Biomedical subjects

Mohab M Ibrahim

Publications and source records attributed to Mohab M Ibrahim.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

CB2 cannabinoid receptor mediation of antinociception.

Management of acute pain remains a significant clinical problem. In preclinical studies, CB2 cannabinoid receptor-selective agonists inhibit nociception without producing central nervous system side effects. The CB2 receptor-selective agonist AM1241 produces antinociceptive effects that are antagonized by CB2, but not CB1, receptor-selective antagonists, suggesting that activation of CB2 receptors results in antinociception. However, it has not been possible to definitively demonstrate that these effects are mediated by CB2 receptors, because we have lacked the pharmacological tools to confirm the in vivo receptor selectivity of the antagonists used. Further, recent evidence for cannabinoid-like receptors beyond CB1 and CB2 raises the possibility that AM1241 exerts its antinociceptive effects at uncharacterized CB2-like receptors that are also inhibited by AM630. The experiments reported here further test the hypothesis that CB2 receptor activation inhibits nociception. They evaluated the antinociceptive actions of AM1241 and the less-selective CB2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 in wild-type (CB2+/+) mice and in mice with genetic disruption of the CB2 receptor (CB2-/- mice). AM1241 inhibited thermal nociception in CB2+/+ mice, but had no effect in CB2-/- littermates. WIN55,212-2 produced equivalent antinociception in CB1+/+ and CB1-/- mice, while its antinociceptive effects were reduced in CB2-/- compared to CB2+/+ mice. The effects of morphine were not altered in CB2-/- compared to CB2+/+ mice. These data strongly suggest that AM1241 produces antinociception in vivo by activating CB2 cannabinoid receptors. Further, they confirm the potential therapeutic relevance of CB2 cannabinoid receptors for the treatment of acute pain.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2005

CB2 cannabinoid receptor activation produces antinociception by stimulating peripheral release of endogenous opioids.

CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-selective agonists are promising candidates for the treatment of pain. CB(2) receptor activation inhibits acute, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain responses but does not cause central nervous system (CNS) effects, consistent with the lack of CB(2) receptors in the normal CNS. To date, there has been virtually no information regarding the mechanism of CB(2) receptor-mediated inhibition of pain responses. Here, we test the hypothesis that CB(2) receptor activation stimulates release from keratinocytes of the endogenous opioid beta-endorphin, which then acts at opioid receptors on primary afferent neurons to inhibit nociception. The antinociceptive effects of the CB(2) receptor-selective agonist AM1241 were prevented in rats when naloxone or antiserum to beta-endorphin was injected in the hindpaw where the noxious thermal stimulus was applied, suggesting that beta-endorphin is necessary for CB(2) receptor-mediated antinociception. Further, AM1241 did not inhibit nociception in mu-opioid receptor-deficient mice. Hindpaw injection of beta-endorphin was sufficient to produce antinociception. AM1241 stimulated beta-endorphin release from rat skin tissue and from cultured human keratinocytes. This stimulation was prevented by AM630, a CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-selective antagonist and was not observed in skin from CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-deficient mice. These data suggest that CB(2) receptor activation stimulates release from keratinocytes of beta-endorphin, which acts at local neuronal mu-opioid receptors to inhibit nociception. Supporting this possibility, CB(2) immunolabeling was detected on beta-endorphin-containing keratinocytes in stratum granulosum throughout the epidermis of the hindpaw. This mechanism allows for the local release of beta-endorphin, where CB(2) receptors are present, leading to anatomical specificity of opioid effects.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2004

Production of paradoxical sensory hypersensitivity by alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonists.

BACKGROUND: Administration of opioid receptor agonists is followed by paradoxical sensory hypersensitivity. This hypersensitivity has been suggested to contribute to the antinociceptive tolerance observed with opioids. The authors hypothesized that alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonists, which also produce antinociceptive tolerance, would produce sensory hypersensitivity. METHODS: alpha 2-Adrenoreceptor agonists were administered to male Sprague-Dawley rats as a single subcutaneous injection, a continuous subcutaneous infusion, a single intrathecal injection, or a continuous intrathecal infusion. Thermal sensitivity was determined using latency to withdrawal of the hind paw from radiant heat. Tactile sensitivity was determined using withdrawal threshold to von Frey filaments. Spinal dynorphin content was measured by enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Single systemic or intrathecal injections of clonidine or dexmedetomidine produced antinociception followed by delayed thermal and tactile hypersensitivity. Six-day systemic or intrathecal infusion of clonidine produced tactile and thermal hypersensitivity observed even during clonidine infusion. Sensory hypersensitivity was prevented by coadministration of the alpha 2-adrenoreceptor-selective antagonist idazoxan or the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-selective antagonist MK-801. Six-day infusion of intrathecal clonidine increased dynorphin content in dorsal lumbar spinal cord. MK-801 and dynorphin antiserum reversed clonidine-induced sensory hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: alpha 2-Adrenoreceptor agonists produce sensory hypersensitivity that may be analogous to that produced by opioids. Sensory hypersensitivity was prevented by idazoxan, demonstrating that it is mediated by alpha 2 receptors. Clonidine infusion increased spinal dynorphin content. Sensory hypersensitivity was prevented or reversed by MK-801 and dynorphin antiserum, implicating N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and spinal dynorphin in its production. Clinicians should be mindful of the possibility of drug-induced hyperalgesia in patients treated with alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonists.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists↗

PubMed2003

Activation of CB2 cannabinoid receptors by AM1241 inhibits experimental neuropathic pain: pain inhibition by receptors not present in the CNS.

We designed AM1241, a selective CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist, and used it to test the hypothesis that CB2 receptor activation would reverse the sensory hypersensitivity observed in neuropathic pain states. AM1241 exhibits high affinity and selectivity for CB2 receptors. It also exhibits high potency in vivo. AM1241 dose-dependently reversed tactile and thermal hypersensitivity produced by ligation of the L5 and L6 spinal nerves in rats. These effects were selectively antagonized by a CB2 but not by a CB1 receptor antagonist, suggesting that they were produced by actions of AM1241 at CB2 receptors. AM1241 was also active in blocking spinal nerve ligation-induced tactile and thermal hypersensitivity in mice lacking CB1 receptors (CB1-/- mice), confirming that AM1241 reverses sensory hypersensitivity independent of actions at CB1 receptors. These findings demonstrate a mechanism leading to the inhibition of pain, one that targets receptors localized exclusively outside the CNS. Further, they suggest the potential use of CB2 receptor-selective agonists for treatment of human neuropathic pain, a condition currently without consistently effective therapies. CB2 receptor-selective agonist medications are predicted to be without the CNS side effects that limit the effectiveness of currently available medications.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2003

CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonists: pain relief without psychoactive effects?

Cannabinoid receptor agonists significantly diminish pain responses in animal models; however, they exhibit only modest analgesic effects in humans. The relative lack of efficacy in man may be because of the dose limitations imposed by psychoactive side effects. Cannabinoid agonists that selectively target CB(2) (peripheral) cannabinoid receptors should be free of psychoactive effects, perhaps allowing for more effective dosing. CB(2) receptor activation inhibits acute, inflammatory and neuropathic pain responses in animal models. In preclinical studies, CB(2) receptor agonists do not produce central nervous system effects. Therefore, they show promise for the treatment of acute and chronic pain without psychoactive effects.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2003

Inhibition of inflammatory hyperalgesia by activation of peripheral CB2 cannabinoid receptors.

BACKGROUND: Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit inflammatory hyperalgesia in animal models. Nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonists also produce central nervous system (CNS) side effects. Agonists selective for CB2 cannabinoid receptors, which are not found in the CNS, do not produce the CNS effects typical of nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonists but do inhibit acute nociception. The authors used the CB2 receptor-selective agonist AM1241 to test the hypothesis that selective activation of peripheral CB2 receptors inhibits inflammatory hyperalgesia. METHODS: Rats were injected in the hind paw with carrageenan or capsaicin. Paw withdrawal latencies were measured using a focused thermal stimulus. The effects of peripheral CB2 receptor activation were determined by using local injection of AM1241. CB2 receptor mediation of the actions of AM1241 was shown by using the CB2 receptor-selective antagonist AM630 and the CB1 receptor-selective antagonist AM251. RESULTS: AM1241 fully reversed carrageenan-induced inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia when injected into the inflamed paw. In contrast, AM1241 injected into the contralateral paw had no effect, showing that its effects were local. AM1241 also reversed the local edema produced by hind paw carrageenan injection. The effects of AM1241 were reversed by the CB2 receptor-selective antagonist AM630, but not by the CB1 receptor-selective antagonist AM251. AM1241 also inhibited flinching and thermal hyperalgesia produced by hind paw capsaicin injection. CONCLUSIONS: Local, peripheral CB2 receptor activation inhibits inflammation and inflammatory hyperalgesia. These results suggest that peripheral CB2 receptors may be an appropriate target for eliciting relief of inflammatory pain without the CNS effects of nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonists.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2002

Inhibition of pain responses by activation of CB(2) cannabinoid receptors.

Cannabinoid receptor agonists diminish responses to painful stimuli. Extensive evidence demonstrates that CB(1) cannabinoid receptor activation inhibits pain responses. Recently, the synthesis of CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-selective agonists has allowed testing whether CB(2) receptor activation inhibits pain. CB(2) receptor activation is sufficient to inhibit acute nociception, inflammatory hyperalgesia, and the allodynia and hyperalgesia produced in a neuropathic pain model. Studies using site-specific administration of agonist and antagonist have suggested that CB(2) receptor agonists inhibit pain responses by acting at peripheral sites. CB(2) receptor activation also inhibits edema and plasma extravasation produced by inflammation. CB(2) receptor-selective agonists do not produce central nervous system (CNS) effects typical of cannabinoids retaining agonist activity at the CB(1) receptor. Peripheral antinociception without CNS effects is consistent with the peripheral distribution of CB(2) receptors. CB(2) receptor agonists may have promise for the treatment of pain and inflammation without CNS side effects.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

CB2 cannabinoid receptor-mediated peripheral antinociception.

Cannabinoid receptor agonists diminish responses to painful stimuli. Extensive evidence implicates the CB(1) receptor in the production of antinociception. However, the capacity of CB(2) receptors, which are located outside the central nervous system (CNS), to produce antinociception is not known. Using AM1241, a CB(2) receptor-selective agonist, we demonstrate that CB(2) receptors produce antinociception to thermal stimuli. Injection of AM1241 in the hindpaw produced antinociception to a stimulus applied to the same paw. Injection of an equivalent dose of AM1241 into the paw contralateral to the side of testing did not. The antinociceptive actions of AM1241 were blocked by the CB(2) receptor-selective antagonist AM630, but not by the CB(1) receptor-selective antagonist AM251. AM1241 also produced antinociception when injected systemically (intraperitoneally). The antinociceptive actions of systemic AM1241 were blocked by injection of AM630 into the paw where the thermal stimulus was applied, but not the contralateral paw. These findings demonstrate the local, peripheral nature of CB(2) cannabinoid antinociception. AM1241 did not produce the CNS cannabinoid effects of hypothermia, catalepsy, inhibition of activity or impaired ambulation, while this tetrad of effects was produced by the mixed CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist WIN55,212-2. Peripheral antinociception without CNS effects is consistent with the peripheral distribution of CB(2) receptors. CB(2) receptor agonists may have promise clinically for the treatment of pain without CNS cannabinoid side effects.

Analgesics↗