PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N A Halpern

Publications and source records attributed to N A Halpern.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To gather data about available technology, staffing, administrative policies, and bed capacities of ICUs in the United States. DESIGN AND SETTING: On January 15, 1991, survey instruments were mailed to the administrators of 4,233 hospitals to gather information from the medical director of the institutions' respective ICUs for the purpose of developing a database on ICUs in the United States. The sampling frame for this study was based on all American Hospital Association (AHA) hospitals that stated they have ICUs. MEASUREMENTS: Census questionnaires solicited information on types of hospitals, types of ICUs, number of ICU beds open and closed, technology available to the unit, organizational structure and management of the ICU, as well as the staffing and certification of unit personnel. MAIN RESULTS: Data were obtained on 32,850 ICU beds with 25,871 patients from 2,876 separate ICUs in 1,706 hospitals in the United States. Census responses came from units in all sizes of hospitals within all ten census regions in the country, all states, and all types of hospital sponsorship (federal, state, and local government, private nonprofit and private for profit). The census response rate was 40% of the AHA hospitals that stated that they have ICUs, with specific ICU data on 38.7% of the nation's ICUs. The number of ICUs per hospital increases with overall hospital size. The smallest hospitals (less than 100 beds) usually had only one ICU. As hospital size increased, the single, all inclusive medical/surgical/coronary care units diminished, and in hospitals with greater than 300 beds, specialization of units became prevalent. In absolute terms, hospitals had the following number of ICUs: 1.04 +/- 0.20 (less than or equal to 100 beds); 1.30 +/- 0.65 (101 to 300 beds); 2.37 +/- 1.58 (301 to 500 beds); and 3.34 +/- 2.21 (greater than 500 beds). ICU beds averaged, nationally, 8.09% of hospital-licensed beds with a median of 6.98%. Generally, medical units, pediatric units, coronary care units (CCUs), and medical/surgical/CCUs reported an average of 10 beds per unit. Neonatal units averaged 21 beds, and surgical units averaged 12 beds. The average ICU size, nationally, was 11.7 +/- 7.8 beds per unit. Available technology within hospitals and individual units was increased as hospital size increased; surgical units tended to have more available technology than other unit types. A wide range of organizational arrangements within hospitals determines where the ICU appears in an organizational chart and to whom unit management is accountable. Thirty-six percent of the units were located organizationally within the hospital's department of medicine, while 23% were considered "free standing," having no departmental affiliation. Although units must have a medical director, the perception as to whether this director supervises the day-to-day operation was different in larger vs. smaller hospitals. In hospitals with less than or equal to 100 beds, 72% of the units were perceived to be supervised by the medical director, whereas in larger hospitals (greater than 500 beds), 81% of units were supervised. Study results indicated that medical directors in pediatric, neonatal, and burn units most often were perceived to supervise the unit. Presently, 63% of all ICUs responding are directed by an internist. The next largest group to direct ICUs were surgeons, followed by pediatricians. Pediatrician involvement tended to be exclusive in pediatric and neonatal units. Surgeons directed most surgical and neurologic units and were involved in 21% of mixed medical/surgical units. Internists predominated in medical units and in CCUs, as well as in combined medical/surgical/CCUs. Direction by anesthesiologists, although relatively infrequent, predominated in the surgical unit. Critical care medicine certification of the medical director and attending staff of the ICU increased as hospital size increased, although only 44% of all units stated that thei

Allied Health Personnel↗
PubMed1992

A computerized intensive care unit order-writing protocol.

OBJECTIVE: To present a computerized intensive care unit order-writing protocol. DESIGN: Descriptive report. SETTING: Eight-bed surgical intensive care unit, Department of Surgery, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY. METHODS: IBM-based, computer network program that provides user-friendly, logical, and comprehensive organ-system order sequences for patient management. RESULTS: Since July 1988, an order program that stresses (1) improved and more efficient patient care, (2) the use of program-integrated automatic safety features, (3) the substitution of computer entry for handwriting, and (4) the assurance that physicians deliver obligatory care in a logical organ-system-based progression has been implemented. CONCLUSIONS: The order protocol system presented is simple to introduce and operate, has minimal training and technical requirements, and is demonstrably reliable.

Computer Security↗
PubMed1992

Postoperative hypertension: a multicenter, prospective, randomized comparison between intravenous nicardipine and sodium nitroprusside.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of iv nicardipine with sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of postoperative hypertension after both cardiac and noncardiac surgery. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study. SETTING: Six tertiary referral medical centers (recovery rooms and surgical ICUs). PATIENTS: A total of 139 patients with postoperative hypertension: i.v. nicardipine (n = 71), sodium nitroprusside (n = 68). INTERVENTION: Administration of i.v. nicardipine or sodium nitroprusside. MEASUREMENTS: Vital signs (BP, heart rate), hemodynamic variables, medication dosage, total number of dose changes, and time to achieve BP control were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Both medications were equally effective in reducing BP in both the cardiac and noncardiac surgical groups. Under the conditions of the study, i.v. nicardipine controlled hypertension more rapidly than sodium nitroprusside (i.v. nicardipine 14.0 +/- 1.0 mins and sodium nitroprusside 30.4 +/- 3.5 mins, p = .0029). The total number of dose changes required to achieve therapeutic BP response was significantly less in the i.v. nicardipine-treated patients (i.v. nicardipine 1.5 +/- 0.2 vs. sodium nitroprusside 5.1 +/- 1.4, p < .05). Adverse effects were observed with both drugs (i.v. nicardipine 7% [5/71] and sodium nitroprusside 18% [12/68] [NS]). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous nicardipine is as effective as sodium nitroprusside in the therapy of postoperative hypertension. Specific advantages have been identified. The use of i.v. nicardipine should be considered in the therapy of postoperative hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Left-sided superior vena cava: a not-so-unusual vascular anomaly discovered during central venous and pulmonary artery catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: To report our ICU experience with patients noted to have a left-sided superior vena cava after central venous and pulmonary artery catheterization. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Surgical ICUs in a University and Veterans Administration Medical Center. PATIENTS: Five patients who had insertion of central venous or pulmonary artery catheters were noted to have abnormal placement. RESULTS: Five patients were noted to have a left-sided superior vena cava that was not appreciated on preinsertion radiography after central venous (two patients) or pulmonary artery catheterization (three patients). The finding of left-sided superior vena cava was confirmed by computed tomography scan (one patient), transesophageal echocardiography (one patient), bolus contrast injection (two patients), and intraoperative inspection (one patient). CONCLUSIONS: Left-sided superior vena cava occurs infrequently, most often in association with a right-sided superior vena cava. It is often associated with cardiac septal defects. The intensivist should be aware of its occurrence in order to not mistake catheters placed in it as being present in the arterial circulation or malpositioned outside of the venous circulation.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Postoperative sepsis: reexplore or observe? Accurate indication from diagnostic abdominal paracentesis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if postoperative diagnostic abdominal paracentesis is a useful clinical tool in the abdominal evaluation of the critically ill septic patient. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Surgical ICU patients in a Veterans Administration medical center. PATIENTS: Ten patients were studied from a total of 1,053 patients admitted to the surgical ICU between September 1985 and May 1989. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic abdominal paracentesis performed by the open or closed approaches. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Results are presented in three patient groups (A, B, and C): Group A (n = 4) had positive diagnostic abdominal paracentesis. Abdominal causes for the sepsis were found at reexploration. One of these four patients survived. Group B (n = 3) had negative diagnostic abdominal paracentesis. No abdominal septic source was found at reexploration; all three patients died. In group C (n = 3), diagnostic abdominal paracentesis was negative, patients were not reexplored, and all survived. Diagnostic accuracy correlated with three variables: a) the gross appearance and smell of the fluid, b) WBC count greater than 5000 or less than 500/mm3, and c) Gram stain demonstrating bacterial organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic abdominal paracentesis proved accurate, reliable, simple, safe, and rapid in evaluating the abdomen in the postoperative septic patient. The use of this procedure should be considered in postoperative septic patients in whom an abdominal source for the sepsis needs to be excluded.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Nicardipine infusion for postoperative hypertension after surgery of the head and neck.

The therapy of postoperative hypertension (POH) after head and neck surgery was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Nicardipine hydrochloride, a Ca channel-blocker for iv use, was compared with placebo. Patients were initially randomized to receive nicardipine infusion or placebo. Those not responding to placebo were given nicardipine infusion on an open basis. Hypertension was significantly better controlled in patients treated with nicardipine infusion compared with placebo (83% vs. 22%, p less than .002). Subsequently, six (86%) of seven of the placebo failures were successfully treated with nicardipine. There were no significant complications in either group. We conclude that the titratable infusion of nicardipine is an effective and safe method for the control of POH after surgery of the head and neck. Further studies are now warranted comparing nicardipine with other drugs currently used to treat this condition.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1990

Postoperative hypertension: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial, with intravenous nicardipine hydrochloride.

Nicardipine hydrochloride, a new calcium channel blocker for intravenous use, has been compared with placebo in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial on postoperative hypertension. Of 175 patients who signed preoperative consent, 24 (13.7%) met entry criteria. Hypertension was significantly better controlled in nicardipine-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo (93% versus 30%, p less than 0.05). All the placebo failures were subsequently successfully treated with nicardipine. There were no significant complications in either group. The authors conclude that nicardipine HC1 is an effective, safe therapy for postoperative hypertension. Further studies are now indicated comparing it with other drugs currently used to treat this condition.

Double-Blind Method↗
PubMed1990

Segmental intestinal absorption of ranitidine: investigative and therapeutic implications.

The absorption of ranitidine from different segments of the intestinal tract was studied in a subject who had an anatomically divided small intestine. The results indicate that the drug is maximally absorbed from the small bowel rather than the stomach. Subsequent animal studies have shown that absorption of ranitidine in dogs is primarily duodenal followed by jejunal and ileal. The lack of gastric absorption, with predominantly small bowel absorption, may have investigational and therapeutic implications in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Visual compatibility of enalaprilat with commonly used critical care medications during simulated Y-site injection.

Physical incompatibility studies between an intravenous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalaprilat, and potentially coadministrable ICU medications have been performed. Forty-one medications and four solutions were evaluated. The medications were anesthetic/narcotics, antibiotics, an anticoagulant, a bronchodilator, electrolyte solutions, fluids, H-2 receptor blocking agents, steroids and vasoactive agents. There was no turbidity, precipitation, or color change caused by the admixing of enalaprilat with any of the 45 agents studied. This study did not take bioavailability into consideration.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1989

The compatibility of nicardipine hydrochloride injection with various ICU medications during simulated Y-site injection.

Physical incompatibility studies between an intravenous calcium channel antagonist, nicardipine hydrochloride, and potentially coadministerable ICU medications have been performed. Forty-one medications and four solutions were evaluated. The medications were anesthetic/narcotics, antibiotics, an anticoagulant, a bronchodilator, electrolyte solutions, fluids, H2 receptor blocking agents, steroids and vasoactive agents. Of the forty-five substances, three showed evidence of physical incompatibility as manifested by turbidity, precipitation, or color change. All three were antibiotics. These were ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam sodium, and cefoperazone. We conclude that until bioavailability studies are performed these three antibiotics should not be coadministered with nicardipine HCl.

Ampicillin↗
PubMed1988

The effect of various postphlebotomy storage conditions on drug levels.

Monitoring drug levels in patients is standard practice in presentday critical care medicine. Clinical laboratories, however, are often unable to assay drug levels immediately following phlebotomy. This may result in blood samples being kept under a variety of storage conditions for nonuniform periods of time. The current study evaluated the stability of eight frequently monitored medications and one of their metabolities, in whole blood and plasma, at 4 degrees C or 25 degrees C, for up to 72 hours. The drugs included antibiotics, a bronchodilator, antiarrhythmics, and an anticonvulsant. Significant changes in drug levels were not identified at the time points studied. Our data suggests that meticulous postphlebotomy handling of blood samples may not be essential to obtain accurate levels of the drugs studied.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Permanent visual display exhibits. A supplementary instructional technique in critical care education.

The discipline of critical care is being challenged to provide ongoing education to the various groups of critical care health providers. Traditional modalities of instruction may not suffice as unique circumstances exist in the practice and daily delivery of patient care. These unique circumstances include a never-ending introduction of new devices, tubes, and catheters into practice. In addition, the intensive care setting features a wide variability of work experience, a high turnover rate of personnel, variable cognitive approaches to understanding technical devices, and a stressful workplace. In their surgical intensive care unit, the authors have developed a set of permanent visual display exhibits. These exhibits were designed to specifically address the above problems and serve as a supplementary mode of education for our diverse medical, nursing, and technical staff. The exhibits may provide an example for other intensive care units and educators.

Critical Care↗