PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mitsuyo Kinjo

Publications and source records attributed to Mitsuyo Kinjo.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Sedation-free colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: The administration of sedative drugs at colonoscopy has its drawbacks, such as increasing the rate of complications and the cost. There are a number of potential advantages to performing colonoscopy without sedation. The aim of this study is to evaluate patient tolerance and acceptance during sedation-free colonoscopy. METHODS: Pain during sedation-free colonoscopy was evaluated in consecutive series of 675 patients in a prospective manner from January 1, 2003, to February 18, 2004. We recorded the degree of patient pain during colonoscopy, willingness to undergo sedation-free colonoscopy in the future, the complication rate, and the intubation time. The assisting endoscopy nurses and patients independently assessed the pain level immediately after the procedure using a four-point pain scale (nil, mild, moderate, severe). RESULTS: Almost all colonoscopies (99.6 percent: 672/675) were successful. There were four complications related to colonoscopy (bleeding after polypectomy). Patients and nurses rated pain by a four-point pain scale as follows. For the patients: nil, 69.6 percent (470/675); mild, 28.0 percent (189/675); moderate, 2.2 percent (15/675); severe, 0.1 percent (1/675). For the nurses: nil, 76.1 percent (514/675); mild, 22.7 percent (153/675); moderate, 0.9 percent (6/ 675); severe, 0.3 percent (2/675). Patients rarely suffered from severe pain during carefully performed colonoscopies. The pain level of almost all colonoscopies was acceptable by patients, with only six patients (1.0 percent) stating that they would never undergo a colonoscopy without sedation in the future because of unbearable pain. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that carefully performed sedation-free colonoscopy rarely causes complications and is well accepted by most patients. Sedation-free colonoscopy is more cost-effective, may be safer, and should be offered as an alternative to colonoscopy with sedation.

Adolescent↗

Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: Colonoscopy can be painful for patients and difficult for colonoscopists; however, it is hard to predict how painful or difficult the examination will be. This study was designed to identify factors that predict pain and difficulty during sedation-free colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 848 consecutive sedation-free colonoscopies were evaluated in a prospective manner. Factors were recorded, including patient pain, intubation time, demographic data, history of abdominal surgery, bowel preparation status, diverticular disease, bowel habits, anxiety level, and number of previous colonoscopies. These factors were analyzed to determine their association with pain and difficulty. RESULTS: Almost all colonoscopies (845/848; 99.6 percent) were successful. Univariate analyses showed that lower body mass index, younger age, female gender, anxiety level, first time, intubation time, preparation status, previous hysterectomy, and previous gynecologic surgery were predictors of patient pain, and lower body mass index, female gender, anxiety level, preparation status, previous hysterectomy, previous gynecologic surgery, and constipation were predictors of difficulty of intubation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that lower body mass index, younger age, intubation time, preparation status, previous hysterectomy, and antispasmodic agent use were predictors of patient pain, and lower body mass index, female gender, constipation, preparation status, and previous hysterectomy were predictors of difficulty of intubation. CONCLUSIONS: By use of intubation time and patient pain, several patient characteristics were identified that may predict technical difficulty and pain associated with the procedure. These findings have implications for the practice and teaching of colonoscopy.

Adolescent↗

Bone mineral density in subjects using central nervous system-active medications.

PURPOSE: Decreased bone mineral density defines osteoporosis according to the World Health Organization and is an important predictor of future fractures. The use of several types of central nervous system-active drugs, including benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and opioids, have all been associated with increased risk of fracture. However, it is unclear whether such an increase in risk is related to an effect of bone mineral density or to other factors, such as increased risk of falls. We sought to examine the relationship between bone mineral density and the use of benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and opioids in a representative US population-based sample. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data on adults aged 17 years and older from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988-1994). Total femoral bone mineral density of 7114 male and 7532 female participants was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Multivariable linear regression models were used to quantify the relation between central nervous system medication exposure and total femoral bone mineral density. Models controlled for relevant covariates, including age, sex, and body mass index. RESULTS: In linear regression models, significantly reduced bone mineral density was found in subjects taking anticonvulsants (0.92 g/cm2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89 to 0.94) and opioids (0.92 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.88 to 0.95) compared with nonusers (0.95 g/cm2; 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.95) after adjusting for several potential confounders. The other central nervous system-active drugs--benzodiazepines or antidepressants--were not associated with significantly reduced bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: In cross-sectional analysis of NHANES III, anticonvulsants and opioids (but not benzodiazepines or antidepressants) were associated with significantly reduced bone mineral density. These findings have implications for fracture-prevention strategies.

Adolescent↗