Documentation in orthopaedic surgery - do integrated care pathways work?
Integrated care pathways (ICPs) are being widely adopted in orthopaedic surgery. This study compares the quality of medical notation in an ICP with traditional record keeping. During a 3-month period, 53 total hip replacements (ICP notation) and 30 total knee replacements (traditional notation) were performed. The records of each patient were scrutinised using a standardised scoring system, based on The Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines on medical record keeping. Each set of records (83) was scored for: admission clerking, subsequent entries, consent form, operation note, and discharge letters. The time taken to retrieve this information was recorded. The overall score for traditional records (mean, 70%) was significantly higher (P = 0.001 ) than for the ICP records (mean, 62%). The mean scores for initial clerking, subsequent entries and consent form were higher in the traditional record group. It took 35% longer to retrieve information from the ICP group (P < 0.001). In this study, the quality of record keeping was higher when using the traditional notation than an established ICP. In both groups, the frequency of omissions was high.