Mihai Pop | PubMed Health

PubMed2025

Challenges and Opportunities in Analyzing Cancer-Associated Microbiomes.

The study of cancer-associated microbiomes has gained significant attention in recent years, spurred by advances in high-throughput sequencing and metagenomic analysis. Microbiome research holds promise for identifying noninvasive biomarkers and possibly new paradigms for cancer treatment. In this review, we explore the key computational challenges and opportunities in analyzing cancer-associated microbiomes (in tumor/normal tissues and other body sites, e.g., gut, oral, and skin), focusing on sequencing-driven strategies and associated considerations for taxonomic and functional characterization. The discussion covers the strengths and limitations of current analysis tools for identifying contamination, determining compositional bias, and resolving species and strains, as well as the statistical, metabolic, and network inferences that are essential to uncover host-microbiome interactions. Several key considerations are required to guide the choice of databases used for metagenomic analysis in such studies. Recent advances in spatial and single-cell technologies have provided insights into cancer-associated microbiomes, and Artificial Intelligence-driven protein function prediction might enable rapid advances in this field. Finally, we provide a perspective on how the field can evolve to manage the ever-growing size of datasets and generate robust and testable hypotheses. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .

Humans↗

PubMed2025

TIPP3 and TIPP3-fast: Improved abundance profiling in metagenomics.

We present TIPP3 and TIPP3-fast, new tools for abundance profiling in metagenomic datasets. Like its predecessor, TIPP2, the TIPP3 pipeline uses a maximum likelihood approach to place reads into labeled taxonomies using marker genes, but it achieves superior accuracy to TIPP2 by enabling the use of much larger taxonomies through improved algorithmic techniques. We show that TIPP3 is generally more accurate than leading methods for abundance profiling in two important contexts: when reads come from genomes not already in a public database (i.e., novel genomes) and when reads contain sequencing errors. We also show that TIPP3-fast has slightly lower accuracy than TIPP3, but is also generally more accurate than other leading methods and uses a small fraction of TIPP3's runtime. Additionally, we highlight the potential benefits of restricting abundance profiling methods to those reads that map to marker genes (i.e., using a filtered marker-gene based analysis), which we show typically improves accuracy. TIPP3 is freely available at https://github.com/c5shen/TIPP3.

Metagenomics↗