Biomedical subjects

Milton Borrelli

Publications and source records attributed to Milton Borrelli.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Hand-assisted bilateral nephrectomy in a patient with adult polycystic kidney disease.

CONTEXT: Dominantly autosomal polycystic disease is characterized by multiple bilateral and non-functional cysts, which lead to progressive kidney failure. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to report on a case of hand-assisted bilateral nephrectomy in a 28-year-old female patient with adult polycystic disease and recurring pyelonephritis in a kidney transplant program. CASE REPORT: A hand-assisted bilateral nephrectomy was performed through a supra-umbilical median incision of approximately 6 cm, and with 3 ports of 10 mm. The length of the surgery was 3 hours and 15 minutes. The kidneys were removed after the aspiration of some cysts through the supra-umbilical incision. Pain control was achieved via the use of analgesics. The blood loss during surgery was 160 ml. During the postoperative period, the patient developed right-side pneumothorax, which was drained with no further occurrence. This drain was kept in place for 48 hours. The length of hospitalization was 4 days.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Ureterolithotripsy in the management of calcified double-J catheter.

OBJECTIVE: The authors present their experience in the management of a rare complication observed during long-term use of a ureteral catheter. The calcification along the entire surface of the catheter followed by incrustation can make its removal by means of cystoscopy difficult, thus becoming a great challenge to the urologist. METHODS: The authors describe their experience in the management of this complication through the analysis of two illustrative cases. RESULTS: After failing to remove the catheter using extracorporeal lithotripsy, ureterolithotripsy was performed and the calcified ureteral catheter was successfully removed in both cases. CONCLUSION: Ureterolithotripsy proved to be an effective and safe method in the management of calcified double-J catheter.

Calcinosis↗

PubMed2002

Preliminary experience with ureteral intussusception in exclusive retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy: a simple and safe option for the resection of the distal ureter and bladder cuff.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a surgical option in the resection of the distal third of the ureter and bladder cuff. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Three nephroureterectomies were performed by the extraperitoneal access. The first was performed in a patient with vesicoureteral reflux, recurrent urinary infection and chronic renal failure; and two nephroureterectomies were performed for the treatment of upper urinary tract transitional cell cancer. RESULTS: Nephrectomy, according to the technique described by Gill, and treatment of the distal ureter were done based on the principles of open surgery, with exposure of the kidney by enlargement of one of the portals, sectioning the ureter, insertion of a catheter in the ureter antegradely of and eversion of the ureter endoscopically, followed by the removal of the bladder cuff. CONCLUSION: Among the techniques utilized for this procedure, we believe that the technique described herein presents some advantages because it does not require an incision for the removal of the distal ureter, it is easy to perform and provides more comfort to the patient after the surgery. Furthermore, only materials used by the urologist in routine practice are required and there is no contamination of the surgical space by neoplastic cells.

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Videoendoscopic surgery by extraperitoneal access: technical aspects and indication.

Laparoscopic surgery in urology is definitely incorporated to the techniques of minimally invasive treatment for urogenital diseases. Though the classic access to organs in the urinary tract is extraperitoneal, this access has not been prioritized when the videoendoscopic technique is used. In Brazil, few groups use this approach and little has been discussed about its true practical applicability. The authors intended to discuss the main technical aspects and criteria for indication, reported though the improvement achieved in a 5-year period with 150 operated cases. A review of the literature shows that the worldly acceptance of the extraperitoneal endoscopic approach is increasing. Nevertheless, there are no evidences that the extraperitoneal access is superior to the transperitoneal route. Thus, the choice depends basically on the surgeon's preference. Major advantages are the immediate access to the renal hilum and isolation of peritoneal structures. Employing this access is useful when one suspects that significant peritoneal adherences could prevent the surgical act or when one wishes to preserve the integrity of the peritoneal cavity.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic Burch surgery: is there any advantage in relation to open approach?

INTRODUCTION: Surgery represents the main therapeutic modality for stress urinary incontinence. In incontinent patients with urethral hypermobility, the retropubic colposuspension by Burch technique is one of the surgeries that present better long-term results. Current trends towards performing minimally invasive techniques led proposing the Burch surgery through videolaparoscopy. The laparoscopic technique's long-term efficacy is a highly controversial issue. However, even if late results turn out to be satisfactory, the assumed advantages of laparoscopy (faster recovery, less pain, early return to daily activities, etc.) must be evident, in order to justify the use of this minimally invasive surgical access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our records and analyzed the medical charts of 26 female patients who underwent Burch surgery by open approach and 36 female patients by laparoscopic approach, between May 1999 and February 2001. The satisfaction level, surgical complication rates, surgery length, hospital stay and return to daily activities were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean age was 42 years, ranging from 27 to 68 years. Epidemiological data from both groups were not statistically different. Patients operated by laparoscopic route had a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.002) and a faster return to their daily activities (p < 0.001). However, there were no statistical differences in the following parameters: surgical time (p = 0.11), surgical complications (p = 0.98), patient satisfaction immediately (p = 0.77) and 90 days following surgery (p = 0.84), surgery acceptance (p = 0.85), indication of this surgery to a friend (p = 0.93) and score given to the procedure (p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Even if the efficacy of both methods is similar, we did not observe significant advantages of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery, concerning the recovery in recent post-operative period.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing three different ways of anesthesia in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

PURPOSE: To make an objective controlled comparison of pain tolerance in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy using intrarectal topic anesthesia, injectable periprostatic anesthesia, or low-dose intravenous sedation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients were randomized into 4 groups: group I, intrarectal application of 2% lidocaine gel; group II, periprostatic anesthesia; group III, intravenous injection of midazolam and meperidine; and group IV, control, patients to whom no sedation or analgesic was given. Pain was evaluated using an analogue pain scale graded from 0 to 5. Acceptance of a repetition biopsy, the side effects of the drugs and complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: 18/20 (90%) and 6/20 (30%) patients reported strong or unbearable pain in the group submitted to conventional biopsy and topical anesthesia (p = 0.23, chi-square = 1.41); whereas those submitted to periprostatic blockade and sedation, severe pain occurred in only 2/60 (3%) patients (p < 0.001, chi-square = 40.19) and 3/60 (5%) patients (p < 0.001, chi-square = 33.34). Acceptance of repetition of the biopsy was present in only 45% of the patients submitted to conventional biopsy, 60% of those that were given topical anesthesia (p = 0.52, chi-square = 0.4), compared to 100% of those submitted to periprostatic anesthesia (p < 0.01, chi-square = 15.17), and 95% of those who were sedated (p < 0.001, chi-square = 25.97%). CONCLUSIONS: Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy is an uncomfortable experience; however application of periprostatic blockade and intravenous analgesia are associated to higher tolerance of the exam and patient comfort. Low dose sedation by association of intravenous meperidine and midazolam is an emerging and safe outpatient option.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗