PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Miyuki Akutsu

Publications and source records attributed to Miyuki Akutsu.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Cytotoxic effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor FK228 (depsipeptide, formally named FR901228) in combination with conventional anti-leukemia/lymphoma agents against human leukemia/lymphoma cell lines.

FK228 is a novel antitumor depsipeptide that inhibits histone deacetylases and restores the expression of genes aberrantly suppressed in cancer cells. This agent was shown to have broad antitumor activity in preclinical studies, and is currently under phase I/II evaluations. Because of its wide spectrum of actions, it is reasonable to consider the combination with other anticancer drugs in clinical application. We studied the cytotoxic interaction of FK228 in combination with conventional antileukemic agents using human promyelocytic leukemia HL60, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph(+)) chronic myelogenous leukemia KU-812, T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia MOLT3 and Burkitt's lymphoma Raji cell lines. For the combination of FK228 and imatinib, Ph(+) leukemia KU812, K562 and TCC-S cell lines were used. The cells were exposed simultaneously to FK228 and other agents for 4 days. Cell growth inhibition was determined by using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. We used the isobologram method of Steel and Peckham to evaluate the cytotoxic interaction at the concentration of drugs that produced 80% cell growth inhibition (IC(80)). FK228 showed an additive effect with cytarabine, carboplatin, doxorubicin, etoposide, 4-hydroperoxy-cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine and SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) in all cell lines studied. FK228 with methotrexate and vincristine showed an antagonistic effect in three and one of the four cell lines, respectively. FK228 was additive with imatinib in all three Ph(+) leukemia cells. Our findings suggest that FK228 is a promising candidate for combining with most anticancer agents except for methotrexate and vincristine, which produce suboptimal effects.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Schedule-dependent interactions between pemetrexed and cisplatin in human carcinoma cell lines in vitro.

The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin shows good clinical activity against mesothelioma and lung cancer. In order to study the potential cellular basis for this, and provide leads as to how to optimize the combination, we studied the schedule-dependent cytotoxic effects of pemetrexed and cisplatin against four human cancer cell lines in vitro. Tumor cells were incubated with pemetrexed and cisplatin for 24 h at various schedules. The combination effects after 5 days were analyzed by the isobologram method. Both simultaneous exposure to pemetrexed and cisplatin for 24 h and sequential exposure to cisplatin for 24 h followed by pemetrexed for 24 h produced antagonistic effects in human lung cancer A549, breast cancer MCF7, and ovarian cancer PA1 cells and additive effects in colon cancer WiDr cells. Pemetrexed for 24 h followed by cisplatin for 24 h produced synergistic effects in MCF7 cells, additive/synergistic effects in A549 and PA1 cells, and additive effects in WiDr cells. Cell cycle analysis of MCF7 and PA1 cells supported these findings. Our results suggest that the simultaneous clinical administration of pemetrexed and cisplatin may be suboptimal. The optimal schedule of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin at the cellular level is the sequential administration of pemetrexed followed by cisplatin and this schedule is worthy of clinical investigations.

Carcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Schedule-dependent synergism and antagonism between pemetrexed and paclitaxel in human carcinoma cell lines in vitro.

Pemetrexed is a novel multitargeted antifolate with significant clinical activity against a variety of tumors. We studied the schedule-dependent cytotoxic effects of pemetrexed in combination with paclitaxel in vitro to improve our understanding of how this combination might be used clinically. Human lung cancer A549 cells, breast cancer MCF7, ovarian cancer PA1, and colon cancer WiDr cells were exposed to both pemetrexed and paclitaxel in vitro. Cell growth inhibition after 5 days was determined and the effects of drug combinations were analyzed by the isobologram method (Steel and Peckham). Simultaneous exposure to pemetrexed and paclitaxel for 24 h produced antagonistic effects in A549 and PA1 cells, additive/antagonistic effects in MCF7 cells, and additive effects in WiDr cells. Pemetrexed for 24 h followed by paclitaxel for 24 h produced synergistic effects in A549 and MCF7 cells and additive effects in PA1 and WiDr cells, while the reverse sequence produced additive effects in all four cell lines. Cell cycle analysis supported these observations. Our findings suggest that the simultaneous administration of pemetrexed and paclitaxel is suboptimal. The optimal schedule of pemetrexed in combination with paclitaxel is the sequential administration of pemetrexed followed by paclitaxel, and this schedule should be assessed in clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗