PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N H Pijls

Publications and source records attributed to N H Pijls.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but "Normal" coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: Coronary arteries without focal stenosis at angiography are generally considered non-flow-limiting. However, atherosclerosis is a diffuse process that often remains invisible at angiography. Accordingly, we hypothesized that in patients with coronary artery disease, nonstenotic coronary arteries induce a decrease in pressure along their length due to diffuse coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary pressure and fractional flow reserve (FFR), as indices of coronary conductance, were obtained from 37 arteries in 10 individuals without atherosclerosis (group I) and from 106 nonstenotic arteries in 62 patients with arteriographic stenoses in another coronary artery (group II). In group I, the pressure gradient between aorta and distal coronary artery was minimal at rest (1+/-1 mm Hg) and during maximal hyperemia (3+/-3 mm Hg). Corresponding values were significantly larger in group II (5+/-4 mm Hg and 10+/-8 mm Hg, respectively; both P<0.001). The FFR was near unity (0.97+/-0.02; range, 0.92 to 1) in group I, indicating no resistance to flow in truly normal coronary arteries, but it was significantly lower (0.89+/-0.08; range, 0.69 to 1) in group II, indicating a higher resistance to flow. In 57% of arteries in group II, FFR was lower than the lowest value in group I. In 8% of arteries in group II, FFR was <0.75, the threshold for inducible ischemia. CONCLUSION: Diffuse coronary atherosclerosis without focal stenosis at angiography causes a graded, continuous pressure fall along arterial length. This resistance to flow contributes to myocardial ischemia and has consequences for decision-making during percutaneous coronary interventions.

Blood Flow Velocity↗
PubMed2001

Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) are indices of coronary stenosis severity that provide the clinician with complementary information on the contribution of epicardial arteries and microcirculation to total resistance to myocardial blood flow. At present, FFR and CFR can only be obtained by 2 separate guidewires. The present study tested the validity of the thermodilution principle in assessing CFR with one pressure-temperature sensor-tipped guidewire. METHODS AND RESULTS: In an in vitro model, absolute flow was compared with the inverse mean transit time (1/T(mn)) of a thermodilution curve obtained after a bolus injection of 3 mL of saline at room temperature. A very close correlation (r>0.95) was found between absolute flow and 1/T(mn) when the sensor was placed >/=6 cm from the injection site. In 6 chronically instrumented dogs (60 stenoses; FFR from 0.19 to 0.98), a significant linear relation was found between flow velocity and 1/T(mn). A significant correlation was found between CFR(Doppler), which was calculated from the ratio of hyperemic to resting flow velocities, and CFR(thermo), which was calculated from the ratio of resting to hyperemic T(mn) (r=0.76; SEE=0.24; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate the validity of the thermodilution principle to assess CFR. Because the pressure-temperature sensor was mounted in a commercially available angioplasty guidewire, this technique permits simultaneous measurements of CFR and FFR.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

[Fractional and coronary flow reserve: intracoronary diagnosis of coronary artery disease]].

A decision to perform coronary angioplasty on a constricted coronary artery should always be preceded by objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia in the flow region concerned. However, for patients with multi-vessel coronary disease it can be difficult to determine which of the several coronary stenoses present is responsible for the anginal complaints. Recently, special miniaturized sensor-equipped guide wires are introduced in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Therefore it is now possible to selectively evaluate coronary stenoses by means of haemodynamic parameters: fractional flow reserve (FFR, based on intracoronary derived pressure measurements) and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR, based on intracoronary derived Doppler flow velocity measurements). The diagnosis of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory has improved considerably due to the use of these intracoronary derived haemodynamic parameters. Several clinical studies have shown that it is safe to defer a coronary angioplasty based on an FFR > or = 0.75 or a CFVR > or = 2.0. In the case of an abnormal FFR or CFVR result, the appropriate treatment strategy can be implemented. Furthermore, these parameters can be used to evaluate the result of the therapy.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2001

Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR), an index of coronary stenosis severity, can be calculated from the ratio of hyperemic distal to proximal coronary pressure. An FFR value of 0.75 can distinguish patients with normal and abnormal noninvasive stress testing in case of normal left ventricular function. The present study aimed at investigating the value of FFR in patients with a prior myocardial infarction. Methods and Results-- In 57 patients who had sustained a myocardial infarction >/=6 days earlier, myocardial perfusion single photon emission scintigraphy (SPECT) imaging and FFR were obtained before and after angioplasty. The sensitivity and specificity of the 0.75 value of FFR to detect flow maldistribution at SPECT imaging were 82% and 87%. The concordance between the FFR and SPECT imaging was 85% (P<0.001). When only truly positive and truly negative SPECT imaging were considered, the corresponding values were 87%, 100%, and 94% (P<0.001). Patients with positive SPECT imaging before angioplasty had a significantly lower FFR than patients with negative SPECT imaging (0.52+/-0.18 versus 0.67+/-0.16, P=0.0079) but a significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (63+/-10% versus 52+/-10%, P=0.0009) despite a similar degree of diameter stenosis (67+/-13% versus 68+/-16%, P=NS). A significant inverse correlation was found between LVEF and FFR (R=0.29, P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate (1) that the 0.75 cutoff value of FFR to distinguish patients with positive from patients with negative SPECT imaging is valid after a myocardial infarction and (2) that for a similar degree of stenosis, the value of FFR depends on the mass of viable myocardium.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2001

Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: PTCA of a coronary stenosis without documented ischemia at noninvasive stress testing is often performed, but its benefit is unproven. Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive index of stenosis severity that is a reliable substitute for noninvasive stress testing. A value of 0.75 identifies stenoses with hemodynamic significance. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 325 patients for whom PTCA was planned and who did not have documented ischemia, FFR of the stenosis was measured. If FFR was >0.75, patients were randomly assigned to deferral (deferral group; n=91) or performance (performance group; n=90) of PTCA. If FFR was <0.75, PTCA was performed as planned (reference group; n=144). Clinical follow-up was obtained at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Event-free survival was similar between the deferral and performance groups (92% versus 89% at 12 months and 89% versus 83% at 24 months) but was significantly lower in the reference group (80% at 12 months and 78% at 24 months). In addition, the percentage of patients free from angina was similar between the deferral and performance groups (49% versus 50% at 12 months and 70% versus 51% at 24 months) but was significantly higher in the reference group (67% at 12 and 80% at 24 months). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a coronary stenosis without evidence of ischemia, coronary pressure-derived FFR identifies those who will benefit from PTCA.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed2001

Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of coronary pressure derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in supporting decisions about medical or surgical treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. DESIGN: A two centre prospective single cohort follow up study. INTERVENTIONS: FFR of the left main coronary artery was determined in 54 consecutive patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery disease. If FFR was >/= 0.75, medical treatment was chosen; if FFR was < 0.75, surgical treatment was chosen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Freedom from death, myocardial infarction, or any coronary revascularisation procedure. RESULTS: In 24 patients (44%), FFR was >/= 0.75 and medical treatment was chosen (medical group). In the remaining 30 patients (56%), FFR was < 0.75 and bypass surgery was performed (surgical group). Mean (SD) follow up was 29 (15) months (range 12-65 months). Survival among patients at three years of follow up was 100% in the medical group and 97% in the surgical group. Event-free survival was 76% in the medical group and 83% in the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS: FFR supports decision making in equivocal left main coronary artery disease. If FFR is below 0.75, the decision for bypass surgery is supported. If FFR is above 0.75, a conservative approach is justified.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenoses within one coronary artery: validation in humans.

BACKGROUND: When several stenoses are present within 1 coronary artery, the hemodynamic significance of each stenosis is influenced by the presence of the other(s), and the calculation of coronary and fractional flow reserve (CFR and FFR) for each individual stenosis is confounded. Recently, we developed and experimentally validated a method to determine the true FFR of each stenosis as it would be after the removal of the other stenosis; the true FFR can be reliably predicted by coronary pressures measured before treatment at specific locations within the coronary artery using equations accounting for stenosis interaction. The aim of the present study was to test the validity of these equations in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study of 32 patients with 2 serial stenoses in 1 coronary artery, relevant pressures were measured before the intervention, after the treatment of 1 stenosis, and after the treatment of both stenoses. The true FFR of each stenosis (FFR(true)) was directly measured after the elimination of the other stenosis and compared with the value predicted (FFR(pred)) from the initial pressure measurements before treatment. Although the hyperemic gradient across 1 stenosis increased significantly (from 10+/-7 to 19+/-11 mm Hg after treatment of the other stenosis), FFR(pred) was close to FFR(true) in all patients (0.78+/-0.12 versus 0.78+/-0.11 mm Hg; r=0.92; Delta%=4+/-0%). Without accounting for stenosis interaction, the value of FFR for each stenosis would have been significantly overestimated (0.85+/-0.08; P:<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary pressure measurements made by a pressure wire at maximum hyperemia provide a simple, practical method for assessing the individual hemodynamic significance of multiple stenoses within the same artery.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2000

Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation.

Background-Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index of stenosis severity validated for isolated stenoses. This study develops the theoretical basis and experimentally validates equations for predicting FFR of sequential stenoses separately. Methods and Results-For 2 stenoses in series, equations were derived to predict FFR (FFR(pred)) of each stenosis separately (ie, as if the other one were removed) from arterial pressure (P(a)), pressure between the 2 stenoses (P(m)), distal coronary pressure (P(d)), and coronary occlusive pressure (P(w)). In 5 dogs with 2 stenoses of varying severity in the left circumflex coronary artery, FFR(pred) was compared with FFR(app) (ratio of the pressure just distal to that just proximal to each stenoses) and to FFR(true) (ratio of the pressures distal to proximal to each stenosis but after removal of the other one) in case of fixed distal and varying proximal stenoses (n=15) and in case of fixed proximal and varying distal stenoses (n=20). The overestimation of FFR(true) by FFR(app) was larger than that of FFR(true) by FFR(pred) (0.070+/-0.007 versus 0.029+/-0.004, P<0.01 for fixed distal stenoses, and 0.114+/-0.01 versus 0.036+/-0. 004, P<0.01 for fixed proximal stenoses). This overestimation of FFR(true) by FFR(app) was larger for fixed proximal than for fixed distal stenoses. Conclusions-The interaction between 2 stenoses is such that FFR of each lesion separately cannot be calculated by the equation for isolated stenoses (P(d)/P(a) during hyperemia) applied to each separately but can be predicted by more complete equations taking into account P(a), P(m), P(d), and P(w).

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Practice and potential pitfalls of coronary pressure measurement.

Guidewire-based coronary pressure measurement has emerged over the last years as a promising approach in the invasive assessment of coronary artery disease. It enables calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) which closely relates distal coronary pressure to myocardial blood flow during maximal arteriolar vasodilation. Coronary pressure measurement and FFR provide important information, both for decision making in diagnostic angiography and for monitoring and evaluating coronary interventions. In this review, the practical set-up of coronary pressure measurement in the catheterization laboratory is discussed step-by-step, special attention is given to potential pitfalls and how to avoid them, and the interpretation of coronary pressure measurement in a variety of pathologic conditions is clarified. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 49:1-16, 2000.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2000

Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow reserve in the right gastroepiploic artery graft.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the functional capacity of the right gastroepiploic artery graft (GEA) and its ability to adapt to provide adequate flow at peak myocardial demand, we investigated the feasibility of determining coronary flow reserve (CFR) provided by this vessel using transabdominal color Doppler echocardiography and the correlation between this noninvasive determination of flow reserve and nuclear stress scintigraphy. METHODS: In 40 selected patients, who underwent complete arterial myocardial revascularization using the GEA and the internal thoracic arteries (ITAs), CFR of the GEA was measured at maximum coronary hyperemia induced by intravenous adenosine infusion, 7 months (range 3 to 20) after surgery. In the same period, in 31 of this group of patients, exercise thallium scintigraphy was performed. RESULTS: We succeeded in measuring CFR in 37 of 40 patients with values ranging from 1.1 to 3.6 with an average of 2.1 +/- 0.7. During adenosine infusion, mean velocity in the GEA significantly increased from 48 +/- 20 to 89 +/- 41 cm/sec (p < 0.001), mean arterial blood pressure significantly decreased from 96 +/- 11 to 87 +/- 11 mm Hg (p < 0.001), and heart rate significantly increased from 74 +/- 11 to 87 +/- 15 beats/min (p < 0.001). In 8 of these 37 patients, the nuclear exercise test was positive (compatible with reversible ischemia in the distribution area of the GEA). Average CFR in these 8 patients with positive nuclear stress test was 1.46 +/- 0.28 versus 2.27 +/- 0.70 in those patients with a negative test (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive determination of CFR of GEAs is feasible, using transabdominal Doppler echocardiography. The present study shows that coronary vasodilator reserve and autoregulation is maintained in myocardium supplied by the GEA and that the CFR has a significant correlation with the results of noninvasive nuclear exercise testing. Therefore, noninvasive determination of CFR by transabdominal Doppler echocardiography might be a valuable contribution to functional assessment of GEAs.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment.

BACKGROUND: Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is the present standard for the evaluation of optimum stent deployment, this technique is expensive and not routinely feasible in most catheterization laboratories. Coronary pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo) is an easy, cheap, and rapidly obtainable index that is specific for the conductance of the epicardial coronary artery. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of coronary pressure measurement to predict optimum and suboptimum stent deployment. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 30 patients, a Wiktor-i stent was implanted at different inflation pressures, starting at 6 atm and increasing step by step to 8, 10, 12, and 14 atm, if necessary. After every step, stent deployment was evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), IVUS, and coronary pressure measurement. If any of the 3 techniques did not yield an optimum result, the next inflation was performed, and all 3 investigational modalities were repeated until optimum stent deployment was present by all of them or until the treating physician decided to accept the result. Optimum deployment according to QCA was finally achieved in 24 patients, according to IVUS in 17 patients, and also according to coronary pressure measurement in 17 patients. During the step-up, a total of 81 paired IVUS and coronary pressure measurements were performed, of which 91% yielded concordant results (ie, either an optimum or a suboptimum expansion of the stent by both techniques, P<0.00001). On the contrary, QCA showed a low concordance rate with IVUS and FFRmyo (48% and 46%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, using a coil stent, both IVUS and coronary pressure measurement were of similar value with respect to the assessment of optimum stent deployment. Therefore, coronary pressure measurement can be used as a cheap and rapid alternative to IVUS for that purpose.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: After regular coronary balloon angioplasty, it would be helpful to identify those patients who have a low cardiac event rate. Coronary angiography alone is not sensitive enough for that purpose, but it has been suggested that the combination of optimal angiographic and optimal functional results indicates a low restenosis chance. Pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index of the functional severity of the residual epicardial lesion and could be useful for that purpose. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 60 consecutive patients with single-vessel disease, balloon angioplasty was performed by use of a pressure instead of a regular guide wire. Both quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and measurement of FFR were performed 15 minutes after the procedure. A successful angioplasty result, defined as a residual diameter stenosis (DS) <50%, was achieved in 58 patients. In these patients, DS and FFR, measured 15 minutes after PTCA, were analyzed in relation to clinical outcome. In those 26 patients with both optimal angiographic (residual DS by QCA </=35%) and optimal functional (FFR >/=0.90) results, event-free survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 92+/-5%, 92+/-5%, and 88+/-6%, respectively, versus 72+/-8%, 69+/-8%, and 59+/-9%, respectively, in the remaining 32 patients in whom the angiographic or functional result or both were suboptimal (P=0.047, P=0.028, and P=0.014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a residual DS </=35% and FFR >/=0.90, clinical outcome up to 2 years is excellent. Therefore, there is a complementary value of coronary angiography and coronary pressure measurement in the evaluation of PTCA result.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Noninvasive assessment of right gastroepiploic artery graft patency using transcutaneous color Doppler echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Because the right gastroepiploic artery graft (GEA), when routed antegastrically, is situated just behind the abdominal wall, we investigated the possibility of evaluating graft patency and flow characteristics using transabdominal color Doppler echocardiography. METHODS: The right GEA graft was evaluated in 71 patients who underwent complete arterial revascularization, 4 months (range, 2 to 17 months) postoperatively. Selective angiography of the right GEA was performed in the patients in whom the graft could not be visualized using color Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Flow in the right GEA graft was detected in 65 (91.5%) of 71 patients using color Doppler echocardiography. In all visualized right GEAs, a biphasic flow pattern was observed, with higher peak velocity during systole. Mean (+/- standard deviation) peak systolic velocity was 76+/-16 cm/s. Mean (+/- standard deviation) velocity was 41+/-14 cm/s. Selective angiography of the right GEA in 5 patients in whom the graft could not be visualized using echocardiography showed four patent and functional grafts and one graft that was open but not functional ("slender sign"). One patient died before angiography could be performed. The sensitivity of noninvasive ultrasound assessment of the patency of the right GEA graft was 94% (65 of 69 patients). In this group of patients, an overall right GEA graft patency rate of 97% (69 of 71 patients) was found at mean follow-up of 4 months (range, 2 to 17 months). CONCLUSIONS: The right GEA graft is an adequate coronary artery graft with a good short-term patency rate, and transcutaneous color Doppler echocardiography is a useful tool for evaluating its patency and flow characteristics. Selective angiography of the right GEA can be avoided in most cases and is indicated only when the graft cannot be detected using Doppler echocardiography.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the safety of deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of angiographically intermediate but functionally nonsignificant stenosis, as assessed by coronary pressure measurement and myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo). BACKGROUND: Decision making in patients with chest pain and intermediate coronary stenosis remains difficult. In these cases it is unclear whether the risk of an intervention and the potentially subsequent restenosis outweigh the future risk of an event if the lesion remains untreated. FFRmyo is a lesion-specific functional index of epicardial stenosis severity that accurately distinguishes stenoses associated with inducible ischemia. METHODS: Retrospective analysis and follow-up was performed in 100 consecutive patients referred to our centers for PTCA of an intermediate stenosis but in whom the planned intervention was deferred on the basis of an FFRmyo > or = 0.75. RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 18+/-13 months (mean +/- SD, range 3 to 42), two patients died of noncardiac causes. Ninety patients remained free of any coronary events, and their average Canadian Cardiovascular Society class decreased from 2.0+/-1.2 at baseline to 0.7+/-0.9 at follow-up (p < 0.0001). A coronary event occurred in eight patients and was target-vessel related in four. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chest pain referred for PTCA of an intermediate stenosis, deferral of the intervention on the basis of an FFRmyo > or = 0.75 is safe and is associated with a much lower clinical event rate than if the procedure had been performed as initially planned in these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Clinical assessment of functional stenosis severity: use of coronary pressure measurements for the decision to bypass a lesion.

BACKGROUND: In the selection of patients eligible for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG), knowledge about the pathophysiologic significance of individual coronary stenoses is important. Only if the lesion amenable to MICABG can be identified as the culprit lesion, and other lesions can be demonstrated not to be responsible for reversible ischemia, will MICABG be an appropriate procedure. METHODS: By simultaneous measurement of mean aortic pressure and transstenotic coronary pressure, a pathophysiologic index can be obtained that specifically indicates the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on maximum achievable blood flow of the supplied myocardial territory. This index is called myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR(myo)). RESULTS: Myocardial fractional flow reserve is a reliable, lesion-specific index for determining whether a particular stenosis is responsible for reversible myocardial ischemia. If FFR(myo) is less than 0.75, revascularization is indicated, whereas if FFR(myo) is greater than 0.75, revascularization usually is not warranted. Moreover, in contrast to classic coronary flow or flow velocity reserve, FFR(myo) is independent of changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and contractility, and also accounts for the contribution of collaterals. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-derived FFR(myo) is an accurate pathophysiologic index for reliable identification of functionally significant epicardial lesions and can be obtained easily and quickly during routine cardiac catheterization. Therefore, FFR(myo) facilitates clinical decision-making with respect to the appropriateness of MICABG.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Decisions regarding coronary interventions should be combined with objective evidence of myocardial ischemia. The most common physiologic approach utilizes hospital facilities outside the catheterization laboratory, requiring additional time and cost. With the introduction of sensor-tipped angioplasty guide wires, distal coronary flow velocity and pressure can be obtained in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, facilitating physiologically based decisions regarding the need for intervention. In the catheterization laboratory, physiologically significant stenoses can be characterized as having impaired post-stenotic coronary flow reserve < 2.0 and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve < 0.75, both variables related strongly to positive ischemic perfusion imaging or stress testing results. Deferring coronary interventions on the basis of normal translesional physiology is safe and is associated with a low rate (< 10%) of lesion progression over a 10-month follow-up period. Preliminary data indicate that excellent physiologic and anatomic end points after balloon angioplasty are associated with low (< 20%) restenosis rates at 6-month follow-up. Clinically relevant relations of in-laboratory physiology support the insight that physiologic, as much as or more than anatomic variables, ultimately determine the functional status of a patient. Current data suggest that an intracoronary physiologic approach complements coronary lumenology and appears to have important clinical and economic implications for patients undergoing invasive evaluation and treatment of coronary artery disease.

Blood Flow Velocity↗
PubMed1997

Right gastroepiploic artery for coronary bypass reoperation without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting procedure presents a particularly challenging situation for cardiac surgeons. Technical obstacles and operative risks still exceed those of primary procedures. We report a case of a reoperative myocardial revascularization in a 61-year-old woman, in whom the pedicled right gastroepiploic artery was used to bypass the right coronary artery without cardiopulmonary bypass. Postoperative angiographic study before discharge of the patient and transcutaneous Doppler echocardiography controls at two and eleven months showed a good patency of the right gastroepiploic artery graft.

Arteries↗