PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N D Vlachakis

Publications and source records attributed to N D Vlachakis.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

A multifactorial trial design to assess combination therapy in hypertension. Treatment with bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide.

BACKGROUND: The safety and effectiveness of different dosages and combinations of antihypertensive agents can be efficiently studied using a multifactorial trial design. In consultation with the Cardio-Renal Division of the Food and Drug Administration, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3 x 4 factorial trial of bisoprolol, a beta 1-selective adrenergic blocking agent, and hydrochlorothiazide. METHODS: A total of 512 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized to once-daily treatment with bisoprolol (0, 2.5, 10, or 40 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (0, 6.25, or 25 mg), and all possible combinations. Diastolic and systolic blood pressures were monitored during this 12-week trial. RESULTS: The effects of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide were additive with respect to reductions in diastolic and systolic blood pressures over the dosage ranges studied. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide (or bisoprolol) to therapy with bisoprolol (or hydrochlorothiazide) produced an incremental reduction in blood pressure. Dosages of hydrochlorothiazide as low as 6.25 mg/d contributed a significant antihypertensive effect. A hydrochlorothiazide dosage of 6.25 mg/d produced significantly less hypokalemia and less of an increase in uric acid levels than a dosage of 25 mg/d. The low-dose combination of bisoprolol, 2.5 mg/d, and hydrochlorothiazide, 6.25 mg/d, reduced diastolic blood pressure to lower than 90 mm Hg in 61% of patients and demonstrated a safety profile that compared favorably with that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of factorial design trials to characterize dose-response relationships and to test the potential interactions between various antihypertensive agents has been demonstrated. The combination of low dosages of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide may be a rational alternative to conventional stepped-care therapy for the initial treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Bisoprolol↗
PubMed1994

Bisoprolol, a once-a-day beta-blocking agent for patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

The 24-h blood pressure control of bisoprolol, a new beta-selective, beta-blocking agent, was studied in 240 mild to moderate hypertensive patients in this 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A once-daily dosing schedule was evaluated by comparing bisoprolol's antihypertensive effectivness and safety at 24 h postdose and 3 h postdose, the latter time intended to correspond to peak effectiveness. Results from this trial demonstrated the antihypertensive effectiveness of once-daily bisprolol at doses ranging from 5-20 mg. Mean reductions from baseline diastolic blood pressure, measured 24 h postdose, were 6.3, 8.8, and 10.1 mmHg for patients receiving bisoprolol 5, 10, and 20 mg, respectively, compared with 1.6 mmHg for placebo-treated patients (p < 0.01); mean reductions from baseline systolic blood pressure for the bisoprolol groups were 8.6, 8.6, and 10.9 mmHg, respectively, versus 3.3 mmHg for placebo (p < or = 0.01); and mean reductions from baseline heart rate for the bisoprolol groups were 5.1, 7.1, and 10.2 beats/min, respectively, compared with a 0.9 beats/min increase in heart rate for the placebo group (p < 0.01). The response rates for bisoprolol-treated patients ranged from 47 to 70% compared with 18% for patients on placebo (p < 0.01). Antihypertensive effects were dose-related and sustained over the 24-h dosing interval. Near maximal antihypertensive effects were achieved within 1 week of initiation of therapy with bisoprolol and were sustained over the course of the trial.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Double-blind evaluation of the dose-response relationship of amlodipine in essential hypertension.

To determine the dose-response efficacy of once-daily administration of placebo or a new long-acting calcium channel blocker amlodipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted. The study included 210 patients with diastolic hypertension (blood pressure 95 to 114 mm Hg) without major hematologic, renal, hepatic, cardiac, or endocrine abnormalities. After a 4-week single-blind placebo run-in period, patients were given placebo or amlodipine (1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg) daily for 4 weeks. To assess the antihypertensive effect of amlodipine over a 24-hour period, blood pressure and pulse rate at weeks 0 and 4 were recorded for 12 hours after the dose and then again at 24 hours. At the end of the study patients treated with all doses of amlodipine greater than 1.25 mg daily had significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure in both supine and standing than 1.25 mg daily had significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure in both supine and standing positions. Amlodipine, 1.25 mg daily, was also associated with a decrease in standing diastolic blood pressure. Response to treatment was greater in all amlodipine-treated patients than in those receiving placebo. Pulse rate in both the supine and standing positions was not significantly affected by amlodipine. At doses of 2.5, 5.0, or 10.0 mg daily, amlodipine maintained blood pressure below values obtained with placebo throughout the 24-hour period. Treatment with amlodipine was well tolerated and the incidence of side effects was low.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Long-term open evaluation of amlodipine vs hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension.

The long-term efficacy and safety of amlodipine (2.5 to 10 mg) once daily was compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (25 to 100 mg) daily in 139 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The study was a randomized, open-label, parallel comparison of 50 weeks' duration. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (amlodipine n = 92: HCTZ n = 47). Atenolol was added at week 12 if monotherapy was inadequate. At week 12, the mean reductions for supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure values with amlodipine were found to be -15.2/-12.3 mmHg and -14.0/-11.6 mmHg respectively, as compared to -15.5/-11.1 mmHg and -16.1/-10.1 mmHg after treatment with HCTZ. The percentage of patients responding to treatment at week 12 was 74% on amlodipine and 70% on HCTZ. The addition of atenolol in those patients not adequately controlled on monotherapy produced additional mean reductions in supine and standing systolic and diastolic pressures in both the amlodipine-atenolol group and in the HCTZ-atenolol group. The incidence of adverse effects was 47% with amlodipine and 26% with HCTZ at 12 weeks. Overall, six patients were discontinued because of side effects while receiving amlodipine monotherapy and one from the HCTZ monotherapy group; none were discontinued because of side effects on combination therapy. Laboratory test abnormalities were reported by 16% of amlodipine-treated patients compared with 63% of patients on HCTZ. The antihypertensive effects of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide appeared to be comparable and were maintained during long-term therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of concomitant administration of terazosin and methyclothiazide for the treatment of essential hypertension.

The efficacy and safety of once-daily 2.5- or 5.0-mg methyclothiazide (MCTZ) added to once-daily 5.0-mg terazosin (TRZ) versus 5.0-mg TRZ alone was evaluated in this double-blind, multicenter study. All patients received TRZ during a 6-week titration period. Hypertensive patients (222) (mean blood pressure of 159/104 mm Hg) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: TRZ alone (N = 76); TRZ+MCTZ-2.5 mg (N = 74); and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0 mg (N = 72) for the 8-week double-blind period. Changes in the supine and standing SBP/DBP from preTRZ period were: TRZ alone (-4.8/-8.1 and -2.6/-6.1 mm Hg); TRZ+MCTZ-2.5 mg (-17.3/-12.4 and -16.0/-11.2 mm Hg); and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0 mg (-20.6/-14.4 and -23.3/-14.6 mm Hg). Blood pressure changes in the combination groups were significantly greater than those in the TRZ alone group. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the TRZ+MCTZ-2.5-mg and TRZ+MCTZ-5.0-mg groups. The combination of TRZ and MCTZ tends to mitigate the adverse effects on serum glucose, uric, potassium and lipids usually associated with thiazide diuretics. Thus, combination treatment that begins with TRZ and adds MCTZ is effective in lowering blood pressure without any significant adverse metabolic effects.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1989

Influence of beta 2 agonism and beta 1 and beta 2 antagonism on adverse effects and plasma lipoproteins: results of a multicenter comparison of dilevalol and metoprolol.

Dilevalol combines vasodilation due to selective beta 2 agonism and nonselective beta antagonism. We studied 311 patients randomized to dilevalol and 138 to metoprolol in a multicenter trial. After a 4-week placebo washout, dilevalol was titrated from 200 to 1,600 mg once daily and metoprolol from 100 to 400 mg to a goal supine diastolic blood pressure less than 90 and greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg decrease from baseline. Responders were followed for 1 year. The average age of patients was 51 years; 72% were men and 54% were white. Both drugs reduced blood pressure effectively to a similar level. Fewer patients discontinued dilevalol than did those taking metoprolol (9 vs 16%; p less than 0.03). More metoprolol-treated patients withdrew because of depression (6 vs less than 1%; p = 0.03) and impotence (5 vs less than 1%; p = 0.03). Lipoprotein levels before and after treatment were measured in 99 patients treated for 53.5 weeks with dilevalol (mean dose 438 mg). Dilevalol increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 2.5 mg/dl to 47.2 (p = 0.05), reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 2.5 mg/dl, increased HDL/LDL by 0.03, and decreased total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol by 0.18. Triglycerides increased by 21 mg/dl (p = 0.06). In patients with an initial HDL cholesterol less than 35 mg/dl, dilevalol increased it by 9 mg/dl. In patients treated with metoprolol, the only significant change (p = 0.02) was a 41.9-mg/dl increase in triglyceride levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1987

Similar efficacy of nitrendipine in young and elderly hypertensive patients.

Calcium channel blockers have been postulated to be more effective as monotherapeutic antihypertensive agents in the elderly than in younger patients. To determine if a new dihydropyridine derivative, nitrendipine, is more effective in the elderly (older than 60 years) than in younger hypertensive subjects (younger than 60 years), nitrendipine was administered in a multicentered study to 21 elderly and 33 younger subjects with essential hypertension. After gradual discontinuation of previous antihypertensive therapy and 2 weeks of placebo, the daily dose of nitrendipine (10 to 40 mg) was titrated over 3 weeks to achieve a 10 mm Hg decrease in supine diastolic blood pressure (BP) for patients entering with 90 to 99 mm Hg. For patients entering with at least 100 mm Hg, the dose was titrated to diastolic BP no greater than 90 mm Hg. Titrated dose of nitrendipine was maintained for 4 additional weeks. Propranolol was added for "symptomatic" tachycardia. Nitrendipine reduced BP in 90% of patients completing all phases of the study (n = 49). The proportion of responders was 47% among the elderly and 44% among young subjects. Change in heart rate was similar in both groups (-0.1 +/- 9.9 and +2.9 +/- 8.8 beats/min, mean +/- standard deviation). Two elderly and 1 younger subject required addition of propranolol (difference not significant). There was no correlation between the age of patients and changes in supine systolic and diastolic BP or heart rate (r = 0.21, -0.15 and -0.21, respectively). Adverse effects occurred with equal frequency in older and younger subjects (19 of 21 vs 23 of 33 patients, difference not significant).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Catecholamines in plasma and erythrocytes of rats with transplantable pheochromocytoma.

Accumulation of catecholamines in erythrocytes (RBC) was compared to rising plasma levels of catecholamines at weekly intervals following transplantation of pheochromocytoma (line P-259) in the New England Deaconess Hospital rat strain. Additionally changes were investigated during a 12 hour interval after tumor was established in PHEO rats. Starting 2 weeks after tumor implant, the concentrations of norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) in RBC paralleled and correlated strongly with rising levels of plasma NE and DA which were maximum by 4 weeks. Four to 6 weeks after implant, the RBC to plasma (L/P) concentration ratio of NE was 30% higher in PHEO rats than controls (p less than 0.05) indicating a shift in distribution of NE between the 2 circulating pools. Three measurements, 6 hours apart, showed that mean arterial pressure, plasma and RBC NE and DA concentrations were highest in AM in both PHEO and control groups. Shifts in DA were smaller and did not rise in PM as did NE suggesting DA may reflect tumor secretion and NE, tumor secretion plus sympathetic neuronal activity.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗
PubMed1985

Pharmacodynamics of intravenous labetalol and follow-up therapy with oral labetalol.

The effectiveness, safety, and pharmacodynamics of repeated doses of intravenous labetalol for rapid reduction of severe hypertension and of subsequent oral labetalol dosing were studied. Twelve patients with severe hypertension were admitted to the hospital after the withholding of antihypertensive therapy for 2 to 14 days. Thirty minutes after an injection of vehicle only, labetalol, 0.25 mg/kg body weight, was injected and followed by repeat injections of 0.5 mg/kg every 15 minutes until the supine diastolic blood pressure (BP) was reduced to less than 90 mm Hg or a total of 3.25 mg/kg had been administered. Twenty-four hours after the last injection, oral labetalol was started at an initial dosage of 100 or 200 mg b.i.d., then increased every 2 days until the standing diastolic BP was less than 90 mm Hg or a maximum daily dosage of 2400 mg was reached. The initial injection achieved mean falls in supine systolic/diastolic BPs of 11/7 mm Hg. Subsequent injections produced additional falls in a dose-related fashion; the mean falls after the last injection (total cumulative dose 2.7 mg/kg) were 40/20 mm Hg. The effect lasted for 12 hours or more in most patients and tended to be biphasic, with one peak at approximately 5 minutes and another much less pronounced peak at about 4 hours. There was no evidence of precipitous falls in BP. All patients were able to ambulate 6 hours after the last injection without symptoms of postural hypotension. Oral labetalol effectively and safely restored and maintained the BP reductions achieved with intravenous labetalol.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1984

Conjugated normetanephrine in human and rat plasma and erythrocytes.

Enzymatic hydrolysis was applied to the deconjugation of normetanephrine (NMN) in plasma and red blood cell lysate. By this procedure, in human plasma 77% of total NMN circulated in sulfate-conjugated form, while in rat plasma 63% was in glucuronidated form. Total NMN in human lysate was significantly higher than in plasma (P less than 0.001) and was mostly in the free form, indicating that red blood cells may play an important role in metabolism of norepinephrine. Enzymatic hydrolysis is superior to the standard method by acid hydrolysis plus heat since: (1) more conjugated NMN is hydrolyzed in human plasma and (2) a smaller sample is needed for hydrolysis.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Plasma levels of free and total catecholamines and two deaminated metabolites in man--rapid deconjugation by heat in acid.

We have described a procedure for deconjugation of plasma catecholamines, norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E) and dopamine (DA) and two catecholamine metabolites 3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid (DOMA) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DOPEG). Heat at 100 degrees C of the acidified specimen, pH 0.8, produced complete deconjugation of catecholamines in 7 minutes and of metabolites in 5-7 minutes. Subsequently all five products were simultaneously measured with a radioenzymatic assay. However, hydrolysis for 7 minutes produced approximately a loss of 5% in DA and E, 15% in NE and 50% in the metabolites. The percent of free compound in the plasma of 11 normotensive and healthy subjects was 23 +/- 16 for NE, 20 +/- 8 E, 0.8 +/- 1 DA, 20 +/- 7 DOMA and 42 +/- 12 for DOPEG. Similar results were obtained in a random specimen of six patients with primary hypertension. In a group of four patients with pheochromocytoma free levels of NE, DOPEG and DOMA were significantly greater than in the other two groups, whereas conjugates were not. The intravenous administration of NE or the activation of sympathetic nervous system by standing combined with exercise for 15 minutes did not produce a change in the levels of plasma conjugates. These findings suggest that short changes in plasma catecholamines are better reflected in the free than the conjugated part.

Catecholamines↗
PubMed1984

Acute effect of labetalol on blood pressure in relation to the sympathetic nervous system and plasma renin activity.

A single oral dose of 300 mg labetalol was given to 10 subjects with uncomplicated primary hypertension; its effects on blood pressure, heart rate (HR), plasma renin activity (PRA), and plasma concentration of catecholamines and of their major metabolites, octopamine ( OTP ), and dopamine-beta hydroxylase (DbH) were investigated. Although HR did not change after dosing, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in 2 hr and remained below control up to 12 hr. There was symptomatic orthostatic hypotension in two subjects in the first 2 hr after dosing. PRA decreased in the first 2 hr and followed a gradual rise that became significant at 24 hr. Although DbH did not change, plasma concentrations of norepinephrine (NE) and its major metabolites and of OTP increased between 2 and 4 hr after dosing and remained elevated up to 12 hr. There was no correlation between change in blood pressure and control levels or changes of PRA or NE concentrations.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1984

Oral potassium chloride and amiloride in hydrochlorothiazide-induced potassium loss.

To compare the effect of amiloride with that of oral potassium chloride (KCl) in hypokalemia, metabolic balance studies were carried out in hospitalized subjects with mild hypertension without edema who developed negative potassium balance after 4 days on hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). Subjects' diets contained measured amounts of sodium and potassium. While HCTZ treatment continued, oral preparations of either KCl solution or amiloride was added for 5 additional days. Potassium balance in the KCl-treated group further decreased by -44.9 +/- 32.3 mEq K+, while subjects on amiloride went into positive balance that averaged +51.7 +/- 24.1 mEq K+. Hypokalemia after HCTZ did not respond to KCl, while K+ levels rose from 3.32 +/- 0.22 to 3.67 +/- 0.26 mEq/l after amiloride.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1984

Role of conjugation and red blood cells for inactivation of circulating catecholamines.

We investigated the extent of catecholamine (CA) conjugation in plasma and accumulation inside red blood cells (RBCs) after forced immobilization of the rat. A control blood sample was obtained from undisturbed rats resting in home cages via an indwelling aortic catheter. Then rats were immobilized for 2 h, and blood samples were taken during stress at 15 min and 2 h and at 30 min poststress. Both sulfate and glucuronide conjugates were deconjugated by enzymatic hydrolysis and measured by radioenzymatic thin-layer chromatographic methods. In plasma of resting rats, the major conjugate of norepinephrine (NE) is sulfate and that of epinephrine (E) and dopamine (DA) is glucuronide; total conjugates in plasma are 53, 57, and 97% of total NE, E, and DA, respectively. During stress, sulfate conjugates of NE, E, and DA increased significantly along with free NE, E, and DA. DA glucuronide unexpectedly declined at 2 h of stress and 30 min poststress. Concentrations of free CAs rose in RBCs during stress, as did NE sulfate, the only conjugate present in RBC lysate. We conclude that both CA conjugation and RBC accumulation are enhanced when large amounts of free CA enter the circulation as a result of immobilization stress and that the relative importance of these inactivation pathways is different for the three CAs.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Role of conjugation and red blood cells for inactivation of circulating normetanephrine.

Plasma and red blood cell (RBC) concentrations of normetanephrine (NMN), in both free and glucuronide-conjugated forms, were measured before, during, and after forced immobilization, an intense stressor of the sympathoadrenal system of rats. In this study NMN glucuronide was deconjugated by enzymatic hydrolysis; free and total NMN were assayed by radioenzymatic, thin-layer chromatographic procedures. In plasma, free NMN and NMN glucuronide are 777 +/- 99 and 792 +/- 74 pg/ml, respectively, when rats are at rest. Both free NMN and NMN glucuronide increased about 200% after 15 min of stress; in absolute amounts, increases were equivalent to that of the simultaneous increase in norepinephrine (NE). At 2 h of stress, NMN glucuronide, but not free NMN, increased further and significantly. The mean concentration of RBC-free NMN is about 50 times higher than that of plasma-free NMN, and it did not change significantly during stress; RBCs do not contain conjugated NMN. RBC NMN levels showed a strong correlation with RBC catechol methyltransferase activity. The latter seems to operate under conditions of substrate saturation; an acute release of NE leads to temporary storage of NE in RBCs but not conversion to NMN. The results indicate that conjugation of NMN with glucuronic acid is an important route for inactivation of plasma NMN formed during forced immobilization stress, whereas free NMN does not accumulate in RBCs during stress.

Animals↗
PubMed1983

Study of single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of the antihypertensive effects of labetalol.

This was an open-label, two-phase crossover study of labetalol in 11 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. A two- to four-week outpatient placebo phase was followed by a three-day inpatient placebo period. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive either labetalol, 200 mg, as a single dose and three times a day for three days and, on the final day, another single dose or a similar sequence with 300 mg as the single dose and multiple twice a day treatment. A two-week placebo outpatient period was followed by the second phase of the study in which the treatment regimen was reversed for the two groups. Blood samples for the determination of free and conjugated labetalol plasma levels were collected, and blood pressures and heart rate were recorded sequentially for 24 hours after the first and last dose of labetalol, and during the multiple dose treatment period before and two hours after each dose as well as four times daily with the patient supine and upright. Of the 11 patients analyzed, five were men and six were women, ranging in age from 33 to 62 years. Labetalol (200 mg and 300 mg) was rapidly absorbed with peak concentrations achieved in approximately one hour. The pharmacokinetic data best fit a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first order absorption. At steady state, the absorption, distribution, and elimination kinetics were similar for both dosage regimens with elimination half life of 7.65 and 7.92 hours for the 200 mg three times a day and 300 mg twice a day regimens, respectively. During the multiple dosing period average steady-state plasma drug concentrations were 0.149 mg/ml and 0.145 mg/ml for the 300 mg twice a day and 200 mg three times a day regimens, respectively. Approximately 12 percent of total plasma labetalol was free drug. The balance was conjugated. The first dose of 200 mg or 300 mg of labetalol significantly (p less than 0.01) lowered standing and supine mean blood pressure over a period of eight to 12 hours, respectively, with peak effects occurring at two (standing) and four (supine) hours. A significant reduction (p less than 0.01) in supine mean blood pressure was present 24 hours after the initial dose of 300 mg. At steady state the antihypertensive effects of the 200 mg three times a day and the 300 mg twice a day dosage regimens were similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Intravenous labetalol in the treatment of severe hypertension and hypertensive emergencies.

The antihypertensive effects of intravenous labetalol were evaluated in 59 patients with hypertensive crises or severe hypertension in need of rapid lowering of blood pressure in a multicenter study. Patients appearing with a supine diastolic blood pressure 125 mm Hg or greater, or a supine systolic blood pressure of more than 200 mm Hg received an initial mini-bolus injection (20 mg) of labetalol. This was followed by repeated incremental doses of 20 to 80 mg given at 10 minute intervals to achieve a supine diastolic blood pressure of less than 95 mm Hg or decrease 30 mm Hg or greater, or a satisfactory decrease in systolic blood pressure. Patients were stratified into those who had taken antihypertensive medication within 24 hours and those who had not. The initial mini-bolus injection caused rapid but not abrupt reduction in blood pressure; the baseline mean blood pressure decreased 23/14 mm Hg. Further injections were needed in the majority of patients (mean: 197 mg). The blood pressure reduction after the last dose of labetalol was 55/33 mm Hg. In pretreated patients and in those who had no medication for 24 hours prior to the intravenous labetalol, the response was similar. Heart rate decreased 10 beats per minute in the total population. In patients pretreated with beta-adrenergic blockers, blood pressure response was similar to that in the total group (59/35 versus 55/33 mm Hg), but heart rate remained essentially unchanged. The dose required to achieve the therapeutic effect was less in pretreated patients than in untreated patients, but the duration of action was shorter. No serious adverse effects were encountered even in patients with concomitant diagnoses of acute left ventricular failure, myocardial infarction, stable congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, angina pectoris, acute stroke, transient ischemic attack or encephalopathy. Labetalol is a safe and effective treatment for a rapid blood pressure reduction in hypertensive emergencies.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗