PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Moshe Jakubowski

Publications and source records attributed to Moshe Jakubowski.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Exploding vs. imploding headache in migraine prophylaxis with Botulinum Toxin A.

Migraine headache is routinely managed using medications that abort attacks as they occur. An alternative approach to migraine management is based on prophylactic medications that reduce attack frequency. One approach has been based on local intramuscular injections of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A). Here, we explored for neurological markers that might distinguish migraine patients who benefit from BTX-A treatment (100 units divided into 21 injections sites across pericranial and neck muscles). Responders and non-responders to BTX-A treatment were compared prospectively (n=27) and retrospectively (n=36) for a host of neurological symptoms associated with their migraine. Data pooled from all 63 patients are summarized below. The number of migraine days per month dropped from 16.0+/-1.7 before BTX-A to 0.8+/-0.3 after BTX-A (down 95.3+/-1.0%) in 39 responders, and remained unchanged (11.3+/-1.9 vs. 11.7+/-1.8) in 24 non-responders. The prevalence of aura, photophobia, phonophobia, osmophobia, nausea, and throbbing was similar between responders and non-responders. However, the two groups offered different accounts of their pain. Among non-responders, 92% described a buildup of pressure inside their head (exploding headache). Among responders, 74% perceived their head to be crushed, clamped or stubbed by external forces (imploding headache), and 13% attested to an eye-popping pain (ocular headache). The finding that exploding headache was impervious to extracranial BTX-A injections is consistent with the prevailing view that migraine pain is mediated by intracranial innervation. The amenability of imploding and ocular headaches to BTX-A treatment suggests that these types of migraine pain involve extracranial innervation as well.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Unitary hypothesis for multiple triggers of the pain and strain of migraine.

Migraine headache is triggered by and associated with a variety of hormonal, emotional, nutritional, and physiological changes. The perception of migraine headache is formed when nociceptive signals originating in the meninges are conveyed to the somatosensory cortex through the trigeminal ganglion, medullary dorsal horn, and thalamus. Is there a common descending pathway accounting for the activation of meningeal nociceptors by different migraine triggers? We propose that different migraine triggers activate a wide variety of brain areas that impinge on parasympathetic neurons innervating the meninges. According to this hypothesis, migraine triggers such as perfume, stress, or awakening activate multiple hypothalamic, limbic, and cortical areas, all of which contain neurons that project to the preganglionic parasympathetic neurons in the superior salivatory nucleus (SSN). The SSN, in turn, activates postganglionic parasympathetic neurons in the sphenopalatine ganglion, resulting in vasodilation and local release of inflammatory molecules that activate meningeal nociceptors. Are there ascending pathways through which the trigeminovascular system can induce the wide variety of migraine symptoms? We propose that trigeminovascular projections from the medullary dorsal horn to selective areas in the midbrain, hypothalamus, amygdala, and basal forebrain are functionally positioned to produce migraine symptoms such as irritability, loss of appetite, fatigue, depression, or the quest for solitude. Bidirectional trafficking by which the trigeminovascular system can activate the same brain areas that have triggered its own activity in the first place provides an attractive network of perpetual feedback that drives a migraine attack for many hours and even days.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Can allodynic migraine patients be identified interictally using a questionnaire?

OBJECTIVE: The gradual development of cutaneous allodynia during the course of a migraine attack is commonly detected by quantitative sensory testing (QST) in migraineurs seeking secondary and tertiary medical help. In this study, the authors developed a questionnaire that tested the recollection of the patients on their skin sensitivity during past migraine attacks. METHODS: The authors devised a series of questions regarding skin sensitivity during migraine and posed them to 89 migraineurs when they were free of migraine (Visit 1). To validate their recollections, the authors determined the patients' pain thresholds to mechanical and thermal skin stimuli in the absence of migraine (Visit 1) and during an attack (Visit 2), using QST. RESULTS: Whereas 75.3% of the patients testified to at least one type of skin hypersensitivity during migraine, 24.7% were unaware of any abnormal skin sensitivity. The questionnaire correctly identified 84.8% of the 66 patients classified as allodynic by QST and mislabeled the remaining 15.2% as nonallodynic (false negatives). Among the 23 patients classified as nonallodynic by QST, 47.8% were mislabeled as allodynic using the questionnaire (false positives). Among the total number of 89 patients studied, the questionnaire produced 62.9% true positives and 13.5% true negatives (= 76.4% correct labeling) vs 12.4% false positives and 11.2% false negatives (= 23.6% mislabeling). CONCLUSION: The reliability of the questionnaire as a diagnostic tool of allodynia varies with the proportion of allodynic patients in a given clinic. The major source of variability is the misconception of nonallodynic patients that their skin is hypersensitive during migraine.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Anti-migraine action of triptans is preceded by transient aggravation of headache caused by activation of meningeal nociceptors.

Consistent with previous accounts, some of the patients visiting our pain clinic during the course of a migraine attack have indicated-without solicitation-that sumatriptan injection initially intensified their headache before they were able to appreciate any pain relief. In this study, those patients who came forward complaining about pain exacerbation were asked to rate their headache intensity every 5 min. Within 5-15 min of sumatriptan injection, 17 of the 31 patients studied (55%) reported that their migraine pain intensified for 10-15 min before they started to notice any pain relief. Similar pattern of pain exacerbation was also observed in migraine attacks treated with oral formulation of almotriptan, eletriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan. To investigate the possible mechanism underlying this transient exacerbation of pain, we examined whether intravenous administration of sumatriptan can alter the response properties of C- and Adelta-meningeal nociceptors in the rat. Five to twenty minutes after intravenous administration of 300 microg/kg sumatriptan, 8/10 C-units and 2/8 Adelta-units increased their firing rate, and 6/10 C-units and 7/8 Adelta-units developed mechanical hyper-responsiveness to dural indentation. The minimal effective dose for activation and sensitization of meningeal nociceptors by sumatriptan was 3 microg/kg, suggesting that relatively low levels of triptans entering the circulation shortly after their administration can alter the physiological properties of meningeal nociceptors and produce a transient exacerbation of headache.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2004

Disruption of communication between peripheral and central trigeminovascular neurons mediates the antimigraine action of 5HT 1B/1D receptor agonists.

Triptans are 5HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists commonly prescribed for migraine headache. Although originally designed to constrict dilated intracranial blood vessels, the mechanism and site of action by which triptans abort the migraine pain remain unknown. We showed recently that sensitization of peripheral and central trigeminovascular neurons plays an important role in the pathophysiology of migraine pain. Here we examined whether the drug sumatriptan can prevent and/or suppress peripheral and central sensitization by using single-unit recording in our animal model of intracranial pain. We found that sumatriptan effectively prevented the induction of sensitization (i.e., increased spontaneous firing; increased neuronal sensitivity to intracranial mechanical stimuli) in central trigeminovascular neurons (recorded in the dorsal horn), but not in peripheral trigeminovascular neurons (recorded in the trigeminal ganglion). After sensitization was established in both types of neuron, sumatriptan effectively normalized intracranial mechanical sensitivity of central neurons, but failed to reverse such hypersensitivity in peripheral neurons. In both the peripheral and central neurons, the drug failed to attenuate the increased spontaneous activity established during sensitization. These results suggest that neither peripheral nor central trigeminovascular neurons are directly inhibited by sumatriptan. Rather, triptan action appears to be exerted through presynaptic 5HT(1B/1D) receptors in the dorsal horn to block synaptic transmission between axon terminals of the peripheral trigeminovascular neurons and cell bodies of their central counterparts. We therefore suggest that the analgesic action of triptan can be attained specifically in the absence, but not in the presence, of central sensitization.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Analgesic triptan action in an animal model of intracranial pain: a race against the development of central sensitization.

We have shown that the development of cutaneous allodynia (exaggerated skin sensitivity) during migraine is detrimental to the anti-migraine action of the 5HT(IB/ID) receptor agonists known is triptans. Because cutaneous allodynia is a manifestation of sensitization of central trigeminovascular neurons, we examined whether triptan treatment can intercept such sensitization before its initiation or after its establishment in our rat model for cutaneous allodynia induced by intracranial pain. Single-unit recordings were obtained from spinal trigeminal neurons that proved to received convergent inputs from the dura and facial skin. The effects of sumatriptan (300 microg/kg i.v.) on central sensitization induced by topical application of inflammatory soup (IS) on the dura were determined when the drug was administered either 2 h after IS (late intervention) or at the same time as IS (early intervention). Late sumatriptan intervention counteracted two aspects of central sensitization: dural receptive fields, which initially expanded by IS, shrunk back after treatment; neuronal response threshold to dural indentation, which initially decreased after IS, increased after sumatriptan. On the other hand, late sumatriptan intervention did not reverse other aspects of central sensitization: spontaneous firing rate and neuronal response magnitude to skin brushing which initially increased after IS, remained elevated after sumatriptan; response threshold to heating of the skin, which initially dropped after IS, remained low after sumatriptan. Early sumatriptan intervention effectively blocked the development of all aspects of central sensitization expected to be induced 2 h after IS application: dural receptive fields did not expand; neuronal response threshold to dural indentation and skin stimulation did not decrease; spontaneous firing rate did not increase. The early treatment results suggest that triptan action provides a powerful means of preventing the initiation of central sensitization triggered by chemical stimulation of meningeal nociceptors. The late treatment results suggest that triptan action is insufficient to counteract an already established central sensitization. Thus, triptan action appears to be exerted directly on peripheral rather than central trigeminovascular neurons.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Defeating migraine pain with triptans: a race against the development of cutaneous allodynia.

For many migraine patients, triptan therapy provides complete pain relief in some attacks but not in others. Here, we tested whether the success of triptan therapy is hindered in the presence of cutaneous allodynia (pain resulting from a nonnoxious stimulus to normal skin), a phenomenon we previously described develop gradually during the course of the migraine attack in more than 70% of patients. We studied migraine patients repeatedly on three visits to the clinic: in the absence of migraine (baseline), within the first hour of one attack, or at 4 hours from onset of another attack. Presence or absence of allodynia was determined based on differences between migraine and baseline pain thresholds to mechanical and thermal stimulation of periorbital skin. In 31 patients, we studied 34 migraine attacks that were associated with allodynia at the time of triptan treatment and 27 attacks that were not. Within 2 hours of triptan treatment, patients were rendered pain-free in 5 of 34 (15%) of allodynic attacks versus 25 of 27 (93%) of nonallodynic attacks. Treating migraine attacks 1 hour (early) or 4 hours (late) after the onset of pain was equally ineffective in inducing a pain-free state in the presence of allodynia, and equally effective in the absence of allodynia. For patients susceptible to allodynia during the attack, triptan therapy was by far more likely to provide complete pain relief if administered before rather than after the establishment of cutaneous allodynia. Patients who never developed allodynia were highly likely to be rendered pain-free by triptan therapy anytime after the onset of pain. We conclude that the probability of consistent pain-free outcome increases drastically if triptan therapy is vigilantly timed to precede any signs of cutaneous allodynia.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Terminating migraine with allodynia and ongoing central sensitization using parenteral administration of COX1/COX2 inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether delayed infusion of COX1/COX2 inhibitors (ketorolac, indomethacin) will stop migraine in allodynic patients, and suppress ongoing sensitization in central trigeminovascular neurons in the rat. BACKGROUND: The majority of migraineurs seeking secondary or tertiary medical care develop cutaneous allodynia during the course of migraine, a sensory abnormality mediated by sensitization of central trigeminovascular neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Triptan therapy can render allodynic migraineurs pain free within a narrow window of time (20 to 120 minutes) that opens with the onset of pain and closes with the establishment of central sensitization. Can drugs that tackle ongoing central sensitization render allodynic migraineurs pain free after the window for triptan therapy has expired? METHODS: Patients exhibiting migraine with allodynia were divided in two groups (n=14, each): group 1 received delayed sumatriptan injection (6 mg) 4 hours after onset of attack--which failed to render them pain free-and ketorolac infusion (two 15-mg boluses) 2 hours later; group 2 received delayed ketorolac monotherapy 4 hours after onset of attack. Pain intensity (visual analog scale) and skin sensitivity (quantitative sensory testing) were measured when the patients were migraine free (baseline); 4 hours after onset of migraine (just before treatment); 2 hours after sumatriptan; 1 hour after ketorolac. In the rat, we tested whether infusion of ketorolac (0.4 mg/kg) or indomethacin (1 mg/kg) will block ongoing sensitization in peripheral and central trigeminovascular neurons. The induction of sensitization (using topical application of inflammatory soup on the dura) and its suppression by COX1/COX2 inhibitors were assessed by monitoring changes in spontaneous activity and responses to mechanical and thermal stimuli. RESULTS: Patients had normal skin sensitivity in the absence of migraine, and presented cutaneous allodynia 4 hours after onset of migraine. In group 1, all patients continued to exhibit allodynia 2 hours after sumatriptan treatment, and none of them became pain free. However, 71% and 64% of the patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, were rendered free of pain and allodynia within 60 minutes of ketorolac infusion. Nonresponders from both groups, in contrast to the responders, had had a history of opioid treatment. In the rat, infusion of COX1/COX2 inhibitors blocked sensitization in meningeal nociceptors and suppressed ongoing sensitization in spinal trigeminovascular neurons. This inhibitory action was reflected by normalization of neuronal firing rate and attenuation of neuronal responsiveness to mechanical stimulation of the dura, as well as mechanical and thermal stimulation of the skin. CONCLUSIONS: The termination of migraine with ongoing allodynia using COX1/COX2 inhibitors is achieved through the suppression of central sensitization. Although parenteral administration of COX1/COX2 inhibitors is impractical as routine migraine therapy, it should be the rescue therapy of choice for patients seeking emergency care for migraine. These patients should never be treated with opioids, particularly if they had no prior opioid exposure.

Adolescent↗