Biomedical subjects

Moreno Naliato

Publications and source records attributed to Moreno Naliato.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Head-to-head comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the localization of mitral valve prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study, undertaken in patients who underwent mitral valve (MV) repair surgery, was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography in the evaluation of MV pathology. BACKGROUND: A pre-operative assessment of MV anatomy is essential to surgical design in patients undergoing MV repair. Although 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography provides precise information regarding MV anatomy, 3D TTE and 3D TEE could increase the understanding of MV apparatus and individual scallop identification. METHODS: One-hundred-twelve consecutive patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to MV prolapse underwent a complete 2D and 3D TTE the day before surgery and a complete 2D and 3D TEE in the operating room. Echocardiographic data obtained by the different techniques were compared with surgical inspection. RESULTS: Three-dimensional techniques were feasible in a relatively short time (3D TTE: 7 +/- 4 min; 3D TEE: 8 +/- 3 min), with good (3D TTE 55%; 3D TEE 35%) and optimal (3D TTE 21%; 3D TEE 45%) imaging quality in the majority of cases. Three-dimensional TEE allowed more accurate identification (95.6% accuracy) of all MV lesions in comparison with other techniques. Three-dimensional TTE and 2D TEE had similar accuracies (90% and 87%, respectively), whereas the accuracy of 2D TTE (77%) was significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional TTE and TEE are feasible and useful methods in identifying the location of MV prolapse. They were superior in the description of pathology in comparison with the corresponding 2D techniques and should be regarded as an important adjunct to standard 2D examinations in decisions regarding MV repair.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

[Off-pump coronary bypass surgery: pros and cons].

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is a well established surgical option for patients candidate to coronary artery bypass. Current evidence suggests that there are no differences between off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery in terms of major perioperative outcomes such as perioperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and renal failure, whereas off-pump coronary surgery seems to reduce some minor complications like atrial fibrillation, transfusion requirements, and postoperative hospital stay. However, some recent papers suggest that graft patency may be lower for grafts performed with the off-pump technique. In this paper we review current knowledge about pros and cons of off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

PubMed2005

Increased prothrombotic state lasting as long as one month after on-pump and off-pump coronary surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether the activation of coagulation, fibrinolysis, and endothelium occurring during the first postoperative month after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery differs from that after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Thirty-five patients candidates to coronary surgery were randomized to undergo on-pump (n = 18) or off-pump (n = 17) coronary artery bypass grafting. Blood samples were collected before the intervention and to 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: Prothrombin fragment F1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and D-dimer increased after surgery and were persistently higher than preoperative values as late as 30 postoperative days in both on- and off-pump groups; higher levels of these variables were detected after on-pump surgery relative to off-pump surgery only at the time point after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (fragment F1.2 and thrombin-antithrombin complex) or from bypass end to 8 postoperative days (D-dimer). Fibrinogen levels decreased after surgery and then increased in parallel in both groups to 8 days after surgery. The von Willebrand factor level increased postoperatively in both groups and returned to baseline 30 days after surgery; it was higher after on-pump surgery from bypass end to 8 postoperative days. Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 was increased significantly from baseline in both groups 30 days after surgery, with no difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing off-pump surgery showed protection against activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis and against endothelial injury only during the intraoperative period; this was followed by the development of a prothrombotic pattern comparable to that of patients undergoing on-pump surgery lasting at least as late as 30 days after surgery.

Blood Coagulation↗

PubMed2005

The role of tissue factor and P-selectin in the procoagulant response that occurs in the first month after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: It has been previously shown that a persistent (up to 1 month) prothrombotic status occurs after coronary bypass surgery performed both on pump and off pump. To assess the pathways involved in the occurrence of postoperative prothrombotic state, in this study we evaluated plasma, monocyte-bound, and platelet-bound tissue factor expression, as well as platelet and soluble P-selectin expression, up to 1 month after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Thirty patient candidates for coronary surgery were randomized to undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 15) or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 15). Blood samples were collected before the intervention, after protamine administration, and 4, 8, and 30 days after surgical intervention. RESULTS: Plasma tissue factor levels were significantly higher than baseline both in the on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group (from protamine administration up to 4 postoperative days) and in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group (at 4 postoperative days), with no differences between groups. Basal and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated monocyte tissue factor expression, as well as basal and adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet tissue factor expression, did not show significant variations over time and were similar in the on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting groups throughout the course of the study. Platelet expression of P-selectin, both basal and after adenosine diphosphate stimulation, did not significantly change over time and was not different in the on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting groups. Soluble P-selectin levels in plasma were significantly higher in patients receiving on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting only at the time point after protamine administration, whereas this variable behaved similarly in the on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting groups for the whole postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative tissue factor and P-selectin expression did not differ between the on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting groups. The distinct increase of plasma tissue factor occurring after both surgical procedures might represent a mechanism that might explain, in part, the early postoperative prothrombotic state occurring after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: meta-analysis of currently available randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) challenges the conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the standard of surgical therapy for coronary disease. The aim of this study is to assess the differences in clinical outcomes between CABG and OPCAB by meta-analysis of data published in randomized trials. METHODS: A literature search (Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Medical Editors Trial Amnesty of unpublished clinical trials) was done for the period starting from January 1990 until May 2002 and was supplemented with a manual bibliographic review for all peer-reviewed English language publications. A systematic overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized trials was done to define the risk of the composite end point (death, stroke, or myocardial infarction) in CABG versus OPCAB. RESULTS: A literature search yielded nine comparable randomized studies, for a total of 1090 patients, of whom 558 and 532 were randomly assigned to CABG and OPCAB, respectively. Meta-analysis of these studies showed a trend, albeit not statistically significant, toward reduction in the risk of the composite end point for patients who had OPCAB (odds ratio 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 1.09; p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative analysis of the few prospective randomized studies currently available found a potential clinical benefit of OPCAB, indicating that the avoidance of extracorporeal circulation might result in improved clinical outcomes. Further evidence, however, from large randomized trials is needed to assess potential advantages of OPCAB in terms of early outcomes.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Biological effects of off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery surgery: focus on inflammation, hemostasis and oxidative stress.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been recognized as a cause of complex systemic inflammatory response, which significantly contributes to several adverse postoperative complications. In the last few years, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting has gained widespread diffusion as an alternative technique to conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Surgeons supporting off-pump surgery state that the avoidance of the CPB and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion significantly reduces the postoperative systemic inflammatory response and other biological derangements and, possibly, may improve the clinical outcomes. We review, here, the available evidence concerning possible differences between off-pump and on-pump procedures in terms of inflammation, hemostasis and oxidative stress. Consistent differences in the involvement of these systems are observed, but they are limited to the final steps of the surgical procedures and the early hours after. These findings suggest that the global surgical trauma may be as important, or even more, as the CPB in terms of systemic inflammatory and coagulation-fibrinolytic pathway activation. Further studies are needed in order to confirm this hypothesis.

Biomarkers↗

PubMed2003

Coagulation and fibrinolytic markers in a two-month follow-up of coronary bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The alterations of the coagulation-fibrinolytic profile immediately and up to few days after cardiac surgery have been widely documented. However, less information is available on whether these alterations persist for prolonged periods of time after the operation. In this study we have evaluated the coagulation-fibrinolytic profile of patients who underwent coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass during a 2-month follow-up period. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (age range, 50-75 years) were studied. Blood samples were collected before the intervention and at different time points postoperatively up to 2 months after the operation. Measurement of selected coagulation-fibrinolytic variables was carried out in plasma from 16 patients. Evaluation of tissue factor activity determined as procoagulant activity was performed in peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes obtained from 10 patients. RESULTS: Antigenic levels of clottable fibrinogen, prothrombin fragment F1.2, D-dimer, and thrombin-antithrombin complex were significantly increased during the first week after the intervention compared with preoperative values. Prothrombin fragment F1.2 levels returned to normal within 15 days, fibrinogen levels normalized within 30 days, and thrombin-antithrombin complex levels normalized at 45 days, whereas D-dimer values were still significantly higher 60 days postoperatively respective to baseline values. There was a trend toward an increased procoagulant activity from peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes 4 days after the operation, whereas no changes of factor VII measured either as antigen or in its coagulant and activated forms were recorded throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: A marked activation of the coagulation-fibrinolytic system occurs after cardiopulmonary bypass and lasts for at least 2 months thereafter. This finding suggests that these alterations might account for the increased thrombotic risk of these patients during the postoperative period.

Aged↗