Shifting-bubble sign in big-bubble technique in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Mohammad H Dastjerdi.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To report corneal decompensation after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in a patient with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. METHODS: Observational case report. RESULTS: A 47-year-old woman with cornea guttata without symptoms or findings of corneal edema had uneventful LASIK for -5.50 -0.50 x 150 in the right eye and -4.00 -1.25 x 170 in the left eye. Postoperatively, she developed corneal edema, with significant loss of best-corrected visual acuity in both eyes. Preoperative corneal thickness was 587 microm in the right eye and 549 microm in the left eye, measured by ultrasound pachymetry. These readings were 550 and 560 microm on day 67 postoperatively. Endothelial cell counts showed means of 1209 and 1661 cells/mm2 in the right and left eyes, respectively. CONCLUSION: Caution is suggested when considering LASIK in eyes with severe cornea guttata.
Refractive surgery is still one of the most innovative and evolving fields in ophthalmology. With the advent of customized ablation, a change in paradigm has been established: the primary goal of refractive surgery is not only to eliminate spectacles but to improve or at least prevent deterioration of the optical performance of the eye. Wavefront-guided refractive surgery has, as a new goal, to correct or at least minimize all optical aberrations of the eye, and consequently to improve or preserve visual performance, especially under scotopic conditions.
Laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) is a relatively new refractive surgical technique that purportedly combines the advantages of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Like LASIK, on the one hand, it employs a "flap" and consequently has the advantages of faster visual recovery, less postoperative pain, reduced stromal haze, and faster epithelial healing than PRK. Like PRK, on the other hand, because the procedure is performed on the anterior cornea, there are virtually no flap- or interface-related complications per se. It may thus be safer for patients who are at an inherently higher risk of developing flap complications, such as those with small palpebral fissures, deep-set eyes, corneal basement membrane dystrophy, and extremely steep or flat corneas. Furthermore, it conserves precious stroma in eyes with thin corneas or high myopia, which otherwise may not qualify for LASIK. It may also be more apropos for patients whose jobs or recreational activities put them at a higher risk of corneal trauma. In a very timely fashion, for reasons discussed below, LASEK may also prove to be superior to LASIK in customized ablations.