PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N L Ford

Publications and source records attributed to N L Ford.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Fundamental image quality limits for microcomputed tomography in small animals.

Small-animal imaging has become increasingly more important as transgenic and knockout mice are produced to model human diseases. One imaging technique that has emerged is microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). For live-animal imaging, the precision in the images will be determined by the x-ray dose given to the animal. As a result, we propose a simple method to predict the noise performance of an x-ray micro-CT system as a function of dose and image resolution. An ideal, quantum-noise limited micro-CT scanner, assumed to have perfect resolution and ideal efficiency, was modeled. Using a simplified model, the coefficient of variation (COV) of the linear attenuation coefficient was calculated for a range of entrance doses and isotropic voxel sizes. COV calculations were performed for the ideal case and with simulated imperfections in efficiency and resolution. Our model was validated in phantom studies and mouse images were acquired with a specimen scanner to illustrate the results. A simplified model of noise propagation in the case of isotropic resolution indicates that the COV in the linear attenuation coefficient is proportional to (dose)(-1/2) and to the (isotropic voxel size)(-2) in the reconstructed volume. Therefore an improvement in the precision can be achieved only by increasing the isotropic voxel size (thereby decreasing the resolution of the image) or by increasing the x-ray dose. For the ideal scanner, a COV of 1% in the linear attenuation coefficient for an image of a mouse exposed to 0.25 Gy is obtained with a minimum isotropic voxel size of 135 microm. However, the same COV is achieved at a dose of 5.0 Gy with a 65 microm isotropic voxel size. Conversely, for a 68 mm diameter rat, a COV of 1% obtained from an image at 5.0 Gy would require an isotropic voxel size of 100 microm. These results indicate that short-term, potentially lethal, effects of ionizing radiation will limit high-resolution live animal imaging. As improvements in detector technology allow the resolution to improve, by decreasing the detector element size to tens of microns or less, high quality images will be limited by the x-ray dose administered. For the highest quality images, these doses will approach the lethal dose or LD50 for the animals. Approaching the lethal dose will affect the way experiments are planned, and may reduce opportunities for experiments involving imaging the same animal over time. Dose considerations will become much more important for live small-animal imaging as the limits of resolution are tested.

Animals↗

Comparison of image quality indicators among mammography facilities in Ontario.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the technical aspects of image quality of mammography machines in facilities across Ontario. METHODS: Eight mammographic physics consultants took measurements and calculated accreditation phantom scores, mean glandular dose, entrance exposure, average optical density, half value layer and the limiting resolution of the imaging chain for 100 mammography machines across Ontario. RESULTS: Of the 100 machines, 39 were affiliated with the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP), and the remaining 61 were applying to become OBSP affiliates. All of the OBSP facilities and 32 of the applicants were accredited with the Mammography Accreditation Program (MAP) of the Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR). All OBSP facilities had passing phantom scores, and 84% of the applicants with CAR accreditation and 79% of those without had passing phantom scores. The mean glandular dose was 1.5 (range 1.0-1.9, standard deviation [SD] 0.22) mGy for OBSP facilities, 1.3 (0.8-1.8, SD 0.29) mGy for CAR accredited and 1.4 (0.9-1.9, SD 0.24) mGy for nonaccredited applicants. Mean entrance exposures were 798 (540-1280, SD 135) mR, 717 (430-980, SD 153) mR and 770 (520-930, SD 116) mR for the OBSP, accredited and nonaccredited facilities respectively. There were no appreciable differences in the mean optical densities (approx. 1.62 OD), mean half-value layers (approx. 0.34 mm Al) or mean resolutions measured with the large focal spot (nominal size of 0.3 mm) either parallel (approx. 16 line pairs/mm) or perpendicular (approx. 14 line pairs/mm) to the cathode-anode axis of the x-ray tube, among the 3 types of facilities. CONCLUSION: Image quality is increased and variability is decreased in facilities participating in a province-wide screening program.

Accreditation↗