PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michele Marchese

Publications and source records attributed to Michele Marchese.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Endoluminal fundoplication.

In GERD patients in whom pharmacological therapies are ineffective and anti-reflux surgery is not indicated, a viable option could be proposed. To date, several endoscopic antireflux procedures, involving sewing, injection and/or implant, and radiofrequency are available. The sewing techniques demonstrated good clinical results, with reduction in proton pump inhibitors consumption; despite significant changes in esophageal manometry and/or acid exposure time reduction and healing of esophagitis were noted only in few patients.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed2006

Self-expanding stents in oesophageal cancer.

The main therapeutic concern in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer is palliation of dysphagia. Self-expandable metal stents are widely used because they are safer than conventional plastic stents, offer rapid relief from dysphagia and may seal off tracheo-oesophageal fistulae. Self-expanding metal stents, particularly when uncovered, are, however, associated with the disadvantage of tumour ingrowth. Self-expandable plastic stents are entirely covered and easy to reposition in case of migration and usually induce less inflammatory proliferation at their flanges when compared with metal stents. The major disadvantage of the current version of plastic stents is the large diameter and stiffness of the stent delivery system when compared with metal stents. Therefore, plastic stents are more difficult to place in patients with angulated strictures or with tumours located in the cervical oesophagus near the upper sphincter.

Constriction, Pathologic↗
PubMed2005

Nonresorbable copolymer implantation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized sham-controlled multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This aim was to determine whether endoscopic implantation of a biocompatible nonresorbable copolymer (Enteryx; Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, MA) is a more effective therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than a sham procedure. METHODS: In a randomized, single-blind, prospective, multicenter clinical trial, 64 patients with GERD were enrolled whose symptoms were well controlled by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and rapidly recurred after cessation of PPI therapy. Thirty-two patients were assigned to Enteryx implantation and 32 to a sham procedure consisting of standard upper endoscopy. Patients in both groups with unsatisfactory symptom relief after 3 months were eligible for re-treatment by Enteryx implantation. The primary study end point was > or =50% reduction in PPI use. Secondary end points included > or =50% improvement in GERD score and the proportion of patients not undergoing re-treatment procedure. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The percentage of Enteryx-treated patients achieving a > or =50% reduction in PPI use (81%) was greater than that of the sham group (53%), with a rate ratio of 1.52 (confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.28; P=.023). A higher proportion of the Enteryx (68%) than sham group (41%) ceased PPI use completely (rate ratio, 1.67; CI, 1.03-2.80; P=.033). GERD health-related quality of life heartburn score improvement > or =50% was achieved by 67% of the Enteryx group versus 22% of the sham group (rate ratio, 3.05; CI, 1.55-6.33; P <.001). More Enteryx-treated (81%) than sham-treated (19%) patients did not undergo re-treatment (rate ratio, 4.33; CI, 2.23-9.29; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Enteryx implantation more effectively reduces PPI dependency and alleviates GERD symptoms than a sham procedure.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Staging of esophageal carcinoma: endoscopic ultrasonography.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has gained ground in the staging of esophageal cancer because of its high accuracy in determining depth of tumor invasion (greater than 80%) and lymph node metastases. The accuracy of EUS increases with increasing stage. However within T1 tumors, EUS performance in distinguishing mucosal (T1m) form submucosal invasion (T1sm) is poor. In this context high-frequency ultrasonography probes can play a major role. The advent of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has dramatically changed the impact of EUS on nodal staging, providing cytological confirmation of malignancy from peritumoral and celiac lymph nodes. Especially celiac node metastases, have a major clinical impact on patient management. Widespread use of EUS in the staging of esophageal cancer should be encouraged. However, EUS should not be considered as first line test for evaluation of these patients and should always be performed after negative CT or PET/CT.

Biopsy, Needle↗