PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N A Holtzman

Publications and source records attributed to N A Holtzman.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Involving consumers in the development of an educational program for cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Input from consumers of health care was sought in developing an educational program to be provided to individuals who are considering carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF). In addition, we assessed the ability of health professionals to predict consumers' priorities with regard to such information. A focus group of six middle school teachers formulated questions that they would ask in trying to decide whether they wanted carrier screening for CF. Then, other adults with (n = 39) and without (n = 60) a family history of CF were presented with the questions and were asked to select the questions in the order in which they would want them answered if offered the carrier test. After each question was answered, they were asked whether they would want the carrier test if it were offered to them. CF clinic staff, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors (n = 31) were asked to select the questions in the order in which they believed that an adult from the general population would want them answered. There were no differences in the order in which adults with and without a family history of CF would want questions answered. Consumers would want to learn about the carrier test as well as their risk of being a carrier and of having a child with CF, before receiving information on reproductive options and the effect that a child with CF would have on the family. Of the 44% of consumers who changed their mind about wanting screening during the course of selecting questions, 52% did so after the first question that they selected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Incorporation of genetics in primary care practice. Will physicians do the counseling and will they be directive?

OBJECTIVE: To determine, by response to a scenario, how willing primary care physicians would be to counsel a couple about prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and how directive they would be about whether the couple should undergo prenatal diagnosis and whether the couple should terminate the pregnancy if the fetus is affected. DESIGN: Survey of a random sample of primary care physicians, psychiatrists, and genetics professionals in 10 geographically representative states. RESPONDENTS: Sixty-five percent (N = 1140) of 1759 obstetricians, pediatricians, internists, family practitioners, and psychiatrists, and 79% (N = 280) of medical geneticists and genetic counselors. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Respondents were evenly divided on whether they would counsel about prenatal diagnosis or refer to a genetic counselor (49.4% and 50.6%, respectively). Those who indicated that they would counsel were likely to have greater knowledge about genetics, greater confidence in communicating about genetics, and higher tolerance for ambiguity and were more likely to have completed their medical training since 1971 and to practice in a rural area. Forty-four percent of physicians would give an opinion about prenatal diagnosis. Men would be more likely to give an opinion than women (P < .005). Only 9.6% of respondents would give an opinion regarding abortion. These respondents were more likely to come from specialties with less exposure to genetics and to value attendance at religious services. Primary care physicians were more likely to give their opinions about prenatal diagnosis and abortion than genetics professionals. CONCLUSIONS: To the extent that attitudes are reflected in practice, genetic counseling may be more directive when provided by primary care physicians than by genetics professionals, unless primary care physicians' growing involvement in genetics changes their attitudes.

Abortion, Eugenic↗
PubMed1993

Physicians' knowledge of genetics and genetic tests.

PURPOSE: To assess primary care physicians' and psychiatrists' knowledge of genetics and genetic tests and the factors associated with differences in these physicians' knowledge. METHOD: Questionnaires were mailed in 1991 to 1,795 primary care physicians (family physicians, internists, pediatricians, obstetrician-gynecologists) and psychiatrists who had graduated from medical school between 1950 and 1985 (67.6% of the sample had graduated after 1970) and who were members of professional societies. The questions elicited demographic and practice characteristics as well as knowledge of genetics concepts and facts and awareness of the availability of genetic tests. To validate the questionnaire, 360 medical geneticists and genetic counselors received questionnaires. Statistical analysis involved arc-sine function transformation, t-tests, analyses of variance, F-tests, Tukey's HSD, and stepwise multiple regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,140 (64.8%) of the non-geneticist physicians responded. They correctly answered an average of 73.9%, SD, 13.9%, of the knowledge items, compared with 94.6%, SD, 4.2%, for the genetics professionals (p < .001). The most significant predictors of knowledge were recency of graduation from medical school and practicing in primary care specialties in which exposure to genetics problems is likely. Other significant predictors (from most to least important) were graduation from a U.S. medical school, willingness to adopt a new predictive test before it becomes standard practice, not using pharmaceutical companies as a source of information about new medical practices, and taking a required genetics course in medical school. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that knowledge of genetics and genetic tests is increasing among physicians, particularly among more recent graduates and physicians who are exposed to genetics problems in their practices, but deficiencies remain. Although a medical school course in genetics may improve knowledge, it is not sufficient. Greater emphasis is needed at all levels of medical education to reduce the chance of physician error as more genetic tests become available.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1993

Measuring physicians' tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing.

Despite uncertainties in medicine, attempts to study physicians' tolerance for uncertainty have been few, and limited by the measurement instruments available. This paper describes development of a modified tolerance for ambiguity (TFA) scale, and correlates it with several physician characteristics and reported behaviors. Eighteen TFA items were included in a national survey of physicians' knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing. Sixty-five percent (n = 1,140) of 1,759 obstetricians, pediatricians, internists, family practitioners, and psychiatrists responded. After psychometric analyses, the scale was reduced to 7 items, demonstrating an acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .75). TFA was higher among psychiatrists than other specialties, among those who were older when they graduated from medical school, and among those willing to offer a new low-cost, accurate predictive test when none of their colleagues do. TFA was lower among those who indicated that attendance at religious services was important, among those who would make a recommendation to their patients regarding pregnancy termination after prenatal diagnosis, and among those who would withhold negative genetic test results. Future research is needed on the scale itself, and to assess factors affecting TFA, such as its susceptibility to modification, and its potential association with clinical practice in other areas of medicine that are characterized by ambiguity.

Abortion, Therapeutic↗
PubMed1993

Primary care physicians as providers of frontline genetic services.

Due in part to shortages of health care professionals with expertise in genetics, primary care physicians will assume a greater role in providing frontline genetic services as genetic tests for more diseases become available. I report some preliminary findings from a national survey of primary care physicians, psychiatrists, medical geneticists and genetic counselors. As expected, no group of nongenetics specialists had as much knowledge as geneticists. Nongeneticist physicians with the greatest exposure to patients with genetic problems had more knowledge than physicians without such exposure. Non-geneticist physicians were more likely to be directive in counseling than geneticists. Problems for future research are enumerated.

Fetal Diseases↗
PubMed1993

Improving response rates through incentive and follow-up: the effect on a survey of physicians' knowledge of genetics.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed efforts to increase response rates to a mailed physician survey and examined whether, as a result, nonresponse bias was reduced. METHODS: Randomly selected physicians and geneticists were mailed a questionnaire concerning genetics knowledge and attitudes. In the final but not the pilot survey, a $25 incentive and intensive follow-up were used to increase the response rate. RESULTS: The response rate from physicians in the final survey was 64.8% (n = 1140), compared with 19.6% in the pilot test (n = 69). Sample representatives in sociodemographic and practice characteristics was improved by follow-up. Respondents recruited with more difficulty did not differ on the principal outcome variable, genetics knowledge, except on one subscore. Pilot study and final survey respondents did not differ in knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effect of increased response rates on the principal outcome variable in this study was minimal, this may not be the case for other studies. Every effort should be made to attain as high a response rate as is practical and to establish that respondents are representative of the population being sampled.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The diffusion of new genetic tests for predicting disease.

This paper examines the pathways by which new genetic tests will become available to the public. In view of the scarcity of genetic specialists, the pathway is likely to involve primary care physicians. Other pathways entail state-mandated testing, community-based programs, or testing by laboratories without much involvement of primary care physicians. When testing does become available the "destination" will be either family-centered testing or population-oriented screening. The deterrent to screening will not be the inability to detect disease-causing mutations but the costs and attitudes of providers and the public. When tests are provided primarily to provide information about risks to future children, some people will oppose screening on religious or moral grounds. When there are no inexpensive treatments, some will fear that insurance companies and employers will use tests to deny them health care coverage. Some may not want to know their risks for disorders about which little can be done. For common, multifactorial disorders, genetic tests will have low predictive value. Because of these problems, the decision to be tested, regardless of the destination, requires that "testees" be fully informed and consent to testing. When acceptance rates are low, screening is less likely to be cost-effective; family-centered testing becomes the default destination.

Genetic Diseases, Inborn↗
PubMed1991

Effectiveness of an antihistamine-decongestant combination for young children with the common cold: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

We tested the hypothesis that antihistamine-decongestant combinations cause no clinically significant relief of the symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections in young children by randomly assigning 96 children to one of three treatment groups: antihistamine-decongestant, placebo, and no treatment. There were no differences among the three study groups in the proportion of children considered "better" overall by the parent 48 hours after the initial assessment (drug, 67%; placebo, 71%; no treatment, 57%; p = 0.53). There were no differences among groups in individual or composite symptom score changes. Two thirds of parents whose children were eligible for the drug trial believed that their child needed medicine for cold symptoms. In the proportion of parents believing that their child needed medicine, there was no difference between those who consented to participate and those who refused. Parents who wanted medicine at the initial visit reported more improvement at follow-up, regardless of whether the child received drug, placebo, or no treatment. We conclude that there is no clinically significant improvement in symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection, including no significant placebo effect, in young children for whom an antihistamine-decongestant is prescribed.

Brompheniramine↗
PubMed1988

Genetic variation in nutritional requirements and susceptibility to disease: policy implications.

I have considered several questions that should be answered in order to develop rational public policy for preventing disability and premature death for common disorders for which genes play a role and for which nutritional modification within the normal range can be effective. The sensitivity and predictive value of screening tests, the increment in improved outcomes from screening compared with population-wide changes in diet; the benefit, if any, to be derived from diet modification for those not identified by screening; and the reliability of the laboratories performing the test are some of the factors to be considered. We must bear in mind that many of the common disorders for which we will soon have tests at the gene or gene-product level result from the interaction of multiple factors, both environmental and genetic. Genetic screening will detect only a small proportion of all those destined to manifest a specific disorder, such as coronary artery disease or colon cancer. Dietary modification will also be only one of several interventions that will be efficacious for certain disorders. In some of these cases, genetic screening will prove to be an effective adjunct to general nutritional changes whereas in others it will have little utility and in still others it could play the predominant role in preventing or reducing the severity of the disorder. If we are to reduce the burden of disease most effectively, we cannot ignore factors in our environment and social structure that limit people's ability to control their own health.

Adult↗