEASUREMENTS: An intervention consisting of two components was studied with the intent of stimulating a high level of performance in relation to a peer group. The first component, a monthly report of physician performance via an individualized performance report, was provided to each physician for each of 6 months. The second component consisted of a financial incentive. For each month in the study, physicians were eligible to receive a variable financial incentive of between $0 and $500 per month depending on individual performance based scoring in relation to each other. Physician performance was tracked in five areas: 1) percentage of first cases of the day in the room at or before the scheduled in-room time, 2) percentage of cases with an anesthesia prep time less than a target, 3) percentage of cases delayed due to waiting for an anesthesiology patient evaluation, 4) percentage of cases delayed during the anesthesiology controlled time, and, 5) percentage of cases delayed due to waiting for the anesthesiology attending. Results were reported to each physician on a monthly basis, by e-mail distribution, of an individualized perioperative efficiency summary report. A monthly financial incentive was awarded to the top performing physicians in the form of a credit to the physician's personal CME/expense account. Also, all physicians received a rank order list of their performance on each indicator at the end of each month. MAIN RESULTS: 31 anesthesiologists, comprising the multispecialty division, and covering all services with the exception of obstetrics, pediatrics, and cardiothoracic anesthesia were tracked for 6 months. Compared to the first month, the percent of first cases of the day in the room at or before the scheduled start time and the percent of cases with an anesthesiology prep time less than target increased significantly (19 +/- 4.6%, vs. 61 +/- 6.5%, 95% CI, p <0.001; and 57 +/- 5.3%, vs. 73 +/- 5.1%, 95% CI, p <0 .001) during the sixth month. The mean number of cases per physician with a delay during anesthesiology controlled time decreased (14.9 +/- 2.9 vs. 3.3 +/- 1, p <0.001), no change occurred in the number of cases with a delay due to waiting for an anesthesiology patient evaluation or number of cases delayed due to waiting for the anesthesiology attending in the sixth month compared with the first month. CONCLUSION: Tracking and rewarding physician performance with monthly profiling and a financial incentive given to the best in a peer group improves anesthesiologist performance in several key areas.

Anesthesiology↗

Factor V Leiden protects against blood loss and transfusion after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of cardiac surgery is influenced by several factors, but the impact of specific genetic variants has not been systematically explored. Because blood conservation is a pressing issue in cardiac surgery, we tested the hypothesis that factor V Leiden (FVL), a common coagulation factor polymorphism, may protect against blood loss and transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 517 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, including 26 heterozygous FVL carriers, and evaluated the impact of FVL on chest tube output and transfusion by using univariate and multivariate techniques. For patients with FVL, blood loss at 6 (238+/-131 mL) and 24 hours (522+/-302 mL) was significantly lower than that for noncarriers (358+/-259 mL and 730+/-452 mL; P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). In a multivariate regression analysis, controlling for ethnicity and factors known to affect blood loss, FVL was a significant independent contributor at both time points. Using a similar regression approach, FVL did not have a significant effect on the number of units transfused. However, logistic regression of the risk of receiving any transfusion during hospitalization demonstrated a significant independent protective effect of FVL on overall transfusion risk. CONCLUSIONS: FVL represents a common genetic trait that may protect against blood loss and transfusion in this population. This study demonstrates that genetic variability can affect the outcome of cardiac surgery.

Adult↗

Food restriction modulates amphetamine-conditioned place preference and nucleus accumbens dopamine release in the rat.

Food restriction has been shown to increase self-administration of psychostimulants, including cocaine and amphetamine (AMPH). Consistent with this, food-restricted rats are more sensitized to the rewarding effects of cocaine as measured by conditioned place preference (CPP). This study investigated whether moderate food restriction in rats (15 g/day) results in an increased CPP, relative to ad libitum-fed controls, to a second psychostimulant, AMPH. Conditioning trials consisted of six alternating injections of i.p. AMPH (0.425-6.8 mg/kg) and i.p. saline, paired with distinct environments. On Day 7, a drug-free 20-min choice test for environment was carried out to assess CPP. 0.85 mg/kg AMPH significantly increased CPP in food-restricted vs. ad libitum-fed rats. At 1.7 and 3.4 mg/kg AMPH, food-restricted rats showed decreased CPP, but increased locomotor activity, relative to ad libitum fed controls. To evaluate whether an alteration in extracellular fluid DA levels in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core could account for these behavioral alterations, DA release was measured by microdialysis. DA release to a single acute i.p. injection of either 0.85 or 1.7 mg/kg AMPH was comparable in food-restricted and ad libitum fed rats. However, ad libitum fed rats demonstrated conditioned DA release after an AMPH conditioning paradigm analogous to the CPP paradigm, whereas food-restricted rats demonstrated no conditioned DA release. In conclusion, altered DA release in the nucleus accumbens core is not a primary effect of moderate food restriction and cannot completely account for either the altered CPP behavior or enhanced locomotor activity observed in this study.

Amphetamine↗