PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Belkind

Publications and source records attributed to N Belkind.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Functional comparison of transmyocardial revascularization by mechanical and laser means.

BACKGROUND: As a result of the clinical benefit observed in angina patients treated by transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) with a laser, interest in mechanical TMR has been renewed. Although the injury induced by mechanical TMR is similar to laser TMR, the resultant impact on myocardial contractility is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether mechanical TMR improves ventricular function as compared with laser TMR in chronically ischemic myocardium. METHODS: After establishing an area of chronic myocardial ischemia, 25 domestic pigs were randomized to treatment by: excimer laser (group I), a hot needle (50 degrees C) (group II), a normothermic needle (group III), an ultrasonic needle (40 KHz) (group IV), or no treatment (group V). All devices create a transmural channel of the same diameter; 22 +/- 1 transmural channels were created in each animal. Regional myocardial contractility was assessed by measuring ventricular wall thickening at rest and with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Six weeks after revascularization, the animals were restudied at rest and with stress. Postsacrifice and histologic analysis of angiogenesis and TMR effects was then assessed. RESULTS: Laser TMR provided significant recovery of ischemic myocardial function. This improvement in contractility after laser TMR was a 75% increase over the baseline function of the ischemic zone (p < 0.01). Mechanical TMR provided no significant improvement in function posttreatment. In fact, TMR achieved with an ultrasonic needle demonstrated a 40% worsening of the contractility versus the pretreatment baseline (p < 0.05). Histologic analysis demonstrated a significant increase in new blood vessels in the ischemic zone after laser TMR, which was not demonstrated for any of the other groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, evaluation of the mechanical TMR channels demonstrated significant scarring, which correlated with the functional results. CONCLUSIONS: Using devices to create an injury analogous to the laser, mechanical TMR failed to improve the function of chronically ischemic myocardium. Only laser TMR significantly improved myocardial function.

Animals↗

Left ventricular functional improvement after transmyocardial laser revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Transmyocardial laser revascularization has been used to treat patients with end-stage coronary artery disease that is not amenable to standard revascularization. Although there is evidence of angina relief and quality of life enhancement, there is little information concerning improvement in myocardial contractility. The purpose of this study was to determine whether transmyocardial laser revascularization improves myocardial function in chronically ischemic myocardium. METHODS: In a model of chronic ischemia by Ameroid occlusion of the circumflex artery, domestic pigs (n = 8) were treated with transmyocardial laser revascularization. Before laser treatment, segmental contraction was assessed at rest and with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Myocardium subtended by the occlusion was compared with that remote from the occlusion. Six weeks after transmyocardial laser revascularization, the animals were restudied at rest and with stress, and then sacrificed. Sham-treated control animals (n = 4) underwent the same procedures but were not treated with transmyocardial laser revascularization. Control animals did not demonstrate significant recovery of function. RESULTS: Transmyocardial laser revascularization improved resting function in chronically ischemic myocardium by 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Transmyocardial laser revascularization significantly improves the function of chronically ischemic myocardium. These data may help explain the mechanisms by which transmyocardial laser revascularization is clinically effective.

Animals↗