PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N A Ator

Publications and source records attributed to N A Ator.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Oral self-administration of triazolam, diazepam and ethanol in the baboon: drug reinforcement and benzodiazepine physical dependence.

Reinforcing and physical dependence-producing effects of oral diazepam and triazolam (0.01-1.28 mg/ml) were studied in four non-water-deprived baboons in daily 2-3-h sessions. Drinking initially was food-induced, but subsequently it was maintained for greater than year without the inducing procedures; drug intake greater than 10 mg/kg per session was attained. Triazolam and diazepam reinforcement (compared to vehicle) was concluded for only one baboon for each drug under a single-spout procedure and for two baboons for each drug under a two-spout procedure. However, all baboons showed ethanol reinforcement under a two-spout procedure. When a lever-pressing requirement was imposed for each drink (one-spout procedure), ethanol maintained requirements of 128 or 256 responses/drink, and volume of ethanol consumed was greater than vehicle. Neither benzodiazepine maintained lever pressing better than vehicle at any response requirement and drinking was suppressed by requirements of 1-32. Physical dependence to triazolam and diazepam developed after approximately 1 month of daily ingestion, evidenced by a precipitated withdrawal syndrome after injection of the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil. A mild spontaneous withdrawal syndrome occurred after substitution of vehicle for triazolam or diazepam. These data indicate a clear dissociation between the reinforcing and physical dependence-producing effects of triazolam and diazepam.

Animals↗

Zolpidem behavioral pharmacology in baboons: self-injection, discrimination, tolerance and withdrawal.

This study examined in baboons various behavioral effects of zolpidem, a short-acting imidazopyridine hypnotic which has selectivity for subtypes of the benzodiazepine receptor. Intravenous drug self-injection was studied under a fixed-ratio 80- or 160-response schedule with a 3-hr timeout after each injection. Maximal rates of self-injection maintained by zolpidem (0.01-1 mg/kg) were consistently higher than those maintained by vehicle and the benzodiazepine hypnotic triazolam. Substitution of vehicle after about 2 weeks of zolpidem self-injection (7-8 mg/kg/day) resulted in a time-limited suppression of food pellet intake, indicating a drug withdrawal effect. In a drug discrimination study, baboons were trained to discriminate either lorazepam (1.8 mg/kg p.o.) or pentobarbital (10 mg/kg p.o.) from the no-drug condition. Zolpidem (0.1-18 mg/kg p.o.) occasioned both lorazepam- and pentobarbital-appropriate responding (greater than 80%) in a dose-dependent manner. In a final experiment, zolpidem (3.2 or 5.6 mg/kg i.m.) produced ataxia and sedation that progressively decreased over 7 consecutive days of administration. The withdrawal, discriminative stimulus effects and tolerance shown with zolpidem were similar to those shown previously with benzodiazepines under similar conditions. The rates of self-injection of zolpidem were similar to those maintained by intermediate duration barbiturates (e.g., pentobarbital) and higher than those maintained by 11 benzodiazepines studied previously under similar conditions. Further research on the reinforcing effects of zolpidem may provide useful insights into mechanisms underlying the maintenance of behavior by compounds acting through the benzodiazepine receptor.

Animals↗

Self-injection of barbiturates, benzodiazepines and other sedative-anxiolytics in baboons.

Self-injection of 12 sedative-anxiolytics was examined in baboons. Intravenous injections and initiation of a 3-h time-out were dependent upon completion of a fixed-ratio schedule requirement, permitting eight injections per day. Before testing each dose of drug, self-injection performance was established with cocaine. Subsequently, a test dose was substituted for cocaine. At some doses, all five of the benzodiazepines examined (alprazolam, bromazepam, chlordiazepoxide, lorazepam, triazolam) maintained rates (number of injections per day) of drug self-injection above vehicle control in each of the baboons tested. Maximum rates of benzodiazepine self-injection were generally submaximal. Of the benzodiazepines examined, triazolam maintained the highest rates of self-injection. Among the three barbiturates tested, methohexital generally maintained high rates of self-injection in contrast to hexobarbital and phenobarbital, which only maintained low rates. Of the four non-benzodiazepine non-barbiturate sedatives examined, both chloral hydrate and methyprylon occasionally maintained high rates of self-injection. Although there were differences within and across animals, baclofen maintained intermediate rates of self-injection. The novel anxiolytic buspirone maintained only low rates of self-injection that were not different from vehicle. This study further validates the self-injection methodology for assessing sedative-anxiolytic abuse liability and provides new information about drug elimination rate as a determinant of drug self-administration.

Animals↗

Comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of midazolam after intracranial and peripheral administration in the rat.

Rats were trained in a two-lever drug discrimination paradigm to discriminate midazolam (0.32 mg/kg, i.p. or 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) from the no-drug condition. After completion of i.p. and s.c. midazolam generalization gradients (0.032-1.0 mg/kg), rats were surgically implanted with unilateral cannulae into the lateral ventricles. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) doses of 1.1-44.2 micrograms midazolam were delivered to unrestrained rats. Midazolam produced dose-dependent increases in drug-appropriate responding by all three routes of administration, but was 2.4- to 4.3-fold more potent when given i.c.v. than when given s.c. or i.p. Midazolam, over the dose range tested, did not produce substantial decreases in response rate by any route of administration. The discriminative-stimulus effect of i.c.v. midazolam was blocked by peripherally administered flumazenil, and such antagonism was surmounted by a 2- to 5-fold increase in the i.c.v. midazolam dose. Taken together, these data suggest that the discriminative-stimulus effects of midazolam are mediated via central benzodiazepine (BZ) receptors.

Animals↗

Drug discrimination in rats successively trained to discriminate diazepam and pentobarbital.

In Phase 1, rats were trained to discriminate either diazepam or pentobarbital from the no-drug condition. Diazepam, pentobarbital, triazolam, meprobamate, and zopiclone occasioned 100% drug-lever responding in tests under both training conditions; but the generalization gradients determined under the pentobarbital training condition were shifted to the right of those determined under the diazepam training condition. In Phase 2, the training drugs were reversed for the two groups, as well as which lever was paired with drug or no drug, in an effort to produce greater specificity of the Phase 2 discrimination. In Phase 2 tests, the Phase 1 training drug occasioned responding on the Phase 2 drug lever in all rats, suggesting that retraining overrode the Phase 1 discrimination. There were indications, however, that Phase 1 training influenced Phase 2 responding: 1) Rats ceased responding partway through no-drug training sessions using the former drug lever, and criterion performance was somewhat more difficult to maintain in Phase 2. 2) In Phase 2, dose-effect curves determined under pentobarbital training were shifted even further to the right of those determined under diazepam training than in Phase 1.

Animals↗

Differential generalization to pentobarbital in rats trained to discriminate lorazepam, chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, or triazolam.

In drug discrimination studies benzodiazepine-trained animals have typically responded on the drug lever when tested with barbiturates. In a recent study, greater specificity appeared to be shown when lorazepam was used as a training drug. The generality and limits of this finding were explored in the present set of experiments. The asymmetrical cross-generalization found in lorazepam- and pentobarbital-trained baboons was replicated in rats and was shown not to be a function of either lorazepam (0.1., 0.32, or 1.0 mg/kg) or pentobarbital (10 or 25 mg/kg) training dose (i.e., pentobarbital-trained rats responded on the drug lever in tests with lorazepam, but lorazepam-trained rats did not show comparable pentobarbital generalization). In the next experiment, groups of rats were trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (10 mg/kg), triazolam (0.1 mg/kg), or diazepam (1.0 mg/kg). Generalization to both lorazepam and pentobarbital was shown by these rats. Finally after daily pentobarbital administration, lorazepam-trained rats made a sufficient number of responses after high pentobarbital doses to permit extension of the range of pentobarbital doses tested. Pentobarbital generalization increased, but still did not occur in all rats and was unreliable in successive tests in the same rats. These results suggest less homogeneity in the discriminative stimulus effects of "depressant drugs" than generally has been recognized.

Animals↗

Effects of environmental conditions on the psychological well-being of primates: a review of the literature.

Amendments made to the Animal Welfare Act in 1985 require primate researchers to provide "a physical environment adequate to promote the psychological well-being of primates". Regulations have not yet been promulgated, in part because "the psychological well-being" of primates is extremely difficult to define. Ideally, those regulations would be based upon observable changes in behavior rather than assumed psychological changes. Regardless, new primate care regulations pertaining to social environment, cage size, exercise and other forms of environmental enrichment are anticipated. A review of the literature suggests that there is little scientific data to support changing existing regulations. For instance, although it is clear that total social isolation in very young primates can be behaviorally devastating in terms of normal social behaviors, there are few, if any, demonstrable adverse effects of individual housing in adult primates. On the other hand, group housing, particularly with groups changing frequently in composition, increases aggression, trauma and disease transmission. In addition, existing research suggests there are important species differences in terms of social preferences. It is impossible to justify an increase in cage size based upon the available literature. An additional practical consideration is that any change in cage size requirements will necessitate replacement of current primate housing on a national level, an enormously expensive proposition. Regarding environmental enrichment, research suggests that providing a naturalistic environment is not as critical as arranging dynamic events that are contingent upon behavior. However, new research is necessary to specify the types of environmental enrichment that are valuable and appropriate before useless, even damaging, and expensive changes are mandated.

Animal Welfare↗

Ethanol's effects on auditory thresholds and reaction times during the acquisition of chronic ethanol self-administration in baboons.

Baboons were trained to ingest ethanol at successively higher ethanol concentrations using oral self-administration techniques. Concurrently, animal psychophysical procedures were employed to determine auditory thresholds and reaction times daily. Maximal consumption of ethanol occurred at concentrations of 6-8% (w/v). During the initial period of ethanol self-administration, both auditory reaction times and auditory thresholds became elevated as animals consumed larger amounts of ethanol. For both the threshold and reaction time measures, the degree of elevation was correlated with the amount of ethanol consumed. These correlations decreased, however, with continued ethanol consumption. The elevations in sensory and motor function recovered to near-baseline levels when ethanol was no longer available.

Animals↗

Self-administration of barbiturates and benzodiazepines: a review.

Studies of barbiturate and benzodiazepine self-administration are categorized by species and route of administration. Reinforcement, defined as self-administration of drug greater than of a non-drug control, has been demonstrated most often in studies employing the IV route, and there has been greater reliability in this result for a given drug among barbiturates rather than among benzodiazepines. Most studies of PO self-administration in rodents have not demonstrated reinforcement, despite a number of behavioral manipulations to induce drug intake. Studies of PO barbiturate self-administration in monkeys have demonstrated reinforcement but recent studies of PO benzodiazepine self-administration in baboons have not, although physical dependence was demonstrated. Reinforcement via the IG route has not been reliably demonstrated. Behavioral variables, including interreinforcement interval and drug self-administration history, appear to be important determinants of whether or not reinforcement will be demonstrated, particularly among the benzodiazepines; but the range of conditions under which behavioral and pharmacological variables interact to promote or lessen the likelihood of self-administration of these drugs remains to be determined experimentally.

Animals↗

Discriminative stimulus effects of atypical anxiolytics in baboons and rats.

Baboons and rats were trained to discriminate lorazepam and pentobarbital in a food-maintained two-lever drug vs. no-drug discrimination procedure. Previous research showed that benzodiazepines, but not barbiturates, occasioned drug lever responding in the lorazepam-trained animals. Lorazepam and six nonbenzodiazepines that have been proposed as anxiolytics (CGS 9896, CL 218,872, PK 9084, zopiclone, buspirone and 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol) were studied in test sessions in which responding on either level produced food. Of the nonbenzodiazepine compounds studied that displace 3H-benzodiazepines in vitro, CL 218,872 and zopiclone occasioned drug lever responding in all animals; PK 9084 did not occasion drug lever responding in any animal; and CGS 9896 did not occasion drug lever responding in lorazepam- or pentobarbital-trained baboons or in lorazepam-trained rats, but did so in the pentobarbital-trained rats. Buspirone, a nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic with prominent dopaminergic activity, and 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol, a gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist, also did not occasion drug lever responding in either baboons or rats, regardless of training drug. Time course studies in baboons with CGS 9896, PK 9084, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol and buspirone did not reveal delayed onset of drug stimulus generalization. Some differences in potency as a function of route of administration were found with CL 218,872, zopiclone and buspirone. The discriminative stimulus effects of lorazepam, CL 218,872 and zopiclone were antagonized by the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788. It is concluded that the discriminative stimulus properties of these nonbenzodiazepine compounds thus do not co-vary with their antipunishment effects, with their clinical efficacy as anxiolytics or with benzodiazepine receptor binding.

Animals↗

Lorazepam and pentobarbital discrimination: interactions with CGS 8216 and caffeine.

Baboons and rats were trained under a two-lever, food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. The training drug was either lorazepam (1.0 mg/kg) or pentobarbital (5.6 mg/kg in baboons, 10.0 mg/kg in rats). Under test conditions, a range of training drug doses occasioned 100% drug lever responding. CGS 8216 (3.2-10.0 mg/kg) combined with lorazepam produced a complete shift to the no-drug lever in both species; this shift was surmountable with higher doses of lorazepam. CGS 8216 (32.0 mg/kg) combined with pentobarbital produced a statistically significant decrease in drug-lever responding in rats, and in baboons CGS 8216 initially, but not subsequently, produced a complete shift to the no-drug lever. Caffeine (0.32-10.0 mg/kg) combined with lorazepam inconsistently decreased drug-lever responding across multiple determinations in baboons and significantly decreased drug lever responding in rats. Caffeine combined with pentobarbital also yielded an inconsistent decrease in drug lever responding in baboons but there was no effect in rats. Thus the most reliable and complete antagonism across species was obtained with the CGS 8216/lorazepam combinations.

Animals↗

Relative abuse liability of triazolam: experimental assessment in animals and humans.

The abuse liability of a drug is a positive, interactive function of the reinforcing and adverse effects of the drug. The relative abuse liability of the hypnotic benzodiazepine, triazolam, has been controversial. This paper reviews animal and human studies bearing on its relative abuse liability, including data on pharmacological profile, reinforcing effects, liking, speed of onset, discriminative stimulus effects, subjective effects, physiological dependence, rebound and early morning insomnia, drug produced anxiety, lethality in overdose, psychomotor impairment, interactions with ethanol, anterograde amnesia, impaired awareness of drug effect, and other psychiatric and behavioral disturbances. It is concluded that the abuse liability of triazolam is less than that of the intermediate duration barbiturates such as pentobarbital. Although there are considerable data indicating similarities of triazolam to other benzodiazepines, there is also substantial speculation among clinical investigators and some limited data suggesting that the abuse liability of triazolam is greater than that of a variety of other benzodiazepines, and virtually no credible data or speculation that it is less. Further research will be necessary to clarify definitively the abuse liability of triazolam relative to other benzodiazepines.

Amnesia↗