PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Goubet

Publications and source records attributed to N Goubet.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning about pain in preterm newborns.

The first goal of the study was to explore whether preterm newborns can learn to predict painful stimulation. The second goal was to provide a description of physiological and behavioral responses to repeated heel-sticks over days. Preterm newborns, born between 28 and 32 weeks gestational age, were observed five times over a period of 2 weeks while undergoing heel-sticks. Infants' facial expressions, cardiac reactions, and movement durations were recorded before, during, and after the heel-stick procedure. On Tests 1, 3, and 5, the phlebotomist picked up the baby's leg and held it for 10 seconds before proceeding to the heel-stick. Infants showed significantly greater increase in heart rate during the leg pickup on Test 5 compared with Test 1. This increase in heart rate after 2 weeks of experience suggests that newborn infants learned to anticipate the painful stimulus. Infants also demonstrated reliable behavioral and cardiac reactions to the invasive part of the heel-stick, but no change was observed in reactivity over days. However, greater post-conceptional age (PCA) was associated with increased behavioral reactivity during heel-stick on Tests 4 and 5. The anticipatory heart rate increase during leg pickup highlights the preterm infant's early capacity to learn and react to experience in the neonatal intensive care unit. The lack of global change in reactivity to the invasive procedure over days illustrates the need to take into account specific factors such as PCA when investigating sensitivity to repeated pain experiences.

Arousal↗

Object and event representation in 6 1/2-month-old infants.

Two experiments were conducted in which infants had to use remembered knowledge of auditory-visual events to guide their reaching and grasping. The events involved a ball falling noisily through a tube and coming to rest at 1 of 2 locations, with either resting site specified by distinctive auditory information. The events were presented initially in the light and then in the dark to determine whether infants would remember and use the auditory cues when they could no longer see where the ball fell. In both experiments, infants' reaching behavior was initiated and carried out after the sound ended, which ensured that search for the ball took place without support from ongoing visual or auditory cues. Accurate searching for the ball depended on infants' experience in the light. The authors conclude that 6 1/2-month-olds can represent unseen objects and events and use this knowledge to guide their actions to achieve a goal. The success in this task was contrasted with the failures of infants this age in the Piagetian hidden object task.

Auditory Perception↗

Enhanced sucking engagement by preterm infants during intermittent gavage feedings.

Non-nutritive sucking (NNS) activities were recorded in preterm infants born at gestational age 32 weeks or less during nasogastric feedings. Six infants on intermittent nasogastric feeding schedules were tested with a pacifier in their mouth for three 5-minute periods (before, during, and after gavage feeding). Analysis of the recordings revealed that NNS activities increased markedly during the intermittent nasogastric feeding schedule. The overall proportions of sucking engagement, the mean duration of sucking burst, the mean number of sucks per burst, and the mean duration of individual sucks within a burst increased markedly during gavage feeding compared with both pre-test and post-test periods. NNS by a group of five infants on continuous nasogastric feedings was similar to the pre-test and post-test of the infants on the intermittent nasogastric feeding schedule. These results indicate that in the context of intermittent nasogastric feedings, NNS engagement in tube-fed infants depends on stomach cues and/or temperature changes associated with tube feedings.

Cues↗

How infants use vision for grasping objects.

The role of vision was examined as infants prepared to grasp horizontally and vertically oriented rods. Hand orientation was measured prior to contact to determine if infants differentially oriented their hands relative to the object's orientation. Infants reached for rods under different lighting conditions. Three experiments are reported in which (1) sight of the hand was removed (N = 12), (2) sight of the object was removed near the end of the reach (N = 40, including 10 adults), and (3) sight of the object was removed prior to reach onset (N = 9). Infants differentially oriented their hand to a similar extent regardless of lighting condition and similar to control conditions in which they could see the rod and hand throughout the reach. In preparation for reaching, infants may use the current sight of the object's orientation, or the memory of it, to orient the hand for grasping; sight of the hand had no effect on hand orientation.

Attention↗