PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Moe R Lim

Publications and source records attributed to Moe R Lim.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Characterization of neurophysiologic alerts during anterior cervical spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of neurophysiologic alerts during anterior cervical surgery. OBJECTIVES: To examine incidence and types of neurophysiologic alerts and their correlation with new postoperative neurologic deficits after anterior cervical discectomy or corpectomy procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although multimodality neurophysiologic monitoring has been shown to predict iatrogenic neurologic injuries in scoliosis surgeries, their role in degenerative or trauma-related anterior cervical spine surgery is still unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1,445 patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy or corpectomy and arthrodesis with neurophysiologic monitoring that included transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials (tceMEP), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), and spontaneous electromyography (EMG). Intraoperative alerts were analyzed for type, perceived cause, actions taken to reverse or minimize the possible spinal cord injury, and any new postoperative neurologic deficits. RESULTS: There were 267 (18.4%) procedures that had either minor (spontaneous, sustained EMG) or major (tceMEP/SSEP amplitude reduction) alerts. Patients who underwent corpectomies had 28% increased risk of having a major neurophysiologic alert compared with those who had discectomies. Diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy or trauma increased the risk of having a major neurophysiologic alert 30% and 76%, respectively, compared with cervical radiculopathy. Eight surgeries were aborted due to persistent tceMEP/SSEP amplitude loss, but none resulted in new postoperative neurologic deficits. Two patients had halo-vest applied due to early termination of surgery. One of these patients ultimately could not receive definitive surgical stabilization. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy or trauma and cervical corpectomy procedures increase the risk for having major intraoperative alerts. In case of persistent tceMEP/SSEP amplitude loss, consider delaying potentially harmful interventions, such as premature termination of the procedure or methylprednisolone infusion, until a new neurologic deficit is verified with an awake-clinical examination.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Quantitative prediction of spinal cord drift after cervical laminectomy and arthrodesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of radiographic parameters. OBJECTIVES: To identify preoperative radiographic parameters that may be quantitatively predictive of postoperative spinal cord drift after cervical laminectomy and arthrodesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical laminectomy and arthrodesis can be an effective method to treat anterior compressions of the spinal cord if there is a sufficient posterior spinal cord drift after surgery. Preoperative cervical alignment has shown some correlations to the degree of spinal cord shift, but whether this and other preoperative radiographic parameters can be used to quantitatively predict the amount of spinal cord drift is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative radiographs (radiographs, MRIs, and CT) of patients who had cervical laminectomy and arthrodesis were reviewed retrospectively. Various radiographic parameters, including sagittal alignment, longitudinal distance index, space available for the spinal cord at cephalad or caudad levels, and distance from apex of the lordosis to the C2-C7 vertical line were measured. In the first cohort of patients, these parameters were correlated with mean postoperative spinal cord shift to identify any relationships. In the second cohort of patients, the identified association was used on preoperative imaging studies to attempt quantitative prediction of the postoperative spinal cord shift. RESULTS: Space available for the spinal cord at the level immediately cephalad to the laminectomized segments had high correlations (R = 0.94) to the postoperative spinal cord shift. This association was used to quantitatively predict postoperative spinal cord shift within 11% +/- 6% of the measured value. If 4 mm of mean postoperative spinal cord shift is desired, the ratio to the available space and anterior posterior diameter of the spinal cord should be approximately 2.0. CONCLUSION: Relative stenosis at the level directly cephalad to the laminectomized level can affect the degree of postoperative spinal cord shift. Preoperative axial imaging studies should be closely scrutinized to ensure that adequate space is available at the cephalad adjacent level to allow sufficient cord shift after decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis.

Cervical Vertebrae↗
PubMed2006

Assessment of injury to the posterior ligamentous complex in thoracolumbar spine trauma.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterior ligamentous complex (PLC), consisting of supraspinous ligament (SSL), interspinous ligament (ISL), ligamentum flavum (LF), and the facet joint capsules is thought to contribute significantly to the stability of thoracolumbar spine. Currently, no consensus exists on radiographic imaging parameters that may indicate injury to the posterior ligamentous complex. PURPOSE: To identify imaging parameters that may suggest a disruption of the PLC of the thoracolumbar spine. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A survey analysis of members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. PATIENT SAMPLE: None. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Compilation of survey results. METHODS: An extensive review of the literature from 1949 to the present was performed to identify key radiographic elements that have been suggested as indicators of PLC injury. Twelve items identified as such were placed on a survey and sent to the members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. They were asked to rank the items from most important to least important, and the results were compiled for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight surveys were returned for final analysis. Fifty-percent (14/28) of the members ranked "vertebral body translation" on plain radiographs as the most important factor in determining disruption of PLC. Plain radiographic signs were ranked higher than computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging indicators, and history of the mechanism ranked lowest. The members were also given freedom to add other criteria that they felt were important in determining PLC integrity. "Interspinous spacing 7 mm greater than that of level above or below on antero posterior plain X-rays" was the only new category that was suggested. CONCLUSION: Plain radiographic findings were felt to be most helpful in determining PLC injury by the members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. Physical examination findings and history of the mechanism of injury were ranked lower than imaging studies. Future analysis should focus on indicators of PLC injury when plain radiographic findings are either subtle or not present.

Consensus↗
PubMed2006

Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of 5 spine surgeons rating 71 clinical cases of thoracolumbar spinal injuries using the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS) and then re-rating the cases in a different order 1 month later. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of the TLISS system. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The TLISS is a recently introduced classification system for thoracolumbar spinal column injures designed to simplify injury classification and facilitate treatment decision making. Before being widely adopted, the reliability of the TLISS must be studied. METHODS: A total of 71 cases of thoracolumbar spinal trauma were distributed on CD-ROM to 5 attending spine surgeons, including clinical/radiographic data, details of the TLISS, and a scoring sheet in which cases would be scored using the system. The surgeons were later assigned the task with the cases reordered. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was calculated for TLISS components, total score, and surgeon's treatment decision using the Cohen unweighted kappa coefficients and Spearman rank-order correlation. RESULTS: Interrater reliability assessed by generalized kappa coefficients was 0.33 +/- 0.03 for injury mechanism, 0.91 +/- 0.02 for neurologic status, 0.35 +/- 0.03 for posterior ligamentous complex status, 0.29 +/- 0.02 for TLISS total, and 0.52 +/- 0.03 for treatment recommendation. Respective results using the Spearman correlation were 0.35 +/- 0.04, 0.94 +/- 0.01, 0.48 +/- 0.04, 0.65 +/- 0.03, and 0.51 +/- 0.04. Surgeons agreed with the TLISS recommendation 96.4% of the time. Intrarater kappa coefficients were 0.57 +/- 0.04 for injury mechanism, 0.93 +/- 0.02 for neurologic status, 0.48 +/- 0.04 for posterior ligamentous complex status, 0.46 +/- 0.03 for TLISS total, and 0.62 +/- 0.04 for treatment recommendation. Respective results using the Spearman correlation were 0.70 +/- 0.04, 0.95 +/- 0.02, 0.59 +/- 0.05, 0.77 +/- 0.04, and 0.59 +/- 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: The TLISS has good reliability and compares favorably to other contemporary thoracolumbar fracture classification systems.

Lumbar Vertebrae↗
PubMed2006

Measurement error of lumbar total disc replacement range of motion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) radiographs. OBJECTIVE: To determine the error and variability in measuring TDR radiographic range of motion (ROM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Motion preservation is the driving force behind lumbar TDR technology. In the recent literature, sagittal radiographic TDR ROM as low as 2 degrees has been reported. In these studies, ROM was determined by using the Cobb method to measure TDR sagittal alignment angles in flexion-extension lateral radiographs. However, previous studies in the spinal deformity literature have shown that the Cobb method is very susceptible to measurement error. METHODS: There were 5 observers, including 2 attending orthopedic spine surgeons, 1 spine fellow, 1 fifth-year resident, and 1 fourth-year resident, who measured the ROM of 50 ProDisc II (Synthes Spine Solutions, New York, NY) TDRs on standard flexion-extension lumbar spine radiograph sets. Repeated measurements were made on 2 occasions using the Cobb method. Measurement variability was calculated using 3 statistical methods. RESULTS: The 3 statistical methods resulted in extremely similar values for TDR ROM observer variability. Overall, the intraobserver variability of TDR ROM measurement was +/-4.6 degrees, and interobserver variability was +/-5.2 degrees . CONCLUSIONS: To be 95% certain that an implanted TDR prosthesis has any sagittal motion, a ROM of at least 4.6 degrees must be observed, which is the upper limit of intraobserver measurement variability for a TDR with a true ROM of 0 degrees. To be 95% certain that a change in TDR ROM has occurred between 2 measurements by the same observer, a change in ROM of at least 9.6 degrees must be observed (the entire range of +/-4.6 degrees intraobserver variability). ROM measurement variability should be considered when evaluating the success or failure of motion preservation in lumbar TDR.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

"Normal" prevertebral soft tissue swelling following elective anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Prevertebral soft tissue swelling (PSTS) has been evaluated in the setting of traumatic cervical spine injuries. However, no study to date has quantified the PSTS following elective anterior cervical decompression and fusion or the time course to resolution of that swelling. METHODS: From May 2002 to May 2005 the senior author performed 193 elective 1- or 2-level anterior cervical decompression and fusions. Patients who underwent corpectomies and anterior cervical fusions for trauma or tumor were excluded. Preoperative, 2-week postoperative and 6-week postoperative radiographs were available on 100 patients. The prevertebral soft tissue stripe was measured on the neutral lateral radiographs for the 3 time points. The mean swelling (mm) for each time point was calculated and stratified by cervical level. Repeated measures analysis of variance with the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test was used to compare the measured swelling at the various time points. RESULTS: The average PSTS was calculated for each cervical level, for each of the 3 time points, preoperative, 2- and 6-week postoperative. There was a significant increase in PSTS between the preoperative and 2-week postoperative measurements at all levels. There is a significant decrease in PSTS between 2- and 6-week postoperatively at all cervical levels. There is no significant change in PSTS at C2, C3, and C5, when comparing the preoperative and 6-week postoperative measurements. There is significant PSTS at C4, C6, and C7, when comparing preoperative and 6-week postoperative measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The "normal" range for PSTS at 2 weeks and at 6 weeks after elective 1- and 2- level anterior cervical decompression and fusions is described. Our data demonstrates that edema persists at the 2-week follow-up. By 6 weeks postoperative, the increased PSTS has greatly dissipated.

Cervical Vertebrae↗
PubMed2006

Surgical infections in the traumatized spine.

UNLABELLED: Patients with acute spinal injury who require operative intervention may be at increased risk for postoperative surgical-site infection when compared with patients having elective spinal surgery. Various local, systemic, and iatrogenic factors predispose this unique population of patients to post-surgical infection. Nonmodifiable risk factors for surgical-site infection in spine trauma include age, medical comorbidities, and neurologic status. Modifiable risk factors include poor postoperative nutritional status, delay from time of injury to surgical intervention, posterior surgical approach, higher number of levels stabilized, length of postoperative stay in the intensive care unit, and treatment by a single specialty team (versus treatment by successive orthopaedic and neurosurgical teams). When treating patients with spine trauma, a high index of suspicion should be maintained for patients with multiple risk factors for infection and every effort should be made to minimize the modifiable risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (expert opinion). Please see the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Surgical decision making for unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a consensus panel review by the Spine Trauma Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal surgical approach and treatment of unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries are poorly defined owing to a lack of widely accepted level I clinical literature. This lack of evidence-based standards has led to varied practice patterns based on individual surgeon preferences. The purpose of this study was to survey the leaders in the field of spine trauma to define the major characteristics of thoracolumbar injuries that influence their surgical decision making. In the absence of good scientific data, expert consensus opinions may provide surgeons with a practical framework to guide therapy and to conduct future research. METHODS: A panel of 22 leading spinal surgeons from 20 level I trauma centers in seven countries met to discuss the indications for surgical approach selection in unstable thoracolumbar injuries. Injuries were presented to the surgeons in a case scenario survey format. Preferred surgical approaches to the clinical scenarios were tabulated and comments weighed. RESULTS: All members of the panel agreed that three independent characteristics of thoracolumbar injuries carry primary importance in surgical decision making: the injury morphology, the neurologic status of the patient, and the integrity of the posterior ligaments. Six clinical scenarios based on the neurologic status of the patient (intact, incomplete, or complete) and on the status of the posterior ligamentous complex (intact or disrupted) were created, and consensus treatment approaches were described. Additional circumstances capable of altering the treatments were acknowledged. CONCLUSIONS: Decision making for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar injuries is largely dependent on three patient characteristics: injury morphology, neurologic status, and posterior ligament integrity. A logical and practical decision-making process based on these characteristics may guide treatment even for the most complicated fracture patterns.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Intrarater and interrater reliability and validity in the assessment of the mechanism of injury and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex: a novel injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar injuries. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting On Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2005.

OBJECT: A new classification and treatment algorithm for thoracolumbar injuries was recently introduced by Vaccaro and colleagues in 2005. A thoracolumbar injury severity scale (TLISS) was proposed for grading and guiding treatment for these injuries. The scale is based on the following: 1) the mechanism of injury; 2) the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC); and 3) the patient's neurological status. The reliability and validity of assessing injury mechanism and the integrity of the PLC was assessed. METHODS: Forty-eight spine surgeons, consisting of neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, reviewed 56 clinical thoracolumbar injury case histories. Each was classified and scored to determine treatment recommendations according to a novel classification system. After 3 months the case histories were reordered and the physicians repeated the exercise. Validity of this classification was good among reviewers; the vast majority (> 90%) agreed with the system's treatment recommendations. Surgeons were unclear as to a cogent description of PLC disruption and fracture mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: The TLISS demonstrated acceptable reliability in terms of intra- and interobserver agreement on the algorithm's treatment recommendations. Replacing injury mechanism with a description of injury morphology and better definition of PLC injury will improve inter- and intraobserver reliability of this injury classification system.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Nucleus pulposus replacement: basic science and indications for clinical use.

STUDY DESIGN: A critical review of available and emerging nucleus pulposus replacement implants. OBJECTIVES: To review the biomechanics, design, and clinical data of currently available and developing nucleus pulposus replacement technologies. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The interest in minimally invasive treatment of degenerative disc disease has grown as the technology for intervertebral motion-sparing devices continues to improve. Replacement of nucleus pulposus without anular obliteration represents a tempting alternative to spinal fusion procedures. The aim in nucleus pulposus replacement is to slow adjacent level degeneration, restore normal loads to the diseased level, and restore segmental spinal biomechanics. METHODS: A literature review of currently available biomaterials, biomechanics, and available preclinical and clinical data on nucleus pulposus replacement implants. RESULTS: New synthetic biomaterials have recently been developed to closely mimic native biomechanics during compressive loading cycles of the intervertebral disc. This, in conjunction with improved understanding of global spine biomechanics, has allowed the development of novel nucleus replacement implants. These implants are currently at different stages of preclinical and clinical investigations. CONCLUSIONS: Although some of the newly designed prosthesis have shown some promising results in preclinical studies, rigorous short- and long-term clinical evaluations will be critical in evaluating their true efficacy.

Biocompatible Materials↗
PubMed2005

Accuracy of computerized frameless stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spines.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart and radiographic review of 122 pedicle screws placed with computerized stereotactic image-guidance into posterolateral fusion masses. OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy rate of computerized stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement in previously fused lumbar spines. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Placement of pedicle screws into a previously fused lumbar spine is challenging. The normal anatomic landmarks used to determine the starting point and trajectory of the screws have either been removed or are obscured by the fusion mass. Computerized frameless stereotaxis provides precise intraoperative real time multiplanar image-guidance and may be valuable in this clinical situation. METHODS: Computerized frameless stereotactic image-guidance was used to place pedicle screws into 78 consecutive patients with prior lumbar spine fusions. Postoperative computed tomography was available on 35 patients (231 screws). One hundred and twenty-two screws were placed into fusion masses. Pedicle cortical perforations were characterized by the direction (medial, inferior, lateral, or superior) and magnitude (in 2-mm increments) of perforation. RESULTS: Five (4.1%) of the 122 pedicle screws placed into previously fused levels were found to have unintentional cortical violations. There were 1 superior (<2 mm), 1 medial (<2 mm), and 3 lateral perforations (<2, 4, and 6 mm). None of these perforations led to clinically apparent radicular pain or weakness. No pedicle screws required revision for malpositioning. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy rate of stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spine levels is 96%. Computerized stereotactic image-guidance may have particular application in situations in which posterior element anatomy is altered, such as in the presence of a prior fusion mass.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiographic and chart review. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) range of motion (ROM) and clinical outcome at 8.6-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are no studies on the relationship between TDR motion and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed 38 patients who underwent 1 or 2-level TDR implantation with 51 TDR. Flexion-extension ROM was measured on lateral radiographs. Clinical outcomes were measured at 8.6 years by modified Stauffer-Coventry scores, Oswestry Disability Questionnaires (ODQ), and subjective ratings of back pain, leg pain, and disability. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine if ROM was correlated with clinical outcome. Patients were divided into 2 groups by motion (< or = 5 degrees and > 5 degrees ). Statistical differences in outcome were sought. RESULTS: Spearman rank correlation coefficient revealed weak-to-moderate but statistically significant associations between ROM and outcome for postoperative back pain (r = -0.35, P = 0.034), ODQ (r = -0.33, P = 0.046), and modified Stauffer-Coventry scores (r = 0.42, P = 0.0095). Patients with motion of > 5 degrees had superior outcomes in ODQ (mean difference 12.6 points, P = 0.026) and Stauffer-Coventry scores (mean difference 2.2 points, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The radiographic ROM at 8.6-year follow-up was positively correlated with several outcomes measures. Patients with motion > 5 degrees had clinically modest but statistically better outcomes in ODQ and modifiedStauffer-Coventry scores. Longer follow-ups will be necessary to measure fully the impact of TDR ROM on outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary understanding of the biomechanics, natural history, and methods of treating thoracolumbar spine injuries continues to evolve. Current classification schemes of these injuries, however, can be either too simplified or overly complex for clinical use. METHODS: The Spine Trauma Group was given a survey to identify similarities in treatment algorithms for common thoracolumbar injuries, as well as to identify characteristics of injury that played a key role in the decision-making process. RESULTS: Based on the survey, the Spine Trauma Group has developed a classification system and an injury severity score (thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score, or TLICS), which may facilitate communication between physicians and serve as a guideline for treating these injuries. The classification system is based on the morphology of the injury, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurological status of the patient. Points are assigned for each category, and the final total points suggest a possible treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of this new system will have to be proven in future studies investigating inter- and intraobserver reliability, as well as long-term outcome studies for operative and nonoperative treatment methods.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Indications for surgery and stabilization techniques of the occipito-cervical junction.

Occipito-cervical (OC) instrumentation and fusion is indicated in traumatic atlanto-occipital dissociation and type III Anderson-Montesano occipital condyle fractures. The goals of surgery are to stabilize the mechanically compromised OC junction, correct deformity or displacement, and decompress compromised neural structures. The goals of instrumentation are to provide immediate stability, improve fusion rate, diminish the need for postoperative external immobilization, and decrease rehabilitation time. To successfully instrument the occipito-cervical spine, a working knowledge of the anatomy of the occipital-cervical junction is imperative. A wide variety of stabilization techniques and instrumentation systems are currently available, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. With familiarity of the constraints and benefits of the available instrumentation systems, the individual fixation needs of a clinical situation can be fulfilled and successful patient outcomes can be achieved.

Bone Plates↗
PubMed2005

Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.

Nonfusion technology in spine surgery may improve outcomes by reducing surgical morbidity and the incidence of adjacent level degeneration; however, new technologies also introduce new short- and long-term complications. There is currently no evidence that nonfusion implants are superior to fusion in mid- to long-term follow-up. Understanding the potential risks and benefits of nonfusion technology is essential for spine surgeons and their patients. This article reviews the current evidence relating to the potential risks and benefits of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗
PubMed2005

Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques.

OBJECTIVE: Current methods used to measure total disc replacement (TDR) radiographic range of motion (ROM) have not been previously evaluated. Sagittal ROM is measured by determining the change in the Cobb angle of the prosthesis from the flexion to the extension radiographs. Either the metallic endplates or the keels of the TDR prosthesis can be used as radiographic landmarks in measuring ROM. We hypothesized that use of the prosthesis keels as radiographic landmarks, when compared with the use of prosthesis endplates, might lead to more precise measurements of TDR sagittal ROM. METHODS: Two observers (a fifth-year orthopedics resident and an attending orthopedic spine surgeon) measured the ROM of 51 Prodisc II TDRs on standard flexion and extension lumbar spine radiograph sets. Repeated measurements were made on two occasions using either the keels or the endplates as landmarks. Precision was defined as the mean of the absolute differences between measurements. RESULTS: For observer A, the mean absolute difference between two measurements was 1.4 degrees with the keel method compared with 3.0 degrees with the endplate method (P < 0.001). For observer B, the mean absolute difference between two measurements was 1.8 degrees with the keel method and 3.3 degrees with the endplate method (P < 0.001). When the interobserver differences were examined, the mean absolute difference was 1.8 degrees with the keel method and 3.3 degrees with the endplate method (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the use of TDR prosthesis keels as radiographic landmarks, when compared with the use of prosthesis endplates, yields greater precision in ROM measurement. For TDR prostheses with a keel, we recommend using the keel to measure ROM.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of the epidemiology of contraindications to lumbar total disc replacement (TDR). OBJECTIVE: To define the prevalence of contraindications to lumbar total disc replacement in a cohort of patients undergoing lumbar surgery in the senior author's (F.P.C.) practice. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No published reports have documented the prevalence of contraindications to lumbar total disc replacement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients who had lumbar surgery by one surgeon between September and December 2002. Procedures performed and contraindications to TDR were recorded. Contraindications to TDR included central or lateral recess stenosis, facet arthrosis, spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis, herniated nucleus pulposus with radiculopathy, scoliosis, osteoporosis, and postsurgical pseudarthrosis or deficiency of posterior elements. Patients were divided into fusion and nonfusion groups. The percentage of patients without contraindications to TDR was calculated. RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 56 had fusions and 44 had nonfusion surgery. In the fusion group, 56 of 56 patients had contraindications to TDR. In the nonfusion group, 11% (5 of 44) were candidates for TDR. Overall, 5% of patients in this series were candidates for TDR. The average number of contraindications to TDR was 2.48 (range, 0-5). CONCLUSIONS: Predictions that TDR will replace fusion are premature. A small percentage (5%) of the patients currently indicated for lumbar surgery at our institution have no contraindications to TDR. Future growth in TDR implantation will result from the indication of patients for surgery who would not be indicated today or from the elimination of current contraindications.

Adult↗