Biomedical subjects

N LaVallee

Publications and source records attributed to N LaVallee.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Evaluation of the onset and duration of effect of azelastine eye drops (0.05%) versus placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis using an allergen challenge model.

OBJECTIVE: The trial evaluated the effectiveness of the investigational antihistaminic and antiallergic compound Azelastine Eye Drops (AZE) in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis using an allergen challenge model. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, paired-eye study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with a history of allergic conjunctivitis (>/=2 years) who were asymptomatic throughout the trial, had a positive skin test (cat dander, grass, or ragweed pollen within the last year), and had a positive conjunctival reaction (score 2+ or more for itching and redness in both eyes on a 0-4 scale) during two separate conjunctival provocation tests (CPT) before randomization. METHODS: Eighty patients underwent a 2-week screening period (visits 1 and 2) that included a CPT during visit 1 to establish the allergen threshold dose and a second confirmatory CPT performed at visit 2. Eye symptom assessments for itching (evaluated by patient) and conjunctival redness (evaluated by physician) were performed 5 and 10 minutes after CPT using a 5-point scale (from 0 = none to 4+ = severe). Qualified patients were randomized to receive one drop of AZE (0.015 mg of azelastine hydrochloride) in one eye and one drop of placebo in the other eye 20 minutes before CPT at visit 3 (onset) and 8 or 10 hours before CPT at visit 4 (duration). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Individual severity scores for itching (evaluated by patient) and conjunctival redness (evaluated by physician) for each eye at 3, 5, and 10 minutes after CPT at visits 3 and 4 using a 5-point scale (0 = none to 4+ = very severe). RESULTS: Each of the 80 randomized patients completed the trial. Mean itching and conjunctival redness scores at visit 3 (onset) were significantly lower (P: < 0.001) in the AZE-treated eyes than in the placebo-treated eyes. At visit 4 (duration), mean itching and conjunctival redness scores (P: </= 0.003) for the 8-hour group and mean itching scores (P: </= 0.001) for the 10-hour group were significantly lower in the AZE-treated eyes than in the placebo-treated eyes. Significant differences in mean tearing and chemosis severity scores were also seen at visit 3 (onset) and visit 4 (duration) in the AZE-treated eyes when compared with the placebo-treated eyes. Treatment with AZE was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy of experimentally induced allergic conjunctivitis with AZE was highly effective, with an onset of action seen within 3 minutes and a duration of effect of at least 8 to 10 hours.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Comparative study of extended release albuterol sulfate and long-acting inhaled salmeterol xinafoate in the treatment of nocturnal asthma.

BACKGROUND: Nocturnal worsening of asthma is a common problem in asthma and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Long acting beta-2 agonists are considered long-term symptom control medications, especially for nocturnal symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy of an extended release oral beta-2 agonist, albuterol sulfate (Volmax), to a long-acting inhaled agent, salmeterol (Serevent) in the treatment of nocturnal asthma. METHODS: This was a multicenter double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, crossover design with a 1-week baseline period and two 3-week treatment periods separated by a 7 to 9-day washout. An optional 2-week, open-label phase was conducted to evaluate patient preference. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. For the primary outcome variable of morning peak expiratory flow, there were similar and significant improvements over the 3-week treatment period for both medications compared with baseline (P < .001). Similar improvements were seen in the overnight change in PEF values (P < .001). The morning and overnight changes in FEV1 were not significantly different between treatment arms (P > .05). There were significant improvements in both treatment periods in regard to the percentage of nights without awakenings (baseline 53.6+/-5.3%), extended release albuterol 83.3+/-3.0% (P < .001), and salmeterol 88.8+/-2.4%. The percentage of patients who had no awakenings during treatment did not differ significantly for the two medications. Both treatments also resulted in a decrease in the use of rescue albuterol (extended release 2.66+/-0.35 puffs per day, salmeterol 1.85+/-0.29) from baseline (4.57+/-0.41, P < .001). There was a significant difference between groups (P = .001). The reasons why patients preferred one medication over the other varied. CONCLUSION: Both extended release albuterol tablets and inhaled salmeterol resulted in similar bronchodilation and good control of nocturnal asthma symptoms.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed1992

Fairness in prospective payment: a clustering approach.

Problems of fairness in prospective payment have existed since the inception of this regulatory method in the early 1980s. While prospective payment ostensibly has sought to reward efficient producers and provide disincentives for inefficient producers of health care, many hospitals have been penalized financially as a consequence of facing systematic factors beyond their control. This article defines homogenous peer groups of Department of Veterans Affairs providers for the purpose of establishing competitive prospective reimbursement rates. An econometric analysis classifies hospitals into six categories: small affiliated, small general, midsize affiliated/tertiary, large affiliated/tertiary, midsize general, and psychiatric. The Department of Veterans Affairs adopted this classification to alter its prospective payment system in 1988.

Cluster Analysis↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Tri-Nasal triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray 200 and 400 micrograms qd versus placebo and Nasacort triamcinolone acetonide nasal aerosol 440 micrograms qd in patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis during the grass season.

Tri-Nasal Nasal Spray is an investigational solution of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) currently being evaluated as a treatment for allergic rhinitis. The safety and efficacy of 200 and 400 micrograms once daily doses of Tri-Nasal Nasal Spray, an active control (440 micrograms once daily of Nasacort Nasal aerosol), and Tri-Nasal Nasal Spray placebo were compared over a 2-week treatment period in a double-blind (the Nasacort treatment was not blinded), parallel design trial. A total of 377 adult patients in 13 centers were enrolled during the grass pollen season. The primary efficacy variable was the weekly average of the SSI (Symptom Severity Index), the sum of daily nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and sneezing severity scores from the patient diary. A total of 355 patients completed the study. All active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo in relieving nasal symptoms at each treatment week. The 400 micrograms Tri-Nasal Nasal Spray and Nasacort treatments had a rapid onset of action, demonstrating significant improvement in the SSI versus placebo by the second day of treatment. Results for the individual nasal symptoms and other secondary efficacy measures paralleled those of the primary efficacy variables. Tri-Nasal Nasal Spray and Nasacort were comparable in safety, and in treating the nonocular symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Administration, Intranasal↗