PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Josman

Publications and source records attributed to N Josman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Memory and metamemory performance in Alzheimer's disease and healthy elderly: the Contextual Memory Test (CMT).

The purpose of the present study was to examine the ability of the Contextual Memory Test (CMT) to differentiate between elderly people suffering from Alzheimer's disease (AD) in comparison to healthy elderly people. Specifically, the objectives were to compare for differences between and within the groups on components of memory, including immediate and delayed recall as well as recognition. In addition, parameters of metamemory skills, such as general awareness, self-prediction of memory capacity, self-estimation, strategy use and use of contextual information, as well as the correlation between self-awareness and actual performance in both groups, were investigated. The sample consisted of 60 elderly participants, including 30 people diagnosed with AD who were assigned to the research group and 30 people matched for age, gender and educational level who were assigned to the control group. The results provide support for the hypothesis positing differences in memory performance between healthy elderly participants and those suffering from AD, particularly in immediate and delayed recall as well as in recognition. Moreover, findings indicate an improvement in memory performance under the cued condition (contextual), whereas improvement in the AD group proved to be significant only for immediate recall. The findings point to a distinct overestimation of memory ability predicted by both the AD and control groups. Following the memory task, however, the participants accurately estimated the number of items they remembered. In addition, significant correlations between the use of contextual and association strategies and the number of items remembered by both groups were obtained, in immediate as well as in delayed recall. Therefore, these findings support the CMT as a valuable memory and metamemory assessment tool for use with the AD population.

Aged↗

Reliability and validity of the Toglia Category Assessment Test.

The aim of this study was to establish interrater reliability, internal consistency reliability, and both concurrent and discriminant validity for the Toglia Category Assessment (TCA), a test of cognitive categorization. This study was based on an examination of categorization skills in clinical samples, using both the Toglia Category Assessment as well as the Riska Object Classification (ROC) test. The study sample consisted of 35 adult persons with brain-injury and 35 persons with chronic schizophrenia (n = 70). Correlations between scores of the two different tests and the two different samples were computed using Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficients. Both inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity were established for the TCA. These results suggest that the Toglia Category Assessment and Riska Object Classification tests may address different cognitive abilities. The Toglia Category Assessment appears to be a more sensitive test than the Riska Object Classification in that it provides an elaborate cognitive profile.

Adolescent↗

A problem-solving version of the Allen Cognitive Level Test.

The purpose of this study was to construct and validate a problem-solving version of the existing Allen Cognitive Level Test (ACL) (Allen, 1985). The new problem-solving version of the ACL (ACL-PS) follows the theoretical developments of the cognitive disability theory and the information processing approach. It was constructed to provide a more accurate assessment of the problem-solving process as well as task performance, especially at the higher cognitive levels. Both tests were administered to a psychiatric adolescent group (n = 49) who were subdivided according to diagnosis and to a matched nondysfunctional control group (n = 29). The results showed that both the ACL and the ACL-PS differentiated significantly between the patients and the control subjects and among the patient groups. At Level 6 of the ACL, none of the subjects needed any demonstration, with all scores distributed between independent performance or performance following verbal instructions only, that is, problem-solving phases that were added with the ACL-PS. The scoring of the ACL-PS is provided in addition to detailed scoring of the cognitive levels. It is suggested that the ACL-PS be implemented as a clinical evaluative tool with adolescents.

Adolescent↗

Construct-related validity of the Toglia Category Assessment and the Deductive Reasoning test with children who are typically developing.

OBJECTIVE: Both classification and deductive reasoning are essential cognitive components underlying any learning process and, therefore, are important to assess in children with developmental or learning disabilities. The aim of this study was to establish construct-related validity of the Toglia Category Assessment (TCA) and the Deductive Reasoning test, which were originally developed to evaluate adults with brain injury. This study represents the first step in validating and adapting the two tests for children who are typically developing. METHOD: The study population consisted of 235 children without disabilities in 6 different age groups (from 5-11 years of age). Both the TCA and the Deductive Reasoning test were administered to all participants. RESULTS: The results of the study indicate significant differences in the average performance of children in several age groups on both the TCA and the Deductive Reasoning test, but they do not show differences among all the groups. Children could not predict their ability in either test, but most were able to estimate their ability after actual performance of the TCA. A significant correlation was found only for the 5-year-olds and 7-year-olds between the Deductive Reasoning test final score and the children's estimation of their performance. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study support the suitability of the TCA and the Deductive Reasoning test for use with children who are typically developing. We recommend that both tools be studied further to amplify their validity.

Child↗