PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

N D Matkin

Publications and source records attributed to N D Matkin.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

Intrasubject variability in the absolute latency of the auditory brainstem response.

For many applications, the latency of obtained ABR peaks is compared to clinical norms. Using this approach, one presupposes that basic assumptions regarding inter- and intrasubject variability of latency are met. Although much is known about intersubject variability, virtually nothing has been reported about intrasubject variability. The purpose of this investigation was to describe intrasubject variability of ABR latency as observed in a clinical setting. Nine male subjects, 10 to 12 years old, participated in the study. At each of four sessions, five ABRs were obtained for each of three stimulus conditions. Stimuli were 100 microseconds condensation clicks presented at 80 dB nHL. For each ABR peak, the intrasubject distribution of latencies was analyzed. For every subject, variability of latency was observed. Typically, the latencies were normally distributed, and the magnitude of variability was less than is commonly reported for groups of subjects. We conclude that by establishing a baseline, the sensitivity of the ABR might be increased for certain monitoring applications.

Acoustic Stimulation

Pressure-equalization (PE) tubes in treatment of otitis media: national survey of otolaryngologists.

This study was designed to describe those indicators for the insertion of pressure-equalization (PE) tubes given highest priority by board-certified otolaryngologists. An original questionnaire was mailed to 1000 board-certified otolaryngologists practicing in the United States. The respondents rated the relative importance of 22 indicators on a 6-point scale. These indicators were grouped into four categories: Medical History, Physical Examination, Audiologic Evaluation, and Related Indicators. With a return rate of 52.7%, approximately 1 of every 9 board-certified, practicing otolaryngologists in the United States was represented in the study. The five indicators with the highest ratings were: "persistence of fluid for 3 or more months per episode," "presence of speech-language delay," "presence of bilateral conductive hearing loss of 20 dB or more," "total number of episodes of otitis media," and "lack of response to suppressive antibiotic therapy." Additional analyses of the data yielded information regarding characteristics of the responding physicians and the self-generated indicators.

Child

Early childhood language delay: the otolaryngologist's perspective.

Many etiologic factors have been implicated in delayed language development in the preschool child including: low birth weight, perinatal insults to the CNS, and chronic/recurrent middle ear disease with conductive hearing impairment during the first years of life. The results of an in-depth evaluation of 24 children, who manifested preschool language delay significant enough to require remedial intervention, are reported. A suggested early identification model employing High Risk Factors and a Developmental Screening Questionnaire for use by otolaryngologists, pediatricians and audiologists is presented.

Adolescent

Behavioral methods in pediatric audiology: past, present, future.

A pediatric audiologic test battery consisting of both behavioral conditioning approaches and electrophysiological techniques has been developed and refined during the past decade. At present, a high rate of success can be anticipated in identifying and describing various degrees, types and configurations of pediatric hearing loss. Further, progress has been seen in the development of a battery of materials which are linguistically appropriate for assessing the utilization of residual auditory function among young hearing-impaired children. It is obvious, however, that clinical research is still needed to assure expansion and refinement of existing materials and techniques used for discrimination testing. Further, methodology must be developed for objective analysis of a youngster's auditory response behaviors if additional handicapping conditions are to be identified at an early age. Finally, a major challenge in the future is to analyze through systematic clinical investigation the potential contribution that can accrue with the administration of central audiologic test procedures designed both to identify and to classify various auditory-based language and learning disabilities.

Audiometry, Evoked Response