PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michael Sugrue

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Sugrue.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) have been increasingly recognized in the critically ill over the past decade. The variety of definitions proposed has led to confusion and difficulty in comparing one study to another. DESIGN: An international consensus group of critical care specialists convened at the second World Congress on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome to standardize definitions for IAH and ACS based upon the current understanding of the pathophysiology surrounding these two syndromes. METHODS: Prior to the conference the authors developed a blueprint for the various definitions, which was further refined both during and after the conference. The present article serves as the final report of the 2004 International ACS Consensus Definitions Conference and is endorsed by the World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS). RESULTS: IAH is redefined as an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) at or above 12 mmHg. ACS is redefined as an IAP above 20 mmHg with evidence of organ dysfunction/failure. ACS is further classified as either primary, secondary, or recurrent based upon the duration and cause of the IAH-induced organ failure. Standards for IAP monitoring are set forth to facilitate accuracy of IAP measurements from patient to patient. CONCLUSIONS: State-of-the-art definitions for IAH and ACS are proposed based upon current medical evidence as well as expert opinion. The WSACS recommends that these definitions be used for future clinical and basic science research. Specific guidelines and recommendations for clinical management of patients with IAH/ACS are published in a separate review.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2005

An evaluation of compliance with practice guidelines on interhospital trauma transfer.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate compliance with current interhospital trauma transfer guidelines in South West Sydney, before and after an implementation programme was instituted. METHODS: A scoring system was developed to assess compliance with the 11 main components of the guideline. Baseline compliance was measured during an initial 3-month period (pre), followed by an implementation programme to alert staff at referring hospitals to the presence of the guidelines. Following this, compliance was again measured over 3 months (post). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were transferred during the pre-implementation phase and 35 patients during the post-phase. Overall compliance with the guidelines increased from 62 to 67%. Mean pre-hospital compliance rose from 75 to 95%, and referring hospital compliance rose from 59 to 63%. While there was an improvement in compliance with the use of the dedicated trauma hotline (86-97%), the use of a transfer checklist (41-53%), and appropriateness of transfer (95-100%), none of these reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Practice guidelines have been developed to optimise the process of interhospital trauma transfers. An implementation programme met with limited success in improving compliance with the guidelines. Further work is needed to ensure awareness of these guidelines, with ongoing monitoring to ensure best practice and optimal patient outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Abdominal compartment syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will set forth the new consensus definitions for intra-abdominal pressure, intra-abdominal hypertension, and the abdominal compartment syndrome from the World Congress on the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in December 2004. The review will explore the challenges in diagnosis, pathophysiology, and recent concepts in the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: Intra-abdominal pressure greater than 12 mm Hg may exert adverse physiologic sequelae, progressing to intra-abdominal hypertension and full-blown abdominal compartment syndrome as intra-abdominal pressure increases. The first challenge is to recognize that abdominal compartment syndrome may be a potential problem in critically ill patients. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring is essential for this. Continuous monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal perfusion pressure adds real-time measurements and can be performed by way of the stomach or bladder. Intra-abdominal hypertension occurs in approximately 35% of patients in the intensive care unit, and abdominal compartment syndrome in approximately 5%. SUMMARY: Massive resuscitation is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to abdominal compartment syndrome. Prophylactic decompression and temporary abdominal closure have important roles in preventing tertiary or recurrent abdominal compartment syndrome. Failure to recognize and treat intra-abdominal hypertension will result in increased risk of renal impairment, visceral and intestinal ischemia, respiratory failure and death.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2005

Citation classics in trauma.

BACKGROUND: The evolution of trauma may be analyzed by review of articles most frequently cited by scientific articles worldwide. This study identified the "trauma classics" by reviewing the most-cited articles ever published in The Journal of Trauma. METHODS: The Science Citation Index of the Institute for Scientific Information was searched for the 50 most-cited articles in The Journal of Trauma. RESULTS: Of the 12,672 articles published since 1961, 80 were cited over 100 times and 17 over 200 times. The most-cited article was by Baker, a hallmark publication on injury scoring published in 1974. Feeding postinjury, bacterial translocation, and multiple organ failure were common themes. Overall, 32% involved gastrointestinal topics and 18% involved injury scoring, with institutions in the United States publishing 80% of the articles. CONCLUSION: This study identified the trauma classics from the last 42 years of The Journal of Trauma. Citation analysis has recognized limitations but gives a fascinating insight into the evolution of trauma care.

Bibliometrics↗
PubMed2005

Institutional practice guidelines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic instability: do they make a difference?

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with hemodynamic instability related to pelvic fracture is a major challenge, with high morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based institutional practice guidelines (PG) were developed as a strategy to optimize the care of these patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate the adherence to the new PG and compare the outcomes before and after their implementation. METHODS: Major blunt trauma patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > 15) with hemodynamic instability (initial base deficit > 6 mEq/L or received > 6 units of packed red blood cells [PRBCs] during the first 12 hours) related to pelvic fracture were investigated. Patients presenting with ongoing bleeding from other regions or with severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 9) were excluded. The pre-PG group (n = 17) were patients managed during the 18 months ending on December 31, 2001. The post-PG group (n = 14) consisted of patients managed during the subsequent 18 months. Demographics, ISS, shock severity, resuscitation, and outcome data were prospectively collected. The adherence to the key steps of PG was evaluated retrospectively in the pre-PG and prospectively in the post-PG group, including abdominal clearance (AC) with diagnostic peritoneal aspiration/lavage or ultrasound (<15 minutes), noninvasive pelvic binding (PB) (<15 minutes), pelvic angiography (PA) (<90 minutes after admission), and minimally invasive orthopedic fixation (MIOF) (<24 hours). Data are presented as mean +/- SEM or percentages. RESULTS: The pre-PG and post-PG groups were similar regarding age (40 +/- 4 years vs. 42 +/- 6 years), gender (both 71% male), ISS (39 +/- 3 vs. 37 +/- 4), admission base deficit (9 +/- 1 vs. 10 +/- 1) admission systolic blood pressure (116 +/- 7 vs. 112 +/- 6 mm Hg), Glasgow Coma Scale score (12 +/- 1 vs. 12 +/- 1), and PRBC transfusion in the first 12 hours (9 +/- 2 U vs. 9 +/- 2 U). The adherence to the guidelines in the post-PG period was as follows: AC, 100%; PB, 86% (p < 0.05 based on t test or chi test); PA, 93% (p < 0.05 based on t test or chi test); and MIOF, 86%. In the pre-PG period, adherence to the guidelines was as follows: AC, 65%; PB, 0%; PA, 30%; and MIOF 52%. In the post-PG period, the 24-hour PRBC transfusion decreased from 16 +/- 2 U to 11 +/- 1 U and the mortality decreased from 35% to 7% (p < 0.05 based on t test or chi test for both). CONCLUSION: The adherence to the PG as a reflection of optimal management was significantly improved. PG focusing particular on timely hemorrhage control reduced the 24-hour transfusion requirements and the mortality rate in the post-PG group.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Abdominal trauma: a disease in evolution.

BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen many changes in the way we investigate and manage abdominal injuries. This study assessed the pattern of abdominal injury and its investigation in patients admitted to a major trauma centre. METHODS: A retrospective registry review of all adult trauma patients admitted to Liverpool Hospital between January 1996 and December 2003 was undertaken. All adult trauma patients were included, identifying mechanism of injury, injury severity score, abbreviated injury score for the abdomen, investigations and intervention. The study period was divided (period 1 from 1996 to 1999, period 2 from 2000 to 2003) and the two periods compared to assess change. RESULTS: The study involved 1224 patients with abdominal injuries. Of these, 969 (79%) were a result of blunt trauma. The main causes were road accidents (61%), interpersonal violence (24%) and falls (7%). Penetrating injury increased from 16% to 25% between the two periods. There were 1274 intra-abdominal injuries, made up of 607 solid organ (liver (n = 220, 36%), spleen (n = 195, 32%), renal (n = 144, 24%) ), 291 hollow viscus (small bowel (n = 160, 55%), large bowel (n = 104, 36%) ) and 168 vascular. Four hundred and thirty-six (36%) patients underwent laparotomy, 65% for blunt trauma. Between the two periods there was a 46% decrease in the use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, with a 40% increase in computed tomography and 325% increase in focused assessment with sonography for trauma. CONCLUSIONS: This study defined abdominal injury pattern and identified a significant shift in mechanism of injury and abdominal investigation at a major trauma centre during an 8-year study period. Abdominal trauma is indeed a disease in evolution.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2004

Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: recent care and new guidelines.

Consistent care of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patients is a major management issue. It was uncertain whether the introduction of newly developed clinical practice guidelines would require much change in current delivery of care at our institution. Assessment of recent care was undertaken and compared with the newly developed evidence-based best practice guidelines. A multidisciplinary project team developed clinical practice guidelines for determination of early optimum management of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures. The guidelines recommend a definitive management plan to arrest hemorrhage within 30 minutes. Intra-abdominal hemorrhage should be assessed with diagnostic peritoneal aspiration (DPA) and/or focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST). Early noninvasive stabilization of the pelvis followed by angiography within 90 minutes are recommended if intra-abdominal hemorrhage is not found. Recent care was assessed in a historical cohort of patients, identified in a prospectively maintained trauma registry, between June 1999 and December 2001. Investigations, interventions, and times were then compared with the new guidelines. The delivery of care to 30 patients (mortality 37%, mean ISS 37.8 +/- 20.9) was studied. Compared with the new guidelines, the abdominal assessment rate with DPA and/or FAST was 53% and early (< 90 minutes) angiography rate was 38%. A form of pelvic external stabilization was applied in 27% of cases. Noninvasive pelvic stabilization was not performed at all. The recent care of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patients was not in line with newly developed guidelines. There is an opportunity to markedly improve the rates of initial assessment of the abdomen, pelvic stabilization, and early angiography.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal compartment syndrome can develop within 12 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in high-risk (shock/trauma, burn, pancreatitis, postabdominal aortic surgery) patients. The current standard of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement via the urinary catheter is labor intensive, and its intermittent nature could prevent timely recognition of significant changes in IAP. We propose that continuous IAP (CIAP) can be accurately measured via the irrigation port of a three-way catheter and has good agreement with the standard intermittent IAP (IIAP). METHODS: CIAP was prospectively validated by comparing it with IIAP measurement in general surgical and trauma patients admitted to the ICU with a three-way urinary catheter. CIAP was measured via the irrigation port of the three-way catheter transduced to the bedside monitor as a continuous trace without intermittent clamping of the catheter. The standard IIAP measurements were performed via the urine drainage port after clamping the catheter and filling the bladder with 50 mL of 0.9% saline. Each patient had three separate paired measurements performed in standardized manner to compare CIAP with IIAP. Patients' demographics, injury severity, type of surgery, body mass index (BMI), and the paired individual IAP measurements were recorded. The paired measurements were compared using the Bland-Altman (B-A) method for comparing a new clinical measurement with an established one. Data are presented as mean +/- standard error of the mean. RESULTS: During a 6-month period (ending in July 2003), 25 patients were investigated. The mean age was 61.5 +/- 4 years, 66% were men, and BMI was 29.2 +/- 2 kg/m(2). Six patients had vascular surgical, four elective and three urgent general surgical interventions. There were 12 trauma patients with ISS of 23 +/- 2. The CIAP was 14.2 +/- 0.66 (range 2 to 24) mm Hg, and the IIAP was 14.0 +/- 0.68 (range 3 to 24) mm Hg. Seventy-five percent of the measured pairs were exactly the same; in 21%, there was 1 mm Hg difference and in 4% 2 mm Hg. There was no measurement difference greater than 2 mm Hg. The mean difference between the CIAP and IIAP was 0.019 +/- 0.05 mmHg. The B-A statistics revealed that the difference between the means of measurements in each individual patient was between +/-1.96 SD (95% confidence intervals). The B-A scatter plot did not follow any patterns of typical systematic bias. CONCLUSION: CIAP measurement with a three-way urinary catheter is a simple and accurate method for monitoring IAP. It has an excellent agreement with the IIAP over wide pressure ranges and should replace the current labor-intensive intermittent technique.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2004

Differences in mortality predictions between Injury Severity Score triplets: a significant flaw.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the validity of similar Injury Severity Scores (ISS) generated by different Abbreviated Injury Scale triplets. METHODS: A cohort of trauma patients admitted to a single major trauma service between 1995 and 2002 was studied retrospectively. Mortality rates were compared for groups with identical ISS scores but different triplets. RESULTS: For 2,223 of the 5,946 trauma patients studied, 12 ISS scores were generated by two different Abbreviated Injury Scale triplets. Six of these ISS totals showed significant differences in mortality depending on the triplet source. One of the most striking was ISS 25 (triplet 5,0,0), with a mortality of 20.6%, as compared with 0% for triplet 4,3,0 (p = 0.005). The other statistically significant mortality differences for ISS totals were ISS 27-28.6% (5,1,1) versus 7.4% (3,3,3) (p = 0.05); ISS 29-30.3% (5,2,0) versus 4.6% (4,3,2) (p = 0.002); ISS 33-50% (4,4,1) versus 6.7% (5,2,2) (p = 0.034); ISS 34-45.2% (5,3,0) versus 4.3% (4,3,3) (p = 0.0009); and ISS 41-60% (5,4,0) versus 11.1% (4,4,3) (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rates are significantly different between pairs of triplets that generate the same ISS total. Caution must be used in the interpretation of outcomes from ISS values generated by different triplets.

Abbreviated Injury Scale↗
PubMed2004

Guidelines for the management of haemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patients.

BACKGROUND: Haemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patients have a high mortality, and decision-making is crucial. The present article discusses key clinical practice guidelines and options in the early management of these challenging patients. METHODS: A multidisciplinary consensus committee developed guidelines following standard scientific methodology, comprehensive Medline searches and level of evidence grading. Clinical practice guidelines and options addressed four key questions: (i) how to determine the source of haemorrhage?; (ii) how to control haemorrhage?; (iii) what is the optimal angiography and embolization technique?; and (iv) what is the optimal pelvic stabilization technique? RESULTS: The consensus best evidence recommends that the source of intra-abdominal haemorrhage should be assessed using diagnostic peritoneal aspiration and/or focused abdominal sonography in trauma within 30 min of patient arrival. Immediate laparotomy and concomitant pelvic stabilization control intra-abdominal haemorrhage and venous pelvic haemorrhage, followed by angiography if pelvic arterial bleeding is also present. If intra-abdominal bleeding is absent, non-invasive pelvic stabilization and transfer to angiography within 45 min of arrival is recommended to control venous and arterial pelvic haemorrhage. Optimal embolization is performed with steel coils or Gelfoam (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Peapack, NJ, USA) suspension. The optimal pelvic stabilization technique for rotationally unstable fractures with haemodynamic instability is non-invasive. CONCLUSION: The consensus committee successfully developed best evidence recommendations identifying the issues and providing guidelines and options for this challenging condition.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2003

Reduction of time to definitive care in trauma patients: effectiveness of a new checklist system.

This study evaluated the feasibility of establishing a new trauma transfer checklist and assessed its impact on trauma-related interhospital transfers. A standard envelope with a printed checklist (N.E.W.S.) incorporating four key concepts in the care and transfer of trauma patients was used. A prospective comparison of consecutive interhospital trauma transfers to the major trauma service between July 1999-May 2000 (pre-N.E.W.S.) and August 2000-November 2000 (post-N.E.W.S.) was made. Changes in management satisfaction were assessed by a Likert scale (1=poor to 5=excellent). Pre-N.E.W.S., 88 trauma patients were transferred and 20 trauma transfers were recorded post-N.E.W.S. The time to definitive care pre-N.E.W.S. was 443+/-322 min, and 339+/-108 min (P=0.014) post-N.E.W.S. The time in the referring hospital was also reduced from 343+/-310 min pre-N.E.W.S. to 197+/-90 min post-N.E.W.S (P=0.0002). The checklist system prompted changes in the management of the trauma patient in 20% of the cases and there was a high level of satisfaction expressed by users of the checklist (4.6+/-0.7). The N.E.W.S. checklist is effective in facilitating the interhospital transfer of trauma patients by shortening the time to definitive care.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Clinical examination is an inaccurate predictor of intraabdominal pressure.

This study was designed to establish if clinical examination can accurately predict intraabdominal pressure (IAP). Between August 1998 and March 2000 a prospective blinded observational study of postoperative intensive care unit patients was undertaken at a major trauma center. IAP was measured using an intravesicular technique and compared with clinical evaluation. An IAP of at least 18 mmHg was considered elevated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value (ppv), negative predictive value (npv), kappa score, and reliability analysis were calculated. A total of 110 patients provided 150 estimates of IAP, which was elevated in 21%. The kappa score was 0.37; sensitivity, 60.9%; specificity, 80.5%; ppv, 45.2%; npv, 88.6%. The mean difference in IAP values between intravesicular readings and clinical estimates was -1.0 +/- 4.1. Prediction of IAP using clinical examination is not accurate enough to replace intravesicular IAP measurements.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2002

Vascular injury in Australia.

Vascular injury poses a small but significant challenge in Australian trauma care. Opportunities such as better practice guidelines and minimum standards will allow surgeons to improve delivery of quality care to the next generation of vascular trauma victims. Training in the management of vascular trauma surgery with integration of vascular and general surgery in trauma care should optimize outcomes. The authors' vision is that all vascular and general surgery trainees would eventually undertake the Definitive Surgical Trauma Care Course and improve vascular trauma outcomes and reduce mortality.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Difference in trauma team activation criteria between hospitals within the same region.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to establish the current criteria for trauma team activation (TTA) in hospitals in the Metropolitan Sydney area, and examine the rationale behind their use. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken of the seven hospitals in the Metropolitan Sydney area designated to receive adult major trauma in March 2004. Trauma coordinators in each hospital provided the criteria used for adult TTA within their hospital. RESULTS: All seven hospitals replied with their TTA criteria and completed the survey. The results show a wide variation in those criteria used by hospitals to activate their trauma team. Universally used criteria included penetrating injury to the head, neck or torso, limb amputation, spinal cord injury and systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg. Physiological limits for TTA varied between hospitals, with different limits for pulse rate and GCS used in different hospitals. All hospitals used mechanism of injury criteria alone as an activation prompt. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for TTA differ between hospitals within the same region. The criteria currently used will result in over-triage of trauma patients, but this might be of benefit in training the trauma team in centres that do not see a large volume of trauma patients. There are several advantages in standardization of criteria including optimization of patient care, training, research and audit. Further work is needed to validate existing criteria for use throughout the region.

Adult↗