PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Matejcić

Publications and source records attributed to N Matejcić.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Adenoid cystic carcinoma of Bartholin's gland: a case report.

OBJECTIVE: A case of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the Bartholin's gland in a 34-year-old woman with unusual presentation and early recurrence is reported. METHODS: Clinical and histologie features were recorded. Immunohistochemical stains and cell-cycle analysis by flow cytometry technique on paraffin-embedded tumor tissue were performed. RESULTS: The tumor presented as a painful nodule in the episiotomy scar three months after delivery. Initial treatment included only wide local excision. Six months later local recurrence occurred despite clear surgical margins. Histologically a predominant "classic" cribriform growth pattern was identified. Immunoreactivity in tumor cells supported dual epithelial-myoepithelial differentiation. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were negative. The DNA histogram revealed a diploid stemline and a low S-phase fraction. CONCLUSION: ACC of the Bartholin's gland is a rare malignant tumor with great propensity for local recurrence. The optimal therapeutic approach has not been established due to the lack of well-defined prognostic parameters.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A simplified fetal biophysical profile.

OBJECTIVE: To modify the classic fetal biophysical profile (FBP) with the aim of obtaining rapid and accurate information about actual fetal condition in non-compromised fetuses with a subsequent favorable outcome and to be suitable for a number of outclinic patients. METHODS: Four-hundred and ninety-four fetuses from singleton pregnancies in two randomized groups were monitored by the modified FBP (mFBP) and 168 of them after the external vibratory acoustic stimulation (VAS/mFBP). The mFBP was characterized by two main characteristics: non-stress test was excluded and the testing was finished at the moment when all of the three fetal biophysical activities became normal. The external VAS was applied only in cases with no evidence of fetal activity at the start of the FBP. RESULTS: Of the examined fetuses, 326 fetuses in the control group were monitored by the mFBP and there were 316 (96.9%) favorable outcomes and 10 (3.1%) adverse perinatal outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the mFBP score in predicting adverse perinatal outcome were 60, 99, 66.7 and 98.7%, respectively. In the study group of 168 fetuses there were 165 (98.2%) favorable outcomes and three (1.8%) adverse perinatal outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the VAS/mFBP were 66.7, 100, 100 and 99.4%, respectively. The efficiency of the VAS/mFBP in predicting perinatal mortality alone was even higher. After the external VAS and the first 5 min of the modified testing approximately two-fifths (41.8%) of healthy fetuses with a subsequent good outcome exhibited normal in all of the three biophysical activities and approximately two-thirds (65.5%) of them after 10 min. In the VAS/mFBP group of healthy fetuses, during the same time periods, normal breathing movements were observed in 72% and 87% of fetuses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results the mFBP and particularly the VAS/mFBP antenatal protocol as a new and rational variant of the FBP could improve fetal assessment allowing in cases of non-compromised fetuses rapid and accurate information about actual fetal well-being. Because of its high accuracy and a reduced testing time the antepartal method with observation of fetal breathing movements after VAS is becoming acceptable as a screening of fetal well-being evaluation in outclinic conditions.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1995

Fetal biophysical profile and vibratory acoustic stimulation in high-risk pregnancies.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of the non-stress test (NST) on the efficiency of the fetal biophysical profile (FBP) and to test the clinical usefulness of the FBP and its combination with vibratory acoustic stimulation (VAS) in managing high-risk pregnancies. METHODS: One hundred twenty fetuses of preeclamptic patients were included in a prospective study. Five standard variables of the FBP were observed ultrasonically following NST. In cases of non-reactive NST, external VAS was applied and the FBP score calculated and compared with the FBP score before VAS. RESULTS: Of 120 calculated FBPs, 102 (85%) had normal profile scores before VAS and 104 (86.7%) after VAS. No statistically significant difference was found. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the FBP score in predicting poor perinatal outcome were 94.7%, 94.4%, 75% and 99%, respectively. VAS produced a high conversion (58.8%) of non-reactive NST to reactive fetal heart rate pattern. The false-negative rate of the FBP score was 9.8 per 1000, which did not increase after VAS. CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of the FBP score was not significantly improved by VAS, although a high conversion of non-reactive to reactive NST was produced. The FBP with its three 'acute biophysical variables' was found to be an accurate method of antepartum assessment even without an NST. The low incidence of perinatal complications among patients with normal FBP scores, permits the conservative management of preterm high-risk pregnancies.

Acoustic Stimulation↗