Biomedical subjects

Michihiro Yamaguchi

Publications and source records attributed to Michihiro Yamaguchi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Psychophysical evaluation of calibration curve for diagnostic LCD monitor.

PURPOSE: In 1998, Digital Imaging Communications in Medicine (DICOM) proposed a calibration tool, the grayscale standard display function (GSDF), to obtain output consistency of radiographs. To our knowledge, there have been no previous reports of investigating the relation between perceptual linearity and detectability on a calibration curve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine a suitable calibration curve for diagnostic liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors, the GSDF and Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) curves were compared using psychophysical gradient delta and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for clinical images. RESULTS: We succeeded in expressing visually recognized contrast directly using delta instead of the just noticeable difference (JND) index of the DICOM standard. As a result, we found that the visually recognized contrast at low luminance areas on the LCD monitor calibrated by the CIE curve is higher than that calibrated by the GSDF curve. On the ROC analysis, there was no significant difference in tumor detectability between GSDF and CIE curves for clinical thoracic images. However, the area parameter Az of the CIE curve is superior to that of the GSDF curve. The detectability of tumor shadows in the thoracic region on clinical images using the CIE curve was superior to that using the GSDF curve owing to the high absolute value of delta in the low luminance range. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the CIE curve is the most suitable tool for calibrating diagnostic LCD monitors, rather than the GSDF curve.

Calibration↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of gradation characteristics between three typical medical imaging display devices using psychophysical analysis.

Although there are remarkable differences in maximum luminance in cathode ray tube (CRT) and liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and film/viewer systems, these differences cannot be recognized in our perception of them. To clarify the reason for this conflict, we analyzed the psychophysical gradient (delta), which is based on the minimum perceptible luminance difference (DeltaL(min)) and can express contrast visually recognized by observers. In this study, we first confirmed the compatibility of the psychophysical analysis to the CRT and the LCD monitors by using their threshold contrasts (C(t)s). Second, we calculated and compared the delta's of the above output devices. The C(t)s values of each device were in good agreement. Moreover, the Moon & Spencer model, which expressed the perceptibility of luminance change, was well suited to the measured C(t)s over the whole luminance range. The psychophysical analysis is therefore available not only for the film/viewer system, but also for the CRT and LCD systems. The difference of physical gradient G of the luminance characteristics curve among the output devices was larger than 20 times, whereas that of d was within 3 times. The display devices listed in the order of decreasing delta were film/viewer>LCD>CRT. These results corresponded to the visual contrast sensation and our clinical experience, which cannot recognize remarkable differences in perception. By using the psychophysical analysis, we clarified the reason for the conflict between the results of physical evaluation and the contrast visually recognized by observers.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed2005

Verification imaging using a computed radiography system for high-energy electron beam therapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine a method to more conveniently acquire verification images. A computed radiography (CR) system was employed using a photostimulable phosphor plate and diagnostic cassette used for taking diagnostic X-ray photographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Verification images were acquired using the diagnostic cassette and therapy cassette. Image processing parameters were adjusted to improve the image quality. Verification images were printed using optimum parameters, and 10 radiation technicians visually evaluated the images. The sign test was used, and image quality was evaluated using a two-sided test at a 5% level of significance. To assess its clinical value, a radiation oncologist evaluated patient verification images. RESULTS: Verification image quality was improved by the adjustment of image processing parameters. As a result of the image quality evaluation, there were no significant differences between the two types of cassette (p>0.05). In most of the clinical cases (98%), the verification images were useful. CONCLUSION: We found that good quality verification images were acquired by a CR system with a diagnostic cassette. This system is suitable for practical use to acquire daily verification images, and it is considered useful for maintaining quality assurance (QA) in high-energy electron beam therapy.

Humans↗