PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi

Publications and source records attributed to Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Congenital fusion of the maxilla and mandible: brief case report.

Congenital fusion of the mandible and maxilla is a rare anomaly usually seen in association with various syndromes. Reports of isolated cases of bony fusion of the jaws are sparse. Only 10 reported cases were found in the literature search. Maxillomandibular fusion restricts mouth opening, causing feeding problems and difficulties in swallowing, respiration, growth, and development, and thus must be treated early. We report a case of congenital fusion of the mandible and maxilla in a 1-year-old boy and describe the clinical features of this anomaly to add to the existing literature on the subject. This is our second encounter of such a case.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

A simple technique to facilitate the Le Fort I osteotomy downfracture.

In order to mobilize and reposition the maxilla when treating dentofacial deformities, the Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy is commonly used. Like other surgical procedures, this procedure is not without inherent difficulties. At times, it may be difficult to initially mobilize the maxilla after performing the osteotomies. Techniques used to help in the initial mobilization and downfracture of the maxilla from the pterygoid plates include digital pressure to the dentoalveolus, disimpaction forceps, spreaders, and other instruments. These techniques are similar in that they all apply a unidirectional downward vector of force on the maxilla and have various drawbacks. We present a technique that uses a 0.5-mm stainless steel traction wire to facilitate Le Fort I maxillary downfracturing by applying a forward and downward vector of force simultaneously. After vertical downfracture of the maxilla, lateral traction on the wire can be used to complete the pterygomaxillary disjunction. This technique has several advantages and is atraumatic, and requires no special instrumentation; thus, downfracturing of the maxilla is done with relatively little effort and minimal risk.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2003

Primary management of maxillofacial hard and soft tissue gunshot and shrapnel injuries.

PURPOSE: A 10-year retrospective study was undertaken of all patients treated for facial gunshot and shrapnel wounds at our medical center to evaluate the outcomes and assess the results of simultaneous management to treat the hard and soft tissue injuries primarily. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 44 patients were treated. Medical documentation of the patients was compiled. All maxillofacial gunshot, shrapnel, and warfare injuries were treated by the oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Other concomitant bodily injuries were treated by pertinent consultant specialists. Patients ranged in age from 8 to 53 years, with a mean age of 24.7 years. Maxillofacial hard and soft tissue injuries were treated definitively in the first operation except when gross contamination, infection, extensive comminution, or general condition precluded this. RESULTS: There were 2 shotgun, 28 bullet, 10 shrapnel, 3 land mine, and 1 breech block injuries. Overall postadmission mortality in this series was 2.2%. Of the 97.7% of the patients who had an injury to the underlying craniofacial skeleton, all required surgical intervention. The soft tissue and underlying bony injuries were addressed concomitantly (in a single stage at the time of primary surgical debridement) in 86.3% of the patients. Nine percent of the patients had a tracheostomy emergently for management of the airway, 6.8% had an intracranial injury, and 2.2% of them required neurosurgery. In the series, 4.5% of the patients had neck wounds that required exploration. Comprehensive treatment was rendered in 1 to 3 major operations (average, 1.5). CONCLUSION: All patients in this series required surgical intervention for treatment of their facial gunshot wounds. Primary treatment of hard and soft tissue injuries of the face at the time of surgical debridement was possible in the majority of our patients. This minimized the number of admissions and did not bear a higher complication rate than other reported series that advocate multiple staged operations to treat such injuries despite the fact that, in our series, flaps were also mobilized for wound closure in the primary phase.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

An assessment of maxillofacial fractures: a 5-year study of 237 patients.

PURPOSE: This descriptive analytical study assesses the cause, type, incidence, demographic, and treatment data of maxillofacial fractures managed at our medical center during a 5-year period and compares them with the existing body of literature on the subject. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 5-year retrospective clinical and epidemiologic study evaluated 237 patients treated for maxillofacial fractures from 1996 to 2001 at one medical center. There were 211 male patients (89%) and 26 (11%) female patients. The patients ranged in age from 3 to 73 years, with 59.0% (140 patients) in the 20- to 29-year age group. A number of parameters, including age, gender, cause of injury, site of injury, type of injury, treatment modalities, and complications, were evaluated. All maxillofacial injuries were assessed and treated by a single oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Other concomitant bodily injuries were treated by appropriate consultant specialists. RESULTS: There were 173 (72.9%) mandibular, 33 (13.9%) maxillary, 32 (13.5%) zygomatic, 57 (24.0%) zygomatico-orbital, 5 (2.1%) cranial, 5 (2.1%) nasal, and 4 (1.6%) frontal injuries. Car accidents caused 73 (30.8%), motorcycle accidents caused 55 (23.2%), altercations 23 (9.7%), sports 15 (6.3%), and warfare caused 23 (9.7%) of the maxillofacial injuries. Regarding distribution of mandibular fractures, 32% were seen in the condylar region, 29.3% in the symphyseal-parasymphyseal region, 20% in the angle region, 12.5% in the body, 3.1% in the ramus, 1.9% in the dentoalveolar, and 1.2% in the coronoid region. The distribution of maxillary fractures was Le Fort II in 18 (54.6%), Le Fort I in 8 (24.2%), Le Fort III in 4 (12.1%), and alveolar in 3 (9.1%). Of the 173 mandibular fractures, 56.9% were treated by closed reduction, 39.8% by open reduction, and 3.5% by observation only. Of 33 maxillary fractures, 54.6% were treated using closed reduction, 40.9% using open reduction, and 4.5% with observation only. Approximately 52.1% of the patients were treated under general anesthesia, and 47.9% were treated under local anesthesia and sedation. Postsurgical complications were recorded in 5% of patients. These complications included infection, asymmetry, and malocclusion. Overall mortality in this series was 0.84% (2 patients); mortality was caused by pulmonary infection. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study, compared with similar studies reported in the literature, support the view that the causes and incidence of maxillofacial injuries vary from 1 country to another.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Surgical management of iatrogenic root perforation following endodontic therapy.

Endodontic mishaps still occur despite technological advancements in the field of dental instrumentation and materials. Iatrogenic root perforations during access preparation, canal instrumentation or preparation of post space are not uncommon, and instrument fractures during filing or reaming, as well as root fractures during condensation, are also encountered. Many of these mishaps are hard to avoid because of the extreme variability in root canal anatomy, canal calcification, abnormal root shapes and curvatures. They occur most often during access preparation, root cleaning, shaping and preparation of post space, or when attempting to bypass fractured instruments. Procedural errors impede endodontic therapy, thus increasing the risk of treatment failure, especially in teeth with necrotic pulps and periradicular lesions. Clinicians often have difficulty diagnosing and treating root perforations and the treatment of such mishaps is very difficult, especially in posterior teeth and in the area of the mandibular furcation. We report on a case of root perforation in a mandibular first molar that was successfully treated by surgery without the use of additional biomaterials.

Adult↗