PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Ostendorf

Publications and source records attributed to N Ostendorf.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Automated serological compatibility testing using a solid-phase test and standard laboratory equipment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To prove the feasibility of a semi-automated cross-match procedure using a commercially available solid-phase microplate test and standard laboratory equipment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The new procedure was evaluated against the conventional spin tube technique and the gel centrifugation system. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the method and the rate of non-specific reactions were equal to those for the other test systems. The samples taken from the red cell concentrates for cross-matching remained stable for the shelf-life of the product. CONCLUSION: The semi-automated cross-match was successfully introduced in our routine laboratory as a means to process large numbers of tests.

Blood Grouping and Crossmatching↗
PubMed1998

Simple reinforcement for thin nephrostomy catheters.

PURPOSE: Nephrostomy catheters are prone to kinking or damage because the thin, flexible silicone tube is too vulnerable against mechanical stress even when the proximal end is carefully fixed. We developed a simple method to reinforce the outside part of a thin catheter protruding from the skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 7 children with nephrostomy catheters or ureteral stents with a diameter of 8F or smaller. After insertion a large plastic tube was wrapped around the small catheter, and fixed to the skin and to the peripheral collection system with adhesive tape. RESULTS: Handling of the catheters improved and there was less need for re-fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Thin nephrostomy catheters can be effectively protected by wrapping them into a larger, outer tube after insertion.

Child↗
PubMed1995

Improved focusing for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral calculi.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral calculi, which is usually performed with the patient in the prone position, may be difficult or even impossible under certain conditions because x-ray visibility is poor or the calculus is out of range of the shock wave focus. Treatment conditions can be improved by a simple change in the positioning of the patient, using the shock wave head from the contralateral side. This method is applicable for the common Siemens Lithostar device.

Humans↗