Biomedical subjects

N Ma'luf

Publications and source records attributed to N Ma'luf.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Appropriateness of prostate-specific antigen testing.

We established criteria for appropriate use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay and used them to evaluate PSA test utilization at 1 tertiary care institution. During a 6-month period, 2,330 PSA results were reported for outpatients and 95 for inpatients. We reviewed medical records for a random sample of 338 outpatient results (14.51%) and all 95 inpatient results, of which 21% (71/338) of outpatient and 17% (16/95) of inpatient results were inappropriate according to our test utilization criteria. Among outpatients, 52% of tests were done for screening and 19% for monitoring for cancer recurrence. For inpatients, workup for cancer (53/95 [56%]) was the most frequent indication for testing and screening the second (24/95 [25%]). Of tests failing the criteria, 66 (76%) of 87 resulted from excessively frequent and age-inappropriate screening. We assessed the potential effect on clinical outcome if these tests were not performed. Of the 87 tests considered inappropriate, only 1 test result influenced clinical management for patients younger than 75 years. By instituting simple limits on age and frequency, we estimate that 74% (64/87) of the inappropriate tests could have been eliminated.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Evaluating the appropriateness of digoxin level monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Digoxin level determinations can be useful clinically in patients receiving digoxin therapy but are sometimes misused. METHODS: Explicit appropriateness criteria were adapted from previously published criteria and revised using local expert opinion. They were then used to evaluate the appropriateness of random samples of inpatient and outpatient serum digoxin levels. Overall agreement between reviewers regarding appropriateness was good (K = 0.65). Patients in the study included 162 inpatients in whom 224 digoxin levels were measured and 117 outpatients in whom 130 digoxin levels were measured during a 6-month period. The main outcome measure was the proportion of digoxin levels with an appropriate indication. RESULTS: Among inpatient levels, only 16% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 11%-20%) were appropriate. Of the 189 digoxin levels considered inappropriate, only 26 (14%) had a result of 2.3 nmol/L or more (> or =1.8 ng/ mL). None of these levels resulted in an important change in therapy, and no patient had a toxic reaction to the therapy. Among inappropriate levels, daily routine monitoring accounted for 78%. Of the 130 outpatient levels, 52% (95% CI, 44%-61%) were appropriate. Of 62 inappropriate levels, only 4 (6%) had a result of 2.3 nmol/L or more (> or =1.8 ng/mL). One result led to a change in therapy, but none of the patients were believed to experience a toxic reaction. Among the inappropriate levels, 87% of patients underwent early routine monitoring before a steady state was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of digoxin levels were inappropriate, particularly among inpatients. In both groups, the primary reason tests were judged inappropriate was early routine monitoring. Few inappropriate tests resulted in important data. Interventions to improve the use of digoxin levels could potentially save substantial resources without missing important clinical results.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of giving physicians computerized reminders about apparently redundant clinical laboratory tests. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial that included all inpatients at a large teaching hospital during a 15-week period. The intervention consisted of computerized reminders at the time a test was ordered that appeared to be redundant. Main outcome measures were the proportions of clinical laboratory orders that were canceled and the proportion of the tests that were actually performed. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 939 apparently redundant laboratory tests among the 77,609 study tests that were ordered among the intervention (n = 5,700 patients) and control (n = 5,886 patients) groups. In the intervention group, 69% (300 of 437) of tests were canceled in response to reminders. Of 137 overrides, 41% appeared to be justified based on chart review. In the control group, 51% of ordered redundant tests were performed, whereas in the intervention group only 27% of ordered redundant tests were performed (P <0.001). However, the estimated annual savings in laboratory charges was only $35,000. This occurred because only 44% of redundant tests performed had computer orders, because only half the computer orders were screened for redundancy, and because almost one-third of the reminders were overridden. CONCLUSIONS: Reminders about orders for apparently redundant laboratory tests were effective when delivered. However, the overall effect was limited because many tests were performed without corresponding computer orders, and many orders were not screened for redundancy.

Boston↗

PubMed1999

Capitation and its effects on physician satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: Capitation is an increasingly common method of paying physicians, but few data exist on its impact on physician satisfaction. This study examines the perceived effects of capitation on physician satisfaction at a large, academic medical center. STUDY DESIGN: Survey of physicians at a single, tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Physicians in a physician hospital organization were surveyed at an urban teaching hospital which received capitation for 5% of patients at the time of the survey but was preparing for a sharp increase in capitation. We used a 5-point Likert scale to assess physicians' satisfaction with their practice, and to compare satisfaction under fee-for-service and expected satisfaction under capitation. RESULTS: Of the 734 physicians surveyed, 147 were excluded because they had no direct patient care responsibilities. Of the remaining 587 physicians, 363 replied, giving a response rate of 62%. Overall, 57% of physicians were satisfied with their practice. Compared to their satisfaction under fee-for-service reimbursement, they were much less satisfied with their ability to care for capitated patients (17 of 19 questions, p < 0.05). The greatest differences were for freedom to order necessary tests and freedom to obtain referrals (0.9 and 0.8 on the 5-point scale, respectively, both p < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed four independent predictors of overall satisfaction: patient load (OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.9-3.9), efficiency in resource utilization (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1), perceived employment stability (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.3-2.2), and control over clinical time schedule (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.2-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians initially encountering capitation payment have strong negative perceptions about it, even for areas in which some policy experts expect capitation to benefit patient care. Physician education and focusing on management relations may help smooth the transition to capitated reimbursement.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed1997

Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization?

BACKGROUND: The computerized display of charges for ancillary tests in outpatients has been found to affect physician-ordering behavior, but this issue has not been studied in inpatients. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the computerized display of charges for clinical laboratory or radiological tests affected physician-ordering behavior. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two prospective controlled trials, randomized by patient, were performed. Each trial included all medical and surgical inpatients at 1 large teaching hospital during 4 and 7 months: 3536 intervention and 3554 control inpatients in the group with clinical laboratory tests, and 8728 intervention and 8653 control inpatients in the group with radiological tests. The intervention consisted of the computerized display of charges for tests at the time of ordering. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of clinical laboratory and radiological tests ordered per admission and the charges for these tests. RESULTS: For the clinical laboratory tests, during a 4-month study period, patients in the intervention group had 4.5% fewer tests ordered, and the total charges for these tests were 4.2% lower, although neither difference was statistically significant. Compared with historical controls from the same 4-month period a year before, the charges for the tests per admission had decreased 13.3%, but the decrease was temporally correlated with a restriction of future ordering of tests, and not with the introduction of the display of charges. For the radiological tests, during a 7-month period, the intervention group had almost identical numbers of tests ordered and charges for these tests. CONCLUSIONS: The computerized display of charges had no statistically significant effect on the number of clinical laboratory tests or radiological procedures ordered or performed, although small trends were present for clinical laboratory tests. More intensive interventions may be needed to affect physician test utilization.

Computer Systems↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Reducing vancomycin use utilizing a computer guideline: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci represent an increasingly important cause of nosocomial infections. Minimizing vancomycin use represents a key strategy in preventing the spread of these infections. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a structured ordering intervention using computerized physician order entry that requires use of a guideline could reduce intravenous vancomycin use. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial assessing frequency and duration of vancomycin therapy by physicians. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Three hundred ninety-six physicians and 1,798 patients in a tertiary-care teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: Computer screen displaying, at the time of physician order entry, an adaptation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for appropriate vancomycin use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The frequency of initiation and renewal of vancomycin therapy as well the duration of therapy prescribed on a per prescriber basis. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, intervention physicians wrote 32 percent fewer orders (11.3 versus 16.7 orders per physician; P = 0.04) and had 28 percent fewer patients for whom they either initiated or renewed an order for vancomycin (7.4 versus 10.3 orders per physician; P = 0.02). In addition, the duration of vancomycin therapy attributable to physicians in the intervention group was 36 percent lower than the duration of therapy prescribed by control physicians (26.5 versus 41.2 days; P = 0.05). Analysis of pharmacy data confirmed a decrease in the overall hospital use of intravenous vancomycin during the study period. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a computerized guideline using physician order entry decreased vancomycin use. Computerized guidelines represent a promising tool for changing prescribing practices.

Drug Prescriptions↗