Biomedical subjects

Mohammed Ismail

Publications and source records attributed to Mohammed Ismail.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

How to guide stent-graft implantation in type B aortic dissection? Comparison of angiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and intravascular ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing interest in stent-graft implantation for type-B aortic dissection, there are no established recommendations to prepare and perform an implantation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We directly compared angiography (ANGIO), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) intraprocedually before and after placement of 48 stent grafts in 42 consecutive patients (12 women, 61+/-11 years of age) with acute and chronic type-B aortic dissection for both usefulness and capability to guide aortic stent-graft implantation. Both IVUS and TEE are superior to ANGIO to identify multiple entries (52 and 43 versus 34; P<0.005 each), to diagnose false-lumen slow flow after stent-graft implantation (32 and 31 versus 24; P<0.005 each) and to detect incomplete stent apposition (18 and 16 versus 8; P<0.005 each). In comparison with ANGIO, guide wire position over the entire length of the aorta was documented more frequently by TEE and IVUS (40 and 42 versus 25; P<0.001 each). In 4 patients with abdominal extension of the dissection, only IVUS was able to accurately identify the false lumen over the entire length of the diseased aorta. TEE was superior to IVUS and ANGIO in the detection of endoleaks (5 versus 0 and 1; P<0.05 each). Intraprocedural ANGIO, TEE, and IVUS had been performed without complications in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: TEE in conjunction with ANGIO appears to be advantageous and adds incremental information to safely guide stent-graft placement in type-B aortic dissection. Additional use of IVUS was found to be helpful in patients with complex anatomy and abdominal extension of the dissection.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Spinal tuberculosis: CT and MRI feature.

BACKGROUND: Spinal tuberculosis (TB) is perhaps the most clinically important extrapulmonary form of the disease. Early recognition is therefore necessary to minimize residual spinal deformity and/or permanent neurological deficit. We defined the CT and MRI image morphology of spinal TB and correlated the imaging features of these two modalities. METHODS: CT (29 patients) and MRI (11 patients) images were retrospectively analyzed in 30 patients with proved spinal TB. CT and MRI findings were compared in cases with both imaging tests (10 cases). The parameters assessed were the type and extent of bone and soft tissue involvement. RESULTS: The majority of the 30 patients were males (n=18) in the 30-49 year age group (43%). The most common clinical presentation was backache (73.3%) followed by fever (63.3%) and malaise (36.6%). The lumbar spine was the commonest site of the disease (43.3%) followed by the thoracic region (36.6%). A fragmentary type of bone destruction was the most frequent CT feature of the disease (48.2%) followed by the lytic type (24.1%). Intervertebral disc destruction (72%) and paravertebral mass/abscess (65.5%) were other features. Of the 11 patients who had an MRI, contiguous vertebral disease with disc destruction was seen in 10 cases. In 4 patients, there was distant vertebral disease in addition to the disease at the symptomatic site. CONCLUSIONS: MRI offers excellent visualization of the bone and soft tissue components of spinal tuberculosis and helps to identify disease at distant asymptomatic sites. CT is useful in assessing bone destruction, but is less accurate in defining the epidural extension of the disease and therefore its effect on neural structures. MR imaging clearly demonstrated the extent of soft tissue disease and its effect on the theca/cord and foramen in cases with doubtful CT findings.

Adult↗