PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

N Eiser

Publications and source records attributed to N Eiser.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

The effect of a beta 2-adrenergic agonist and a histamine H1-receptor antagonist on the late asthmatic response to inhaled antigen.

In this double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial, the role of histamine and the possible protective effect of a beta 2-adrenergic agonist in the later asthmatic response to inhaled antigen was investigated in nine atopic asthmatic patients. On four study days, 2-4 weeks apart, patients were given either: placebo; salbutamol aerosol 400 micrograms before and 200 micrograms 2-hourly after challenge; oral terfenadine 120 mg 2 h before and 10 h after challenge; and, on the final day, lung function was monitored without medication or antigen challenge. A nebuliser-dosimeter system was used to deliver a predetermined, single dose of antigen aerosol. Response was assessed by specific airways conductance (SGAW) measured in a body plethysmograph; FEV1 and PEFR were measured with a Pocket Spirometer. All measurements were made for 10 h in the clinic and then the patients continued to record PEFR and FEV1 at home for at least 2 more hours. Similar findings were obtained with all three lung function parameters. After challenge, the early response (ER) was small when compared with the late response (LR). All patients had a definite LR on the placebo day when FEV1 was compared with 'no challenge day'. Neither drugs had much effect on the small ER. The LR was not altered by terfenadine but was very significantly attenuated by salbutamol; the mean maximum fall in FEV1 during LR being 31, 29 and 12% after placebo, terfenadine and salbutamol, respectively. It is unlikely that histamine plays an important role in the LR to inhaled antigen but beta 2-adrenergic stimulants can attenuate LR, probably by directly preventing bronchial smooth muscle constriction and also by stabilising bronchial mast cells.

Administration, Inhalation

Oral diamorphine: lack of effect on dyspnoea and exercise tolerance in the "pink puffer" syndrome.

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of diamorphine on breathlessness and exercise tolerance in patients with severe chronic airflow obstruction and normal arterial carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) levels ("pink puffer" syndrome). In this double-blind, cross-over, randomized study we examined both acute and chronic effects of single and multiple doses of oral diamorphine in 14 "pink puffer" patients. Their mean resting forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 36% predicted normal, mean arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) was 9.2 kPa and mean PaCO2 was 5.2 kPa. Ten patients took either diamorphine 2.5 or 5 mg or placebo elixir 6 hourly for 2 weeks, recording on a diary card dyspnoea, sleepiness and well-being on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The final treatment was given 30 min before measuring spirometry, arterial blood gases, plasma morphine levels, 6 min walking distances, time walked on treadmill and self-assessment of dyspnoea on a VAS scale after exercise. On two further days, eight patients took two doses, 4 h apart, of either diamorphine 7.5 mg or placebo elixir. Spirometry, 6 min walking distance with a VAS score for dyspnoea were measured before and at 1 h after each dose. Morphine levels and blood gases were also measured. Whether given in single or repeated doses, oral diamorphine had no significant effect on exercise tolerance and breathlessness when compared with placebo. Diamorphine 2.5-7.5 mg produced neither sleepiness nor a deterioration in blood gases. However, plasma levels associated with analgesic efficacy were not achieved with these doses. Thus, as given in this study, oral diamorphine is unlikely to have therapeutic potential in the treatment of dyspnoea in the "pink puffer" syndrome.

Administration, Oral

Histamine receptors and pulmonary epithelial permeability.

In seven normal subjects and five asthmatics we have compared the effects of inhaled histamine with that of betahistine (a relatively selective H1-receptor agonist) and that of impromidine (a relatively H2-receptor agonist) on pulmonary epithelial permeability, as measured by the half-time clearance from lung to blood of inhaled 99mTc-DTPA (t1/2LB). Both histamine and betahistine produced statistically significant falls in baseline t1/2LB and peak expiratory flow rate, while impromidine produced no significant effects on either parameter. Similar results were obtained in normal subjects and asthmatics alike. In four of the normal subjects, histamine-induced falls in t1/2LB and peak expiratory flow rate were prevented by oral pretreatment with terfenadine 120 mg but not by cimetidine 400 mg. Histamine-induced increases in lung permeability and bronchoconstriction are both mediated via H1-receptors in normal and asthmatic subjects.

Adult