PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N L Geller

Publications and source records attributed to N L Geller.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Comparison of subgroups assigned to medical regimens used to suppress cardiac ischemia (the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot [ACIP] Study).

This report focuses on the subset of 235 patients from the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study receiving randomly assigned medical therapy to treat angina and suppress ischemia detected on ambulatory electrocardiography: 121 patients received the sequence of atenolol and nifedipine, and 114 diltiazem and isosorbide dinitrate. After 12 weeks of therapy, the primary end point (absence of ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) ischemia and no clinical events) was reached in 47% of atenolol/nifedipine- versus 31% of diltiazem/isosorbide dinitrate-treated patients (adjusted p = 0.03). A trend to increased exercise time to ST depression was seen in the atenolol and nifedipine versus diltiazem and isosorbide dinitrate regimens (median treadmill duration 5.8 vs 4.8 minutes; p = 0.04). However, when adjusted for baseline imbalances in ambulatory ECG ischemia, the 2 medical combinations were similar in suppression of ambulatory ECG ischemia. In both medication regimens, an association between mean heart rate and ischemia on ambulatory electrocardiography after 12 weeks of treatment was observed so that patients on either regimen with a mean heart rate > 80 beats/min had ischemia detectable almost twice as often as those with a mean heart rate < 70 beats/min (p < 0.001).

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1996

Diabetics with coronary disease have a prevalence of asymptomatic ischemia during exercise treadmill testing and ambulatory ischemia monitoring similar to that of nondiabetic patients. An ACIP database study. ACIP Investigators. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot Investigators.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data as to whether diabetics have a higher prevalence of asymptomatic ST-segment depression during exercise treadmill testing (ETT) and ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring. This study was conducted to determine whether diabetic patients with coronary disease enrolled in the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) have more episodes of asymptomatic ischemia during ETT and 48-hour AECG monitoring than nondiabetic patients and to compare differences in angiographic variables and the magnitude of ischemia as measured by standard ETT and AECG criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Angiographic variables and the prevalence and magnitude of ischemia during the qualifying ETT and 48-hour AECG were compared by the presence and absence of diabetes mellitus in 558 randomized ACIP patients. Seventy-seven patients had a history of diabetes and were taking oral hypoglycemics or insulin (diabetic group); 481 patients did not meet these criteria (nondiabetic group). Multivessel disease (87% versus 74%, P = .01) was more frequent in the diabetic group. The percentages of patients without angina during the ETT were similar in the diabetic and nondiabetic groups (36% and 39%, respectively). Time to onset of > or = 1-mm ST-segment depression and time to onset of angina were similar in both groups. The percentages of patients with only asymptomatic ST-segment depression during the 48-hour AECG were similar in the diabetic and nondiabetic groups (94% versus 88%, respectively). However, total ischemic time per 24 hours (15.0 +/- 21.4 versus 23.6 +/- 31.1 minutes, P = .02), ischemic time per episode (6.3 +/- 4.6 versus 9.0 +/- 8.7 minutes, P < .01), and the maximum depth of ST-segment depression tended to be less in the diabetic group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled in ACIP were selected on the basis of an abnormal ETT and 48-hour AECG and ability to undergo coronary revascularization. When patients with diabetes mellitus were compared with those without diabetes, there was a similar prevalence of asymptomatic ischemia during ETT and 48-hour AECG monitoring. Despite more extensive and diffuse coronary disease, diabetic ACIP patients tended to have less measurable ischemia during the 48-hour AECG.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Meta-analysis of clinical trials: a consumer's guide.

Meta-analysis is a popular statistical tool allowing the synthesis of related research studies in a quantitative manner. Components of a good meta-analysis are first discussed, with a view toward critical reading of reports of meta-analyses. Examples include lipid-lowering drugs and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A role for meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials was examined at a workshop held at the National Institutes of Health and aspects of these uses of meta-analyses are considered. Basic analytical and graphical methods of meta-analysis are briefly reviewed. The goal is to encourage more thoughtful evaluation of the many meta-analyses that are published or are presented.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1996

Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke t-PA Stroke Trial.

BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) held a workshop on statistical approaches to analysis of acute stroke trials that have multiple pre-specified outcomes. An objective was to plan for statistical analysis of the NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Treatment success was defined as a "consistent and persuasive difference" in the proportion of patients achieving favorable outcomes on the Barthel Index, Modified Rankin Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee for the trial recommended this outcome because the committee did not believe that a positive result for a single outcome would provide sufficient evidence of efficacy. SUMMARY OF COMMENT: Workshop participants accepted the global test as a viable approach to testing the primary trial hypothesis. Clinician participants advocated categorizing outcomes as favorable/unfavorable, outcomes more clinically meaningful than continuous outcomes for evaluating a drug with potentially serious side effects. They agreed that a global test was appropriate for ischemic stroke when no single outcome is accepted. Hypothetical, special-case examples illustrate that highly correlated outcomes diminish the power of the global test. NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial data demonstrate the clinical interpretability of the global test. CONCLUSIONS: Workshop participants concluded that a global statistic should be used to test the trial's primary hypothesis accompanied by secondary tests of individual outcomes. Workshop participants recommended familiarizing the clinical/scientific community with the global approach.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study. Improvement of cardiac ischemia at 1 year after PTCA and CABG.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac ischemia on the ambulatory ECG (AECG) and/or on the exercise treadmill test (ETT) is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcome. Myocardial revascularization more often suppresses cardiac ischemia than does medical management alone. However, few studies have compared the effects of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with those of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on cardiac ischemia and clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment strategies in the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study: angina-guided medical strategy (n = 184), ischemia-guided medical strategy (n = 182), or revascularization (n = 192). In patients assigned to revascularization, the choice of the procedure, PTCA or CABG, was made by the clinical unit staff and patient based on a coronary angiogram usually performed within 2 months of enrollment. CABG was selected in 78 patients and PTCA in 92 patients. At 12 weeks, ischemia on the AECG was suppressed in 70% of CABG patients versus 46% of PTCA patients (P = .002). Ischemia on the ETT was no longer present in 46% versus 23% of the patients, respectively (P = .005). Angina, within 4 weeks of the follow-up visit, was absent in 90% versus 68%, respectively (P = .001). These clinical variables remained improved in both groups at 1 year. Clinical events (myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization) occurred in 1 CABG patient versus 7 PTCA patients at 12 weeks, and in 1 versus 16 patients, respectively, at 12 months (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Ischemia on the AECG and ETT and angina were relieved in many patients after both procedures; however, CABG was superior to PTCA, and it was associated with a lower incidence of clinical events at 1 year. These results suggest that more complete revascularization relates to better clinical outcome. However, a large trial is needed to confirm these results.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1995

Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study: outcome at 1 year for patients with asymptomatic cardiac ischemia randomized to medical therapy or revascularization. The ACIP Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: This report discusses the outcome at 1 year in patients in the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study. BACKGROUND: Comparative efficacy of medical therapy versus revascularization in treatment of asymptomatic ischemia is unknown. The ACIP study assessed the ability of three treatment strategies to suppress ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) ischemia to determine whether a large-scale trial studying the impact of these strategies on clinical outcomes was feasible. METHODS: Five hundred fifty-eight patients with coronary anatomy amenable to revascularization, at least one episode of asymptomatic ischemia on the 48-h ambulatory ECG and ischemia on treadmill exercise testing were randomized to one of three treatment strategies: 1) medication to suppress angina (angina-guided strategy, n = 183); 2) medication to suppress both angina and ambulatory ECG ischemia (ischemia-guided strategy, n = 183); or 3) revascularization strategy (angioplasty or bypass surgery, n = 192). Medication was titrated atenolol-nifedipine or diltiazem-isosorbide dinitrate. RESULTS: The revascularization group received less medication and had less ischemia on serial ambulatory ECG recordings and exercise testing than those assigned to the medical strategies. The ischemia-guided group received more medication but had suppression of ischemia similar to the angina-guided group. At 1 year, the mortality rate was 4.4% in the angina-guided group (8 of 183), 1.6% in the ischemia-guided group (3 of 183) and 0% in the revascularization group (overall, p = 0.004; angina-guided vs. revascularization, p = 0.003; other pairwise comparisons, p = NS). Frequency of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke and congestive heart failure was not significantly different among the three strategies. The revascularization group had significantly fewer hospital admissions and nonprotocol revascularizations at 1 year. The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, nonprotocol revascularization or hospital admissions at 1 year was 32% with the angina-guided medical strategy, 31% with the ischemia-guided medical strategy and 18% with the revascularization strategy (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year, revascularization was superior to both angina-guided and ischemia-guided medical strategies in suppressing asymptomatic ischemia and was associated with better outcome. These findings require confirmation by a larger scale trial.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Asymptomatic cardiac ischemia pilot (ACIP).

This pilot study demonstrated that (1) patients with CAD and asymptomatic cardiac ischemia can be randomized to medical or revascularization strategies using a complex and demanding protocol, (2) asymptomatic cardiac ischemia can be suppressed in 40-50% of patients with clinically advanced coronary disease with relatively low to moderate doses of medication titrated over a period of 12 weeks (3). Revascularization was the most effective of the treatment strategies studied in reducing ischemia. Any type of therapy, whether it be drugs or revascularization requiring repetitive monitoring with ambulatory ECG or other methods to detect ischemia over a long period of time, will escalate the cost of quality medical care for our patients. Thus, the health care costs implications and treatment of asymptomatic ischemia are enormous. But the apparent cost advantage of treating only symptoms, that is ignoring all ischemia, could disappear if treatment of ischemia reduces the risk of adverse events. The clinical question to be addressed in the future is what is necessary to reduce the cardiac-event rates of death and myocardial infarction in this group of patients? Will more aggressive drug therapy eliminate more ischemia and will therapy directed at the elimination of all detectable ischemia improved clinical outcome better than therapy directed to control angina only? These questions can only be answered by a large clinical trial. The results of such a trial will provide the basis and rationale for safe and effective therapy for patients with coronary disease and evidence of cardiac ischemia. Whatever the answer to this important medical and scientific question is, it will have tremendous economic implications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Sample size calculation for clinical trials in which entry criteria and outcomes are counts of events. ACIP Investigators. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot.

In many chronic diseases, therapy aims to prevent or reduce the frequency of episodes of a disease manifestation, for example cardiac ischaemic episodes or epileptic seizures. Entry criteria for clinical trials typically include a minimum number of episodes within a baseline period, and regression to the mean should be anticipated. The distribution of the number of episodes at follow-up, the statistical power for treatment comparisons, and the difficulty of recruitment will depend on the entry criterion chosen. A gamma-Poisson mixture model is employed to describe the regression to the mean when the entry criterion and outcome measure are counts of discrete events. Sample size formulae which take account of the entry criterion are derived for comparison of mean number of events at follow-up and the proportion of patients with zero events at follow-up. Application of these formulae to screening data from the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study is presented as an example.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1994

The Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study: design of a randomized clinical trial, baseline data and implications for a long-term outcome trial.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives of the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot were 1) to compare the 12-week efficacy of three treatment strategies to suppress cardiac ischemia, and 2) to assess the feasibility of a prognosis trial in patients with asymptomatic cardiac ischemia. BACKGROUND: Cardiac ischemia has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, most cardiac ischemia is asymptomatic, and although therapeutic strategies ranging from no medication to revascularization are being used to treat ischemia, no prospective study evaluating different treatment strategies has been reported. METHODS: Patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and ischemia on exercise and ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) in 11 clinical units were randomized to receive angina-guided medical therapy, angina-guided plus ambulatory ECG ischemia-guided medical therapy or revascularization (coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery). Patients were also randomized to receive either diltiazem plus isosorbide dinitrate or atenolol plus nifedipine when possible. After anti-ischemic medication adjustment to control angina, blinded medication was adjusted in the medical therapy groups to eliminate ischemia in the ischemia-guided group. The primary outcome was the absence of ischemia at 12 weeks. Follow-up was scheduled for 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 1,959 patients were screened by ambulatory ECG monitoring; 982 (49%) had asymptomatic ischemia, and 618 (65%) were enrolled in the study. Most patients were men, were > 60 years old and had two or more ischemic episodes, early positive exercise tests and multivessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: Design and baseline data for a pilot study of ischemia treatment strategies are described.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Effects of treatment strategies to suppress ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease: 12-week results of the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study.

OBJECTIVES: The Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study was initiated to determine the feasibility of a large trial in evaluating the effects of treatment of ischemia on outcome (mortality and myocardial infarction). The study was designed to examine the effects of medical treatment to control angina compared with treatment strategies guided by ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) ischemia or coronary anatomy. BACKGROUND: Treatments to suppress ischemia (asymptomatic and symptomatic) have not been evaluated in a large prospective, randomized trial. Before undertaking such a trial, issues about recruitment and treatment strategies must be addressed. METHODS: The 618 enrolled patients had coronary artery disease suitable for revascularization, ischemia on stress test and asymptomatic ischemia on ambulatory ECG. Patients were assigned randomly to one of three treatment strategies: 1) angina-guided medical strategy with titration of anti-ischemic medication to relieve angina (angina-guided strategy); 2) angina-guided plus ambulatory ECG ischemia-guided medical strategy with titration of anti-ischemic medication to eliminate both angina and ambulatory ECG ischemia (ischemia-guided strategy); and 3) revascularization by angioplasty or bypass surgery (revascularization strategy). RESULTS: Ambulatory ECG ischemia was no longer present at the week 12 visit in 39% of patients assigned to the angina-guided strategy, 41% of patients assigned to the ischemia-guided strategy and 55% of patients assigned to the revascularization strategy. All strategies reduced the median number of episodes and total duration of ST segment depression during follow-up ambulatory ECG monitoring. Revascularization was the most effective strategy. Treadmill test results were concordant with those of ambulatory ECG monitoring. For most patients in the two medical strategies, angina was controlled with low to moderate doses of anti-ischemic medication, and the majority of patients (65%) in the revascularization strategy did not require medication for angina. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that cardiac ischemia can be suppressed in 40% to 55% of patients with either low or moderate doses of medication or revascularization and that a large trial is feasible.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

After a treatment breakthrough: a comparison of trial and population-based data for advanced testicular cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine to what extent the benefits of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy have been disseminated to all American men diagnosed with advanced testicular cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-two advanced testicular cancer cases from five population-based registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program diagnosed from 1978 to 1984 were compared with 133 diagnostically comparable cases from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) vinblastine, dactinomycin, and bleomycin (VAB) regimens 7 through 9. Exclusions were made in both series for cases with elevated markers only, abdominal disease only, or extragonadal tumors. Ratings of extent of disease using the Indiana University system (minimal/moderate or advanced) were available for the MSKCC cases, and were determined retrospectively on the SEER cases based on information abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: Among the SEER cases, 89% reported receiving chemotherapy, and 95% of these received cisplatin-containing regimens. Survival among the MSKCC patients was significantly better than for the SEER cases in the minimal/moderate extent of disease category (95% and 73% 3-year survival rate, respectively); however, the difference for advanced cases was only marginally significant (52% and 40% 3-year survival rates, respectively). Survival did not vary significantly by year of diagnosis in either series. CONCLUSION: Although most of the patients in the SEER series received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, this alone did not produce results equivalent to that in the MSKCC series. Since the patients were selected to be as diagnostically comparable as possible at baseline, remaining differences in survival may be due to adherence to a fixed regimen and level of dose-intensity, adequacy of diagnostic work-up, implementation of salvage therapies and debulking surgery, and unknown factors related to who is willing and able to travel to a tertiary care center for treatment. Whatever the reason for not achieving optimal results in the SEER series, the very modest survival improvements over the time period 1978 to 1984 indicates that the differences in outcome between the two series were basically stable over the study period.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Monitoring pairwise comparisons in multi-armed clinical trials.

This paper proposes a method for monitoring multi-armed clinical trials on the basis of pairwise comparisons between arms. The set of pairwise test statistics is examined during the course of the trial in order to make decisions about hypotheses, continuation of treatment arms, and continuation of the trial. Strong control of the Type I error rate is achieved by modifying two-armed group sequential procedures of Pocock (1977, Biometrika 64, 191-199), O'Brien and Fleming (1979, Biometrics 35, 549-556), and Lan and DeMets (1983, Biometrika 70, 659-663) to multi-armed trials. In the fixed-sample situation, these methods reduce to either Dunnett's or Tukey's procedure for multiple comparisons. A simpler, more flexible approximation based on the Bonferroni inequality is suggested, as well as an analogue to a sequentially rejective procedure.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1993

Practical issues in data monitoring of clinical trials: summary of responses to a questionnaire at NIH.

A targeted poll was undertaken to compare and contrast models of data monitoring of randomized clinical trials sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. In an attempt to represent the institutes which conduct clinical trials, twelve individuals were selected and asked to respond to a questionnaire specifically prepared for this workshop. The response rate was 100 per cent. Most of the large trials sponsored by the institutes have independent, formally constituted data monitoring committees. There was one institute which does not have any data monitoring committees. The questionnaire is described in detail and a summary of the results is given.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1993

Effect of relative cumulative dose-intensity on survival of patients with urothelial cancer treated with M-VAC.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the received dose-intensity in a mature data set of patients with advanced urothelial cancer who received at least one cycle of the methotrexate (M), vinblastine (V), Adriamycin ([A], doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cisplatin (C) regimen (M-VAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Received dose-intensity was evaluated over time by summing doses over cycles for each patient, cumulating treatment times, and assuming four cycles of chemotherapy were planned. Relative cumulative dose-intensity was then calculated for individual patients at the end of each cycle. To assess a relationship with survival, relative cumulative dose-intensity was then used as a time-dependent covariate in Cox regression. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6 years and median survival 13.3 months, with 20 patients alive at the time of analysis. Out of a maximum of 1.0, the median relative dose-intensity for the M-VAC combination decreased from .69 to .59 from cycle 1 to cycle 4. Similarly, a decrease from .68 to .62 and from .80 to .72 was observed for A and C, respectively. The median received dose-intensity for A was 6.0 mg/m2/wk, and for C 14 mg/m2/wk. Neither the four-cycle relative cumulative dose-intensity for the M-VAC combination, nor the relative cumulative dose-intensities for A or C were found to be significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The absence of an effect for received dose-intensity on survival may reflect the low dose-intensities of the components of the regimen actually delivered in this study. The results question whether the individual agents can be escalated sufficiently, with growth factor support, to improve significantly complete response proportions, a prerequisite for increasing the proportion of long-term survivors.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1993

Randomized trial of etoposide and cisplatin versus etoposide and carboplatin in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors: a multiinstitutional study.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized phase III clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of etoposide plus carboplatin (EC) versus etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in good-risk germ cell tumor (GCT) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1986 and December 1990, 270 patients with good-risk GCTs were randomized to receive four cycles of either EP or EC. The etoposide dose in all patients was 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5. EP patients received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 and therapy was recycled at 21-day intervals. For EC patients, the carboplatin dose was 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle and the EC recycling interval was 28 days. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five patients were assessable: 131 patients treated with EC and 134 treated with EP. One hundred fifteen of 131 assessable patients (88%) treated with EC achieved a complete response (CR) versus 121 of 134 patients (90%) treated with EP (P = .32). Sixteen patients (12%) treated with EC relapsed from CR versus four patients (3%) treated with EP. Therefore, 32 patients (24%) who received carboplatin experienced an event (incomplete response [IR] or relapse) compared with 17 of 134 patients (13%) who received cisplatin (P = .02). At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, event-free and relapse-free survival were inferior for patients treated with EC (P = .02 and P = .005, respectively). No difference in overall survival was evident (P = .52). CONCLUSION: Two-drug therapy with EC using this dose and schedule was inferior to therapy with EP. Cisplatin remains as the standard platinum analog in the treatment of patients with good-risk GCTs. Carboplatin should be restricted to investigational trials in GCT.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

On the design and analysis of randomized clinical trials with multiple endpoints.

This paper considers some methods for reducing the number of significance tests undertaken when analyzing and reporting results of clinical trials. Emphasis is placed on designing and analyzing clinical trials to examine a composite hypothesis concerning multiple endpoints and combining this multiple endpoint methodology with group sequential methodology. Four methods for composite hypotheses are considered: an ordinary least squares and a generalized least squares approach both due to O'Brien (1984, Biometrics 40, 1079-1087), a new modification of these, and an approximate likelihood ratio test, due to Tang, Gnecco, and Geller (1989, Biometrika 76, 577-583). These are extended for group sequential use. In particular, simulation is used to generate critical values and sequences of nominal significance levels for the approximate likelihood ratio test, which is not normally distributed. An example is given and the relative merits of the suggested approaches are discussed.

Asthma↗
PubMed1992

Prognostic factors for survival of patients with bidimensionally measurable metastatic hormone-refractory prostatic cancer treated with single-agent chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: A range of response proportions have been reported using the same single-agent inpatients with hormone refractory prostatic cancer. To assess whether these results were due to imbalances in prognostic factors, the authors evaluated a series of prognostic factors for survival in patients with prostatic cancer treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: Complete data sets were available in 146 patients, in whom 27 individual variables were considered in univariate analysis. Significant factors (P < 0.05) were then evaluated using regression analysis along with transformations of the data to obtain a Cox and exponential model. The derived model was then evaluated on an independent data set from the National Cancer Institute treated with suramin. RESULTS: In univariate analysis in order of significance, the serum alkaline phosphate (0.0018), serum lactic dehydrogenase (0.006), prior radiation therapy (0.007), serum aspartate amino transferase (0.02), presence of liver disease (0.033), and pretreatment Karnofsky performance status (0.04) were associated with survival. In the regression analysis, only the log-transformed lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) and normal versus abnormal alkaline phosphatase were significant. This model was confirmed with an independent data set from patients treated with the putative growth factor inhibitor suramin. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis emphasizes important factors that can be used to stratify patients in future phase II and III trials.

Aged↗