Biomedical subjects

N Georgakopoulos

Publications and source records attributed to N Georgakopoulos.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Correlation of spontaneous and induced premature atrial complexes initiating atrial fibrillation in humans: electrophysiologic parameters for guiding therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The low frequency of spontaneous premature atrial contractions (PACs) may be an impediment to mapping and ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). It has been shown that PACs following external or internal cardioversion of AF can initiate AF. If this method could reproducibly induce PACs from the same location as spontaneous PACs, it would be clinically significant. High-resolution noncontact mapping can map a single beat, should help identify the sites of spontaneously occurring PACs and PACs induced following cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF, and could help correlate the trigger sites for AF induction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve patients (8 men and 4 women; mean age 49+/-10 years) with spontaneous PACs were included in the study. In all patients, AF was induced and subsequently cardioverted to assess and map isolated PACs or PACs that induced AF. Using the EnSite 3000 noncontact mapping system, mapping was performed of spontaneously occurring isolated PACs and PACs that induced AF and PACs (both with and without AF) that occurred on at least two different occasions following cardioversion. The locations of the spontaneous and the induced PACs were similar; 97% of induced PACs came from the same locations as those of spontaneous PACs (P = 0.5). Radiofrequency lesions guided by this mapping technique were delivered at 14 pulmonary vein sites. Following a single ablation attempt during a mean follow-up of 19+/-4 weeks, 42% of the patients were in sinus rhythm and drug-free, whereas an additional 24% of patients could be maintained in sinus rhythm on drugs that had failed before. CONCLUSION: There is a high degree of correlation between spontaneous and induced PACs as the trigger sites for AF initiation. Cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF could be used as an electrophysiologic parameter for guiding therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Left ventricular function during interval and steady state exercise.

PURPOSE: Interval training (INT) is a commonly used method of exercise training in both athletic and clinical populations. Although we generally understand left ventricular (LV) function during steady state (SS) exercise, there are no data regarding LV function during INT. METHODS: We studied eight healthy, physically active volunteers during upright cycle ergometry during 15 min of both SS and INT, at the same average power output (90% individual anaerobic threshold), using first pass radionuclide ventriculography. During INT (60s/60s), measures of LV function were made during work (220 W) after 4 and 12 min and during recovery (120 W) after 7 and 15 min. These were compared with the average of four temporally matched measures made during SS (170 W). RESULTS: During INT, LV ejection fraction increased from rest (67 +/- 6%) to 77 +/- 5, 80 +/- 5, 77 +/- 5 and 79 +/- 4% after 4, 7, 12, and 15 min, respectively. During SS, LV ejection fraction was not significantly different at rest (70 +/- 4%) or during exercise (76 +/- 4, 79 +/- 4, 80 +/- 3, and 81 +/- 3%) after 4, 7, 12, and 15 min, respectively. Other measures of LV function (HR, BP, LV volumes, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, peak emptying, and filling rates) were likewise similar during temporally matched measurements during INT and SS. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were the expected transitions of ejection fraction with work and recovery, the overall hemodynamic picture during INT was very similar to SS. These data suggest that LV function during INT is not substantially different to that during SS.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Comparison of left ventricular function during interval versus steady-state exercise training in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.

This study sought to assess the safety of interval exercise training in patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) with respect to left ventricular (LV) function. For effective rehabilitation in CHF, both aerobic capacity and muscle strength need to be improved. We have previously demonstrated in both coronary artery bypass surgery and patients with CHF that interval exercise training (IET) offers advantages over steady-state exercise training (SSET). However, because LV function during IET has not yet been studied, the safety of this method in CHF remains unclear. To assess LV function during IET and SSET, at the same average power output, 11 patients with stable CHF were compared with 9 stable coronary patients with minimal LV dysfunction (control group). Using first-pass radionuclide ventriculography, changes in LV function were assessed during work versus recovery phases, at temporally matched times between the fifth and sixteenth minute of IET and SSET. In CHF during IET, there were no significant variations in the parameters measured during work and/or recovery phases. During the course of both IET and SSET, there was a significant increase in LV ejection fraction (5 vs 4 U; p <0.05 each), accompanied by increased heart rate (6 vs 8 beats/min; p <0.05 each) and cardiac output (2.4 vs 1.8 L/min; p <0.01 and p <0.05). In CHF, the magnitude of change in LV ejection fraction during IET was similar to that seen in controls. Both LV ejection fraction and the clinical status in patients with CHF remained stable during IET. Because IET appears to be as safe as SSET with respect to LV function, IET can be recommended for exercise training in CHF to apply higher peripheral exercise stimuli and with no greater LV stress than during SSET.

Exercise Therapy↗

PubMed1998

Physiological and pathological aspects of exercise left ventricular function.

Measures of left ventricular function during exercise provide information that is more accurate than the exercise ECG in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, supportive of the data provided by myocardial perfusion studies, and of great prognostic significance. We review basic methods for evaluating left ventricular function during exercise and responses to various types of exercise, including incremental exercise and exercise training conditions. Additionally, we review changes in both incremental exercise test responses and responses to training in various pathological conditions. Case reports are included to illustrate the utility of measuring left ventricular function during exercise.

Coronary Circulation↗