PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Bruder

Publications and source records attributed to N Bruder.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Intracerebral haemorrhage, what's new?].

Haemorrhagic stroke is frequent and associated with a high mortality and morbidity. Less than 30% of patients are still alive five years after onset and few patients regain functional independence. The worsening effect of anticoagulation has been demonstrated and the failure to rapidly normalize coagulation further increases haematoma expansion. In a recent phase II trial, recombinant activated factor VII given within 4 hours of stroke onset, reduced haematoma growth, mortality and disability. An aggressive blood pressure and intracranial pressure control early after the haemorrhage seems beneficial. A large prospective randomized study (the STICH trial) did not demonstrate any beneficial effect of surgery.

Animals↗

Venous thromboembolism prevention in surgery and obstetrics: clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To produce up-to-date clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgery and obstetrics. METHODS: A Steering Committee defined the scope of the topic, the questions to be answered, and the assessment criteria. Eight multidisciplinary working groups (total of 70 experts) performed a critical appraisal of the literature in the following disciplines: pharmacology of antithrombotic agents, orthopaedics; general surgery (gastrointestinal (GI) and varicose vein surgery); urology; gynaecology and obstetrics; thoracic, cardiac and vascular surgery; surgery of the head, neck and spine; and surgery of burns patients. The resultant reports and guidelines were submitted for comment and completion of the Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation questionnaire to a total of 150 peer reviewers, before producing definite guidelines. RESULTS: The report answers the following questions for each type of surgery: (i) What is the venous thromboembolism incidence according to clinical and/or paraclinical criteria in the absence of prophylaxis? (with stratification of venous thromboembolism risk into low, moderate and high categories); (ii) What is the efficacy and safety of the prophylactic measures used? (iii) When should prophylaxis be introduced and how long should it last? (iv) Does ambulatory surgery affect efficacy and safety of prophylaxis? CONCLUSIONS: Apart from answering the above questions, the guidelines provide a summary table for each discipline. This table stratifies types of surgery into the three risk categories, specifies the recommended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (pharmacological and/or mechanical) and grades each recommendation. In addition, whenever appropriate, the recommended prophylaxis is adjusted to low- and high-risk patients.

Anticoagulants↗

[Prevention of venous perioperative thromboembolism in ENT and maxillofacial surgery].

There are few studies of poor methodological quality on the risk of thromboembolism in head and neck surgery. The incidence of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis is estimated between, 0.1% and 0.6%. The patient's risk factors (cancer, alcoholism, smoking, malnutrition) determine for the assessment of the potential benefit of thromboembolism prophylaxis. No method can be recommended based on the literature. In patients receiving anticoagulant therapy undergoing superficial head and neck surgery or dental extraction, the literature suggest to continue anticoagulation throughout the perioperative period.

Humans↗

[Thromboprophylaxis in elective spinal surgery and spinal cord injury].

The risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after spinal cord injury is very high. Without prophylaxis the incidence of DVT using venography is 81% and the risk of symptomatic DVT is between 12 and 23%. The risk is much lower in elective spine surgery. After discectomy or laminectomy on less than two spine levels, the risk of DVT is less than 1%. After spinal fusion or extended laminectomy, the risk can be estimated between 0.3 and 2.2%. A prophylaxis is recommended for all patients after spinal cord injury (grade A). The association of a mechanical method and heparin is recommended (grade B). The duration of prophylaxis is 3 months in patients with a motor deficit (grade C). No prophylaxis is recommended after discectomy or limited laminectomy in patients without additional risk factors. Mechanical methods are recommended after spinal fusion or extended laminectomy. For patients with additional risk factors a low molecular weight heparin is recommended.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗