PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Michele Patak

Publications and source records attributed to Michele Patak.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Nucleus accumbens lesions decrease sensitivity to rapid changes in the delay to reinforcement.

Both humans and non-humans discount the value of rewards that are delayed or uncertain, and individuals that discount delayed rewards at a relatively high rate are considered impulsive. To investigate the neural mechanisms that mediate delay discounting, the present study examined the effects of excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus accumbens (NAC) on discounting of reward value by delay and probability. Rats were trained on delay (n=24) or probability discounting (n=24) tasks. Following training, excitotoxic lesions of the NAC were made by intracranial injections of 0.5 microl 0.15 M quinolinic acid (n=12) or vehicle (n=12) aimed at the NAC (AP +1.6, ML +/-1.5, DV -7.1). NAC lesions did not alter performance in animals tested with a constant delay (4s) or probability (0.4) of reinforcement. However, when tested with between session changes in the delay (0, 1, 2, 4, and 8s) of reinforcement, the lesioned rats had flatter discount curves than the sham group, indicating that they were less sensitive to frequent changes in the delay to reward. In contrast, the NAC lesions did not affect discounting of probabilistic rewards. NAC lesions impaired the ability to adapt to frequent between session changes in the delay to reward but did not increase or decrease discounting when the delay was held constant across sessions. NAC lesions may disrupt the ability of the animals to predict the timing of delayed rewards when the delay to reward is changed frequently.

Animals↗

Question-based assessments of delay discounting: do respondents spontaneously incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards?

This research was designed to determine if, and to what extent, participants incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards when completing measures of delay discounting, even though uncertainty is not specified in the delay-discounting questions. Twenty-four adolescent participants completed a question-based measure of delay discounting and immediately following answered questions about perceived certainties of receiving the delayed rewards. Results showed that respondents rated the delayed rewards as increasingly uncertain with longer delays. Also, ratings of uncertainty were correlated with rate of delay discounting (r=0.55). These findings suggest participants automatically evaluate delayed rewards as uncertain when using this assessment procedure. The current finding may hold important implications for future addiction research in interpreting why addicted persons often discount more by delay than non-addicted controls, i.e., delay to reward or uncertainty about delayed rewards?

Adolescent↗