PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Miguel Blanquer

Publications and source records attributed to Miguel Blanquer.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Glycocalyx-edited mesenchymal stem/stromal cell therapy in advanced osteoporosis.

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are osteoregenerative; however, their therapeutic efficacy for skeletal conditions is hampered by poor bone-homing ("osteotropism"). In preclinical models, this deficit is correctable by MSC glycocalyx editing to enforce sialylated Lewis X (sLeX) expression, thereby programming osteotropism. We conducted a first-in-human clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02566655) involving a single intravenous infusion of glycocalyx-edited autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs in ten women with advanced-stage osteoporosis. The protocol-mandated evaluation spanned 2 years and included clinical assessments, radiographic studies, and measurements of bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone tissue area (BTA), and bone mineral density (BMD). Thereafter, fracture and safety monitoring continued for >3 additional years for each patient. No serious adverse events occurred. Fragility fractures were markedly and durably reduced, amidst increased osteoanabolic BTM levels, BTA, and volumetric BMD. These findings indicate that glycocalyx editing effectuates MSC-based osteoporosis therapy and also refute notions that MSCs derived from older persons and/or diseased-tissue sites are biologically compromised.

E-selectin ligand

Phase IIB, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Intravenous Defibrotide for the Prevention and Treatment of Respiratory Distress and Cytokine Release Syndrome in COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Endothelial dysfunction is key in COVID-19 pathogenesis. This randomized, double-blind phase IIb trial investigated continuous intravenous infusion of defibrotide in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection and respiratory failure. METHODS: One-hundred and fifty patients were randomized (2:1) to defibrotide or placebo, stratified by disease severity (WHO COVID-19 severity scale 4/5 vs. 6). The primary endpoint was clinical improvement time (days from first improvement through Day 30). RESULTS: Median clinical improvement time was not significantly different with defibrotide versus placebo (15.0 [IQR: 0-24] vs. 20.0 [IQR: 9-25] days; p = 0.10). Day-30 (23.0% vs. 22.0%) and Day-60 (26.0% vs. 22.0%) mortality, reduction in mean fraction of inspired oxygen during treatment, and median duration of hospitalization did not differ with defibrotide versus placebo. Defibrotide demonstrated favorable safety, with no differences versus placebo in serious adverse events (34.0% vs. 36.0%), hypotension (16.0% vs. 12.0%), or hemorrhage (13.0% vs. 8.0%). Exploratory pre-specified biomarker analyses showed greater early d-dimer reduction and lymphocyte recovery with defibrotide, although these results require validation. CONCLUSION: Continuous intravenous infusion of defibrotide was safe but did not improve clinical outcomes in severe COVID-19. Further analyses will explore mechanistic actions and pharmacokinetics of defibrotide and the pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT identifier: 2020-001409-21. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04348383.

Adult