PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N N Finer

Publications and source records attributed to N N Finer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The sy-fi study: a randomized prospective trial of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus a high-frequency flow interrupter in infants less than 1000 g.

OBJECTIVE: Mechanical ventilation has significantly decreased mortality for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. However, the barotrauma associated with mechanical ventilation is responsible for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in 20% to 90% of these infants, depending on gestational age. Recent studies suggest that high-frequency ventilation is associated with better gas exchange and less barotrauma. The purpose of this study is to determine if high-frequency ventilation, using the flow interrupter, reduces the incidence of BPD in the ELBW infant. STUDY DESIGN: Parental consent was obtained prior to mechanical ventilation. Infants less than 1000 g without significant congenital anomalies were eligible for study entry. Infants were randomized, prior to the onset of mechanical ventilation, to receive either synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) or high-frequency flow interruption. Both ventilator methods were obtained using the Infant Star Ventilator (Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO). Data were collected prospectively on all study entrants and analyzed using SigmaStat Software. RESULTS: Forty-six infants, from two centers, were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in the ventilator days or BPD, defined as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, between the high-frequency ventilation and SIMV groups.

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia↗

Comparison of methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: There are a variety of manual bagging devices used for neonatal resuscitation. To our knowledge, there has been no comparison of the ability of different operators to utilize such devices for the delivery of predetermined inspiratory and end-expiratory pressures. In addition, the use of prolonged inflation may be of benefit for infants who require bag and mask ventilation, and there has been no evaluation of the ability of a variety of operators to reliably deliver such breaths using currently available equipment. METHODS: We utilized a neonatal manikin (Laerdal Armonk, NY) with a functional larynx and lungs, and a clear cushioned mask (Owens-BriGam, Morganton, NC). We studied a latex-free disposable anesthesia type bag (Model 5126 Vital Signs, Totawa, NJ), a Jackson-Rees (JR) type anesthesia bag (Model E191 Anesthesia Associates, San Marcos, CA) fitted with a Norman elbow and a flow-control tail-piece (Dupaco, Oceanside, CA), and the Neopuff (Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand), an FDA approved mechanical device that is flow-controlled and pressure-limited, specifically designed to facilitate neonatal resuscitation. The ventilating pressures were continuously recorded throughout the process. We evaluated neonatal nurses, neonatal nurse practitioners, neonatal staff and fellows, pediatric residents and neonatal respiratory therapists. RESULTS: The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was significantly different between operators using either anesthesia bag, P<0.001. Similar results were found for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a significant difference among the operator groups, P<0.001. All the differences in post hoc analysis were between the therapists and the other groups, P<0.05. Therapists produced significantly higher pressures than the other groups for both PIP and PEEP (P<0.001). The PIP was similar for all groups using the Neopuff device. The PIP and PEEP delivered by the Neopuff differed from the other two devices independent of the operators (P<0.05). On post hoc analysis, there was a significant difference between the disposable anesthesia bag and Neopuff for both PIP and PEEP for the therapists, whereas among the non-therapists, there was a difference in PIP with the JR device producing a greater PIP (26.6+/-3.8 cmH(2)O) compared with the Neopuff and disposable anesthesia bag (24.8+/-1.1 cmH(2)O, 24.8+/-4.3 cmH(2)O). The level of PEEP was significantly different among all three devices for the non-therapists (1.3+/-1.6 cmH(2)O, Disposable; 2.9+/-1.2 cmH(2)O, JR; 4.7+/-0.5 cmH(2)O, Neopuff; P<0.05). Only the therapists were able to consistently deliver PEEP with the anesthesia bags, whereas all operators could generate the target PEEP with the Neopuff (P<0.05). We compared the pressure delivered during the first second to the pressure delivered during the fifth second during prolonged 5-s inflations. The absolute differences between the first and fifth second for the Neopuff versus the anesthesia bags were significantly different with a median of 7.1 cmH(2)O for the anesthesia bags compared with 0.2 cmH(2)O for the Neopuff, P<0.001, reflecting the difficulty in obtaining and maintaining the target inflation pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that the Neopuff, a purpose-built neonatal resuscitator ventilator, facilitates the delivery of the desired airway pressures while maximizing the operators ability to obtain and maintain a patent airway, and facilitates the delivery of prolonged inflations. Further research is required to determine the clinical benefit of end-expiratory pressure and prolonged inflations in neonatal resuscitation.

Analysis of Variance↗

Sequential analysis for quality control in the neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: This article describes a novel application of a statistical technique for continuous quality assurance in the NICU. METHODS: We used prospective analysis of rates of survival to 28 days of life, without major IVH in ELBW infants in a single tertiary NICU, before and after the introduction of an evidence-based treatment protocol. By using the CUSUM function, each infant's results were sequentially plotted, and significant changes in outcomes were noted when the plot crossed predetermined boundary lines. RESULTS: Significant changes in outcomes were evident with this method sooner than traditional analyses on the basis of year-end or other arbitrary intervals. The introduction of the ELBW protocol was temporally associated with significant improvement in intact short-term survival. CONCLUSION: Sequential analysis techniques are useful tools for ongoing quality assurance; deviations in outcomes may be detected more quickly, which should assist in the identification of improvements or decrements in performance of the NICU.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗

Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether noninvasive, nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (nSIMV) improves the likelihood that very low birth weight infants will be successfully extubated. METHODS: Infants of <1251-g birth weight who were due to be extubated before 6 weeks of age were eligible once they were receiving <35% oxygen and were on a ventilator rate of <18 breaths per minute (bpm). Extubation was performed following intravenous loading with aminophylline, after a successful trial of 12 hours of endotracheal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation at a rate of 8. Infants were randomized to either nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) at 6 cm H(2)O or nSIMV after extubation. nSIMV was commenced at a rate of 12 bpm with pressure on the ventilator set to achieve a delivered pressure of at least 12 cm H(2)O and a peak end expiratory pressure of 6 cm H(2)O. Continuous recording for diagnosis of apnea was performed for 72 hours after extubation. Objective criteria for failure of extubation were as follows: a PaCO(2) >70; FIO(2) >0.7; or severe recurrent apnea (>2 apneas requiring intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in 24 hours or >6 apneas >20 seconds per day). The study ended after 72 hours postextubation or when infants satisfied failure criteria. A sample size of 54 was determined by power analysis. RESULTS: Mean birth weight (831 standard deviation [SD]: 193 g) and gestation (26.3 SD: 1.8 weeks) did not differ between groups. Mean age at extubation was 7.6 (SD: 9.7) days, range 1 to 40 days. The nSIMV group had a lower incidence of failed extubation 4/27 compared with the continuous positive airway pressure group, 12/27. This was attributable to both a decreased incidence of apnea and a decreased incidence of hypercarbia. There was no increase in the incidence of abdominal distension or feeding intolerance. DISCUSSION: nSIMV is effective in preventing extubation failure in very low birth weight infants in the first 72 hours after extubation. Noninvasive ventilation may have other roles in the care of the very low birth weight infant.

Aminophylline↗

Randomized, prospective study of low-dose versus high-dose inhaled nitric oxide in the neonate with hypoxic respiratory failure.

OBJECTIVE: There is little information on the response to very low doses of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in hypoxic near-term infants. The potential toxicities of iNO are dose related; thus, the ability to use lower doses safely and effectively may be advantageous. We hypothesized that there is no difference in the acute improvement in oxygenation between treatment with inhaled nitric oxide at 1 to 2 parts per million (ppm) or 10 to 20 ppm. METHODS: We randomized near-term and term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure with oxygenation indices (OIs) of >/=10 and PaO(2) <100 on 2 separate blood gases taken at least 30 minutes apart. Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia were excluded. After parental consent was obtained, patients were randomized to receive a starting nitric oxide (iNO) dose of either 1 to 2 ppm (low-dose group, n = 15) or 10 to 20 ppm (high-dose group, n = 21). The response to iNO was assessed according to the increase in arterial PaO(2) and decrease in OI 30 to 60 minutes after exposure to the initial starting concentration. A response of <10% increase on PaO(2) and a <10% decrease in OI resulted in a doubling of iNO within the dose range protocol (1, 2, 4, and 8 ppm for the low-dose group; 10, 20, 40, and 80 ppm for the high-dose group). RESULTS: Thirty minutes after the study gas was initiated, PaO(2) increased significantly overall in the low-dose (90.7 +/- 41 torr to 166.8 +/- 95.6 torr) and high-dose (76.2 +/- 32.7 torr to 198.7 +/- 142.8 torr) groups; the maximal increase was seen in the infants who initially were treated with 10 ppm. The OI also decreased significantly overall and also was significant in the high-dose group (21.0 +/- 13.7 to 11.4 +/- 10.4; low-dose: 18.3 +/- 7.1 to 13.2 +/- 12.3). There was a nonsignificant fall of PaCO(2) with iNO treatment (low dose 35 +/- 7.3 to 30 +/- 8.5 torr vs high dose 35.2 +/- 9.9 to 32.4 +/- 10.7 torr). A sustained response (ie, maintaining a PaO(2) and OI gain greater than 20% for the duration of the study gas administration) was greater in the high-dose group (53.3% vs 30.0%). In addition, dose increases were required more often in the low-dose group than in the high-dose group (80.0% vs 57.1%). Among patients who did not respond to the initial iNO dose, 100.0% and 83.3% responded at higher doses of iNO for the low- and high-dose groups, respectively. There were no differences for death, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or other outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any significant difference in response to low- versus high-dose iNO. An initial exposure to low-dose iNO does not compromise the response to higher doses if required and may result in less toxicity.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Nitric oxide for respiratory failure in infants born at or near term.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment of hypoxemic newborn infants with inhaled nitric oxide (INO) improves oxygenation and reduces the rates of death, or the requirement for ECMO. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic and hand searching of pediatric/neonatal literature and personal data files. In addition we contacted the principal investigators of articles which have been published as abstracts to ascertain the necessary information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi randomized studies in term and near term infants. Administration of inhaled nitric oxide. Clinically relevant outcomes, including death, requirement for ECMO, and oxygenation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eight randomized controlled studies were found in term and near term infants with hypoxia. Entry criteria were reasonably consistent except for the one trial that studied only infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Ninos 1997). MAIN RESULTS: Inhaled nitric oxide appears to improve outcome in hypoxemic term and near term infants by reducing the incidence of the combined endpoint of death or need for ECMO. The reduction seems to be entirely a reduction in need for ECMO; mortality is not reduced. Oxygenation improves in approximately 50% of infants receiving nitric oxide. The Oxygenation Index decreases by a (weighted) mean of 15.1 within 30 to 60 minutes after commencing therapy and PaO2 increases by a mean of 53 mmHg. It does not appear to affect outcome whether infants have clear echocardiographic evidence of PPHN or not. The outcome of infants with diaphragmatic hernia was not improved; indeed there is a suggestion that outcome was slightly worsened. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: On the evidence presently available, it appears reasonable to use inhaled nitric oxide in a concentration of 20 ppm for term and near term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure who do not have a diaphragmatic hernia. Longterm neurodevelopmental and pulmonary followup of surviving infants enrolled in randomized trials of INO are required to establish more firmly the role of INO in the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure.

Fetal Hypoxia↗

Inhaled nitric oxide for respiratory failure in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether, in preterm newborn infants who have hypoxic respiratory failure, treatment with inhaled nitric oxide improves oxygenation and reduces the rates of death, or adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic and hand searching of pediatric/neonatal literature and personal data files. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi randomized studies in preterm infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. Administration of inhaled nitric oxide. Clinically relevant outcomes, including death, oxygenation, intraventricular haemorrhage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One randomized controlled trial of nitric oxide therapy was found in preterm infants with a high risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (Subhedar 1997). MAIN RESULTS: No significant effect of inhaled nitric oxide on any outcome variable was found. In particular there was no effect on the primary outcome variable of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no published information to support the use of inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants. Preterm infants should not be treated with inhaled nitric oxide except in the context of prospective, randomized controlled trials.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Vancomycin for prophylaxis against sepsis in preterm neonates.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial, late onset sepsis occurs in up to 50% of infants of less than 1000gm at birth. The commonest organism isolated is coagulase negative staphylococcus (CoNS). A number of studies have evaluated the efficacy or prophylactic low dose vancomycin given either as a continuous infusion added to the infant's hyperalimentation fluid or by intermittent intravenous administration and these studies in very low birth weight infants are the subject of this review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin prophylaxis for the prevention of late-onset sepsis, coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis, mortality, and effects on length of stay, total vancomycin exposure, evidence of vancomycin toxicity, and the development of vancomycin resistant organisms in the preterm neonate. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of Medline, (MeSH terms: Vancomycin and Sepsis; limits: age groups, newborn infants), HealthStar and EMBase, electronic abstracts, personal files and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials which compared the incidence of sepsis and mortality in preterm neonates receiving vancomycin prophylaxis versus a control group receiving no prophylaxis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including the overall incidence of sepsis, the incidence of coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis, mortality, length of stay, total vancomycin exposure, evidence of vancomycin toxicity, and the development of vancomycin resistant organisms were excerpted from previous clinical trials. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: The administration of prophylactic vancomycin reduced the incidence of both total neonatal nosocomial sepsis and coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis in eligible preterm infants. Mortality, length of stay, and evidence of vancomycin toxicity were not significantly different between the two groups. There was insufficient evidence to ascertain the risks of development of vancomycin resistant organisms in the nurseries involved in these trials. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of prophylactic vancomycin in low doses reduces the incidence of nosocomial sepsis in the neonate. The methodologies of these studies may have contributed to the low rate of sepsis in the treated groups, as the blood cultures drawn from central lines may have failed to grow due to the low levels of vancomycin in the infusate. Although there is a theoretical concern regarding the development of resistant organisms with the administration of prophylactic antibiotic, there is insufficient evidence to ascertain the risks of development of vancomycin resistant organisms. Few clinically important benefits have been demonstrated for very low birth weight infants treated with prophylactic vancomycin. It therefore appears that routine prophylaxis with vancomycin should not be undertaken at present.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

The hemodynamic effects of prolonged respiratory alkalosis in anesthetized newborn piglets.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that prolonged alkalosis decreases cardiac output and, furthermore, exacerbates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, as respiratory alkalosis is frequently induced as a therapy for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn despite a lack of controlled evidence of improved outcomes. Potential adverse effects of prolonged alkalosis have been demonstrated. METHOD: Two groups (control, n = 6, and hypocapnic alkalosis, n = 6) of 1-3 day old fentanyl-anesthetized, vecuronium-paralyzed piglets were instrumented to measure cardiac index (CI) and mean systemic (MAP) and pulmonary (PAP) arterial pressures. Baseline values were recorded. Alveolar hypoxia was then induced to achieve an arterial oxygen saturation of between 50 and 60% for 15 min. Respiratory alkalosis was then induced, by increasing ventilation to achieve a pH between 7.55-7.60, and was continued for 240 min. Inspired carbon dioxide was used with hyperventilation in the control group to maintain pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) at 35-45 mmHg and pH of 7.35-7.45. Hypoxia was induced again at 15 and 240 min. Pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances (PVR and SVR) were calculated. RESULTS: Prolonged alkalosis led to a significant and progressive fall in mean MAP from 61 (SD 7) mmHg at the start of the study falling to 50 (SD 6.9, p = 0.043), with no effect on CI. Calculated SVR decreased (0.45 SD 0.03 vs 0.36 SD 0.05). There were no statistically significant changes in any of the variables in the control group. Neither acute nor prolonged respiratory alkalosis had a significant effect on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged hyperventilation leads to systemic hypotension, however it does not exacerbate hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.

Alkalosis, Respiratory↗

Nitric oxide therapy for the newborn infant.

Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) is a novel selective pulmonary vasodilator without significant effects on the systemic circulation. Initial case studies of near-term newborn infants with hypoxic respiratory failure and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn showed that INO was associated with improvements in oxygenation. There have now been at least 11 prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of INO in the near-term neonate with hypoxic respiratory failure, 10 of which have been published. A meta-analysis of these trials provides evidence that INO improved the PaO2 in the INO treated infants by 46.4 torr (weighted mean difference) compared with controls (95% CI, 34.2, 58.5) and significantly decreased the oxygenation index by 10.7 compared with controls (95% CI, -14.1, -7.4). The incidence of death or need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was significantly reduced by treatment with INO, relative risk (RR) 0.72 compared to control (95% CI, 0.6, 0.87) with the majority of the improvement seen in the reduction in the need for ECMO. Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia do not appear to benefit from early INO therapy. The only prospective trials evaluating INO in premature infants to date have not found that this therapy is associated with significant clinical benefit. The long-term evaluations of near-term and full-term infants who have received INO suggest that this therapy does not increase the incidence of adverse neurodevelopmental sequelae in these high-risk infants. INO is an effective therapy for the hypoxic term neonate and will reduce the occurrence of death or the need for ECMO in this population. Further research is required to evaluate the benefit of this therapy in the hypoxic preterm infant.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Effects of magnesium sulfate in a newborn piglet meconium aspiration model.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the hemodynamic effects of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) in a neonatal model of meconium aspiration syndrome. DESIGN: A prospective animal study. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight anesthetized neonatal piglets. METHODS: Animals were instrumented under fentanyl anesthesia for the determination of pulmonary and systemic blood pressures and cardiac index. A model of meconium aspiration was produced by instilling 6 to 7 ml of 20% fresh human meconium in normal saline down the endotracheal tube, resulting in hypoxemia (mean arterial O2 saturation 73 SD, 10%), respiratory acidosis (mean pH 7.08, SD 0.04; PaCO2 89, SD 2 torr), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure 52 SD, 5 mm Hg). A total of four aliquots of MgSO4 (25 mg/kg equivalent to 0.1 mM/kg of magnesium) were administered intravenously to five animals (total of 100 mg/kg MgSO4). Three animals served as controls and did not receive MgSO4. RESULTS: Each dose of MgSO4 was associated with a transient decrease in heart rate, cardiac index, pulmonary and systemic arterial pressures, and SaO2, followed by a partial gradual recovery of all these variables within 2 to 3 minutes. According to measurements taken after MgSO4 therapy, there was a significant decrease in arterial saturations (from 73 SD (10%) to 63 SD (13%); p < 0.05), mean systemic blood pressure (from 77 SD (16 mm Hg) to 74 SD (15 mm Hg); p < 0.05) and pulmonary artery pressure (to 52 SD (5 mm Hg); p < 0.05). The ratio between pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance was not significantly affected by MgSO4 therapy. There were no changes in the control animals. CONCLUSION: The administration of magnesium sulfate is associated with increased hypoxemia in this model of meconium aspiration syndrome, probably because of worsening ventilation perfusion mismatch. These data do not provide any physiological support for the use of MgSO4 in the neonate with meconium aspiration and pulmonary hypertension and suggest that this agent should be used cautiously, if at all, in such situations.

Animals↗

A cost-effectiveness analysis of the application of nitric oxide versus oxygen gas for near-term newborns with respiratory failure: results from a Canadian randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) vs. oxygen administered to near-term (gestational age > or =34 wks) newborns with severe respiratory illness that were referred for consideration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DESIGN: The cost-effectiveness analysis is based on outcome and utilization data from two multicentered randomized clinical trials conducted by the Canadian Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study group, one for patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and one for patients without CDH. Data from the western Canadian ECMO center were used to establish costs. SETTING: Patients were cared for in Canadian regional neonatal intensive care units, including two ECMO centers. Air transport was used for transporting patients between centers. PATIENTS: Term and near-term newborns with severe respiratory illness who were receiving maximum conventional therapy and whose oxygenation index was >40. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomly received NO or oxygen. If their conditions deteriorated, they qualified for ECMO. Not all that qualified for ECMO received it because of individual parent/ physician preferences. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness ratio was the ratio of net cost (including neonatal intensive care, ECMO, and transport) to net outcome (survival) for the two interventions. For non-CDH cases, the cost-effectiveness ratio was $36,613 (Canadian) per life saved; the confidence intervals were wide and the results were not statistically significant. For CDH patients, the death rate was lower for oxygen and the oxygen patients cost less; the results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The small numbers of patients in the trials precluded significant results. Further, our results have a short-term time horizon (discharge to home or death). Thus, for non-CDH patients, the favorable ratio provides very qualified evidence in favor of NO.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Neonatal acute respiratory failure.

Acute respiratory failure is the most common problem seen in the preterm and term infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. In preterm infants, the most common cause of acute respiratory failure is respiratory distress syndrome caused by surfactant deficiency. Acute respiratory failure in term and near term infants is usually a result of meconium aspiration syndrome, sepsis, pulmonary hypoplasia, and primary pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. The response to various methods of treatment may vary, depending on the severity of respiratory failure and the cause of the acute respiratory failure. We reviewed the evidence for efficacy and current utilization of newer treatment modalities, including exogenous surfactant administration, high frequency ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide therapy, antenatal steroids for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome, and use of postnatal steroids for the prevention of chronic lung disease.

Acute Disease↗

Video recording as a means of evaluating neonatal resuscitation performance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the compliance to Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines in our institution, by the use of videotaped newborn resuscitations. BACKGROUND: NRP is the standard of care for newborn resuscitation. The application of NRP guidelines and resuscitation skills in actual clinical settings is undocumented. DESIGN/METHODS: A video recorder, mounted to the radiant warmer in the main obstetrical operating room, was used to record all high-risk resuscitations. All members of the resuscitation team were NRP-certified. The videotapes were reviewed within 14 days of the resuscitation and then erased. This ongoing review was approved as a quality assurance (QA) project ensuring confidentiality under California law. The first 100 resuscitations were evaluated to assess NRP compliance. Each step in the resuscitation (positioning, oxygen delivery, ventilation, chest compressions, intubation, and medication) was graded. A score was devised, with 2 points being awarded for every correct decision and proper procedure, 1 point for delayed interventions or inadequate technique, and zero points for indicated procedures that were omitted or for interventions that were not indicated. The total points were divided by the total possible points for that patient. The scores for the first 25 resuscitations (group 1) and the last 25 resuscitations (group 2) were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the 100 resuscitations had deviations from the NRP guidelines. Ten percent received overly aggressive stimulation and 22% had poor suction technique. Of the 78 infants given oxygen, this decision was considered incorrect in 15% and the delivery technique was poor in 10% of the infants given oxygen. Of those requiring mask ventilation (n = 18), 24% had poor chest expansion, 11% used an incorrect rate, and 17% had inadequate reevaluation. Twelve infants were intubated; only 7 were successfully intubated on the first attempt and only 4 were intubated in <20 seconds. The longest intubation attempt was 50 seconds. Naloxone was given to 2 patients. One was breathing spontaneously with a heart rate >100. Resuscitations receiving a perfect evaluation score were more likely to occur in infants needing less intervention. The level of resuscitation required for groups 1 and 2 were statistically similar. There was no difference in resuscitation scores between the 2 groups. Only the inappropriate use of deep suctioning improved, with 8 of 25 events in group 1, and 0 of 25 in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: We have found a significant number of deviations from the NRP guidelines. Video recording of actual clinical practice is a useful QA tool for monitoring the conduct of newborn resuscitation. We are now conducting repeat video assessments of individual NRP providers to determine whether there is improved performance.

California↗

Early childhood neurodevelopment in very low birth weight infants with predischarge apnea.

Apnea commonly occurs in preterm infants and may persist beyond term. We prospectively investigated the relationship between apnea that persisted beyond 35 weeks post-conceptional age and subsequent neurodevelopment in early childhood. Between January, 1990-November, 1993, we performed predischarge respiratory recordings, using 24-hr, 4-channel pneumography, at 35 weeks or more of postconceptional age in 164 infants (birth weight, <1,250 g; gestational age, < or = 32 weeks), who subsequently underwent multidisciplinary neurodevelopmental assessment at 15-64 (median 24) months of adjusted age. The duration of initial artificial ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome and the grade of intraventricular hemorrhage were independent predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome. Mean oximetry desaturation and frequency of predischarge apnea correlated with mental and motor developmental scores. Mean oximetry desaturation during apnea was an independent predictor for motor score in the total population, and for both mental and motor scores in 50 infants with grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, but not in 114 infants without grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage. Despite its limited predictability for early childhood neurodevelopment, predischarge respiratory recordings may be useful in predicting subsequent neurodevelopment of high-risk preterm infants, especially those with severe intraventricular hemorrhage.

Analysis of Variance↗

Effects of ibuprofen and indomethacin on the regional circulation in newborn piglets.

We investigated the effects of clinically comparable doses of ibuprofen and indomethacin on renal, gastrointestinal and cerebral perfusion in newborn piglets, and hypothesized that ibuprofen would have less effect on regional circulation. Animals were randomly assigned to receive ibuprofen (20 mg/kg, n = 8), indomethacin (0.3 mg/kg, n = 7) or vehicle (n = 6). Fluorescent microspheres were injected prior to and at 20, 40, 60, 90 and 120 min after drug administration. Regional blood flow was measured and vascular resistances were calculated. Cardiovascular and respiratory variables were not significantly affected by either study drug or vehicle. Ibuprofen increased renal cortical and medullary resistance by 44 and 52% (p < 0.05). However, ibuprofen had no significant effects on gastrointestinal or cerebral resistance. Indomethacin raised renal cortical and medullary resistance by 66 and 71% at 60 min postinjection, respectively (p < 0.05). Indomethacin increased duodenojejunal, ileal and colon resistance by 97, 102 and 75% at 60 min, respectively (p < 0.05). Indomethacin increased cerebral cortical and cerebellar resistance by 92 and 86% at 90 min (p < 0. 05). While indomethacin and, to a lesser extent, ibuprofen both increase renal vascular resistance, indomethacin vasoconstricts the gastrointestinal and cerebral circulations which are unaffected by ibuprofen.

Animals↗