PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N C Mann

Publications and source records attributed to N C Mann.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Missed opportunities to impact fast response to AMI symptoms.

The potential for reducing cardiovascular disease mortality rates lies both in prevention and treatment. The earlier treatment is administered, the greater the benefit. Thus, duration of time from onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction to administration of treatment is important. One major factor contributing to failure to receive efficacious therapy is the delay time from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) symptom onset to hospital arrival. This paper examines the relationship of several factors with regard to intentions to seek care promptly for symptoms of AMI. A random-digit dialed telephone survey (n = 1294) was conducted in 20 communities located in 10 states. People who said they would wait until they were very sure that symptoms were a heart attack were older, reported their insurance did not pay for ambulance services, and reported less confidence in knowing signs and symptoms in themselves. When acknowledging symptoms of a heart attack, African-Americans and people with more than a high school education reported intention to act quickly. No measures of personal health history, nor interaction with primary care physicians or cardiologists were significantly related to intention to act fast. The study confirms the importance of attribution and perceived self-confidence in symptom recognition in care seeking. The lack of significant role of health history (i.e. those with chronic conditions or risk factors) and clinician contact highlights missed opportunities for health care providers to educate and encourage patients about their risk and appropriate action.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Statewide variation in the treatment of patients hospitalized with spleen injury.

HYPOTHESIS: Surgeons' treatment decisions for patients with spleen injuries in Washington State from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1994, were different in rural compared with urban communities. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Retrospective cohort analyses using the Death and Illness History Database for the state of Washington, which provides a cross-linked record of an individual's sequential hospitalizations. Counties were defined as metropolitan, urban, or rural on the basis of population density. PATIENTS: A total of 1905 patients (1927 hospitalizations) with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, discharge diagnosis code of 865. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician management decisions (perform a celiotomy or repair the spleen) were stratified by geographic region. RESULTS: Throughout the state, there was substantial variability in the treatment of spleen-injured patients. Factors associated with higher odds of splenectomy included older age, overall severity of injury, treatment in rural hospitals, and treatment in the earlier years of study. While the frequency of splenic salvage increased over time, hospital length of stay, rehospitalization, and 30-day mortality did not increase. CONCLUSIONS: Injury to the spleen is a common problem for which management decisions vary by geographic region, indicating that a single management protocol does not universally apply. To evaluate appropriateness of care by process measures, such as splenic injury management, will require that decision makers grant some latitude in management variability based on factors such as practice setting.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Methanol-related deaths in Ontario.

OBJECTIVE: Methanol poisoning accounts for several deaths annually in the province of Ontario. Our study was aimed at identifying the associated epidemiological factors for fatal outcomes following methanol poisoning in order to develop preventative strategies. METHODS: The records of the Ontario Provincial Coroner's Office were reviewed retrospectively for all poison-related, alcohol-related, and chronic alcohol use-related deaths for the period of January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1991. Age, gender, reason for ingestion (accidental or intentional), and source of methanol for each victim were recorded. RESULTS: There were 43 fatalities during this period, 39 males and 4 females with a mean age of 45 years (range 18-80). Suicide attempts accounted for 21 (49%) cases while the remaining 22 (51%) deaths were classified as accidental. Fourteen (64%) of these 22 patients consumed products labeled as methyl alcohol or wood alcohol as a substitute for ethanol. In 3 cases, the accidental ingestion was the direct result of methanol being improperly stored in containers normally associated with ethanol. The remaining 5 patients were poisoned through the consumption of liquor from illicit sources. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the methanol-related deaths in Ontario are accidental and potentially preventable. Possible preventative strategies include mandatory product relabeling to eliminate the word alcohol, enhanced public education, and the addition of aversive agents to methanol-containing commercial products.

Accidents↗
PubMed1999

Summary report: evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury.

We evaluated the evidence for effectiveness of rehabilitation methods throughout the phases of recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults. MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched, and a total of 3,098 abstracts were reviewed. The strongest studies were critically appraised and their data placed in evidence tables. Results showed that to determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for persons with TBI, a commitment must be made to population-based studies, strong controlled research design, standardization of measures, adequate statistical analysis, and specification of health outcomes of importance to persons with TBI and their families.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.

We evaluated evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation methods to improve outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A search of MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library produced 600 potential references. Thirty-two studies met predetermined inclusion criteria and were abstracted; data from 24 were placed into evidence tables. Two randomized controlled trials and one observational study provided evidence that specific forms of cognitive rehabilitation reduce memory failures and anxiety, and improve self-concept and interpersonal relationships for persons with TBI. The durability and clinical relevance of these findings is not established. Future research utilizing control groups and multivariate analysis must incorporate subject variability and must include standard definitions of the intervention and relevant outcome measures that reflect health and function.

Brain Injuries↗
PubMed1999

Trauma system impact on admission site: a comparison of two states.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a measure assessing statewide hospital admission patterns for trauma and evaluate its utility in identifying significant admission redistributions in neighboring states as a function of trauma system implementation. METHODS: A retrospective claims database analysis was performed of hospitalized trauma patients in Washington and Oregon. The site of hospitalization and diagnostic information were used to determine an admission rate difference for each hospital: the rate of index patient admissions minus the rate of non-index patient admissions. Mean admission rate differences for Level II and III versus other hospitals in each state were compared as a function of time. RESULTS: A bias in favor of admitting more serious injuries to Level II and III hospitals was seen with trauma system implementation in both states, but it was more pronounced in the Oregon trauma system. CONCLUSION: Assessment of admission rate differences is a helpful method of characterizing the evolution of statewide trauma systems.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Systematic review of published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: Provide a systematic review of the published literature assessing the affect of trauma center/system implementation on patient outcomes. DATA SOURCES: A bibliographic search of MEDLINE (1966-May of 1998), HealthSTAR (1995-May of 1998), and CINAHL (1982-May of 1998). Additional manuscripts were identified in the references of reviewed manuscripts. Literature was limited to English language reports on trauma systems in the United States and Canada. STUDY SELECTION: Initial inclusion criteria were based on methodologic criteria (i.e., a comparative [controlled] study). Authors independently assessed the strength of evidence demonstrated by each article. DATA EXTRACTION: Included articles were classified into three groups based on study design: panel review studies, trauma registry comparison studies, and population-based studies. Key demographic, sampling frame, study design, and outcome variables were tabulated for each included study. Potential sources of bias were also identified and tabled. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 12, 11, and 17 studies were incorporated into individual evidence tables for panel review, registry comparison, and population-based studies, respectively. Included studies rely on weak evidence (Class III) to assess the impact of trauma systems on patient care and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: To date, studies assessing trauma system efficacy rely on hospital deaths as the primary indicator of effectiveness. Future research should use more sophisticated study designs (Class II) and expand available outcome measures to assess the entire continuum of care, including prehospital, rehabilitation outcomes, and long-term quality of life.

Data Collection↗
PubMed1999

Population-based research assessing the effectiveness of trauma systems.

OBJECTIVE: To review published evidence regarding the effectiveness of trauma systems by using population-based data. DESIGN: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature assessing the influence of trauma system implementation on the outcome of all injured patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature available in MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, and CINHAL was reviewed for studies that use population-based data to assess the benefit of trauma system development. Studies were included that assessed trauma systems in North America and used a comparison or control group in the analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Published evidence, reported for eight of the nine trauma systems evaluated, demonstrates improved outcomes, principally measured as hospital survival. Improvement occurred after the trauma system or some component of a trauma system (e.g., sophisticated prehospital care) was established. CONCLUSION: Population-based evidence supports a 15 to 20% improved survival rate among seriously injured patients with trauma system implementation. Future study is required to determine whether trauma systems improve the outcome of all injured patients, not just high-risk subsets of the population.

Community Health Planning↗
PubMed1999

Assessing the effectiveness and optimal structure of trauma systems: a consensus among experts.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a consensus exists among experts regarding the effect of organized trauma systems on patient outcomes based on peer-reviewed, published evidence. Second, to ascertain whether experts agree on the optimal structure of trauma systems. METHODS: A multistage, longitudinal survey was administered to trauma system experts participating in a national symposium designed to assess the published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness. Survey questions assessed published evidence by evaluating study designs, potential biases, and sample case mix. Trauma system structure was assessed by asking participants to rate the merit of previously identified key trauma system characteristics. Analyses were conducted using consensus theory. RESULTS: Ninety symposium participants (99%) completed all five surveys. Respondents considered the evidence to be "moderately supportive" of trauma system effectiveness when considering severely injured patients in urban settings. Several key trauma system characteristics were identified as mandatory or highly desirable components of trauma system implementation and maintenance. Experts currently favor exclusive rather than inclusive trauma systems. CONCLUSION: A consensus does exist among trauma system experts regarding the effectiveness of trauma systems and the optimal structure of trauma systems. Additional research is needed to determine whether trauma system benefits extend to other patient subgroups in other geographic regions. Consensus theory provides an impressive model for assessing rater agreement by controlling for response bias and providing a probability measure to determine whether a true consensus exists.

Canada↗
PubMed1999

Telemark skiing injuries: characteristics and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the types of injuries associated with telemark skiing and the effects of ability level, equipment, and terrain. METHODS: A survey was mailed to a sample of North American telemark skiers. RESULTS: Completed surveys were returned by 548 telemarkers (response rate = 74.5%). The mean age was 42.7 (+/- 9.3) years, and 69% were male. A total of 439 injury events resulted in 494 body injuries, reported by 285 skiers (52%). Lower-extremity injuries (n = 231) were more frequent than upper-extremity injuries (n = 187). Knee injuries were most common with 128 cases, followed by 80 thumb, 66 shoulder, and 44 ankle injuries. Surgery was required in 39 cases. Skiers suffering thumb injuries with sequela lasting greater than 3 months were 10.1 times less likely to have sought medical attention than skiers with other long-term injuries (p < 0.001). Injuries occurred more often at lift-served ski areas (74.2%) than in the backcountry (25.8% [p < 0.001, OR = 2.09]). There was no association between boot type and overall knee or ankle injury, but risk of severe ankle injury was increased in leather boots compared to plastic (OR = 8.0, CI = 1.05, 60.59). Release bindings were used by 27.9% of all skiers but were in use in only 18.7% of injury events, suggesting that release plates have a protective effect against injury (OR = 0.59, p < 0.001). In 66 of 82 injuries (80.5%) sustained while using release bindings, the bindings did not release. CONCLUSIONS: The knee, thumb, shoulder, and ankle are most frequently injured telemark skiing. Injuries are more likely to occur at lift-served areas than in the backcountry. Thumb injuries are often ignored and may result in long-term sequela. Ankle injuries appear more severe in leather boots. Release bindings appear protective against injury, but they often do not release.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Evidence of case management effect on traumatic-brain-injured adults in rehabilitation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence for effectiveness of case management during recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults. After an overview of TBI incidence, prevalence, and problems, and a brief explanation of case management, the study methods are described, the findings are discussed and recommendations are made for future research. Medline, HealthSTAR, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched and 83 articles met the criteria for review. The strongest studies (n = 3) were critically appraised and their design features and data were placed in two evidence tables. Due to methodological limitations, there was neither clear evidence of effectiveness nor of ineffectiveness. For future research, we recommend controlled research designs, standardization of measures, adequate statistical analysis and specification of health outcomes of importance to persons with TBI and their families.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Adequacy of hospital discharge status as a measure of outcome among injured patients.

CONTEXT: Crude mortality rates at the time of hospital discharge are commonly used to assess the quality of care provided to patients hospitalized following trauma. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the adequacy of hospital death rates as an outcome measure following trauma and to determine the influence of noninjury illness as a cause of hospital death and the frequency of postdischarge death. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analyses using hospital discharge data for injured patients cross-linked to death certificate data that provided 1 year of follow-up for all patients discharged alive. PATIENTS: A total of 90048 injured patients admitted to all acute care hospitals in the state of Washington from 1991 through 1993 and discharged with at least 1 diagnosis coded in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification to indicate trauma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death in the hospital and death within 30 days of hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among 1912 injured patients with in-hospital deaths, 825 death certificates (43%) listed a noninjury cause of death. The overall mortality rate at hospital discharge was 21.2 per 100000 hospitalized injured patients, and was 12.1 per 100000 for trauma deaths and 9.1 per 100000 for those designated as nontrauma deaths. Patients with trauma-related death designations were younger (mean age, 51.5 years vs 77.9 years), had shorter lengths of stay (median stay, 2 days vs 5 days), and sustained more severe injures (P<.001). Including the 1273 deaths that occurred within 30 days of hospital discharge increased rates for trauma-designated deaths to 14.1 per 100000 and increased rates for nontrauma-designated deaths to 21.3 per 100000. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital discharge death rates are incomplete measures of death frequency for injured patients. Designation of the cause of death, especially among older, hospitalized, injured patients often reflects preexisting medical conditions. Adequate assessment of mortality following trauma requires measurement of the frequency of death following hospital discharge.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Statistical design of REACT (Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment), a multisite community trial with continual data collection.

Unusual problems in statistical design were faced by Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT), a multisite trial testing a community intervention to reduce the delay between onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and patients' arrival at a hospital emergency department. In 20 pair-matched U.S. communities, hospital staff members recorded delay time throughout a 4-month baseline period and the subsequent 18-month intervention period, during which one randomly selected community of each pair received a campaign of public and professional education. To exploit the continual nature of its data-collection protocol, REACT estimated the trend of delay time separately in each community by linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, and history of MI, and compared the ten adjusted slopes from intervention communities with those from control communities by a paired t-test. Power calculations based on the analytical model showed that with K=600-800 cases per community, REACT would have 80% power to demonstrate a differential reduction of 30 min in mean delay time between intervention and control communities, as well as effects on a variety of secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the number of communities was optimal within constraints of funding and that the detectable effect depended weakly on the effectiveness of matching but strongly on K, helping the investigators set operational priorities. The methodologic strategy developed for REACT should prove useful in the design of similar trials in the future.

Emergencies↗
PubMed1998

Preferential benefit of implementation of a statewide trauma system in one of two adjacent states.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of Oregon's trauma system was associated with a reduction in the risk of death for hospitalized injured patients. An alternative explanation for improved outcome, however, is favorable concurrent temporal trends, e.g., new technologies and treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To control for temporal trends, seriously injured hospitalized patients in Oregon and Washington were compared before either state had a trauma system (1985-1988) and when only the Oregon trauma system had been implemented (1990-1993). The study group consisted of hospitalized injured patients aged 16 to 79 years with one or more index injuries in six body regions, i.e., head, chest, spleen/liver, femur or pelvis fracture, and burns. Hospital discharge claims data were analyzed, converting International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, discharge diagnosis codes to Abbreviated Injury Scale scores and Injury Severity Scores using a conversion algorithm. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the differential risk-adjusted odds of death in Oregon compared with Washington after adjustment for demographics, injury type, and injury severity. RESULTS: Findings indicated no difference in the risk-adjusted odds of death between Oregon and Washington while both states functioned under an ad hoc trauma system (1985-1988). A significant reduction in the risk of death, however, was noted in Oregon for patients with an index injury and an Injury Severity Score > 15 compared with Washington (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70-0.91) after trauma system implementation in Oregon (1990-1993). Specifically, reductions in the risk of death were demonstrated for patients with head injuries (adjusted OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59-0.82) or liver/spleen injuries (adjusted OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.54-0.99). CONCLUSION: Assuming that the two states demonstrated similar concurrent temporal trends, the findings support the conclusion that improved outcomes among injured patients in Oregon may be attributed to the institution of a statewide trauma system.

Abbreviated Injury Scale↗
PubMed1998

Assessment of chest pain onset and out-of-hospital delay using standardized interview questions: the REACT Pilot Study. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the consistency of responses to a standardized 2-part "key" question (Key-Q) about acute symptom onset in patients presenting with chest pain when measured using alternative questions (Qs) about symptom perception and decisions to seek treatment. METHODS: A structured patient interview was performed at 3 university teaching hospitals and 1 community hospital. Convenience samples of adult patients presenting to these EDs with chest pain were asked specific questions related to their symptoms and recognition of illness. Information obtained included the 2-part Key-Q: "What are the symptoms that brought you here today?" and "When did those symptoms start?" The alternative Qs (in order of use) were as follows: Q1 = "When did your very first symptom or sensation begin?"; Q2 = "When did your symptoms lead you to think something was wrong or that you were ill?"; Q3 = "When did your symptoms become serious enough for you to seek medical care?"; and Q4 = "When did you actually call 9-1-1/emergency medical services (EMS) or go to the hospital?" The documented ED arrival time, demographic variables, and whether the patient arrived by ambulance were obtained from the medical record. Patients also were queried regarding potential barriers to seeking medical care and their cardiac risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 135 patients surveyed, 9 were unsure of the date and time of symptom onset. For the 126 patients with analyzable data, the mean (+/- SD) patient age was 62 +/- 16 years, and 59% were male. The general sequence of events reported from acute symptom onset until hospital care was Q1/Key-Q-->Q2-->Q3-->Q4-->ED arrival. The median differences and interquartile ranges (IQRs) in minutes between Q times and the Key-Q response were: Q1 = 0 (0-0); Q2 = 30 (0-210); Q3 = 140 (30-720); Q4 = 265 (90-1,215); and ED arrival = 340 (120-1,230). The interval from the Key-Q response until calling 9-1-1/EMS or going to the hospital was shorter for those who used an ambulance and for those who did not consult a physician first. The interval from the Key-Q response until considering symptoms to be serious was shorter for those with a family history of heart disease, but longer for non-white patients. CONCLUSION: The Key-Q elicited a response recalled near the time of first symptoms and generally before the patient had concluded something was "wrong or that he or she was ill." Measurement of the out-of-hospital delay in chest pain patients using the Key-Q appears promising.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Do patients refusing transport remember descriptions of risks after initial advanced life support assessment?

OBJECTIVE: To determine patient recall and understanding of instructions given to patients who refuse transport after initial paramedic assessment and medical treatment. METHODS: Following patient consent, a phone interview was completed for consecutive persons living in a large urban area for whom 9-1-1 was contacted but who subsequently refused transport after advanced life support (ALS) assessment. Subjects were asked about their recall of explained risks and benefits of transport, their understanding of those risks at the time of assessment, and subsequent use of medical care, including hospitalization. RESULTS: From October 1, 1996, to February 23, 1997, 324 people refused transport after ALS arrival. Sixty-eight people could not be contacted, providing a response rate of 79% (256/324). Six percent were subsequently admitted to the hospital for the same problem and an additional 59% sought care from a health care provider (66 ED visits, 63 personal physician, 16 urgent care, 5 other). There were no unexpected deaths. Ninety (35%) respondents were still experiencing symptoms at the time of phone contact. Despite the routine practice of providing a verbal explanation of risks and written instructions, only 141 (55%) recalled receiving written instructions and 56 (22%) recalled an explanation of risks. Twenty-six percent believed they did not fully understand their conditions or circumstances surrounding the 9-1-1 call when they refused transport and 18% would now take an ambulance if the same incident were to recur. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients refusing transport do not recall receiving verbal or written instructions and would reconsider their transport decision, raising doubts about people's ability to make informed decisions at a time of great vulnerability. The majority of patients accessed health care after refusing transport and 6% were hospitalized.

Emergency Medical Services↗