PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Britten

Publications and source records attributed to N Britten.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Qualitative interviews in medical research.

Much qualitative research is interview based, and this paper provides an outline of qualitative interview techniques and their application in medical settings. It explains the rationale for these techniques and shows how they can be used to research kinds of questions that are different from those dealt with by quantitative methods. Different types of qualitative interviews are described, and the way in which they differ from clinical consultations is emphasised. Practical guidance for conducting such interviews is given.

Health Services Research↗
PubMed1995

Continued prescribing of inappropriate drugs in general practice.

Seven general practitioners used various methods to identify patients in their practices whom they had inherited and whose medication they regarded as inappropriate in the light of current knowledge. Information was collected in each case about the drug concerned, the patient, the original prescriber, and the reason for continued prescribing. Each patient was also interviewed. Altogether, 25 different drugs were prescribed for 40 patients: in 16 the inappropriate drug was one acting on the brain, in 13 an antihypertensive, in seven it was given for heart disease and in three, for asthma. The influence of the original prescriber, and the patient's dependence on the drug, helped to explain its continued use. Almost half the patients said that they might consider changing their medication. The study underlines the importance of reviewing long-term medication and offers a method of scrutinizing repeat prescribing in general practice. Community pharmacists could help in this process.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Factors that influence the patient centredness of a consultation.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that patients are more satisfied with patient-centred consultations than with doctor-centred consultations and that some health measures are positively influenced by this type of consultation. Research on the factors that influence the patient centredness of the consultation is sparse but suggests that women doctors are more patient centred than men doctors. AIM: A study was designed, first, to confirm or reject the suggestion that women general practitioners are more patient centred than men general practitioners and, secondly, to determine some of the factors that might influence the patient centredness of a general practitioner. METHOD: The audiotaped consultations of 41 general practitioners were analysed using an instrument designed to measure patient centredness. The general practitioners were selected from a group of volunteers to represent both sexes as well as a wide range of age and experience. RESULTS: The results of the analysis showed that women general practitioners, particularly trainers, had higher patient-centredness scores than men general practitioners. This behaviour is characterized by an increased frequency of open questions and greater attention to patient offers (anything of potential significance that a patient brings to the general practitioner consultation). Additionally, the combination of sexes in a consultation seemed to have an effect on the interaction, with woman general practitioner/female patient dyads (pairings) having the highest median patient-centredness score, woman general practitioner/male patient and man general practitioner/male patient dyads scoring the same as each other and man general practitioner/female patient dyads having the lowest median scores. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that women general practitioners, in this sample, were more patient centred than men general practitioners. The results also suggest that inherent inequalities exist, with female patients receiving a more patient-centred service from general practitioners of their own sex than from general practitioners of the opposite sex. Male patients, on the other hand, seemed to fare equally well, irrespective of the sex of their general practitioner. Training is required to address these inequalities and to improve the level of patient centredness in the consultation.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Confidentiality of medical records: the patient's perspective.

BACKGROUND: The development of modern information technology and the increasing amount of multidisciplinary teamwork in primary health care mean that the principle of patient confidentiality is becoming difficult to uphold. The debate about confidentiality so far has paid little attention to patients' views. AIM: A qualitative study was undertaken to explore patients' expectations and attitudes concerning confidentiality of patients' medical records in general practice. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 39 patients from one general practice. RESULTS: Patients' expectations diverged considerably from actual practice. The majority of interviewees felt that administrative and secretarial staff should not have access to medical records. Some patients had reservations about a doctor not directly involved in their care having access to their records. They were unaware of the fact that practice staff had ready access to their medical records. Interviewees had particular concerns about recording of nonmedical information in their records, and the confidentiality of computerized records. CONCLUSION: Assumptions of shared doctor-patient definitions of confidentiality, at least in this practice, would be misplaced. It is suggested that explicit negotiations about what is recorded in patients' records would go some way to addressing the discrepancies identified in this study.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Patient demand for prescriptions: a view from the other side.

This paper describes patients' ideas about doctor's prescribing habits, their expectations for prescriptions and their self-reported behaviour in cashing prescriptions. It is based on semistructured interviews with 30 adult patients from two general practices. Views about doctors' prescribing habits ranged from those wanting more help with their symptoms saying that doctors underprescribe to those aware of doctors' pressure of work saying that they overprescribe. The desire for a prescription in a consultation can be related to the stage of the illness at which a patient consults; not all patients wanted a prescription or collected it if they received one. It is suggested that in appropriate cases, doctors could ask patients directly if they were expecting a prescription.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Patients' experiences of emergency admission: how relevant is the British government's Patients Charter?

This paper evaluates the British government's Patients Charter from the perspective of patients admitted via accident and emergency departments. It uses qualitative data obtained about issues of concern to these patients to judge whether the standards set out in the Charter are appropriate to their priorities and, conversely, if there are issues of importance to these patients which the Charter overlooks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 83 patients admitted to two London hospitals. It is concluded that the rights and standards outlined in the Patients Charter are generally appropriate to these patients' experiences, although some are defined too narrowly. The study identified a number of issues of importance to patients which are not mentioned in the Patients Charter: pain relief, giving information, receiving information, reception staff, examinations and investigations, physical environment, and other people in casualty. The patient wants rather more than recent British government documents suggest.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Patients' ideas about medicines: a qualitative study in a general practice population.

BACKGROUND: Little attention has been paid to patients' ideas about medicines and such ideas might well have relevance for understanding non-adherence to medication. AIM: This qualitative study set out to describe the ideas about medicines and the self-reported adherence to medication of a general practice population. METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 30 adult patients (attenders and non-attenders) from two general practices. RESULTS: The main themes emerging from the analysis were: perceived properties of medicines; orientation towards medicines, that is, patients' general preference for taking or not taking medication; and actual usage of medicines. The data revealed that on the one hand much medicine taking was taken for granted and on the other hand that patients had many fears and powerful negative images of medicines. CONCLUSION: Any assessment of the appropriateness of a proposed treatment for an individual patient should include an exploration of his or her preferences, orientation towards medicines and social context.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Patient access to records: expectations of hospital doctors and experiences of cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to examine cancer patients' reactions to the offer of access to their medical records, hospital doctors' preconceptions of patient access to medical records and the reality of access to records for both parties. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 32 patients and 21 hospital doctors. Hospital doctors were also shown letters from their department to the general practitioner and asked about any changes they would have made as a result of knowing about patient access to records. The results showed that most patients were able to judge for themselves if they wanted access or not and that patients who chose to look at their records found access to their records helpful and reassuring even if the news was bad. Doctors expected access to records to be harmful to patients but would not have wished to amend many of the letters they had written. Patient access to records can be a safe and useful adjunct to good patient care.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1991

A study of the relationship between patients' attitudes and doctors' prescribing.

Questionnaires were given to 139 appointment attenders and 141 open access attenders prior to consultations at one general practice. These enquired about patients' attitudes toward common illness and its treatment. Data on prescribing were obtained from the general practitioners after the consultation. The results suggested that two sets of attitudes were present in the sample: a preference for self care and a preference for drug treatment. They did not suggest that open access attenders were more in favour of drug treatment than appointment attenders. Although the issuing of prescriptions was broadly in line with patients' attitudes, the only attitudinal statement significantly associated with doctors' prescribing behaviour was one reflecting a preference for drug treatment. A logit analysis showed that the effect of patients' attitudes was apparent for open access attenders but not appointment attenders. The data lend support to the hypothesis that doctors are more aware of the pressure to prescribe than of the preference for self care.

Appointments and Schedules↗
PubMed1991

Consultants' and patients' views about patient access to their general practice records.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 hospital consultants and 47 general practice patients, asking for their opinions about a proposed policy of partial access to records in one general practice. Eleven consultants were opposed to the policy, 10 were in favour and three were classified as ambivalent. Arguments against access were couched largely in terms of consultants' own interests whereas arguments in favour of access were couched in terms of patients' interests. Although 81% of patients interviewed said that they should in principle be allowed to see their own records, only 51% wanted access to their own records. Fears expressed by consultants on patients' behalf are not necessarily well founded.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1988

Validity of claims to lifelong non-smoking at age 36 in a longitudinal study.

Consistency of self-reported cigarette smoking habits was investigated in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development, using data collected at ages 20, 25, 31 and 36 years. Of those claiming to be lifelong non-smokers at age 36, 7.9% had previously reported smoking at least one cigarette a day. Those cohort members with inconsistent records had smoked fewer cigarettes and were less likely to inhale than cohort members who smoked at age 36, and had started smoking later. Re-analysis of data collected by Friedman et al suggested that the effect of misclassification of ex-smokers was to reduce the relative risk of death from all causes, for men and women aged 35-54 years, by a factor of 5%. It is suggested that in future studies, those claiming to be lifelong non-smokers should be questioned about their habits in late adolescence and early adulthood.

Adult↗