PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N B de Cesare

Publications and source records attributed to N B de Cesare.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

[Implantation of the Palmaz-Schatz stent in coronary vessels irrigating and non-irrigating necrotic myocardial areas: comparison of acute results and at mid-term].

Recent evidence suggests that higher restenosis rate is observed after coronary angioplasty of an infarct-related artery. Furthermore, angiographic restenosis seems associated with a deterioration of left ventricular function at follow-up. The aim of this study was to assess the acute results and angiographic restenosis following coronary artery stenting of infarct-related (Group 1) and non infarct-related coronary arteries (Group 2). We retrospectively analyzed the results of 381 consecutive patients treated with Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation between May 1992 and January 1996. Stenting of the infarct-related artery was performed in 154 patients (Group 1), while 227 patients (Group 2) received stenting of the non infarct-related artery. Both groups had similar age, gender, clinical conditions and coronary angiographic pattern. There were no significant differences between groups, concerning type of stented coronary vessel (left anterior descending-LAD 52.4% vs non-LAD 47.6%, Group 1, LAD 59.5% vs non-LAD 40.5%, Group 2) and number of stents per patient (1.31 +/- 0.48 in Group 1, 1.18 +/- 0.56 in Group 2) and per coronary vessel (1.17 +/- 0.54 in Group 1, 1.09 +/- 0.46 in Group 2). The procedure was performed using similar maximal inflation pressures in both groups (13.3 +/- 2.9 atm in Group 1, 13.40 +/- 3.17 atm in Group 2). Technical success was achieved in 96.8% of Group 1 and in 96% of Group 2 patients. Acute coronary stenting success and major adverse events (acute myocardial infarction, emergency bypass, death) were similar in both groups of patients. No difference was found in restenosis rate at 6-month angiographic follow-up (Group 1 = 29.8%, Group 2 = 27%). In conclusion, this study indicates that stenting of infarct and non infarct-related coronary arteries has similar success and 6-month restenosis rates.

Coronary Circulation↗

[Peri-infarct angiographic behavior of "non-culprit" coronary infarct lesions].

Because systemic factors, such as lipoproteins, autoantigens, infectious agents, may facilitate plaque rupture, thrombus formation and coronary occlusion, the question may arise of whether thrombosis be only a local plaque event or the consequence of an acute activity of the entire coronary tree. Taking changes at the narrowest point of non culprit lesions as reflecting progression or regression of the disease when > 0.27 mm, early (within a few days) and late (within 1 month) coronarographic findings in 23 patients with first infarction were compared with those of patients with stable angina, in whom coronary angiography was performed for diagnostic purposes and was repeated 1 month later, before angioplasty. Sixteen infarction patients had progression, 4 had regression, 1 had both, and 2 had steadiness; corresponding values in stable angina group were 2 (p < 0.001), 1 (NS), 0 (NS) and 20 (p < 0.001). In the infarction group, 17 out of the 45 non culprit lesions progressed and 5 regressed; corresponding figures in stable angina group were 2 (p < 0.001) and 1 (p < 0.05). Three of the infarction patients developed interim angina at rest that was associated with progression of a culprit lesion in each of them. These results support the hypothesis that in a number of cases infarction may not reflect an arbitrary plaque event but rather a systemic coronary disease activity with maximal expression at the level of the offending plaque.

Angina Pectoris↗

Early reocclusion after successful thrombolysis is related to lesion length and roughness.

BACKGROUND: Reocclusion is a significant problem after thrombolysis. Results of previous studies conflict regarding the association of various features of postlytic lesions that might predict reocclusion. METHODS: A computer-assisted algorithm was therefore used to quantitatively measure edge roughness in the 90-minute postlysis angiogram of 84 patients receiving recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 hours of chest pain. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had reocclusion, and 59 did not. The baseline angiogram showed no differences between these two groups with respect to minimal dimensions or relative percentage of stenosis. Length was greater in the reocclusion group (12.2 +/- 5.0 vs 10.0 +/- 4.2 mm, P < 0.05). Three of four roughness indices based on curvature analysis indicated greater roughness in those patients with reocclusion. These differences were largely due to the increased length of these lesions. The scaled edge-length ratio, an index of roughness that is independent of length, was, however, significantly greater in the reocclusion group (1.15 +/- 0.10 vs 1.09 +/- 0.08, P < 0.006). Multiple regression analysis showed that lesion length, the scaled edge-length ratio, and the number of features (invaginations and evaginations) per cm correlated independently with the risk for reocclusion. CONCLUSIONS: The length and roughness of postlytic residual lesions are determinants of reocclusion.

Algorithms↗

Establishing comprehensive, quantitative criteria for detection of restenosis and remodeling after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

To establish comprehensive criteria for detecting restenosis and remodeling, inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of quantitative arteriography in the analysis of 20 lesions immediately after and 6 months after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were assessed. Geometric single-plane (minimum, maximum, mean diameter and percent diameter stenosis), biplane (absolute and relative cross-sectional area stenosis), relative densitometric area stenosis and the average of densitometric area stenosis in orthogonal views were compared. A high intra- and interobserver reproducibility of all absolute measurements was found, with the highest correlations for minimum diameter and cross-sectional area (interobserver, r = 0.85 and 0.85; intraobserver, r = 0.93, and 0.95 for minimum diameter and cross-sectional area, respectively). Of the relative measurements, biplane geometric percent cross-sectional area stenosis was the most reliable and percent densitometric area stenosis was the most variable (interobserver, r = 0.67; intraobserver, r = 0.71). Only small differences were demonstrated for the absolute measurements between the analysis of lesions immediately after PTCA and after follow-up, whereas a greater variability was found for relative measurements, especially videodensitometry. In both circumstances, a poor correlation between relative densitometric cross-sectional area from orthogonal views was found, whereas geometric elliptical cross-sectional area correlated quite well with the average of densitometric percent cross-sectional area in orthogonal views (interobserver, r = 0.86; intraobserver, r = 0.84). Thus, data in this study support the suitability of geometric quantitative analysis for the assessment of PTCA results. Densitometry was the least reliable quantitative parameter.

Analysis of Variance↗