PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Moises Guelrud

Publications and source records attributed to Moises Guelrud.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in children.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a clinical entity caused by a primary motility alteration of either the biliary or the pancreatic sphincter. SOD is a rare condition that has been scarcely reported in children. Most of the reported literature has been in children with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. These children are treated endoscopically by dual sphincterotomy of the pancreatic and common duct sphincters. However, the safety and efficacy of sphincter of Oddi manometry and sphincterotomy in the pediatric population await further study.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2006

Functional gallbladder and sphincter of oddi disorders.

The functional disorder of the gallbladder (GB) is a motility disorder caused initially either by metabolic abnormalities or by a primary motility alteration. The functional disorders of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) encompass motor abnormalities of either the biliary or the pancreatic SO. Dysfunction of the GB and/or biliary SO produce similar patterns of pain. The pain caused by a dysfunction of the pancreatic SO can be similar to that of acute pancreatitis. The symptom-based diagnostic criteria of motility dysfunction of the GB and biliary SO are episodes of moderate to severe steady pain located in the epigastrium and right upper abdominal quadrant that last at least 30 minutes. GB motility disorder is suspected after gallstones and other structural abnormalities have been excluded. This diagnosis should then be confirmed by a decreased GB ejection fraction induced by cholecystokinin at cholescintigraphy and after disappearance of the recurrent biliary pain after cholecystectomy. Symptoms of biliary SO dysfunction may be accompanied by features of transient biliary obstruction, and those of pancreatic SO dysfunction are associated with elevation of pancreatic enzymes and even pancreatitis. Biliary-type SO dysfunction is more frequently recognized in postcholecystectomy patients. SO manometry is valuable to select patients with sphincter dysfunction; however, because of the high incidence of complications, these patients should be referred to an expert unit for such assessment. Thus invasive tests should be performed only in the presence of compelling clinical evidence and after noninvasive testing has yielded negative findings. The committee recommends that division of the biliary or pancreatic sphincters only be considered when the patient has severe symptoms, meets the required criteria, and other diagnoses are excluded.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗
PubMed2004

Normal sphincter of oddi motor function.

With the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) manometry, the characteristics of sphincter of Oddi (SO) motor activity have been described. SO manometry is the only available method to measure SO motor activity directly and is usually performed at the time of ERCP. SO manometry is considered to be the gold standard for evaluating patients for sphincter dysfunction. This review reports the technique of SO manometry and normal values for SO manometry. SO motility is characterized by prominent phasic contractions superimposed on a tonic pressure. Elevated basal SO pressure is the most consistent and reliable criteria to diagnose SO dysfunction. Basal pressures obtained from the biliary sphincter are similar to the basal pressure obtained from the pancreatic sphincter. Abnormal SO manometric values are shown. Factors that influence SO pressures, and interpretation of SO manometric tracing are discussed. The most common and serious complication of SO manometry is post-manometry pancreatitis. In healthy volunteers with normal sphincter function, pancreatitis is almost never seen. However, in patients with SO dysfunction, the incidence of pancreatitis is high. The use of new nonperfused microtransducers may reduce this complication.

Catheterization↗
PubMed2004

Enhanced magnification endoscopy in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

In diseases such as Barrett's esophagus and celiac disease, the mucosal abnormality is patchy or irregular, highlighting the need for targeted biopsies. Enhanced magnification endoscopy is an effective, readily available method that can be used to assist in target biopsies and endoscopic diagnosis leading to an endoscopic classification system. The technique is not difficult and adds only an additional 5 to 10 minutes to a standard endoscopic procedure;however, most endoscopists never receive instruction in magnification endoscopy during their training. The value of this technique is still being explored, but the improvement in diagnostic accuracy will have an impact on decreasing morbidity and mortality without a large increase in cost. Increased use of this technique will aid in the diagnosis of celiac disease and simplify the classification system for Barrett's esophagus. Using enhanced magnification endoscopy at multiple centers in studies will help to determine the intra- and inter-observer variability, define the endoscopic criteria for dysplasia and early neoplastic changes, and standardize the visualized mucosal patterns more clearly.

Acetic Acid↗
PubMed2002

Intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia: A prospective study with enhanced magnification endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: There are no endoscopic features that distinguish intestinal metaplasia of the cardia (CIM) from the normal cardia. Biopsy specimens are therefore randomly obtained from normal-appearing mucosa with significant potential sampling errors. Enhanced magnification endoscopy involves the combined use of magnification endoscopy with acetic acid instillation. This study assessed the value of enhanced magnification endoscopy in detecting CIM. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy were invited to participate in the study. Patients were included if the squamocolumnar junction and the esophagogastric junction were judged to be at the same level. Enhanced magnification endoscopy was performed with 3% acetic acid instillation. Standard endoscopy was followed by magnification endoscopy and repeated after acetic acid spraying. Surface patterns were characterized before and after acetic acid spraying. The observed surface patterns were compared with histological results obtained from a single targeted biopsy specimen of each pattern. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of CIM was 34.8% (86/247 patients). After excluding 52 patients because of endoscopic evidence of Barrett's esophagus, 195 patients were eligible for participation in the study. In the study group, CIM was detected in 86 patients (44.1%) in targeted biopsy samples. No dysplasia was identified. Enhanced magnification endoscopy detected four different patterns of the mucosal surface: I) round pits, II) reticular, III) villous, and IV) ridged. The yields of detection of intestinal metaplasia according to endoscopic patterns were I) 0%, II) 5.3% (odds ratio = 0.05), III) 57.7% (odds ratio = 7.5, p = 0.0001), and IV) 95.8% (odds ratio = 42.8, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CIM is more common than previously reported. Enhanced magnification endoscopy identifies two characteristic endoscopic patterns, villous (pattern III) and ridged (pattern IV), with outstanding clarity and resolution that correlate with histological identification of CIM with a single targeted biopsy sample. Enhanced magnification endoscopy will permit longitudinal studies of an entity that can be identified endoscopically.

Acetic Acid↗