PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Miquel Taron

Publications and source records attributed to Miquel Taron.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

The promise of pharmacogenomics: gemcitabine and pemetrexed.

Although no overall differences in survival have been observed between the many chemotherapy combinations in non-small-cell lung cancer, the clinical application of mRNA expression levels of amplified genes may disclose many genetic influences on cytotoxic drug sensitivity and enable clinicians to tailor chemotherapy according to each individual's gene profile. Specifically, the assessment of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 and thymidylate synthase mRNA expression levels might select patients who benefit from gemcitabine (Gemzar) or pemetrexed (Alimta) combinations. Until recently, clinical prognostic factors such as performance status, weight loss, and lactate dehydrogenase were the only parameters used to predict chemotherapy response and survival. However, accumulated data indicate that overexpression of genes involved in cancer glycolysis pathways plays an important role, and might be an independent mechanism of chemoresistance. The dysregulation of glycolytic genes is affected by growth signals involving the PI3K/Akt pathway and downstream genes such as hypoxia-inducible factor-1-alpha. One can thus envision that substantial improvements in therapeutic outcome could benefit from the integration of tailored ribonucleotide reductase-dependent chemotherapy, ribonucleotide reductase antisense therapy, and targeted therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

Transcripts in pretreatment biopsies from a three-arm randomized trial in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Non-small-cell lung cancer patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis show marginal response to chemotherapy in terms of tumor shrinkage, time to progression and median survival. The identification and implementation of predictive genetic markers of response-specific cytotoxic drugs is a priority of current research and future trials. In this study, we have used quantitative PCR to analyse expression of beta-tubulin III, stathmin, RRM1, COX-2 and GSTP1 in mRNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies of 75 nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients treated as part of a large randomized trial. In total, 22 patients were treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin, 25 with vinorelbine/cisplatin and 28 with paclitaxel/carboplatin. There were no differences in clinical characteristics and transcript levels in the pretreatment biopsies according to treatment arm. Patients with low beta-tubulin III levels had better response in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm (P=0.05), and those with low RRM1 levels showed a tendency to better response in the gemcitabine/cisplatin arm. Time to progression was influenced by beta-tubulin III (P=0.03) and stathmin (P=0.05) levels in the vinorelbine/cisplatin arm, and there was a tendency toward correlation between beta-tubulin III levels and time to progression in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm. RRM1 levels influenced time to progression (P=0.05) and even more so, survival (P=0.0028) in the gemcitabine/cisplatin arm. The predictive value of beta-tubulin III, stathmin and RRM1 should be tested in prospective customized chemotherapy trials, the results of which will help tailor chemotherapy to improve patient survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Methylation patterns and K-ras mutations in tumor and paired serum of resected non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Gene methylation and K-ras mutations were examined in tumor and paired serum DNA of 50 resected non-small-cell lung cancer patients. RASSF1A, death associated protein kinase and target of methylation-induced silencing were methylated in 17/50 (34%), 23/50 (45%) and 18/50 (35%) tumors, respectively, and in 17/50 (34%), 20/50 (40%) and 17/50 (34%) sera, respectively. Methylation in tumor and serum were closely correlated (P=0.001), but no correlation was found with survival. Twelve K-ras mutations (cysteine) were found in serum and nine mutations were found in tumor (five cysteine, one alanine, one aspartic, one arginine, and one valine). K-ras mutations in serum correlated significantly with survival (P=0.01).

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Targeted therapy in combination with gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer.

Gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) and cisplatin are commonly used in the treatment of many solid tumors, although the impact of chemotherapy is limited in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. However, in clinical practice, there is a minority of patients who can attain long-term survival. Upregulation of mRNA transcripts has been linked to chemoresistance, and in some instances, mRNA expression has been correlated with polymorphisms. Cisplatin resistance is directly linked to the nucleotide excision repair system, specifically to the transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair pathway that involves genes that are deficient in rare inborn disorders such as Cockayne syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum. Overexpression of ERCC1 correlates with poor survival in gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients. At the preclinical level, ERCC1 and XPD mRNA expression correlate with each other, and overexpression of XPD causes selective cisplatin resistance in human tumor cell lines. XPD polymorphisms have been associated with lower DNA repair capacity. In our experience, time to progression is significantly higher in gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients with the Lys751Gln genotype (9.6 months) than in those with the Lys751Lys genotype (4.2 months; P =.03). Other polymorphisms involved in parallel DNA repair systems may well provide the same information, indicating a high degree of biologic redundancy. The overexpression of the subunit M1 of ribonucleotide reductase (RRM1) has been linked to gemcitabine resistance in our retrospective assessment. Preliminary findings that a subset of gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients with low ERCC1 and RRM1 mRNA levels show a significantly longer survival and highlight the possibilities of individually tailored chemotherapy.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2003

Genetic testing for chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin or carboplatin is commonly used with gemcitabine, docetaxel, paclitaxel, or vinorelbine as chemotherapy doublets in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several randomized trials have failed to identify major differences in survival between any of these doublets. This lack of evidence for improvement in survival with any chemotherapy regimen has created a tabula rasa where no more large randomized trials should be conducted without including a genetic analysis. Patients see survival as their major concern, and other considerations, such as cost and quality of life, are relegated to lower positions. Genetic alterations related to the transcription-coupled repair pathway of the nucleotide excision repair system (TC-NER) have revealed the subset of patients who are resistant to cisplatin. TC-NER involves genes that are deficient in rare inborn disorders such as Cockayne syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum. For a long time, ERCC1 mRNA levels have been known to correlate with DNA repair capacity in various tissues. Levels of DNA cisplatin adducts in peripheral blood and buccal mucosa cells predict chemotherapy response, and high ERCC1 mRNA levels have been related to chemoresistance in ovarian cancer and in malignant lymphocytes from chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Moreover, in some instances, mRNA expression has been correlated with polymorphisms. Overexpression of ERCC1 correlates with poor survival in gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated NSCLC patients. An ongoing customized ERCC1-based chemotherapy trial has been designed based on this knowledge. Patients are randomized to the control arm of cisplatin/docetaxel or to the experimental arm, where docetaxel is combined with cisplatin or gemcitabine according to ERCC1 levels. To date, 86 patients have been included.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

Influence of genetic markers on survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin or carboplatin is commonly used with gemcitabine, docetaxel, paclitaxel or vinorelbine as chemotherapy doublets in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Several randomized trials have failed to identify major differences in survival between any of these doublets. This lack of evidence for improvement in survival with any chemotherapy regimen has created a tabula rasa in which no more large randomized trials should be conducted with out including a genetic analysis. Patients see survival as their major concern, and other considerations, such as cost of treatment and qualify of life, are relegated to lower positions. Genetic alterations related to the transcription-coupled repair pathway of the nucleotide excision repair system (TC-NER) have revealed the subset of patients who are resistant to cisplatin. TC-NER involves genes that are deficient in rare inborn disorders such as Cockayne syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum. For a long time, ERCC1 mRNA levels have been known to correlate with DNA repair capacity in various tissues. Levels of DNA cisplatin adducts in peripheral blood and buccal mucosa cells predict chemotherapy response, and high ERCC1 mRNA levels have been related to chemoresistance in ovarian cancer and in malignant lymphocytes from chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Moreover , in some instances, mRNA expression has been correlated with polymorphisms. Overexpression of ERCC1 correlates with poor survival gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients. An ongoing customized ERCC1-based chemotherapy trial has been established on this knowledge. Patients are randomized to the control arm of cisplatin/docetaxel is combined with cisplatin or gemcitabine according to ERCC1 levels. To date, 80 patients have been included. At the preclinical level, ERCC1 and XPD mRNA expression correlate with each other, and overexpression of XPD causes selective cisplatin resistance in human tumor cell lines. Some XPD polymorphisms have been associated with lower DNA repair capacity. In our experience, time to disease progression is significantly higher in gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients with the Lys751Gln genotype (9.6 months) than in those with the Lys751Lys genotype (4.2 months; p = 0.03). Other polymorphisms involved in parallel DNA repair systems may well provide the same information, indicating a high degree of biological redundancy. The overexpression of the subunit M1 of ribonucleotide reductase (RRM1) has been linked to gemcitabine resistance in our retrospective assessment. Preliminary findings indicate that a subset of gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients with low ERCC1 and RRM1 mRNA levels show a significantly longer survival. This highlights the possibilities of individually tailored chemotherapy. However, in patients treated with cisplatin/vinorelbine, the opposite effect has been observed. Patients with Lys751Lys had a longer time to progression. When docetaxel was added to gemcitabine/cisplatin, patients with Lys751Lys also had better survival. Our findings indicate that TC-NER status can help to decide between cisplatin/gemcitabine and docetaxel/ cisplatin. TC-NER-dependent activity is similar to other anticancer agents that cause DNA-binding enzymes to kill cells (topoisomerase inhibitors). At least 50% of non-small cell lung cancer patients harbor Lys751Lys and can benefit from docetaxel/ cisplatin treatment. Genes involved in spindle formation, centrosome functions and mRNA transport along the microtubule tracks should provide further information on potential markers of docetaxel resistance.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2003

O6-methyl-guanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation in serum and tumor DNA predicts response to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea but not to temozolamide plus cisplatin in glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: In glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the cytotoxic effect of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and temozolamide is dependent on O(6) alkylation, which correlates inversely with expression of the DNA repair enzyme O(6)-methyl-guanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Thus, MGMT assessment can be useful in predicting response in GBM, but the scarcity of neoplastic cells limits the practicality of MGMT assessment in these tumors. Although GBM grows within the skull, we investigated the concordance of methylation in glioma tissue, and paired serum DNA and the potential correlation with response and time to progression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using MSP assay, we assessed the methylation of MGMT, p16, DAPK, and RASSF1A in tumor and serum DNA from 28 GBM patients treated with BCNU or with temozolamide plus cisplatin. RESULTS: The concordance between methylation in tumor and serum was highly significant. Overall, response plus stable disease was noted in 10 of 11 (90.9%) patients with MGMT methylation and in 5 of 14 (35.7%) patients without (P = 0.01). In the 16 patients treated with temozolamide plus cisplatin, no significant correlation between MGMT methylation status and response was observed, whereas in BCNU-treated patients, a significant difference was observed in favor of those with methylated MGMT. Time to progression was 29.9 weeks in 12 patients with MGMT methylation and 15.7 weeks in 10 patients without (P = 0.006). No correlation was observed between response or time to progression and p16, DAPK, or RASSF1A methylation. CONCLUSIONS: Methylated MGMT, p16, DAPK, and RASSF1A were found in serum DNA of GBM patients, with a good correlation between serum and primary tumor tissue. Serum MGMT methylation predicted response and time to progression in BCNU-treated GBM patients. The methylation-specific PCR assay in serum DNA could be a good predictive tool for selecting GBM patients to be treated with BCNU or alternatively with the combination of temozolamide plus cisplatin.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

DNA repair and cisplatin resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer.

The results of cisplatin-based chemotherapy seem to have reached a plateau, and empirical approaches are targeting the inclusion of novel biological agents with different mechanisms of action, but their clinical benefit is still unknown. In preparing this review of cisplatin resistance, we posed two questions: Who are we writing for and why? We believe that medical oncologists should be involved in the reality of the growing list of genetic mechanisms of cancer and chemoresistance. Only by becoming familiar with these mechanisms will we be able to circumvent them. In this review, we provide some insight into DNA repair defects involved in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cisplatin effect. Some DNA repair genes, like ERCC1, have been shown to be crucial in predicting cisplatin resistance and can be used for tailoring cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Determinants of response and resistance to cytotoxics.

There is an underlying feeling in the oncology community that chemotherapy has reached a therapeutic "glass ceiling" in non-small cell lung cancer, and that we will never attain the acceptable survival rates that are just beyond our reach. Multiple clinical trials have tested doublets, triplets, and sequential chemotherapy in what is often regarded as a futile attempt to break through this ceiling. Recent large randomized trials have not shown that any of these combinations is superior to any of the others. Nevertheless, the analysis of DNA and RNA from patients' serum can permit us to assess genes that may be specific targets of certain cytotoxic agents and others that may be markers of multidrug resistance. With this information, we will hopefully be able to create guidelines for individualized chemotherapy. With this in mind, the Spanish Lung Cancer Group has designed a trial to test the involvement of various genes in resistance to gemcitabine and cisplatin. With the gene corral that will emerge from this trial, we will create an up-front diagnostic test for selecting the most appropriate gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2002

Translational oncogenomics: toward rational therapeutic decision-making.

The wealth of data in basic science and translational research may often represent a conundrum for clinical oncologists, who need to selectively consider this abundant information and translate it into therapeutic decisions. For the sake of simplicity, we have classified the multiplicity of genetic abnormalities in five repertoires that are rapidly assessable and useful for stratification in clinical trials: allelic imbalance, aberrant promoter methylation, gene mRNA overexpression, microtubule alterations, and polymorphisms. Allelic imbalance refers to chromosomal instability, which is a major feature of cancer, and innovative techniques used in colorectal cancer should also be implemented in lung cancer. Epigenetic changes (variations in transcription levels) have been extensively studied in non-small cell lung cancer. Methylation techniques have shown that these epigenetic changes commonly occur at the same frequency in numerous genes, both well-known ( FHIT, APC, p16 ) and recently discovered ( TMS1, RASSF1 ) in non-small cell lung cancer and in breast cancer. Innovative techniques like quantitative polymerase chain reaction can determine gene expression profiles, mainly overexpression of mRNAs, which may be related to resistance to specific cytotoxic drugs. In the near future, we hope these profiles can be used to individualize chemotherapy. Multiple microtubule alterations related to overexpression of different genes can also be used to predict response to taxanes and Vinca alkaloids. Finally, the assessment of polymorphisms could enable us to understand their functional consequences in chemotherapy response.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2002

Pharmacogenomic strategies for developing customized chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

In this review, we deal with six groups of cytotoxic drugs commonly used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although there are many reviews of thymidylate synthase (TS) and antifolate inhibitors, in this article, we have tried to highlight aspects that are more important for medical oncologists to consider when treating NSCLC patients. There is compelling evidence that TS gene transcripts and TS polymorphisms could be used to decide which patients can best benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy approaches, especially in colorectal cancer, and not less importantly, to tailor chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC when using drugs akin to fluorouracil, such as pemetrexed. Secondly, cisplatin is central to chemotherapy combinations and evidence indicates that DNA repair capacity influences response to cisplatin-based regimens. ERCC1 gene transcript stands out as a predictive marker of cisplatin sensitivity. Thirdly, preliminary studies indicate that upregulation of beta-tubulin III correlates with response to paclitaxel and vinorelbine. Fourthly, overexpression of ribonucleotide reductase can influence response to gemcitabine. Fifthly, we describe mechanisms of resistance to topoisomerase I inhibitors, although this subject has not yet been completely elucidated. Finally, to understand the mechanisms of resistance to EGF-R inhibitors, which have been shown to be useful in many different types of cancer, the Src-STAT signaling pathways are described here in detail. Hopefully, the assessment of Src and of STAT-3 can be implemented as predictive markers.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Quantification in the serum of the catalytic fraction of reverse telomerase: a useful prognostic factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The purpose of this analysis was to study the association between the quantity of free circulating DNA and clinical variables in 99 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC). The quantification in the serum of the gene of the catalytic fraction of telomerase (hTERT) by RT-PCR was used as a reference of the total amount of free DNA in blood. Patients were treated with cisplatin and docetaxel. The median hTERT level for patients in stage IIIB was 70.7 ng/ml vs. 53.1 ng/ml in patients in stage IV (p= 0.35). There was no association between hTERT values and therapy response, 53.9 ng/ml in the complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) group vs. 54.1 ng/ml in the stable disease (SD) + progressive disease (PD) group (p=0.23). In the multivariate analysis, hTERT was an independent predictive variable for time to progression (TTP) Hazard ratio (HR) 2.0, CI 95% 1.2-3.4, p=0.009) and overall survival (OS) (HR 2.4 CI 95% 1.3-4.3, p=0.004). The analysis of TTP and OS with a cut-off of hTERT at 40 ng/ml revealed that patients about this level had statistically poorer TTP (4 vs. 7 months, p= 0.009) and OS (5 vs. 15 months, p<0.0001). In conclusion, in advanced NSCLC, high serum hTERT levels may be a poor prognostic indicator for TTP and OS.

Adult↗