PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N M Armstrong

Publications and source records attributed to N M Armstrong.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. The effects of age and hearing loss.

Auditory perception with hearing protectors was assessed in three groups of subjects, two with normal hearing, but differing in age, and one with moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Individuals were tested with the ears unoccluded, and fitted with each of two level-dependent ear muffs and their conventional level-independent counterparts. One of the former devices provided limited amplification. In each of these five ear conditions, the threshold of audibility for one-third octave noise bands centered at 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 Hz, consonant discrimination, and word recognition were measured in quiet and in a continuous impulse noise background. The results showed that the attenuation of sounds (i.e. the difference between protected and unoccluded thresholds) in quiet did not vary as a function of age or hearing loss for any of the four protectors. In noise, the difference between protected and unoccluded listening was close to zero, as long as hearing was normal. With hearing loss as a factor, there was a significant increment in the protected threshold, the amount determined by the device. Word recognition in quiet was adversely affected in normal-hearing listeners by the three attenuating devices but improved in noise relative to unoccluded listening. Amplification had a deleterious effect for both consonant discrimination and word recognition in noise. In hearing-impaired listeners, speech perception was impeded by all four muffs but less so in quiet with limited amplification.

Adult↗

Sound localization with hearing protectors.

A preliminary investigation was conducted of the ability of normal-hearing subjects to localize sound while wearing hearing protective devices. Performance with Bilsom 2392 level-dependent stereophonic muffs with limited amplification was compared with that of conventional level-independent E-A-R 3000 muffs and E-A-R plugs. Sound localization was assessed using an array of six speakers, positioned in the horizontal plane, 1 m from the subject at azimuth angles of 30 degrees, 90 degrees, 150 degrees, 210 degrees, 270 degrees and 330 degrees. The stimulus was an 80 dB SPL 300-ms one-third octave noise band centered at 500 Hz or 4000 Hz. The experiment was conducted in quiet and in a 65 dB SPL white noise background. The results indicated that at 500 Hz, the wearing of protectors resulted in a 20% decrease in the accuracy of speaker identification but the three types of device were indistinguishable. At 4000 Hz, performance was best in the unoccluded condition and relatively worst with the level-dependent muff. Error patterns depended on the interaction of stimulus frequency, speaker azimuth and protector. Front/back errors in localizing the high-frequency stimulus were greatest with the conventional muff, whereas right/left errors were greatest with the level-dependent muff. Protected listening was generally unaffected by the presence of a noise background for both of the frequencies tested.

Adult↗