Biomedical subjects

Mirjam Hönn

Publications and source records attributed to Mirjam Hönn.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of physiological growth pattern and anterior tooth inclination on the outcome in Class II patients treated with removable orthodontic plates and functional orthodontic appliances. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After recruiting 50 patients with an upper anterior proclination of 1-SN >or= 107 degrees for this retrospective study, another 50 patients with a retroclination of 1-SN <or= 95 degrees were also included. All patients initially presented a skeletal Class II relationship with a distoclusion of at least one premolar width in the region of the first molars. All patients were evaluated separately by gender and additionally subdivided into three subgroups with a horizontal, neutral, or vertical craniofacial configuration. Treatment with removable orthodontic plates (pretreatment) and functional orthodontic appliances was initiated in mixed dentition. Pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms were evaluated for each patient. RESULTS: Dento-alveolar analysis showed that the inclination of the upper incisors changed in the direction of the clinical standard value independent of the craniofacial configuration, although full correction using removable orthodontic plates and functional orthodontic appliances was not always achieved. Similarly good treatment outcomes were achieved with regard to overjet and overbite. The lower incisors of all patients were in proclination after treatment. The ANB angle was reduced in both groups. Nevertheless, on average a skeletal Class II persisted in the Class II, Division 2 patients, while Class II, Division 1 patients with horizontal craniofacial configurations attained skeletal Class I. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of Class II patients with removable appliances resulted in differences depending on anterior tooth inclination (Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2) and craniofacial configuration. These differences must be taken into account during treatment planning. Complete treatment success with regard to sagittal jaw balance is very difficult to achieve with removable orthodontic plates (pre-treatment) and functional orthodontic appliances alone in Class II, Division 1 cases with a vertical craniofacial configuration and generally in Class II, Division 2 cases. A particularly favorable constellation for removable treatment is a Class II, Division 1 situation with a horizontal craniofacial configuration and retroclined or orthognathic mandibular anteriors.

Bone Development↗

PubMed2006

A premolar extraction case using the Invisalign system.

INTRODUCTION: Invisalign therapy is an orthodontic treatment method using removable transparent polyurethane splints. Its applicability in extraction cases is limited. This case report documents the treatment with Invisalign of a patient in whom four premolars had to be extracted due to dental crowding. FINDINGS AND DIAGNOSIS: The patient's primary objective was to undergo treatment to resolve her anterior crowding as esthetically inconspicuously as possible. Diagnostic findings were: constriction of the maxillary and mandibular arch with anterior dental crowding; proclination and anteposition of the anteriors; neutroclusion with an overjet of 6 mm and an overbite of 1 mm. The radiographs showed a mesial tilt of the lower canines and premolars and a mild skeletal Class II relationship with a vertical craniofacial configuration. TREATMENT PROGRESS AND RESULTS: Treatment was initiated by extracting the four first premolars and placing the attachments (Tetric Ceram composite). After the Invisalign aligners had been worn, the anterior segment was uprighted and retracted, the crowding resolved, and the arches well-aligned. The patient's neutroclusion was maintained, physiological anterior relations in the sagittal and vertical planes were achieved, and the lower canines and premolars were uprighted. Active treatment lasted 1 year and 8 1/2 months and involved 43 maxillary and 28 mandibular aligners. CONCLUSION: Particularly in cases with an extended indication for this new treatment modality, due consideration must be given to the importance of comprehensive and meticulous diagnostics and treatment planning, and a solid grasp of the biological and mechanical fundamentals.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to answer the following questions: Are profiles of Class I patients perceived as more attractive than profiles of Class II or Class III patients in Germany today? How pronounced must a skeletal malocclusion be to be perceived as less attractive? Are there differences in perception between dentists and laypersons? MATERIAL AND METHOD: For the present study we examined seven patients with skeletal Class I, orthognathic maxillae and mandibles, and straight average faces (ideal biometric face as defined by A. M. Schwarz). Using the Onyx Ceph software, their profile lines were modified to reflect three different Class II profile variants and three different Class III profile variants. The 49 profiles thus obtained were assigned to two groups. Group 1 comprised the seven straight average faces and the first part of the retrognathic and prognathic profile variants. Group 2 comprised the same seven straight average faces and the remaining retrognathic and prognathic profile variants. Both groups of faces were scored by 130 laypersons and 126 dentists. RESULTS: Both groups of observers perceived the seven straight average faces similarly both in the first and second (subsequent) scoring rounds. The straight average face was perceived as most attractive by laypersons (mean, 5.48; 95% confidence interval (CI:) 5.33-5.60) and dentists (mean, 5.44; 95% CI, 5.28-5.50) alike, followed by the mildest variant of the retrognathic face (laypersons, mean, 4.85; 95% CI, 4.68-5.01; dentists, mean, 4.98; 95% CI, 4.81-5.10). Dentists differentiated more clearly by degree of skeletal malocclusion than did laypersons. Both groups alike perceived the extreme variant of the prognathic and retrognathic profile lines as the least attractive. Grouping the subjects by gender yielded only minor differences in perception. CONCLUSION: The straight average face is perceived as most attractive by representative German populations today. Dentists make clearer gradual distinctions in their perceptions than do laypersons.

Adult↗