Portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to N Atweh.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Many experts have suggested that blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years should not be managed by observation because of supposed increased fragility of the spleen and decreased physiologic reserve in elderly patients. We sought to determine the outcome of nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years. METHODS: For the years 1994 through 1996, data for patients with splenic injury older than 55 years from seven trauma centers in a single state were reviewed. RESULTS: Blunt splenic trauma occurred in 41 patients older than 55 years. Eight patients were excluded from further analysis because of death from massive associated injuries within 24 hours of admission. The remaining 33 patients (mean age, 72+/-10 years) were divided into two groups: immediate exploration (10 patients) and observation (23 patients). Observation of blunt splenic injury failed in 4 of 23 patients (17%). No patient deaths were related to the method of management of the splenic injury. CONCLUSIONS: Observation of the elderly patient with blunt splenic trauma has an acceptable failure rate of 17%.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A penetrating extremity trauma registry was created to prospectively study the physical findings, use of arteriography, nonoperative management with embolization or observation and operation in the management of vascular injuries. During a recent ten month period, 228 patients with 320 injuries of the extremity secondary to firearms were admitted to the Trauma Service. Twenty-four percent of the patients had more than one injury, and there were six perioperative deaths related to associated injuries. Fifty-one patients had 50 arterial and 17 venous injuries. Limb salvage was 100 percent. Twenty-two patients with obvious arterial injuries were taken directly to the operating room without arteriography. Arteriography was performed immediately after admission in 41 patients and the findings were positive in 46.4 percent of the patients; nine required operation. Arteriography was performed for injuries in proximity to a major vessel as the indication in 153 injuries and revealed seven arterial injuries (4.6 percent). Three patients underwent operation. Five patients with arterial injuries had successful embolization during the initial arteriography and five patients with intimal injuries were observed, four healed and one patient was lost to follow-up evaluation. Operative repair of arterial injuries included the use of saphenous vein (21 patients), prosthetic grafts (seven patients) and ligations (four patients). Seventeen venous injuries were either repaired (eight patients) or ligated (nine patients). In the patients undergoing operative repairs, 68.7 percent had fasciotomies performed. The excellent results in the current study (no amputations with 51 survivors of arterial injuries) were obtained by a multidisciplinary approach, involving selective arteriography to avoid unnecessary operation and operative repair in those with extensive vascular injuries. The use of arteriography for proximity characterized a few vascular injuries requiring operation or observation. It should serve as the standard for evaluating noninvasive diagnostic studies and for studying the natural history of asymptomatic injuries.
We report our use of percutaneous antegrade ureteral stenting (PAUS) as an adjunct for the management of dehisced ureteral repairs and delayed-presentation ureteral injuries secondary to penetrating trauma. This procedure was performed in treating six patients with ureteral injuries. Four patients had dehiscence of a lacerated ureter that had been primarily repaired. Two other patients had ureteral contusions that subsequently became full-thickness disruptions postoperatively. One of these patients developed a pancreaticoureteral fistula. The sepsis resolved in all six patients and in five of the six patients the ureteral disruption healed within 2 months after PAUS without operative intervention. In one patient the ureter healed with stricture, necessitating ureteral reanastomosis. All urinomas resolved with percutaneous drainage. The PAUS technique was used to successfully treat four dehisced ureteral repairs and was the primary method used to successfully treat two disrupted ureteral contusions that were associated with multiple collections and fistulas. These techniques can be utilized for complex ureteral injuries associated with pancreatic leaks, colon or duodenal injuries, and multiple abscesses.
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 11 patients admitted to the trauma service at Kings County Hospital who underwent packing and temporary closure for severe nonhepatic injuries. The mean ISS was 37 and the mean Abdominal Trauma Index value was 48. Operative findings included 17 major vascular injuries. Although the mean blood pressure was 105 mm Hg during the procedure, the patients required an average of 17 units of blood and all were acidotic, hypothermic, and coagulopathic. Acidosis persisted in all patients and the mean base excess was -13 at closure. A conscious decision was made to terminate the procedure when surgical bleeding was controlled. Patients were resuscitated and warmed in the ICU and returned to the operating room within 48 hours. Seven of the 11 patients survived. Of the eight patients who survived to return to the operating room, all required gastrointestinal procedures at re-exploration. This preliminary experience supports packing to control coagulopathic bleeding, use of temporary abdominal closure, and further ICU resuscitation with a planned second laparotomy for definitive management of gastrointestinal injuries in patients with severe nonhepatic injuries.
Seventy-two consecutive patients who underwent neck arteriography were reviewed to assess recent suggestions that angiography is not indicated in asymptomatic patients with penetrating neck trauma. Proximity to major neck vessels without signs or symptoms of vascular trauma was the reason for angiography in ten of 26 patients with proven arterial injuries. Physical examination had a specificity of 80% and a sensitivity of 61% in this series. There was no correlation between mechanism or location of penetration and the likelihood of clinically significant injury. We conclude that recent recommendations suggesting that arteriography is unnecessary in asymptomatic patients with penetrating neck trauma are premature. Further investigations of larger patient samples are necessary to determine if "proximity" should be abandoned as an indication for arteriography. We advocate that, until additional data are accumulated, urgent arteriography and esophagography or operative exploration are indicated in stable asymptomatic patients with neck wounds which violate the platysma.
The role of the radiologist in the management of urologic disease has changed dramatically in the last 10 years with the introduction of new imaging methods and the evolution of the angiographic catheter into a therapeutic instrument. The authors review the diagnostic options in genitourinary trauma, the indications for and techniques of transcatheter arterial embolization for renal and other retroperitoneal hemorrhage, and nonvascular interventions such as antegrade nephrostomy, stenting of urethral disruptions, percutaneous bladder drainage, and drainage of abscesses, hematomas, and urinomas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.