PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Finer

Publications and source records attributed to N Finer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Psychiatric co-morbidities in patients attending specialist obesity services in the UK.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is rising, but little is known about its psychosocial correlates. AIM: To assess psychological co-morbidities and impairment of quality of life in obese individuals seeking treatment at two specialist centres in the UK. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of anthropometric and questionnaire data collected at initial clinic visit. METHODS: Patients attending for a first visit between April 2004 and March 2005 completed questionnaires that included scales for measurement of anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), eating disorder-behaviour (Eating Disorder Inventory 2), assessment of body image (Body Image Assessment for Obesity) and quality of life (Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite). We examined the relationships between variables measured on these scales and anthropometric data. RESULTS: Of 253 questionnaires evaluated, there were elevated scores for depression in 48%, and elevated scores for anxiety in 56%. Twenty-two percent demonstrated scores suggestive of a personality trait that overlaps with an eating disorder; an additional 11.5% had an elevated score for bulimia. About a third of individuals had significant impaired quality of life in the areas of examined. DISCUSSION: Psychological co-morbidities are common in obese individuals attending specialist weight-management clinics, and may merit consideration at (or before) commencement of a weight loss programme.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Prediction of response to sibutramine therapy in obese non-diabetic and diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Early weight loss is generally considered to predict long-term weight outcome in obese patients, and this is reflected in prescribing guidelines for antiobesity drugs. For example, the current prescribing guidelines for the antiobesity drug, sibutramine, indicate that if patients have not lost 2 kg (or 4 lb) in the first 4 weeks of treatment with sibutramine 10 mg, the physician should re-evaluate the therapy, which may result in increasing the dose to 15 mg or discontinuation. This regimen may deny treatment to a large group of patients who might otherwise benefit, particularly patients with type 2 diabetes who often find it more difficult to lose weight than non-diabetic obese individuals. MATERIALS: We have re-analysed pooled data from seven randomized, controlled studies of sibutramine-induced weight loss and maintenance in which patients (n = 928; 75% female) had taken sibutramine 10 or 15 mg continuously for 12 months, in order to determine the predictors of success in weight loss (defined as loss of at least 5% of initial body weight at Month 12) in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were used to calculate optimal predictive values. RESULTS: In both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, weight loss of 4 kg at 3 months was identified as the optimal predictor for achieving at least 5% weight loss at 12 months. This target was associated with the best average values for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, as well as high positive (78% vs. 84% for non-diabetics and 76% vs. 85% for diabetics, compared to existing guidelines target of 2 kg after 1 month treatment) and negative predictive values (63% vs. 71% for non-diabetics; 52% vs. 70% for diabetics). CONCLUSION: Sibutramine, in conjunction with diet and exercise, should be continued for at least 3 months (providing there are no adverse effects) to determine whether or not patients are likely to achieve a clinically valid outcome at 1 year. This highlights the need to ensure that regulatory restrictions reflect the needs of clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Use of a reference four-component model to define the effects of insulin treatment on body composition in type 2 diabetes: the 'Darwin study'.

AIMS: To define the effects of insulin treatment on body composition and fat distribution, and investigate the potential role of body weight (BWt) gain predictors in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Assessments of body composition, using a four-component model, and biochemical indices were obtained in 19 patients [mean (SD): age, 60 (8.3) years; BMI, 25.3 (3.3) kg/m(2)] with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, despite maximal oral hypoglycaemic agents, receiving insulin [40 (12.2) units/day] at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Insulin therapy significantly reduced plasma glucose [-6.0 (4.3) mmol/l], improved [HbA(1)c [-1.9 (1.8)%], and reversed the BWt lost [3.3 (1.8) kg] before treatment. The 6-month BWt gain [+5.2 (2.7) kg] consisted of body fat [+2.9 (2.7) kg] and fat-free mass [FFM; +2.3 (1.8) kg], with the FFM increase due solely to total body water [TBW; +2.4 (1.5) l], as there were no detectable changes in total body protein or bone mineral, thereby increasing FFM hydration by 1.3%. More body fat was deposited centrally in patients receiving insulin alone than those receiving insulin with an oral hypoglycaemic agent (metformin). Daily insulin dose, HbA(1)c and hip circumference were independent predictors of BWt gain. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin treatment increased fat and FFM similarly in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients, with the FFM gain due entirely to TBW. The possible role of metformin in reducing central fat accumulation following insulin treatment warrants further investigation into its mechanism and potential long-term benefits.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2005

Empowering primary care to tackle the obesity epidemic: the Counterweight Programme.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the management of obese adults (18-75 y) in primary care. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTINGS: UK primary care. SUBJECTS: Obese patients (body mass index > or =30 kg/m(2)) or BMI> or =28 kg/m(2) with obesity-related comorbidities in 80 general practices. INTERVENTION: The model consists of four phases: (1) audit and project development, (2) practice training and support, (3) nurse-led patient intervention, and (4) evaluation. The intervention programme used evidence-based pathways, which included strategies to empower clinicians and patients. Weight Management Advisers who are specialist obesity dietitians facilitated programme implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of practices trained and recruiting patients, and weight change at 12 months. RESULTS: By March 2004, 58 of the 62 (93.5%) intervention practices had been trained, 47 (75.8%) practices were active in implementing the model and 1549 patients had been recruited. At 12 months, 33% of patients achieved a clinically meaningful weight loss of 5% or more. A total of 49% of patients were classed as 'completers' in that they attended the requisite number of appointments in 3, 6 and 12 months. 'Completers' achieved more successful weight loss with 40% achieving a weight loss of 5% or more at 12 months. CONCLUSION: The Counterweight programme provides a promising model to improve the management of obesity in primary care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Predictors of programme adherence and weight loss in women in an obesity programme using meal replacements.

OBJECTIVE: To explore predictors of programme adherence and weight loss in patients participating in a weight management programme using meal replacements (MR). DESIGN: One hundred and fifty healthy obese women, age 48.5 years (s.d. = 8.3); weight, 97.6 kg (13.4); body mass index (BMI) 36.5 (3.7), participated in a longitudinal study with a 16-week acute weight loss phase (Phase 1) followed by 1 year of a trial of weight-loss maintenance (Phase 2). Energy intake during Phase 1 totaled 900 kcal (3.7 MJ) a day from a diet including two MR. Energy intake during Phase 2 consisted of either MR or a low-fat diet with a calculated energy deficit of 600 kcal/day (2.5 MJ). METHODS: Weight, height and waist circumference were measured and body composition assessed by air plethysmography (Bodpod). Glucose and insulin were measured by standard immunoassays and insulin sensitivity assessed by homeostatic model assessment. RESULTS: At the end of 16 weeks, 114 subjects (76%) completed Phase 1 and achieved a mean weight loss of 8.95 kg (3.38). Adherence to Phase 1 was predicted by weight loss over the first 2 weeks (p < 0.001). Weight loss during Phase 1 was predicted by initial weight and initial systolic blood pressure. Adherence to Phase 2 was not predicted by physiological measures. Weight loss maintenance in Phase 2 (not gaining more than 3% of the weight at start of phase 2) was predicted by cholesterol and triglyceride measured at the start of Phase 2 but otherwise was not predicted by the physiological measures. Initial insulin sensitivity did not predict weight loss in either phase. CONCLUSION: Participants whose weight loss over the first 2 weeks falls in the bottom third may need additional intervention if they are to continue in this type of programme. A battery of physiological measures at entry to a MR weight loss and maintenance programme explains only a very small proportion of the variation in weight loss.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed2005

Effect of three treatment schedules of recombinant methionyl human leptin on body weight in obese adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on body weight and safety of subcutaneously administered recombinant leptin in obese adults and to evaluate whether the timing of recombinant leptin administration influences efficacy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study was designed, comprising of a 3-week dietary lead-in followed by a 12-week leptin or placebo treatment period. A total of 284 overweight and obese (body mass index 27-37.0 kg/m(2)) predominantly white (98%) women (66%) and men (34%) with a mean (+/-s.d.) 46.8+/-10.4 years of age were randomized into three treatment groups with three matching placebo groups. Recombinant leptin was administered by subcutaneous injection [10 mg/morning, 10 mg/evening or 20 mg/day (10 mg twice daily)]. Patients were counselled at baseline to reduce dietary intake by 2,100 kJ/day (500 kcal/day), and dietary advice was reinforced every 2-4 weeks. RESULTS: No statistically significant change in body weight occurred with recombinant leptin treatment compared with placebo treatment in any treatment group. No clinically significant adverse effects were observed with the exception of an increase in injection-site reactions in patients treated with recombinant leptin (83%) vs. placebo (36%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of recombinant leptin to an overweight and obese population, in addition to a mildly energy-restricted diet, was not efficacious in terms of weight loss at the doses and schedules studied. The hypothesis that nocturnal administration of recombinant leptin might have a specific effect on weight loss was not supported.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of morbid obesity together with the development of laparoscopic approaches has led to a steep rise in the number of bariatric operations. These guidelines intend to define the comparative effectiveness and surrounding circumstances of the various types of obesity surgery. METHODS: A consensus panel representing the fields of general/endoscopic surgery, nutrition and epidemiology convened to agree on specific questions in obesity surgery. Databases were systematically searched for clinical trial results in order to produce evidence-based recommendations. Following two days of discussion by the experts and a plenary discussion, the final statements were issued. RECOMMENDATIONS: After the patient's multidisciplinary evaluation, obesity surgery should be considered in adults with a documented BMI greater than or equal to 35 and related comorbidity, or a BMI of at least 40. In addition to standard laboratory testing, chest radiography, electrocardiography, spirometry, and abdominal ultrasonography, the preoperative evaluation of obesity surgery patients also includes upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or radiologic evaluation with a barium meal. Psychiatric consultation and polysomnography can safely be restricted to patients with clinical symptoms on preoperative screening. Adjustable gastric banding (GB), vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) are all effective in the treatment of morbid obesity, but differ in degree of weight loss and range of complications. The choice of procedure therefore should be tailored to the individual situation. There is evidence that a laparoscopic approach is advantageous for LAGB, VBG, and GB (and probably also for BPD). Antibiotic and antithromboembolic prophylaxis should be used routinely. Patients should be seen 3 to 8 times during the first postoperative year, 1 to 4 times during the second year and once or twice a year thereafter. Outcome assessment after surgery should include weight loss and maintainance, nutritional status, comorbidities and quality-of-life.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Sibutramine: its mode of action and efficacy.

Sibutramine has a dual mode of action. It reduces food intake and attenuates the fall in metabolic rate associated with weight loss. The drug's neurochemical actions can also be distinguished from those of previous centrally acting anti-obesity agents. Clinical trials show that two out of three patients taking sibutramine lose >/= 5% weight and that the drug can enhance the maintenance of weight loss. Early weight loss predicts long-term success and can be used to guide clinical practice. To maximize the benefits of sibutramine, it is important that patients receive adjunctive diet and lifestyle therapy.

Appetite Depressants↗
PubMed2002

Changes in risk factors for cardiovascular disease with body fat loss in obese women.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for obesity management emphasize the improvements in health risks associated with weight losses of 5-10% initial weight. However, most of the data is derived from periods of acute weight loss and may not represent the true effect in the longer term or in obese but otherwise healthy individuals. This study examines the temporal changes in risk factors for cardiovascular disease with weight change over 52 weeks. METHODS: In total, 57 overweight women (age 43.7 +/- 9.1 years, mean BMI of 31.7 kg/m2, range 27.2-38.5 kg/m2) with no other significant medical history, entered a milk-based, low-energy weight loss programme for 12 weeks and were then monitored without further intervention until 52 weeks. Weight, fat mass, fasting plasma insulin, lipids and blood pressure were measured at 0, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. RESULTS: The mean weight change in sequential periods was -11.6% (p < 0.0001), +1.1% (p = 0.02) and +5.2% (p < 0.0001). The change from baseline to 1 year being -6.0% (p < 0.0001) an 11% (p < 0.0001) reduction in initial body fat mass. Initial weight loss (0-12 weeks) was positively correlated with greater longer term weight loss (0-52 weeks, r = 0.75, p < 0.0001) and not with weight regain (12-52 weeks, r = 0.14, p = 0.28). Despite significant improvements in insulin sensitivity, lipid profile and blood pressure (BP) with acute weight loss, in the group overall, only benefits in BP were maintained after 52 weeks. However, improvements in insulin sensitivity were sustained in those who maintained more than 5% weight loss, and those with higher baseline metabolic risk had greater benefits with weight loss. Change in waist circumference was better than BMI or fat mass in predicting improvements in metabolic risk in these obese women. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests, in otherwise apparently healthy obese women, the rationale of targeting individuals most likely to benefit from weight management. Most importantly it highlights the need to focus on achieving initial weight losses of greater than 10% to maintain longer term losses of at least 5% and the associated health benefits.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2002

Pharmacotherapy of obesity.

The growing recognition of the health risks of obesity coupled with the difficulties in treating it successfully by lifestyle modification predicates a need for effective drug treatment. The history of drug treatment in the second half of the 20th century is, however, one of disappointment and concern over drug toxicity. However, the advances in our understanding of the mechanism of weight control, together with improved ways of evaluating anti-obesity drugs, has resulted in two effective compounds, sibutramine and orlistat, becoming available for clinical use. Sibutramine has actions on both energy intake and expenditure and had been shown to enhance weight loss and weight maintenance achieved by diet, in simple obesity as well as when accompanied by complications of diabetes or hypertension. About 50-80% of patients can achieve a >5% loss, significantly more than if patients receive the same lifestyle intervention with placebo. Orlistat, which acts peripherally to block the absorption of dietary fat, has had similar results in clinical trials; a recent study (XENDOS) has just reported results which show that the enhanced, albeit modest, weight loss achieved with orlistat delays the development of diabetes over a 4-year period. A number of other compounds are expected to complete or enter clinical trials over the next decade. There is considerable optimism that we will soon have the pharmacological tools needed to make the treatment of obesity feasible.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗
PubMed2001

Low-calorie diets and sustained weight loss.

The principles of weight management in overweight and obesity are primarily to achieve clinically significant weight loss and secondarily (but perhaps more importantly) to maintain weight loss. The traditional approach to weight reduction has been the prescription of diets that provide an energy intake below that of energy expenditure, usually to provide a balanced ratio of protein, carbohydrate, and fat in reduced quantities to provide an energy intake of 800 to 1500 kcal/d. Evaluation of the efficacy of such interventions is difficult despite a wealth of publications, because few randomized trials have been conducted and various adjunctive therapies confound interpretation. Systematic reviews of low-calorie diets have been unable to come to any firm conclusions about the value of different ways of achieving energy restriction, but one meta-analysis of low-fat diets produced a mean weight loss of 10 kg of weight loss that was greater in those with a higher initial body weight. Greater weight loss was achieved by subjects prescribed a 600-kcal deficit diet, compared with a conventional low-calorie (1200 kcal/d) diet. This study has been influential for clinical dietetic practice, particularly with UK dietitians, but also in the design of dietetic support in clinical trials of pharmacotherapy. Low-calorie diets can be effective treatment, but the optimum way of delivering such diets remains unclear.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2001

Predictors of weight loss and maintenance during 2 years of treatment by sibutramine in obesity. Results from the European multi-centre STORM trial. Sibutramine Trial of Obesity Reduction and Maintenance.

BACKGROUND: In this report we assess pre-treatment determinants of weight loss and maintenance outcome in The Sibutramine Trial of Obesity Reduction and Maintenance (STORM), a 2 y randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, European multicenter study examining the effect of sibutramine (Sib) on inducing and maintaining weight loss in obese subjects. MATERIAL: A total of 605 obese patients (BMI: 30-45 kg/m2) of both gender were included from eight European centers and treated for 24 months. The patients were treated for the initial 6 months by Sib (10 mg/day) and a low-fat low-energy, individualized diet (600 kcal/day deficit). The 467 patients who achieved >5% weight loss after 6 months were randomized 3&ratio;1 to Sib (10 mg/day) (Sib/Sib) and placebo (Sib/Pla) for weight maintenance over a further 18 months. MAIN OUTCOME AND ANALYSES: Pre-treatment individual characteristics were assessed as predictors of 6 months weight loss (kg) and 24 months weight maintenance using simple and multivariate correlation and regression analyses. RESULTS: In univariate analyses, the 6 month weight loss (n=505) was positively associated with pre-treatment body weight (r=0.27), height (r=0.18), fat-free mass (r=0.21) (all P<0.001), fat mass (r=0.13, P<0.03), and resting metabolic rate (r=0.13, P<0.003). However, no relation was found with age, gender, smoking status, age at onset of obesity, or number of previous slimming attempts. The same predictors were found for weight change to endpoint in the Sib/Sib group (n=350), while no predictors were identified in the Sib/Pla (n=114). In the multivariate regression analysis only pre-treatment body weight predicted weight loss at 6 months (P<0.001). Weight change (kg) to 24 month was predicted by: 4.34+0.07*body weight (kg)-4*treatment (Sib=1, Pla=0)-0.06*age (y), (r2=8%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Only pre-treatment body weight seems to be an important independent predictor of 6 months weight loss and 24 month weight maintenance in this study on diet and Sib. As only 8% of the variation in 24 months weight change could be explained by the predictors, the clinical value of this information is limited.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Sibutramine in clinical practice.

The role of sibutramine as an effective adjunct to diet and exercise in weight management programmes has been proven in clinical trials. Although the reality of managing obesity in clinical practice is very different from that of a controlled clinical trial, there is good evidence that sibutramine is an easy-to-use and highly effective additional therapy when used in everyday practice to manage obesity and its complications. It is possible to predict which patients will respond well to sibutramine treatment, and to modify programmes and support to ensure the best outcome for patients, whatever their clinical circumstances.

Appetite Depressants↗
PubMed2001

The role of sibutramine in weight management--towards a blueprint for a sibutramine weight management system.

Sibutramine offers a new opportunity to provide a comprehensive weight reduction programme for many overweight and obese patients. A methodical and team approach to managing patients on sibutramine plus diet and exercise should hold the key to the best use of this adjunctive therapy in real clinical practice. This paper provides an overview of how to care for patients who are in need of weight management, and shows that simple measures and well organised, good clinical practice are all that is required to achieve clinically important weight reduction and longer term care.

Appetite Depressants↗